Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 153(3): 321-323, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29501098

RESUMO

The American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) works to certify orthodontists in a fair, reliable, and valid manner. The process must examine an orthodontist's knowledge, abilities, and critical thinking skills to ensure that each certified orthodontist has the expertise to provide the highest level of patient care. Many medical specialty boards and 4 American Dental Association specialty boards use scenario-based testing for board certification. Changing to a scenario-based clinical examination will allow the ABO to test more orthodontists. The new process will not result in an easier examination; standards will not be lowered. It will offer an improved testing method that will be fair, valid, and reliable for the specialty of orthodontics while increasing accessibility and complementing residency curricula. The ABO's written examination will remain as it is.


Assuntos
Certificação , Inovação Organizacional , Objetivos Organizacionais , Ortodontia/normas , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional/organização & administração , Humanos , Estados Unidos
2.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 152(2): 139-142, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28760267

RESUMO

The American Board of Orthodontics has developed tools to help examinees select patients to be used for the Board examination. The Case Management Form can be used to evaluate aspects of a patient's treatment that cannot be measured by other tools. The Case Management Form is a structured treatment-neutral assessment of orthodontic objectives and outcomes associated with a patient's treatment. Despite the availability of this form, examiners continue to see problems, including lack of attention to finishing details, inappropriate treatment objectives, excessive proclination of mandibular incisors due to treatment mechanics, excessive expansion of mandibular intercanine width, closing skeletal open bite with extrusion of anterior teeth leading to excessive gingival display, and failure to recognize the importance of controlling the eruption or extrusion of molars during treatment. In addition, some examinees exhibit a lack of understanding of proper cephalometric tracing and superimposition techniques, which lead to improper interpretation of cephalometric data and treatment outcomes.


Assuntos
Certificação , Ortodontia/normas , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional , Administração de Caso , Certificação/normas , Certificação/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Ortodontia/estatística & dados numéricos , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional/normas , Estados Unidos
6.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 147(5 Suppl): S232-3, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25925653

RESUMO

The American Board of Orthodontics was established in 1929 and is the oldest specialty board in dentistry. Its goal is to protect the public by ensuring competency through the certification of eligible orthodontists. Originally, applicants for certification submitted a thesis, 5 case reports, and a set of casts with appliances. Once granted, the certification never expired. Requirements have changed over the years. In 1950, 15 cases were required, and then 10 in 1987. The Board has continued to refine and improve the certification process. In 1998, certification became time limited, and a renewal process was initiated. The Board continues to improve the recertification process.


Assuntos
Certificação/métodos , Ortodontia/normas , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional/normas , Certificação/história , Competência Clínica/normas , Educação Continuada em Odontologia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia , História do Século XX , Humanos , Ortodontia/educação , Ortodontia/história , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional/história , Estados Unidos
10.
J Calif Dent Assoc ; 34(10): 807-12, 2006 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17087395

RESUMO

The age at which children should start orthodontic treatment has been debated amongst orthodontists for many decades. Orthodontists can agree on what is a quality orthodontic result, but disagree as to how and when to best obtain this result Some orthodontists contend that starting treatment in the primary dentition is the most effective means of orthodontic care. Other orthodontists would prefer to begin in the early or late mixed dentition. Still others would rather postpone treatment until the permanent dentition at approximately age 12. This article will evaluate the pros and cons of initiating treatment at different ages.


Assuntos
Ortodontia Corretiva/métodos , Fatores Etários , Criança , Dentição Mista , Feminino , Humanos , Má Oclusão Classe II de Angle/terapia , Mordida Aberta/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA