Histological and immunohistochemical outcomes after microdissection TESE in contrast with hormonal profile, testis volume and genetics in patients with azoospermia.

A limited number of individuals with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) may recover spermatozoa through traditional testicular sperm extraction (TESE) techniques. There is an ongoing debate over the effectiveness of microdissection TESE compared to standard TESE methods. Microdissection TESE (micro-TESE) techniques enable the identification of spermatogenesis foci in non-obstructive forms of azoospermia. Only histological examination can provide an objective and definitive assessment of the testicular phenotype. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between histopathological findings after microdissection TESE (micro-TESE) and the predictive role of various factors in determining the success of sperm retrieval. We evaluated 24 patients with azoospermia who underwent micro-TESE and considered the patient's hormonal profile, testis ultrasound, genetic evaluation, histology, and immunohistology (PLAP antibody) of collected testis biopsies. The preoperative blood FSH level, in conjunction with other parameters, may aid in the prediction of micro-TESE success. Sensitivity increases, and specificity decreases with higher FSH levels. Furthermore, testicular volume and FSH levels are typically normal in patients with maturation arrest. In conclusion, hormones, ultrasound evaluation of the testicles, testis volume, and available genetic tests have a predictive value in differentiating obstructive azoospermia (OA) from NOA with various sensitivity and specificity rates. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation establishes the testicular phenotype accurately and guides patient management.

The Correlations of Clinical and Biochemical Indices of Vitamin D with Erectile Dysfunction.

Erectile dysfunction is a multifactorial disease; it has been demonstrated that endothelial dysfunction plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of this disease, and Vitamin D deficiency is considered to favor endothelial lesions. Our study, based on a group of 58 patients who have erectile dysfunction and a control group of 26 healthy subjects, tends to confirm that low levels of vitamin D could potentiate the severity of erectile dysfunction, promoting endothelial dysfunction. Statistical analysis using the Pearson's correlation criteria showed a robust and significant correlation between vitamin D levels and erectile dysfunction severity (ρ=0.752, p<0.000) according to the SHIM (Sexual Health Inventory For Men) questionnaire. Also, in patients with erectile dysfunction, there is a strong association between vitamin D and testosterone levels (ρ=0.728, p<0.000). At the same time, a negative correlation between vitamin D and BMI (ρ=-0.517, p<0.000); cholesterol (ρ=-0.560, p<0.001), and triglycerides(ρ=-0.529, p<0.005) was observed. Also, a moderate correlation between erectile dysfunction severity degree and testosterone levels (ρ=0.544) was also detected, and the same severity parameter of erectile dysfunction correlates negatively with cholesterol levels (ρ=-0.534). In its turn, the testosterone level correlates negatively with other biochemical indices: cholesterol (ρ=-0.694) and triglycerides (ρ=-0.670). Vitamin D level reduction, concomitantly with decreased testosterone and increased cholesterol, contributes to the development and maintenance of erectile dysfunction, more probably through endothelial mechanisms. The assessment of vitamin D values can be used as an independent marker in erectile dysfunction assessment. Thus, one of the diagnostic tests recommended for erectile dysfunction should be the determination of the vitamin D serum level.