Ectodermal dysplasia and cholesteatoma: A cross-sectional analysis of otologic issues.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have also associated cleft palate with increased cholesteatoma risk. Despite this close relation, the incidence of cholesteatoma and associated otologic issues in patients with ectodermal dysplasia types highly associated with cleft palate (EDT-ACPs) has not been formally analyzed. This study provides insight to guide clinicians caring for patients with ED types associated with cleft palate. METHODS: Individuals with TP63 disorders and Goltz syndrome/Focal Dermal Hypoplasia in the National Foundation for Ectodermal Dysplasia database were contacted for participation in an online REDCap survey from Sept-Dec '22. Descriptive statistics were generated using SAS JMP Pro 17 statistical software. RESULTS: 65 individuals participated in the survey (response rate approx. 18 %). The median [IQR] age was 22 [14, 43], 41 (63 %) were female, and Ectrodactyly-Ectodermal Dysplasia-Cleft Lip/Palate Syndrome (EEC) was most common (n = 26, 40 %). We found that, among our respondents with a history of cleft palate, the incidence of cholesteatoma was 39 %. Among respondents without a history of cleft palate, the incidence of cholesteatoma was 13 % CONCLUSIONS: Otologic issues, such as cholesteatoma, can have permanent implications including hearing loss that can be minimized by early identification and treatment. The estimated incidence of cholesteatoma among our participants is far above the estimated incidence of cholesteatoma in the general population with and without a history of cleft palate, suggesting an independent contribution of EDT-ACPs to the risk of cholesteatoma.

Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery resident and medical school characteristics: Current paradigm amidst changing application criteria.

PURPOSE: To determine the characteristics of current US Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Oto-HNS) residents and their medical school. METHODS: Data were manually collected between Dec 2022 and Jan 2023 for 1649 residents attending 163 US-based ACGME accredited Oto-HNS residency programs, reflecting the 2018-2022 cohort. All data were collected from publicly available sources including residency and medical school program websites, web of science, and professional networking sites (ex: LinkedIn, Doximity). Data were analyzed to determine the "feeder" schools which contributed the greatest number and percent of residents. Using univariable linear regression models, we characterized factors which were associated with feeder school status. RESULTS: Of 1649 residents analyzed, 364 (22 %) matched to their home program and 918 (56 %) stayed in the region of their medical school. The median [IQR] number of published papers and abstracts was 5 [3, 9] with an h-index of 2 [1,4]. Factors associated with producing a greater percent of Oto-HNS residents include presence of an interest group, presence of a home program, USNWR research rank of the medical school, Doximity reputation rank of the home residency program, average pre-residency h-index of the school's graduates, and total NIH research funding (each p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the changing landscape of residency applications after the USMLE Step 1 exam's transition in January 2022 to pass/fail scoring, it is important to objectively characterize current Oto-HNS residents. Findings from this study will inform prospective residents and residency programs seeking to improve access to Oto-HNS. Future small-scale studies may help further identify driving factors within medical school curricula.

Trends in Twitter Utilization Among Academic Otolaryngologists.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize Twitter utilization among academic otolaryngologists and evaluate the relationship between Twitter utilization and research productivity. METHODS: Data were collected manually from accredited US otolaryngology residency programs from July-November 2021. Program and faculty demographics were documented, including citations and H-index for faculty and Doximity reputation and US News and World Report ranking for programs. Twitter metrics were also recorded. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of Twitter utilization. RESULTS: Currently, 333 (16%) faculty and 70 (62%) programs have a Twitter account. Of these, 36 (11%) and 27 (39%), respectively, were created in 2020. The regression model indicates that for each 5 unit increase in H-index, the odds of having a Twitter account increase 22% (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.34, p = 0.0009). The number of faculty with a Twitter account predicts the existence of program Twitter accounts (OR:1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.19, p = 0.04). Finally, of the 323 faculty with a Twitter account and available Scopus profile, we found that the number of individuals with Twitter use out of proportion to their academic productivity was low (n = 8/323). CONCLUSION: The H-index is a significant predictor of faculty Twitter accounts, whereas the number of faculty with Twitter is a significant predictor of program Twitter utilization. Although Twitter utilization is increasing, especially during the coronavirus pandemic, the findings indicate that there is ample room for growth, particularly amongst faculty with strong academic portfolios. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 134:1190-1196, 2024.

Clinical application of physical therapy in facial paralysis treatment: A review.

This review aims to summarize recent studies regarding the specific modalities of physical therapy as a form of treatment for patients with facial paralysis, analyze the different components of physical therapy, and provide healthcare providers with guidance for their best practice in treating patients with facial paralysis. This paper will discuss the mechanism, indications, and impact factors for facial retraining, evaluate the standards for facial retraining, the creation of a treatment plan, and analyze the combined use of facial retraining with botulinum toxin injections and the application of facial retraining in post facial reanimation patients. Other modes of physical therapy, including electrical stimulation, dry needling, and acupuncture, will be addressed. Lastly, the application of new digital technology will be discussed.

The psychological and psychosocial effects of facial paralysis: A review.

Facial nerve function is essential for a multitude of processes in the face, including facial movement; expression; and functions, such as eating, smiling, and blinking. When facial nerve function is disrupted, facial paralysis may occur and various complications for the patient may result. Much research has been conducted on the physical diagnosis, management, and treatment of facial paralysis. However, there is a lack of knowledge of the psychological and social effects of the condition. Patients may be at an increased risk for anxiety and depression, as well as negative self and social perceptions. This review analyzes the current literature on the various adverse psychological and psychosocial effects of facial paralysis, factors that may play a role, and treatment options that may help improve patients' quality of life.

Interdisciplinary assessment of tracheostomy care knowledge: An opportunity for quality improvement.

PURPOSE: A 2013 AAOHNS consensus statement called for reduced variation in tracheostomy care. Multidisciplinary approaches and standardized protocols have been shown to improve tracheostomy outcomes. This study aims to identify inconsistencies in knowledge in order to design standardized education targeting these areas to improve quality of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online, multiple-choice tracheostomy care knowledge assessment was administered to nurses and respiratory therapists in ICUs, stepdown units, and regular nursing floors, as well as residents in otolaryngology, general surgery, and thoracic surgery. The survey was administered and data were recorded using the Select Survey online platform. RESULTS: 173 nurses, respiratory therapists, and residents participated in this study. Over 75 % of respondents identified correct answers to questions addressing basic tracheostomy care, such as suctioning and humidification. Significant variation was observed in identification and management of tracheostomy emergencies, and appropriate use of speaking valves. Only 47 % of all respondents identified all potential signs of tracheostomy tube displacement. Respiratory therapists with over 20 years of experience (p = 0.001), were more likely to answer correctly than those with less. Nurses were less likely than respiratory therapists to have received standardized tracheostomy education (p = 0.006) and were less likely than others to choose the appropriate scenario for speaking valve use (p = 0.042), highlighting the need for interdisciplinary education. CONCLUSIONS: An interdisciplinary assessment of tracheostomy care knowledge demonstrates variation, especially in identification and management of tracheostomy emergencies and appropriate use of speaking valves. Design of a standardized educational program targeting these areas is underway.

Head and Neck Wound Reconstruction Using Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix Versus Collagen-Chondroitin Silicone Bilayer.

Background: Head and neck reconstruction is challenging because of the functional requirements of movement, sensation, and cosmesis of this highly visible region. This study is the first to compare Novosorb biodegradable temporizing matrix (BTM) and Integra collagen-chondroitin silicone (CCS) skin substitutes for reconstruction of soft tissue head and neck wounds. Methods: This retrospective review included adults who underwent wound reconstruction of the head/neck with either BTM or CCS between 2015 and 2020. Patient-level data, complications, and closure rates were compared. Results: The review identified 15 patients: 5 who received BTM and 10 who received CCS. Mean age at dermal template placement was 55 (range, 28-79) years. Race, sex, smoking status, medical comorbidities, defect size, radiation history, prior surgeries, and follow-up time were not significantly different between groups. Wound etiologies for BTM and CCS included burn (40% vs 60%), trauma (20% vs 20%), surgical wounds (20% vs 20%), and skin cancer (20% vs 0%), respectively (P = .026). Skin grafts were placed in 8 (80%) wounds after CCS placement, compared with 3 (60%) after BTM (P = .670). Template reapplication was required in 2 (40%) BTM wounds and 3 (30%) CCS wounds (P = 1.0). Infection, hematoma, and seroma were comparable between groups, although skin graft failure was higher in the CCS group at 3 (37.5%) compared with 0 for BTM (P = .506). More secondary procedures were required after CCS placement (CCS, 1.9 ± 2.2; BTM, 0.9 ± 0.8; P = .090). Definitive closure in patients not lost to follow-up occurred in 4 (100%) BTM and 6 (75%) CCS cases (P = 1.0). Conclusions: Head and neck wounds treated with BTM had comparable closure and complication rates as CCS bilayer and required fewer secondary procedures and skin grafts. These findings suggest that BTM is safe and efficacious for application in head and neck wounds and may be considered as an economical alternative.