Comparison between transradial and transfemoral mechanical thrombectomy for ICA and M1 occlusions: insights from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR).

BACKGROUND: The role for the transradial approach for mechanical thrombectomy is controversial. We sought to compare transradial and transfemoral mechanical thrombectomy in a large multicenter database of acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: The prospectively maintained Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) was reviewed for patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for an internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess outcomes including reperfusion time, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), distal embolization, and functional outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 2258 cases, 1976 via the transfemoral approach and 282 via the transradial approach, were included. Radial access was associated with shorter reperfusion time (34.1 min vs 43.6 min, P=0.001) with similar rates of Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2B or greater reperfusion (87.9% vs 88.1%, P=0.246). Patients treated via a transradial approach were more likely to achieve at least TICI 2C (59.6% vs 54.7%, P=0.001) and TICI 3 reperfusion (50.0% vs 46.2%, P=0.001), and had shorter lengths of stay (mean 9.2 days vs 10.2, P<0.001). Patients treated transradially had a lower rate of symptomatic ICH (8.0% vs 9.4%, P=0.047) but a higher rate of distal embolization (23.0% vs 7.1%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in functional outcome at 90 days between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Radial and femoral thrombectomy resulted in similar clinical outcomes. In multivariate analysis, the radial approach had improved revascularization rates, fewer cases of symptomatic ICH, and faster reperfusion times, but higher rates of distal emboli. Further studies on the optimal approach are necessary based on patient and disease characteristics.

Managing Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) for Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery: A Pilot Survey.

Introduction: Patients affected by autoimmune pathologies such as rheumatoid arthritis require surgery for various reasons. However, the systemic inflammatory nature of these disease processes often necessitates therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Alteration of these agents in the perioperative period for surgery requires a careful risk-benefit analysis to limit disease flares, infection rates, and secondary revisions. We therefore queried North and South American practices for perioperative management of DMARDs in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. Methods: An institutional review board-approved pilot survey was disseminated to spine surgeons regarding how they managed DMARDs before, during, and after spine surgery. Results: A total of 47 spine surgeons responded to the survey, 37 of whom were neurosurgeons (78.7%) and 10 orthopedic surgeons (21.3%). Of the respondents, 80.9% were from North America, 72.3% were board-certified, 51.1% practiced in academic institutions, and 66.0% performed 50-150 spine surgeries per year. Most respondents consulted a rheumatologist before continuing or withholding a DMARD in the perioperative period (70.2%). As such, a majority of the spine surgeons in this survey withheld DMARDs at an average of 13.8 days before and 19.6 days after spine surgery. Of the spine surgeons who withheld DMARDs before and after spine surgery, the responses were variable with a trend toward no increased risk of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Based on the results of this pilot survey, we found a consensus among spine surgeons to withhold DMARDs before and after elective spine surgery.

Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Ligamentous Injury in Cervical Spine Trauma: A 2-Year Consecutive Case Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used as an adjunct to spinal soft tissue evaluation in cervical spine (C-spine) trauma; however, the utility of this information remains controversial. In this consecutive observational study, we reviewed the utility of MRI in patients with C-spine trauma. METHODS: We identified patients in real time over a 2-year period as they presented to our level 1 trauma center for C-spine computed tomography (CT) scan followed by MRI. MRI was obtained by the trauma team prior to the spine service consultation if (1) they were unable to clear the C-spine according to protocol or (2) if the on-call radiologist reported a concern for ligamentous integrity from the CT findings. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients, including 19 males (58%) and 14 females, with a mean age of 54 years, were referred to the spine service for concerns of ligamentous instability. The most common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle accidents (n = 13) and falls (n = 11). MRI demonstrated ligamentous signal change identified by the radiologist as potentially unstable in all patients. Fifteen patients (45%) had multiple C-spine ligaments affected. The interspinous ligament was involved most frequently (28%), followed by the ligamentum flavum (21%) and supraspinous ligament (15%). All patients underwent dynamic upright C-spine X-rays that were interpreted by both the ordering surgeon and radiologist. There was no evidence of instability in any patient; concurrence between X-ray interpretation was 100%. The cervical collar was successfully removed in all cases. No patients required late surgical intervention, and there were no return visits to the emergency department of a spinal nature. CONCLUSIONS: MRI signal change within the ligaments of the C-spine should be interpreted with caution in the setting of trauma. To physicians less familiar with spinal biomechanics, MRI findings may be perceived in an inadvertently alarming manner. Bony alignment and, when indicated, dynamic upright X-rays remain the gold standard for evaluating the ligamentous integrity of the C-spine.

Outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients with extreme large infarction core.

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and large infarction core may still benefit from mechanical thrombectomy (MT). In this study, we evaluate outcomes of MT in LVO patients presenting with extremely large infarction core Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS 0-2). METHODS: Data from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) was interrogated. We identified thrombectomy patients presenting with an occlusion in the intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) or M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery and extremely large infarction core (ASPECTS 0-2). A favorable outcome was defined by achieving a modified Rankin scale of 0-3 at 90 days post-MT. Successful recanalization was defined by achieving a modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) score ≥2B. RESULTS: We identified 58 patients who presented with ASPECTS 0-2 and underwent MT . Median age was 70.0 (59.0-78.0) years, 45.1% were females, and 202 (36.3%) patients received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. There was no difference regarding the location of the occlusion (p=0.57). Aspiration thrombectomy was performed in 268 (54.6%) patients and stent retriever was used in 70 (14.3%) patients. In patients presenting with ASPECTS 0-2 the mortality rate was 4.5%, 27.9% had mRS 0-3 at day 90, 66.67% ≥70 years of age had mRS of 5-6 at day 90. On multivariable analysis, age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission, and successful recanalization (mTICI ≥2B) were independently associated with favorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This multicentered, retrospective cohort study suggests that MT may be beneficial in a select group of patients with ASPECTS 0-2.

Comparison of balloon guide catheter versus non-balloon guide catheter for mechanical thrombectomy in patients with distal medium vessel occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have established the safety and efficacy of balloon guide catheters (BGCs) for large vessel occlusions. However, the utility of BGCs remains largely unexplored for distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs). In this study, we aim to compare the outcomes of BGC vs. Non-BGC in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for DMVO. METHOD: This retrospective study from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) encompassed adult patients with acute anterior cerebral artery, posterior cerebral artery, and middle cerebral artery-M2-3-4 occlusions. Procedure times, safety, recanalization, and neurological outcomes were compared between the two groups, with subgroup analysis based on first-line thrombectomy techniques. RESULTS: A total of 1508 patients were included, with 231 patients (15.3%) in the BGC group and 1277 patients (84.7%) in the non-BGC group. The BGC group had a lower modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥2C (43.2% vs 52.7%, P=0.01), longer time from puncture to intracranial access (15 vs 8 min, P<0.01), and from puncture to final recanalization (97 vs 34 min, P<0.01). In the Solumbra subgroup, the first pass effect (FPE) rate was lower in the BGC group (17.4% vs 30.7%, P=0.03). Regarding clinical outcomes, the BGC group had a lower rate of distal embolization (8.8% vs 14.9%, P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Our study found that use of BGC in patients with DMVO was associated with lower mTICI scores, decreased FPE rates, reduced distal embolization, and longer procedure times.

Mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of primary and secondary anterior cerebral artery occlusions: insights from STAR.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for the treatment of acute anterior cerebral artery (ACA) occlusions have not clearly been delineated. Outcomes may be impacted based on whether the occlusion is isolated to the ACA (primary ACA occlusion) or occurs in conjunction with other cerebral arteries (secondary). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the multicenter Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm (STAR) database. All patients with MT-treated primary or secondary ACA occlusions were included. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, complications, and clinical outcomes were collected. Primary and secondary ACA occlusions were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Willis test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 238 patients with ACA occlusions (49.2% female, median (SD) age 65.6 (16.7) years). The overall rate of successful recanalization was 75%, 90-day good functional outcome was 23%, and 90-day mortality was 35%. There were 44 patients with a primary ACA occlusion and 194 patients with a secondary ACA occlusion. When adjusted for baseline variables, the rates of successful recanalization (68% vs 76%, P=0.27), 90-day good functional outcome (41% vs 19%, P=0.38), and mortality at 90 days (25% vs 38%, P=0.12) did not differ between primary and secondary ACA occlusion groups. CONCLUSION: Clinical and procedural outcomes are similar between MT-treated primary and secondary ACA occlusions for select patients. Our findings demonstrate the need for established criteria to determine ideal patient and ACA stroke characteristics amenable to MT treatment.

Comprehensive analysis of the impact of procedure time and the 'golden hour' in subpopulations of stroke thrombectomy patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of procedure time on thrombectomy outcomes in different subpopulations of patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), given the recently expanded indications for EVT. METHODS: This multicenter study included patients undergoing EVT for acute ischemic stroke at 35 centers globally. Procedure time was defined as time from groin puncture to successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b) or abortion of procedure. Patients were stratified based on stroke location, use of IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score, age group, and onset-to-groin time. Primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, with scores 0-2 designating good outcome. Secondary outcome was postprocedural symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Multivariate analyses were performed using generalized linear models to study the impact of procedure time on outcomes in each subpopulation. RESULTS: Among 8961 patients included in the study, a longer procedure time was associated with higher odds of poor outcome (mRS score 3-6), with 10% increase in odds for each 10 min increment. When procedure time exceeded the 'golden hour', poor outcome was twice as likely. The golden hour effect was consistent in patients with anterior and posterior circulation strokes, proximal or distal occlusions, in patients with large core infarcts, with or without IV tPA treatment, and across age groups. Procedures exceeding 1 hour were associated with a 40% higher sICH rate. Posterior circulation strokes, delayed presentation, and old age were the variables most sensitive to procedure time. CONCLUSIONS: In this work we demonstrate the universality of the golden hour effect, in which procedures lasting more than 1 hour are associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher rates of sICH across different subpopulations of patients undergoing EVT.

Outcomes following therapeutic intervention of post-traumatic vasospasm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vasospasm occurrence following traumatic brain injury may impact neurologic and functional recovery of patients, yet treatment of post-traumatic vasospasm (PTV) has not been well documented. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the current evidence regarding favorable outcome as measured by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores following treatment of PTV. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid EMBASE was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included manuscripts were methodically scrutinized for quality; occurrence of PTV; rate of favorable outcome following each treatment modality; and follow-up duration. Treatments evaluated were calcium channel blockers (CCBs), endovascular intervention, and dopamine-induced hypertension. Outcomes were compared via the random-effects analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with 1885 PTV patients were quantitatively analyzed: 982 patients who received tailored therapeutic intervention and 903 patients who did not receive tailored therapy. For patients undergoing treatment, the rate of favorable outcome was 57.3 % (500/872 patients; 95 % CI 54.1 - 60.6 %) following administration of CCBs, 94.1 % (16/17 patients; 95 % CI 82.9 - 100.0 %) following endovascular intervention, and 54.8 % (51/93 patients; 95 % CI 44.7 - 65.0 %) following dopamine-induced hypertension. Of note, the endovascular group had the highest rate of favorable outcome but was also the smallest sample size (n = 17). Patients who received tailored therapeutic intervention for PTV had a higher rate of favorable outcome than patients who did not receive tailored therapy: 57.7 % (567/982 patients; 95 % CI 54.1 - 60.8 %) versus 52.0 % (470/903 patients; 95 % CI 48.8 - 55.3 %), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The available data suggests that tailored therapeutic intervention of PTV results in a favorable outcome. While endovascular intervention of PTV had the highest rate of favorable outcome, both CCB administration and dopamine-induced hypertension had similar lower rates of favorable outcome.

Predictors of revision surgery after bedside subdural drain placement for chronic subdural hematomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: For chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH), bedside subdural drains (SDD) provide a useful alternative to more invasive neurosurgical techniques, including evacuation through multiple burr holes or formal craniotomy. However, no scale currently exists adequately predicting SDD candidacy or treatment response. The present study sought to characterize predictors of revision surgery after initial treatment with bedside SDD for cSDH. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case control study of cSDH patients treated with bedside SDD at a level one trauma center between 2018 and 2022. Binomial regression was used to compare SDD patients and generate odds ratios associated with revision surgery, which were compared using a binary random effects model. RESULTS: Ninety six cSDH patients were included, of whom 13 (13.5%) required a revision surgery after initial treatment failure with bedside SDD. Patients requiring revision surgery demonstrated an increased male predominance (84.6% vs. 69.9% of SDD patients not requiring revision surgery), tended to be younger (67.8 vs. 70.5 years) with a greater body mass index (28.7 vs. 25.6 kg/m2), and have a lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on presentation of 12.5 (versus 14). Patients with an initial GCS score less than 13 (OR 11.0 95% CI 2.8 - 43.3), midline shift greater than 10 mm on CT (OR 6.5 95% CI 1.7 - 25.7), or duration of SDD placement longer than 3 days (OR 10.5 95% CI 2.6 - 41.9) demonstrated a greater likelihood of needing a revision surgery after initial treatment with bedside SDD. CONCLUSION: Among patients treated with SDD, we identified 3 independent factors predicting the need for revision surgery: GCS score, midline shift, and duration of drain placement. Craniotomy may be favored over bedside SDD in patients presenting with a GCS score less than 13 or midline shift greater than 10 mm and for SDD patients demonstrating inadequate clinical response after 3 days.

Effect of intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular therapy on outcomes in patients with large core infarct.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of bridging therapy with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with large core infarct has not been sufficiently studied. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety outcomes between patients who received IVT+MT and those treated with MT alone. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the Stroke Thrombectomy Aneurysm Registry (STAR). Patients with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≤5 treated with MT were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups based on pre-treatment IVT (IVT, no IVT). Propensity score matched analysis were used to compare outcomes between groups. RESULTS: A total of 398 patients were included; 113 pairs were generated using propensity score matching analyses. Baseline characteristics were well balanced in the matched cohort. The rate of any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) was similar between groups in both the full cohort (41.4% vs 42.3%, P=0.85) and matched cohort (38.55% vs 42.1%, P=0.593). Similarly, the rate of significant ICH was similar between the groups (full cohort: 13.1% vs 16.9%, P=0.306; matched cohort: 15.6% vs 18.95, P=0.52). There was no difference in favorable outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale 0-2) or successful reperfusion between groups. In an adjusted analysis, IVT was not associated with any of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment IVT was not associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage in patients with large core infarct treated with MT. Future studies are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of bridging therapy in patients with large core infarct.