Laparotomy and intraoperative enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding before and after the era of video capsule endoscopy and deep enteroscopy: A tertiary center experience.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate roles of intraoperative endoscopy (IOE) in management of severe obscure GI bleeding (OGIB) before vs. after introduction of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and deep enteroscopy (DE). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data of patients undergoing IOE for severe OGIB in a tertiary referral center. RESULTS: 52 patients had laparotomy/IOE for OGIB, 11 pre and 41 post VCE/DE eras. In the pre VCE/DE era, 36.4% (4/11) had preoperative presumptive diagnoses while in the post VCE/DE era presumptive diagnoses were made in 48.8% (20/41) (p = 0.18). Preoperative evaluation led to correct diagnoses in 18.2% (2/11) in the pre and 51.2% (21/41) in the post VCE/DE era (p = 0.09). Vascular lesions and ulcers were the most common diagnoses, but rebleeding was common. No rebleeding was found among patients with tumors, Meckel's diverticulum, and aortoenteric fistula. CONCLUSIONS: Presumptive diagnoses in the post VCE/DE era were usually accurate. If VCE or DE are negative, the probability of negative IOE is high. Patients with tumors and Meckel's diverticulum were the best candidates for IOE.

Doppler Endoscopic Probe Monitoring of Blood Flow Improves Risk Stratification and Outcomes of Patients With Severe Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: For 4 decades, stigmata of recent hemorrhage in patients with nonvariceal lesions have been used for risk stratification and endoscopic hemostasis. The arterial blood flow that underlies the stigmata rarely is monitored, but can be used to determine risk for rebleeding. We performed a randomized controlled trial to determine whether Doppler endoscopic probe monitoring of blood flow improves risk stratification and outcomes in patients with severe nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. METHODS: In a single-blind study performed at 2 referral centers we assigned 148 patients with severe nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (125 with ulcers, 19 with Dieulafoy's lesions, and 4 with Mallory Weiss tears) to groups that underwent standard, visually guided endoscopic hemostasis (control, n = 76), or endoscopic hemostasis assisted by Doppler monitoring of blood flow under the stigmata (n = 72). The primary outcome was the rate of rebleeding after 30 days; secondary outcomes were complications, death, and need for transfusions, surgery, or angiography. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the rates of lesion rebleeding within 30 days of endoscopic hemostasis in the control group (26.3%) vs the Doppler group (11.1%) (P = .0214). The odds ratio for rebleeding with Doppler monitoring was 0.35 (95% confidence interval, 0.143-0.8565) and the number needed to treat was 7. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled trial of patients with severe upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from ulcers or other lesions, Doppler probe guided endoscopic hemostasis significantly reduced 30-day rates of rebleeding compared with standard, visually guided hemostasis. Guidelines for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding should incorporate these results. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT00732212 (CLIN-013-07F).

Origin, Clinical Characteristics and 30-Day Outcomes of Severe Hematochezia in Cirrhotics and Non-cirrhotics.

BACKGROUND: The sites of origin, causes and outcomes of severe hematochezia have not been compared between cirrhotics and non-cirrhotics. In cirrhotics versus non-cirrhotics presenting with severe hematochezia, we aimed at (1) identifying the site and etiology of gastro-intestinal bleeding and independent predictors of bleeding from the upper gastrointestinal tract versus small bowel or the colon, (2) comparing 30-day clinical outcomes, and (3) proposing an algorithm for management of severe hematochezia. METHODS: In this cohort study from two university-based medical centers, 860 consecutive patients with severe hematochezia admitted from 1995 to 2011 were prospectively enrolled with 160 (18.6 %) cirrhotics. We studied (a) general clinical and laboratory characteristics of cirrhotics versus non-cirrhotics, (b) predictors of bleeding sites in each patient group by multiple variable regression analysis, and compared (c) 30-day outcomes, including rebleeding, surgery and deaths. RESULTS: Cirrhosis independently predicted an upper gastrointestinal source of bleeding (OR 3.47; 95 % CI 2.01-5.96) as well as history of hematemesis, melena in the past 30 days, positive nasogastric aspirate, prior upper gastrointestinal bleeding or use of aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory. The most prevalent diagnoses were esophageal varices (20 %) in cirrhotics and colon diverticular bleeding (27.1 %) in non-cirrhotics. Thirty-day rates of rebleeding, surgical interventions and deaths were 23.1 versus 15 % (P = 0.01), 14.4 versus 6.4 % (P < 0.001), and 17.5 versus 4.1 % (P < 0.001), in cirrhotics versus non-cirrhotics, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhosis predicted an upper gastrointestinal site of bleeding in patients presenting with severe hematochezia. The 30-day rates of rebleeding, surgery, and death were significantly higher in cirrhotics than in non-cirrhotics.

Doppler endoscopic probe as a guide to risk stratification and definitive hemostasis of peptic ulcer bleeding.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: For more than 4 decades endoscopists have relied on ulcer stigmata for risk stratification and as a guide to hemostasis. None used arterial blood flow underneath stigmata to predict outcomes. For patients with severe peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB), we used a Doppler endoscopic probe (DEP) for (1) detection of blood flow underlying stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH), (2) quantitating rates of residual arterial blood flow under SRH after visually directed standard endoscopic treatment, and (3) comparing risks of rebleeding and actual 30-day rebleed rates for spurting arterial bleeding (Forrest [F] IA) and oozing bleeding (F IB). METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 163 consecutive patients with severe PUB and different SRH. RESULTS: All blood flow detected by the DEP was arterial. Detection rates were 87.4% in major SRH-spurting arterial bleeding (F IA), non-bleeding visible vessel (F IIA), clot (F IIB)-and were significantly lower at 42.3% (P < .0001) for an intermediate group of oozing bleeding (F IB) or flat spot (F IIC). For spurting bleeding (F IA) versus oozing (F IB), baseline DEP arterial flow was 100% versus 46.7%, residual blood flow detected after endoscopic hemostasis was 35.7% versus 0%, and 30-day rebleed rates were 28.6% versus 0% (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: (1) For major SRH versus oozing or spot, the arterial blood flow detection rate by the DEP was significantly higher, indicating a higher rebleed risk. (2) Before and after endoscopic treatment, spurting (F IA) PUB had significantly higher rates of blood flow detection than oozing (F IB) PUB and a significantly higher 30-day rebleed rate. (3) The DEP is recommended as a new endoscopic guide with SRH to improve risk stratification and potentially definitive hemostasis for PUB.

Comparison of Three Risk Scores to Predict Outcomes of Severe Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Improved medical decisions by using a score at the initial patient triage level may lead to improvements in patient management, outcomes, and resource utilization. There is no validated score for management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) unlike for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of our study was to compare the accuracies of 3 different prognostic scores [Center for Ulcer Research and Education Hemostasis prognosis score, Charlson index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score] for the prediction of 30-day rebleeding, surgery, and death in severe LGIB. METHODS: Data on consecutive patients hospitalized with severe gastrointestinal bleeding from January 2006 to October 2011 in our 2 tertiary academic referral centers were prospectively collected. Sensitivities, specificities, accuracies, and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve were computed for 3 scores for predictions of rebleeding, surgery, and mortality at 30 days. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-five consecutive patients with LGIB were included between 2006 and 2011. Twenty-three percent of patients rebled, 6% had surgery, and 7.7% of patients died. The accuracies of each score never reached 70% for predicting rebleeding or surgery in either. The ASA score had a highest accuracy for predicting mortality within 30 days (83.5%), whereas the Center for Ulcer Research and Education Hemostasis prognosis score and the Charlson index both had accuracies <75% for the prediction of death within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: ASA score could be useful to predict death within 30 days. However, a new score is still warranted to predict all 30 days outcomes (rebleeding, surgery, and death) in LGIB.

Natural history of definitive diverticular hemorrhage based on stigmata of recent hemorrhage and colonoscopic Doppler blood flow monitoring for risk stratification and definitive hemostasis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Few prospective reports describe the short-term natural history of colon diverticular hemorrhage based on stigmata of recent hemorrhage, and none include blood flow detection for risk stratification or as a guide to definitive hemostasis. Our purposes were to report the 30-day natural history of definitive diverticular hemorrhage based on stigmata and to describe Doppler probe blood flow detection as a guide to definitive hemostasis. METHODS: Different cohorts of patients with severe diverticular bleeding and stigmata on urgent colonoscopy are reported. For 30-day natural history, patients were treated medically. If severe rebleeding occurred, they had surgical or angiographic treatment. We report natural history with major stigmata (active bleeding, visible vessel, or adherent clot) and no stigmata or flat spots after clots were washed away. We also report Doppler probe detection of arterial blood flow underneath stigmata before and after hemostasis in a recent cohort. RESULTS: For natural history, patients with major stigmata treated medically had 65.8% (25/38) rebleeding rates, and 44.7% (17/38) had intervention for hemostasis. Patients with spots or clean bases had no rebleeding. A Doppler probe detected arterial blood flow in 92% of major stigmata--none after hemostasis--and there was no rebleeding. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Patients with major stigmata treated medically had high rates of rebleeding and intervention for hemostasis. (2) Patients with clean diverticula or only flat spots had no rebleeding. (3) High rates of arterial blood flow were detected under major stigmata with a Doppler probe, but with obliteration by hemostasis no rebleeding occurred.

Epistaxis in end stage liver disease masquerading as severe upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

AIM: To describe the prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of end stage liver disease (ESLD) patients with severe epistaxis thought to be severe upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH). METHODS: This observational single center study included all consecutive patients with ESLD and epistaxis identified from consecutive subjects hospitalized with suspected UGIH and prospectively enrolled in our databases of severe UGIH between 1998 and 2011. RESULTS: A total of 1249 patients were registered for severe UGIH in the data basis, 461 (36.9%) were cirrhotics. Epistaxis rather than UGIH was the bleeding source in 20 patients. All patients had severe coagulopathy. Epistaxis was initially controlled in all cases. Fifteen (75%) subjects required posterior nasal packing and 2 (10%) embolization in addition to correction of coagulopathy. Five (25%) patients died in the hospital, 12 (60%) received orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), and 3 (15%) were discharged without OLT. The mortality rate was 63% in patients without OLT. CONCLUSION: Severe epistaxis in patients with ESLD is (1) a diagnosis of exclusion that requires upper endoscopy to exclude severe UGIH; and (2) associated with a high mortality rate in patients not receiving OLT.

Ischemic colitis as a cause of severe hematochezia: risk factors and outcomes compared with other colon diagnoses.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors and outcomes of severe hematochezia from ischemic colitis compared with other colonic diagnoses have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: Our purposes were (1) to compare demographics and outcomes of patients hospitalized with severe hematochezia from ischemic colitis compared with other colonic diagnoses, (2) to compare inpatient and outpatient start of bleeding from ischemic colitis, and (3) to describe potential risk factors. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral academic centers. PATIENTS: Patients referred for gastroenterology consultation for severe hematochezia. INTERVENTIONS: Colonoscopic therapy was provided as indicated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rebleeding, surgery, and length of hospital stay after colonoscopy. RESULTS: Of 550 patients in the past 12 years with severe hematochezia from colonic sources, the cause in 65 patients (11.8%) was ischemia. Ischemic colitis was found more often in females, in patients taking anticoagulant agents, in patients with severe lung disease, those with higher creatinine levels, those with higher glucose levels, and those with more fresh frozen plasma transfusions. Five patients with focal lesions had colonoscopic hemostasis. Major 30-day outcomes of ischemic colitis patients were significantly worse than patients with other colonic diagnoses. Patients with inpatient (vs outpatient) ischemic colitis had significantly more and more severe comorbidities at baseline and significantly higher rates of rebleeding, surgery, and more days spent in hospital and in the intensive care unit. LIMITATIONS: Two-center study. CONCLUSIONS: Major 30-day outcomes in ischemic colitis patients were significantly worse than in patients with other colonic diagnoses. Comparing outpatient and inpatient start of ischemic colitis, inpatients had significantly worse outcomes.

Developing valid and reliable health utilities in irritable bowel syndrome: results from the IBS PROOF Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: A "utility" is a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) that ranges between 0 (death) and 1 (perfect health). Disease-targeted utilities are mandatory to conduct cost-utility analyses. Given the economic and healthcare burden of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), cost-utility analyses will play an important role in guiding health economic decision-making. To inform future cost-utility analyses in IBS, we measured and validated the IBS utilities. METHODS: We analyzed data from Rome III IBS patients in the Patient Reported Observed Outcomes and Function (PROOF) Cohort-a longitudinal multi-center IBS registry. At entry, the patients completed a multi-attribute utility instrument (EuroQOL), bowel symptom items, IBS severity measurements (IBS Severity Scale (IBSSS), Functional Bowel Disease Severity Index (FBDSI)), HRQOL indexes (IBS quality-of-life instrument (IBS-QOL), Center for disease control-4 (CDC-4)), and the Worker Productivity Activity Index for IBS (WPAI). We repeated assessments at 3 months. RESULTS: There were 257 patients (79% women; age=43+/-15 years) at baseline and 85 at 3 months. The mean utilities in patients with severe vs. non-severe IBS were 0.70 and 0.80, respectively (P<0.001). There were no differences in utilities among IBS with constipation (IBS-C), IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D), and mixed IBS (IBS-M) subgroups. EuroQOL utilities correlated with FBDSI (r=0.31; P<0.01), IBSSS (r=0.36; P<0.01), IBS-QOL (r=0.36; P<0.01), CDC-4 (r=0.44; P<0.01), WPAI presenteeism (r=0.16; P<0.01), abdominal pain (r=0.43; P<0.01), and distension (r=0.18; P=0.01). The utilities in patients reporting "considerable relief" of symptoms at 3 months vs. those without considerable relief were 0.78 and 0.73, respectively (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: EuroQOL utilities are valid and reliable in IBS. The utility of severe IBS (0.7) is similar to Class III congestive heart failure and rheumatoid arthritis. These validated utilities can be employed in future IBS cost-utility analyses.

Esomeprazole versus other proton pump inhibitors in erosive esophagitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There are limited data comparing the effectiveness of available proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in erosive esophagitis (EE). We performed a meta-analysis to calculate the pooled effect of esomeprazole on healing rates, symptom relief, and adverse events versus competing PPIs in EE. METHODS: We performed a structured electronic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE and reviewed published abstracts to identify English-language, randomized clinical trials from 1995-2005, comparing rates of endoscopic healing, symptom relief, and adverse events with esomeprazole versus alternative PPIs in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)/EE. We then performed meta-analysis to compare the relative risk (RR) of EE healing, symptom relief, and adverse events between study arms and calculated the absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat (NNT) for each outcome. RESULTS: Meta-analysis was performed on 10 studies (n=15,316). At 8 weeks, there was a 5% (RR, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.08) relative increase in the probability of healing of EE with esomeprazole, yielding an absolute risk reduction of 4% and NNT of 25. The calculated NNTs by Los Angeles grade of EE (grades A-D) were 50, 33, 14, and 8, respectively. Last, esomeprazole conferred an 8% (RR, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.11) relative increase in the probability of GERD symptom relief at 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with other PPIs, esomeprazole confers a statistically significant improvement, yet, clinically, only a modest overall benefit in 8-week healing and symptom relief in all-comers with EE. The clinical benefit of esomeprazole appears negligible in less severe erosive disease but might be important in more severe disease.

Treatment alternatives for hepatitis B cirrhosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients with cirrhosis are at risk for developing costly, morbid, or mortal events, and therefore need highly effective therapies. Lamivudine is effective but is limited by viral resistance. In contrast, adefovir and entecavir have lower viral resistance, but are more expensive. The most cost-effective approach is uncertain. METHODS: We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of six strategies in HBV cirrhosis: (1) No HBV treatment ("do nothing"), (2) lamivudine monotherapy, (3) adefovir monotherapy, (4) lamivudine with crossover to adefovir on resistance ("adefovir salvage"), (5) entecavir monotherapy, or (6) lamivudine with crossover to entecavir on resistance ("entecavir salvage"). The primary outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: The "do nothing" strategy was least effective yet least expensive. Compared with "do nothing," using adefovir cost an incremental US dollars 19,731. Entecavir was more effective yet more expensive than adefovir, and cost an incremental US dollars 25,626 per QALY gained versus adefovir. Selecting between entecavir versus adefovir was highly dependent on the third-party payer's "willingess-to-pay" (e.g., 45% and 60% of patients fall within budget if willing-to-pay US dollars 10K and US dollars 50K per QALY gained for entecavir, respectively). Both lamivudine monotherapy and the "salvage" strategies were not cost-effective. However, between the two salvage strategies, "adefovir salvage" was more effective and less expensive than "entecavir salvage." CONCLUSION: Both entecavir and adefovir are cost-effective in patients with HBV cirrhosis. Choosing between adefovir and entecavir is highly dependent on available budgets. In patients with HBV cirrhosis with previous lamivudine resistance, "adefovir salvage" appears more effective and less expensive than "entecavir salvage."

The cost-effectiveness and budget impact of intravenous versus oral proton pump inhibitors in peptic ulcer hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The most cost-effective route of administering proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in peptic ulcer hemorrhage remains uncertain. Oral (PO) PPI therapy may be less effective than intravenous (IV) PPI therapy, but is less expensive and does not mandate a 72-hour posthemostasis hospital stay to complete a full therapeutic course. Because there are currently no published head-to-head clinical trials comparing IV vs PO PPIs, we used decision analysis with budget impact modeling to measure the clinical and economic outcomes of these competing modes of administration. METHODS: We compared 3 postendoscopic strategies for high-risk peptic ulcer hemorrhage: (1) PO PPI therapy, (2) IV PPI therapy, and (3) IV histamine(2) receptor antagonist therapy. The primary outcomes were cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained, and per-member per-month cost in a hypothetical managed care organization with 1,000,000 covered lives. RESULTS: Compared with the PPI strategies, the histamine(2) receptor antagonist strategy was more expensive and less effective. Of the 2 PPI strategies, using IV instead of PO PPI cost an incremental 708,735 US dollars per year to gain 1 additional quality-adjusted life-year. Substituting IV in lieu of PO PPI cost each member 2.86 US dollars per month to subsidize. The IV PPI strategy became dominant when the rebleed rate with PO PPIs exceeded 24% (base case = 13%), and when the hospital stay on IV PPIs decreased to less than 72 hours. CONCLUSIONS: The higher effectiveness of IV PPI therapy may not offset its increased costs vs PO PPI therapy in ulcer hemorrhage. The managed care budget impact of IV PPIs exceeds most benchmarks.

Comparing rates of dyspepsia with Coxibs vs NSAID+PPI: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Because dyspeptic symptoms are far more prevalent than ulcer complications in users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), economic models indicate that dyspepsia rates (not ulcer complications) are the major determinant of cost-effectiveness in treating arthritis. We performed a meta-analysis to compare rates of dyspepsia for two common therapies in high-risk patients with arthritis: cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (Coxib) alone and combination therapy with a nonselective NSAID and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (NSAID+PPI). METHODS: We performed a systematic review to identify trials comparing either a Coxib versus NSAID or NSAID+PPI versus NSAID in chronic arthritis. We selected studies that report incident dyspepsia, defined a priori as "epigastric pain," "dyspepsia," and "nausea." We then performed meta-analysis to compare the relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction of dyspepsia for Coxib versus NSAID and NSAID+PPI versus NSAID. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 26 studies comparing dyspepsia between Coxibs and NSAIDs revealed a 12% relative risk reduction for Coxibs with an absolute risk reduction of 3.7%. Meta-analysis of four studies comparing dyspepsia between the NSAID+PPI combination and NSAIDs alone revealed a 66% relative risk reduction for NSAID+PPI with an absolute risk reduction of 9%. Compared with the NSAID strategy, the number needed to treat to prevent dyspepsia was 27 for Coxibs and 11 for NSAID+PPI. CONCLUSION: NSAID+PPI affords greater risk reduction for dyspepsia than Coxibs when compared with the common baseline of NSAIDs. Because there are limited head-to-head data comparing Coxibs versus NSAID+PPI, these data provide the best indirect evidence that NSAID+PPI may be superior to Coxibs in minimizing incident dyspepsia.

Treatment of watermelon stomach.

Watermelon stomach (WMS), or gastric antral vascular ectasia, is an uncommon but clinically important cause of chronic occult or overt gastrointestinal (GI) blood loss. Patients typically present with symptomatic anemia and hemoccult positive stools. Although the diagnosis is based primarily on the typical endoscopic appearance, the lesion may be overlooked on initial evaluation or interpreted as "gastritis." Gastric biopsy may be helpful in confirming the diagnosis by showing vascular ectasia, typically without inflammation. WMS is idiopathic but is often associated with autoimmune diseases or cirrhosis of the liver. The majority of patients with classic WMS are elderly and female. In contrast, there is no gender predominance with the diffuse pattern associated with cirrhosis. General supportive care includes transfusion of blood products as necessary to control symptomatic anemia and coagulopathy, iron replacement therapy by oral or parenteral routes, identification and treatment of iatrogenic (eg, warfarin) or hereditary (eg, von Willebrand's disease) coagulopathy, and avoidance of substances that might cause gastric mucosal damage and/or bleeding (eg, aspirin, NSAIDs, alcohol). The goals of therapy are to eliminate or decrease the need for blood transfusions, hospitalization, office visits, and endoscopic therapy sessions aimed at cessation of GI blood loss and resolution of symptomatic anemia. Multipolar electrocoagulation is our preferred technique for endoscopic ablation of WMS. A 10-Fr probe (3.2 mm in diameter) is used at a generator setting of 12 to 16 W. Pulse duration can be as short as 1 to 2 seconds if a pinpoint coagulation technique is used, or continuous if a paint-stroke technique is used to coagulate all vascular stripes in the classic WMS pattern or as many small lesions as possible in the diffuse type. Other techniques we currently use are argon plasma coagulation (APC) or heater probe. In the past, lasers (neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet , KTP, or argon) were successfully used for such treatments. An initial treatment interval of 4 to 8 weeks should allow for interim healing of iatrogenic ulcers. Patients are routinely given standard doses of available proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) to facilitate healing of iatrogenic ulcers and to prevent secondary bleeding. The treatment interval can be gradually lengthened as the long-term goals of obliteration of angiomata and resolution of anemia are reached. Side effects may include iatrogenic ulceration at the site of treatment, bleeding, and transient abdominal pain. Antral scarring (after APC or Nd:YAG laser) and hyperplastic polyps have also been reported after endoscopic treatment of classic WMS. Surgical antrectomy is very effective in the prevention of bleeding but has substantial (5% to 10%) mortality in older patients with comorbidity and is now reserved for endoscopic failures.

Sensitivity and inter-observer variability for capsule endoscopy image analysis in a cohort of novice readers.

AIM: To determine the performance of novice readers (4th year medical students) for detecting capsule endoscopy findings. METHODS: Ten capsule endoscopy cases of small bowel lesions were administered to the readers. Gold standard findings were pre-defined by gastroenterologists. Ten gold standard "targets" were identified among the 10 cases. Readers were given a 30-min overview of Rapid Reader software and instructed to mark any potential areas of abnormalities. A software program was developed using SAS to analyze the thumbnailed findings. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity for detecting the gold standard findings was 80%. As a group, at least 5 out of 10 readers detected each gold standard finding per recording. All the gold standard targets were identified when the readers' results were combined. Incidental finding/false positive rate ranged between 8.2-59.8 per reader. CONCLUSION: A panel of medical students with minimal endoscopic experience can achieve high sensitivity in detecting lesions on capsule endoscopy. A group of novice readers can pre-screen recordings to thumbnail potential areas of small bowel lesions for further review. These thumbnails must be reviewed to determine the clinical relevance. Further studies are ongoing to assess other cohorts.

Is a negative colonoscopy associated with reassurance or improved health-related quality of life in irritable bowel syndrome?

BACKGROUND: Although colonoscopy is rarely of clinical use in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), it is, nonetheless, frequently performed in IBS. Proponents contend that a normal colonoscopy provides reassurance and improves health-related quality of life (HRQOL). However, no previous data have measured these effects. We sought to measure the association of a normal colonoscopy with reassurance and HRQOL in patients with IBS aged <50 years. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 458 patients with IBS, aged 18 to 49 years. Subjects completed a symptom questionnaire, the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) psychometric checklist, and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey. The main outcomes were HRQOL as measured by the mental component score (MCS) and the physical component score (PCS) of the SF-36 and reassurance as operationalized by a negative response to the question: "Do you think there is something seriously wrong with your body?" The independent variable was presence or absence of a previous normal colonoscopy. We performed regression analysis to control for potential confounders, including timing of colonoscopy. RESULTS: The unadjusted mean SF-36 PCS was 42 +/- 10 (0-100 scale: 0, worst) in patients with recent colonoscopy (<12 months), 45 +/- 11 in patients with distant colonoscopy (>12 months), and 45 +/- 10 in patients without colonoscopy (p = 0.78). The mean SF-36 MCS in the 3 groups were 42 +/- 13, 44 +/- 11, and 43 +/- 11 (p = 0.57). Colonoscopy did not impact the proportion reassured (69.3%, 67.2%, 66.6%; p = 0.85). There were no significant differences between groups for any outcomes when adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: We found no independent association between a negative colonoscopy and reassurance or improved HRQOL in IBS patients aged <50 years. These results suggest that the role of colonoscopy in IBS may be limited but require confirmation in prospective trials.

Impact of chronic viral hepatitis on health-related quality of life in HIV: results from a nationally representative sample.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the health burden of chronic viral hepatitis in HIV-infected patients. We compared health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) or HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection to those with HIV monoinfection. METHODS: Using a nationally representative sample of 1,874 adults with HIV who completed a baseline and two follow-up interviews, we identified those with HIV monoinfection (n = 1,493), HIV-HCV coinfection (n = 279), and HIV-HBV coinfection (n = 122). We measured baseline and change over time scores for physical and mental health (PHS, MHS), overall quality of life (QOL), overall health, and disability days. To identify the independent effect of coinfection, we adjusted for demographic and clinical predictors of HRQOL using multivariable regression. RESULTS: Despite significant differences in socio-demographic characteristics between groups, there were no differences in the baseline scores for PHS, MHS, overall QOL, overall health, or disability days between groups. The HRQOL did not decline significantly over time for the HIV patients with or without HCV or HBV coinfection. All groups reported similar longitudinal changes in the HRQOL scores for all measures. CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant differences in disease burden as assessed by a generic HRQOL instrument between patients with HIV monoinfection and HIV-HCV or HIV-HBV coinfection. These data are relevant in counseling coinfected patients regarding the impact of coinfection on HRQOL, and are important in designing clinical trials and conducting cost-effectiveness analyses including this vulnerable cohort.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus and HCV seropositive status after renal transplantation: meta-analysis of clinical studies.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has a detrimental role on patient and graft survival after renal transplantation (RT). Some studies have also implicated HCV in the development of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). We conducted a systematic review of the published medical literature of the relationship between anti-HCV seropositive status and DM after RT. The risk of DM occurrence in anti-HCV-positive and -negative patients after RT was regarded as the most reliable outcome end-point. We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to generate a summary estimate of the Odds Ratio (OD) of new onset DM in HCV-positive and -negative patients after kidney transplantation. Ten studies involving 2502 unique RT recipients were identified. The incidence of PTDM after RT ranged between 7.9% and 50%. The summary estimate for adjusted OR was 3.97 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.83-8.61 (p-value for homogeneity <0.0473). Thus, pooling of study results demonstrated the presence of a significant link between anti-HCV seropositive status and DM after RT. This relationship provides one potential explanation for the adverse effects of HCV on patient and graft survival after RT.