Role of the exercise professional in metabolic and bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) is important for the long-term health and weight management of patients who undergo metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). However, the roles of exercise professionals in MBS settings have not been systematically determined. OBJECTIVES: To investigate: (1) who are the professionals implementing PA programming in MBS clinical settings; and (2) what patient-centric tasks do they perform? SETTING: Clinical and academic exercise settings worldwide. METHODS: This multimethod study included a scoping review of PA programs in MBS described in the research literature. Data about job tasks were extracted and provided to 10 experts to sort into categories. Cluster analysis was utilized to find the hierarchical structure of tasks. A Delphi process was used to agree on a final model. RESULTS: The majority of PA professionals were exercise physiologists in the USA and physiotherapists or other types of exercise professionals elsewhere. Forty-three tasks were identified, the most reported being supervision of exercise, fitness testing, and exercise prescription. Seven higher-order categories were determined: (1) Exercise-related health assessment, (2) Body composition and physical fitness assessment, (3) Lifestyle physical activity and sedentary behavior assessment, (4) Education, instruction, and prescription, (5) Exercise monitoring, (6) Behavioral counseling and psychosocial support, and (7) Dietary support. The following statements were rated an average of 9.0, classifying them as "imperative": 1) "Pre- and postoperative PA/exercise guidelines for MBS patients are needed", 2) "MBS programs need to include PA/exercise as part of multidisciplinary care". CONCLUSIONS: The expert group reached a consensus on 7 major classifications of job tasks for the exercise professional. It is important for governing medical associations across the world to formally recognize experienced exercise professionals as playing pivotal roles in continuing, multidisciplinary care for MBS patients. These findings also provide evidence-based information in the effort to solidify these positions within the greater context of healthcare.

Racial differences after bariatric surgery: 24-month follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial for postoperative loss-of-control eating.

BACKGROUND: While some bariatric surgery outcomes vary by race/ethnicity, less is known about racial/ethnic differences in loss-of-control (LOC) eating and psychosocial outcomes post-surgery. OBJECTIVE: This prospective study examined and extended initial short-term findings regarding racial differences in post-bariatric surgery LOC eating and weight loss to longer-term outcomes through 24-month follow-ups. SETTING: Academic medical center in the United States. METHODS: Participants were 140 patients (46.4% non-White) in a 3-month randomized, controlled trial for LOC eating performed about 6 months after bariatric surgery. Participants were reassessed at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment ended (about 33 mo after surgery). Doctoral assessors administered the Eating Disorder Examination-Bariatric Surgery Version interview to assess LOC eating and eating-disorder psychopathology at 12- and 24-month follow-ups. The Beck Depression Inventory II was repeated, and measured weight was obtained at all follow-ups. RESULTS: White patients had significantly greater percent excess weight loss at all follow-ups than non-White patients (p < .03). White patients reported significantly more LOC eating at 12- (p = .004) and 24-month (p = .024) follow-ups and significantly greater eating disorder psychopathology at 12-month follow-up (p < .028). Racial groups did not differ significantly in eating disorder psychopathology at 24-month follow-ups or in Beck Depression Inventory II depression scores at any follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that among patients with LOC eating after bariatric surgery, non-White patients attain a lower percent excess weight loss than White patients but have comparable or better outcomes in LOC eating, associated eating disorder psychopathology, and depression over time.

Structured Resident Training in Robotic Surgery: Recommendations of the Robotic Surgery Education Working Group.

OBJECTIVE: A universal resident robotic surgery training pathway that maximizes proficiency and safety has not been defined by a consensus of surgical educators or by surgical societies. The objective of the Robotic Surgery Education Working Group was to develop a universal curriculum pathway and leverage digital tools to support resident education. DESIGN: The two lead authors (JP and YN) contacted potential members of the Working Group. Members were selected based on their authorship of peer-review publications, their experience as minimally invasive and robotic surgeons, their reputations, and their ability to commit the time involved to work collaboratively and efficiently to reach consensus regarding best practices in robotic surgery education. The Group's approach was to reach 100% consensus to provide a transferable curriculum that could be applied to the vast majority of resident programs. SETTING: Virtual and in-person meetings in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Eight surgeons (2 females and 6 males) from five academic medical institutions (700-1541 beds) and three community teaching hospitals (231-607 beds) in geographically diverse locations comprised the Working Group. They represented highly specialized general surgeons and educators in their mid-to-late careers. All members were experienced minimally invasive surgeons and had national reputations as robotic surgery educators. RESULTS: The surgeons initially developed and agreed upon questions for each member to consider and respond to individually via email. Responses were collated and consolidated to present on an anonymized basis to the Group during an in-person day-long meeting. The surgeons self-facilitated and honed the agreed upon responses of the Group into a 5-level Robotic Surgery Curriculum Pathway, which each member agreed was relevant and expressed their convictions and experience. CONCLUSIONS: The current needs for a universal robotic surgery training curriculum are validated objective and subjective measures of proficiency, access to simulation, and a digital platform that follows a resident from their first day of residency through training and their entire career. Refinement of current digital solutions and continued innovation guided by surgical educators is essential to build and maintain a scalable, multi-institutional supported curriculum.

Role of the exercise professional in metabolic and bariatric surgery.

Background: Physical activity (PA) is important for the long-term health and weight management of patients who undergo metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). However, the roles of exercise professionals in MBS settings have not been systematically determined. Objectives: To investigate: (1) who are the professionals implementing PA programming in MBS clinical settings; and (2) what patient-centric tasks do they perform? Setting: Clinical and academic exercise settings worldwide. Methods: This multimethod study included a scoping review of PA programs in MBS described in the research literature. Data about job tasks were extracted and provided to 10 experts to sort into categories. Cluster analysis was utilized to find the hierarchical structure of tasks. A Delphi process was used to agree on a final model. Results: The majority of PA professionals were exercise physiologists in the USA and physiotherapists or other types of exercise professionals elsewhere. Forty-three tasks were identified, the most reported being: supervision of exercise, fitness testing, and exercise prescription. Seven higher-order categories were determined: (1) Exercise-related health assessment, (2) Body composition and physical fitness assessment, (3) Lifestyle physical activity and sedentary behavior assessment, (4) Education, instruction, and prescription, (5) Exercise monitoring, (6) Behavioral counseling and psychosocial support, and (7) Dietary support. The following statements were rated an average of 9.0, classifying them as "imperative": 1) "Pre- and post-operative PA/exercise guidelines for MBS patients are needed", 2) "MBS programs need to include PA/exercise as part of multidisciplinary care". Conclusions: The expert group reached a consensus on 7 major classifications of job tasks for the exercise professional. It is important for governing medical associations across the world to formally recognize experienced exercise professionals as playing pivotal roles in continuing, multidisciplinary care for MBS patients. These findings also provide evidence-based information in the effort to solidify these positions within the greater context of healthcare.

Predictors of early weight loss in post-bariatric surgery patients receiving adjunctive behavioural treatments for loss-of-control eating.

This study examined baseline patient characteristics as predictors of early weight loss, defined as any weight loss within the first month of treatment, among patients receiving adjunctive behavioural treatments for loss-of-control (LOC) eating about 6 months after bariatric surgery. Participants were 126 patients in a treatment trial for LOC-eating (roughly 6 months postoperatively) categorized by early weight change following 1 month of treatment. Early weight-loss, defined as any weight loss following 1 month of treatment, and weight-gain, defined as any weight gain, groups were compared on sociodemographic and clinical variables assessed using a battery of reliably administered diagnostic and clinical interviews and established self-report measures, and on surgery-related variables (time since surgery, percent total [%TWL], and percent excess weight loss). Most patients (n = 99; 78.6%) lost weight after the first month of adjunctive treatments. Black patients (n = 24; 61.5%) were significantly less likely to achieve early weight loss compared to patients identifying as White (n = 60; 83%) or 'other' (n = 15; 100%) which was not predicted by any other sociodemographic variable. Severity of eating-disorder psychopathology, psychiatric comorbidity, and a broad range of psychosocial measures were not significantly predictive of early weight changes. Duration since surgery and percent weight loss from time of surgery to study enrolment 6-months post-surgery differed by early weight-loss and weight-gain groups. Findings suggest that among post-bariatric surgery patients receiving adjunctive behavioural treatments for LOC-eating, baseline patient characteristics, aside from race and surgery-related variables, do not predict early weight loss.

Information Technology-Enhanced Telehealth Consultations Reduce Preoperative Evaluation Center Visits in a Bariatric Surgery Population.

Background: Preoperative patient evaluation and optimization in a preoperative evaluation center (PEC) has been shown to improve operating room (OR) efficiency and patient care. However, performing preoperative evaluation on all patients scheduled for surgery or procedure would be time- and resource-consuming. Therefore, appropriate patient selection for evaluation at PECs is one aspect of improving PEC efficiency. In this study, we evaluate the effect of an enhanced preoperative evaluation process (PEP), utilizing a nursing triage phone call and information technology (IT) optimizations, on PEC efficiency and the quality of care in bariatric surgery patients. We hypothesized that, compared to a traditional PEP, the enhanced PEP would improve PEC efficiency without a negative impact on quality. Methods: The study was a retrospective cohort analysis of 1550 patients from January 2014 to March 2017 at a large, tertiary care academic health system. The study was a before/after comparison that compared the enhanced PEP model to the traditional PEP model. The primary outcome was the efficiency of the PEC, which was measured by the reduction of in-person patient visits at the PEC. The secondary outcome was the quality of care, which was measured by delays, cancellations, and the need for additional testing on the day of surgery (DOS). Results: The enhanced PEP improved the primary outcome of efficiency, as evident by an 80% decrease in in-person patient visits to the PEC. There was no reduction in the secondary outcome of the quality of care as measured by delays, cancellations, or the need for additional testing on the DOS. The implementation of the enhanced PEP did not result in increased costs or resource utilization. Conclusions: The enhanced PEP in a multi-disciplinary preoperative process can improve the efficiency of PEC for bariatric surgery patients without any decrease in the quality of care. The enhanced PEP process can be implemented without an increase in resource utilization and can be particularly useful during the COVID-19 pandemic.

24-Month follow-up of randomized controlled trial of guided-self-help for loss-of-control eating after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Loss-of-control (LOC)-eating postoperatively predicts suboptimal longer-term outcomes following bariatric surgery. This study examined longer-term effects through 24-month follow-ups after completing treatments in a randomized controlled trial testing guided-self-help treatments (cognitive-behavioral therapy [gshCBT] and behavioral weight-loss [gshBWL]) and control (CON) delivered postoperatively for LOC-eating. METHODS: 140 patients with LOC-eating 6 months after bariatric surgery were randomized (5:5:2 ratio) to 3-months of gshCBT (n = 56), gshBWL (n = 60), or CON (n = 24) delivered by trained allied-health clinicians. Independent assessments were performed throughout/after treatments and at 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-ups; 83% of patients were assessed at 24-month follow-up. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses comparing the three groups (gshCBT vs. gshBWL vs. CON) in LOC-eating abstinence at posttreatment (30%, 27%, 38%), 12-month follow-up (34%, 32%, 42%), and 24-month follow-up (45%, 32%, 38%) revealed no significant differences. Mixed-models revealed significantly reduced LOC-eating frequency through posttreatment, no significant changes in LOC-eating frequency during follow-up, and no differences between the three groups. Weight reduced significantly, albeit modestly, through posttreatment but increased significantly and substantially during follow-ups, with no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the 12-week scalable guided-self-help treatments did not differ from each other or control, were associated with significantly reduced frequency of LOC-eating and modest weight loss at posttreatment but were followed by significant weight gain during the 24-month follow-up. Weight gain was substantial and nearly universal whereas the frequency of LOC-eating did not change over time (i.e., LOC-eating reductions and abstinence rates were well maintained through 24-moth follow-ups). Patients with postoperative LOC-eating require more intensive adjunctive treatments. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Loss-of-control (LOC) eating postoperatively predicts poorer bariatric surgery outcomes and the longer-term effects of postoperative adjunctive postoperative interventions for LOC eating are unknown. In this 24-month follow-up of a controlled study of scalable guided-self-help treatments and a control condition, improvements in LOC-eating frequency, eating-disorder psychopathology, and depression during treatment were maintained well, with no differences between the three groups. Proportion of patients achieving abstinence from LOC-eating at the 24-month follow-up ranged from 38% to 45% across the three groups. In contrast, weight increased significantly during the 24-month follow-ups, with no differences between the three groups. Findings suggest LOC-eating following bariatric surgery might represent a "marker" for a subgroup of patients that are at risk for substantial weight gains over time. LOC eating following bariatric surgery is challenging to treat with low-intensity scalable treatments and may require more intensive specialist treatments.

Examination of night eating and loss-of-control eating following bariatric surgery.

PURPOSE: Post-operative loss-of-control (LOC)-eating is a negative prognostic indicator for long-term outcomes following bariatric surgery. Emerging research suggests that night eating might also be associated with poorer post-operative outcomes. This study examined the co-occurrence and clinical features of night eating in patients with LOC-eating following bariatric surgery. METHODS: Participants were 131 adults who sought treatment for eating/weight concerns 6 months following sleeve gastrectomy. The Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) interview (Bariatric-Surgery-Version) assessed LOC-eating, regular night eating (at least weekly), and eating-disorder psychopathology. Participants completed the Night Eating Questionnaire (NEQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). RESULTS: Approximately, 15% met screening criteria for night-eating syndrome based on the NEQ. Greater NEQ scores were associated significantly with race, lower percent total weight loss (%TWL), and greater EDE, BDI-II, and PSQI scores. Similar results were observed when comparing groups with regular night eating (21.4%) versus without (78.6%); adjusting for race and %TWL revealed similar findings. DISCUSSION: In post-bariatric patients with LOC-eating, 15% likely had night-eating syndrome and 21.4% engaged in regular night-eating behavior. The co-occurrence of LOC-eating and regular night eating following sleeve gastrectomy may represent a more severe subgroup with elevated psychopathology, poorer sleep and %TWL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Treatments for Loss-of-Control Eating Following Bariatric Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Loss-of-control (LOC) eating postoperatively is a consistent predictor of suboptimal longer-term bariatric surgery outcomes. This randomized controlled trial examined the effectiveness of two guided self-help treatments (cognitive behavioral therapy [gshCBT] and behavioral weight loss [gshBWL]) compared with a control (CON) for reducing LOC eating and weight. METHODS: A total of 140 patients with recurrent LOC eating approximately 6 months after bariatric surgery were randomly assigned (5:5:2 ratio) to one of three conditions: gshCBT (n = 56), gshBWL (n = 60), or CON (n = 24). Three-month treatments were delivered by trained allied health clinicians to increase generalizability to bariatric surgery settings. Independent assessments were performed by doctoral research-clinicians using established interviews/measures; posttreatment outcomes were obtained for 89% of patients. RESULTS: Mixed models revealed significant improvements for LOC eating frequency and weight loss but no significant differences between treatments; race neither predicted (main effect) nor moderated (interaction effect) treatment outcomes. Intent-to-treat categorical analyses of abstinence from LOC eating (30% for gshCBT, 27% for gshBWL, 38% for CON) and proportion attaining 5% weight loss (20%, 22%, 17%) revealed no significant differences between treatments; non-White participants had a higher proportion achieving LOC eating abstinence but a lower proportion attaining 5% weight loss compared with White participants. CONCLUSIONS: In this 12-week randomized controlled trial following bariatric surgery, significant LOC eating reductions and weight loss did not differ significantly between treatments. Race was associated with posttreatment categorical outcomes.

Gallbladder Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.

Gallbladder disorders encompass a wide breadth of diseases that vary in severity. We present a comprehensive review of literature for the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnostic evaluation, and management of cholelithiasis-related disease, acute acalculous cholecystitis, functional gallbladder disorder, gallbladder polyps, gallbladder hydrops, porcelain gallbladder, and gallbladder cancer.

Does Bariatric Binge-Eating Size Matter? Conceptual Model and Empirical Support.

OBJECTIVE: Bariatric surgery affects the quantity of food individuals can eat, yet some individuals still experience loss of control (LOC) while eating. This cross-sectional study examined a new classification system for binge/LOC eating following bariatric surgery. METHODS: A total of 168 individuals who underwent bariatric surgery 6 months earlier and reported LOC eating were administered the Eating Disorder Examination-Bariatric Surgery Version interview and self-report measures of depressive symptoms, functional impairment, and physical and mental health-related quality of life. Three groups were created based on the largest LOC-eating episode determined by the Eating Disorder Examination-Bariatric Surgery Version interview as follows: (1) "traditional" objective binge-eating episodes, defined as eating unusually large quantities of food while having LOC; (2) "bariatric-objective binge eating," meaning unusually large quantities for postsurgical bariatric patients with LOC; and (3) "bariatric-subjective binge eating," meaning small quantities of food with LOC after surgery. RESULTS: In total, 75% (n = 126) met criteria for the bariatric-objective binge episodes group, 10% (n = 17) met criteria for the traditional objective binge-eating group, and 15% (n = 25) met criteria for the bariatric-subjective binge episodes group. The three groups differed significantly, with a graded pattern by binge size, in global eating-disorder psychopathology, depressive symptoms, and functional impairment but not quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide empirical support for a new classification system for bariatric binge/LOC eating. Binge size was associated with distinct psychopathology. Longitudinal follow-up is needed to ascertain effects on clinical outcomes.

Outcomes of routine upper gastrointestinal series screening and surveillance after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal dilatation and dysmotility are known complications of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB), but their incidence varies widely in the literature. There are no formal recommendations guiding surveillance for these potentially underdiagnosed pathologies. This study demonstrates the utility and outcomes of a yearly upper gastrointestinal series screening protocol to detect and manage esophageal dysfunction after LAGB. METHODS: We reviewed charts for all patients presenting for an outpatient surgical encounter related to LAGB between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. Exclusion criteria included failure to undergo UGIS 6 months or more after band placement, or having undergone band placement in combination with another bariatric procedure. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize demographics, imaging findings and surgical outcomes. All imaging classifications were based on final radiologist report. Means were compared using a Student's t test. RESULTS: A total of 322 records were reviewed with 39 patients excluded; 31 without UGIS and 8 with concomitant gastric bypass. 85% were female with an average age of 50 years. 66.8% identified as white or Caucasian with 24.7% black/African-American. Greater than 75% of the cohort had at least 5-year follow-up interval. UGIS was performed for symptoms in 66.1% and for routine screening in 33.9%. Of asymptomatic patients, 47.9% demonstrated esophageal dilatation or dysmotility on UGIS, similar to 51.3% of symptomatic patients. 96.8% of all patients went on to band removal. Sixty-four patients had repeat UGIS an average of 8 months following band removal, of which 40.6% were persistently abnormal. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of esophageal pathology was significantly higher than most reported series, as was the number of patients with persistently abnormal UGIS despite band removal. The data supports our policy of yearly UGIS for all post-LAGB patients, with strong recommendation for band removal if esophageal dilatation or dysmotility is found.

Examining Sleep Quality Following Sleeve Gastrectomy Among Patients with Loss-of-Control Eating.

BACKGROUND: Sleep is associated with post-bariatric surgical outcomes; however, little is known about sleep in bariatric patients with loss-of-control (LOC) eating, a consistent predictor of poorer weight outcomes. This study examined sleep quality and clinical correlates in sleeve gastrectomy patients with LOC eating. METHODS: Participants (N = 145) were treatment-seeking post-operative sleeve gastrectomy patients with LOC eating. Eating-disorder features were assessed with the Eating Disorder Examination-Bariatric Surgery Version Interview (EDE-BSV) and participants completed established measures assessing sleep, health-related quality of life, perceived stress, depression, and night eating. RESULTS: 58.6% of participants were characterized with "poor" sleep. Poor sleep quality was significantly associated with greater eating-disorder psychopathology, physical and mental functioning, night eating, perceived stress, and less % excess weight loss (EWL); these findings remained significant after controlling for %EWL and race. Regression analyses, adjusting for correlated variables, revealed that sleep quality significantly predicted mental functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Poor sleep quality was common among post-operative sleeve gastrectomy patients with LOC eating. Sleep quality was significantly associated with eating-disorder psychopathology, less post-operative weight loss, and psychosocial and physical functioning problems. These findings suggest the importance of assessment and treatment of sleep problems following sleeve gastrectomy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02259322.

Racial Comparisons of Postoperative Weight Loss and Eating-Disorder Psychopathology Among Patients Following Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine racial differences in postoperative eating-disorder psychopathology, psychosocial functioning, and weight loss among adults with loss-of-control (LOC) eating following sleeve gastrectomy. METHODS: Participants were 123 patients (n = 74 non-Hispanic White and n = 49 non-Hispanic Black) who underwent sleeve gastrectomy surgery within the previous 4 to 9 months and reported regular LOC eating during the previous month. The Eating Disorder Examination Bariatric Surgery Version assessed LOC eating, eating-disorder psychopathology, and meal patterns. Participants completed self-report measures, including the Beck Depression Inventory-II and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey. RESULTS: Presurgical BMI did not differ by race, but Black patients had significantly less percent total weight loss and percent excess weight loss than White patients. Black and White patients did not differ significantly in LOC eating frequency, onset time of postoperative LOC eating, eating-disorder psychopathology, depressive symptoms, or physical or mental health-related quality of life. White patients were significantly more likely to meet criteria for lifetime binge-eating disorder than Black patients. Black patients were significantly more likely to skip breakfast and dinner and engage in night eating than White patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that among patients with LOC eating following sleeve gastrectomy surgery, there exist few racial differences in current eating-disorder psychopathology and psychosocial functioning, although Black patients achieved less weight loss than White patients.

Intraoperative Blood Pressure Lability Is Associated with Postoperative Hemorrhage after Uncomplicated Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative hemorrhage is a rare complication in bariatric surgery. We aim to determine if differences in blood pressure or perioperative medication administration contribute to postoperative bleeding in patients who were hemodynamically stable intraoperatively. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of all bariatric surgery patients from 2014 to 2017 at a high volume academic center. We identified controls based on age, gender, ethnicity, type of procedure, and pre-operative blood pressure. RESULTS: Patients with postoperative hemorrhage had a significantly lower MAP during the portion of the surgery in which the abdominal contents were inspected for leaks and bleeds. The timing of enoxaparin or ketorolac administration was not associated with bleeding. CONCLUSION: Blood pressure lability, but not enoxaparin or ketorolac administration, is associated with postoperative hemorrhage.

Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Practices and Evidence-Based Guidelines in Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Excessive opioid prescribing creates risk for abuse and adverse effects, but must be balanced against individualized pain control. Minimal literature exists to guide providers in the postoperative bariatric surgical setting. STUDY DESIGN: We compare opioid prescribing practice for minimally invasive bariatric surgery in a university hospital with self-reported patient use and satisfaction. This data is used to create practice guidelines for postoperative prescriptions. A 10-question survey was administered at the first postoperative office visit. All patients at this visit were eligible. None declined or excluded. We analyzed 115 patients for 3 procedures: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG; n = 53), laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB; n = 50), and laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal (LAGBR; n = 12). Outcomes included number of pills prescribed (verified), proportion used, duration of use, satisfaction with pain control, and non-narcotic analgesic use. RESULTS: An average of 27 ± 10 pills were dispensed for LSG, average 4.1 days of use; 28 ± 7 pills for LRYGB, 4.6 days; and16 ± 9 pills for LAGBR, 2.6 days. Fifty to 74% retained more than half or all of their opioids at 2 weeks. Fifty-four percent utilized non-narcotic analgesics. Overall, 91.3% reported adequate pain control. For each procedure, average number of pills used was calculated with representative values for "less than half left" (75% of average number of pills prescribed) and "more than half left" (25% of average number of pills prescribed). For LSG, an average of 9 pills were used; LRYGB 14 pills, and LAGBR 7 pills. CONCLUSIONS: Opioids are overprescribed following most common surgical procedures, but only one study has evaluated patterns after bariatric surgery. Our survey-based tool examines prescribing, utilization and satisfaction following common minimally invasive bariatric procedures. Opioid prescriptions were variable, and excessive for most patients. We now recommend prescribing no more than 15 pills after these operations.

Safety and Feasibility of a Lower-Cost Stapler in Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic staplers are integral to bariatric surgery. Their pricing significantly impacts the overall cost of procedures. An independent device company has designed a stapler handle and single-use reloads for cross-compatibility and equivalency with existing manufacturers, at a lower cost. OBJECTIVES: We aim to demonstrate non-inferior function and cross-compatibility of a newly introduced stapler handle and reloads compared to our institution's current stapling system in a large animal survival study. SETTING: University-affiliated animal research facility, USA. METHODS: Matched small bowel anastomoses were created in four pigs, one with each stapler (a total of two per animal). After 14 days, investigators blinded to stapler type evaluated the anastomoses grossly and microscopically. Each anastomosis was scored on multiple measures of healing. Individual parameters were added for a global "healing score." RESULTS: Clinical stapler function and gross quality of anastomoses were similar between stapler groups. Individual scores for anastomotic ulceration, reepithelialization, granulation tissue, mural healing, eosinophilic infiltration, serosal inflammation, and microscopic adherences were also statistically similar. The mean "healing scores" were equal. While this study was underpowered for subtle differences, safe and reliable performance in large animals still supports the feasibility of introducing new devices into human use. CONCLUSIONS: The new stapler system delivers a similar technical performance and is cross-compatible with currently marketed stapling devices. An equivalent quality device at a lower price point should enable case cost reduction, helping to maintain hospital case margin and procedure value in the face of potentially declining reimbursement. This device may provide a safe and functional alternative to currently used laparoscopic surgical staplers.

Impact of preoperative wait time due to insurance-mandated medically supervised diets on weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy. Are patients losing momentum?

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined whether preoperative period length, as defined by the amount of time from enrollment in a surgical weight loss program to the day of surgery, affects postoperative weight loss. OBJECTIVES: To identify associations between preoperative period length and postoperative weight loss. SETTING: Single surgeon at an academic medical center in the United States. METHODS: Retrospective chart review in 109 consecutive patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy from 2014-2015. RESULTS: When patients were grouped based on postoperative percentage of total weight loss, greater weight loss was associated with shorter preoperative wait time. During the preoperative period, 72.2% of our patients achieved a net weight loss, but 34.6% had gained net weight until they started the preoperative "liver-shrinking" diet; 71.4±8.3% of the total preoperative weight loss occurred after initiating the preoperative diet, which accounted for approximately 15% of the whole preoperative period length. There was no correlation between the length of the preoperative diet and preoperative weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: Shorter preoperative periods and earlier initiation of liver reduction diets may increase postoperative weight loss, although ultimately there may be a limit to the weight loss that patients can achieve while adhering to highly restrictive lifestyle modifications.