Incidence and Risk Factors Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease After Liver Transplantation: A Review of a 20-Year Experience at a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the major complications after liver transplantation (LT), with a significant impact on patient outcomes. This study aims to investigate the incidence and risk factors of CKD in LT recipients at Siriraj Hospital over the past 20 years. METHODS: There were 366 adult patients undergoing LT at Siriraj Hospital between January 2002 and December 2021. After excluding patients with pretransplant CKD stages 4 to 5, simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation, and patients who died after LT within 90 days, we retrospectively reviewed a total of 288 patients. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors of post-transplant CKD. RESULTS: Of the 288 patients, 171 (59.4%) developed CKD after LT. The median time to develop CKD was 5.8 months (IQR, 3.8-15.3). Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that age ≥55 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.44; 95% CI, 1.34-4.42; P = .003), pretransplant kidney dysfunction defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR = 2.23; 95% CI, 1.16-4.27; P = .016), and postoperative acute kidney injury (OR = 3.06; 95% CI, 1.73-5.42; P < .001) were significantly associated with post-transplant CKD. Patients with preexisting kidney dysfunction who received delayed calcineurin inhibitor introduction without antibody induction protocol had a significantly lower incidence of post-transplant CKD (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.70; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age, pre-transplant kidney dysfunction, and postoperative acute kidney injury are risk factors for CKD after LT. Importantly, delayed calcineurin inhibitor introduction can protect patients with pretransplant kidney dysfunction from developing post-transplant CKD. These results may have important clinical implications in reducing the incidence of CKD after LT.

MR imaging biomarkers in HCC: outcomes correlation in liver transplant listed patients.

PURPOSE: To determine hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers that enable the prediction of delisting from tumor progression versus successful transplantation in patients listed for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). METHODS: With IRB approval and HIPPA compliance, patients with HCC awaiting OLT who were delisted due to HCC progression from 2006 to 2015 were identified. Patients with adequate MR images for review were subsequently matched with a cohort of patients successfully bridged to OLT in the same time period. Matching considered the tumor stage and the dominant treatment strategy adopted to bridge the patient to OLT. Potential MRI features were evaluated by univariable and multivariable analysis using a conditional logistic model. RESULTS: There were 53 patients included in each cohort. On uni-variable analysis, significant unfavorable MR imaging features included T2 hyperintensity (odds ratio [OR], 19.0), infiltrative border (OR, 7.50), lobulated shape (OR, 4.5), T1 hypointensity (OR, 3.0), heterogeneous arterial enhancement (OR, 7.0), and corona venous enhancement (OR, 4.0). A significant favorable MR imaging feature was the presence of intralesional fat (OR = .36). The best multivariable logistic prediction model derived from the above notable features included only T1 and T2 signal intensity, border definition, and absence of intra-lesional fat as significant variables, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of .86 in the prediction of delisting. CONCLUSION: Select MR imaging features of HCC at presentation before any treatment are significantly associated with the risk of tumor progression regardless of tumor stage and treatment strategy in patients awaiting liver transplantation.

Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a single center propensity-score-matching comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival.

BACKGROUND: Although the benefits of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in most circumstances are evident, the benefits for large HCC are contentious. This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes and survival after LH versus open hepatectomy (OH) in large HCC patients. METHODS: An analysis of prospectively maintained database included 215 hepatectomies for large HCC (diameter ≥ 5 cm). The operative and survival outcomes were compared between the LH group (n = 109) and the OH group (n = 106). Propensity score matching (PSM) 1:1 included 70 patients in each group. The entire cohort multivariable analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with surgical complications and suboptimal recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: After PSM, baseline characteristics and the extent of liver resection were similar in both groups. The LH group had a shorter hospital stay than the OH group (7 vs 9.5 days, p = 0.001). The R0 resection rate, complication rate, overall survival, and RFS were similar between the groups. The multivariate analyses revealed two independent factors predicting surgical complication (major resection; p < 0.001 and large volume blood loss; p = 0.042), and 3 independent factors predicting suboptimal RFS including R1 resection (p = 0.011), multifocal HCC (p = 0.005), and microvascular invasion (p = 0.001). LH was not associated with surgical complication and suboptimal RFS. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the benefits of LH by improving the perioperative outcomes, without long-term survival inferiority in selected large HCC patients compared with conventional OH. LH can be an attractive option for large HCC treatment.

Delayed Calcineurin Inhibitor Introduction Without Antibody Induction in Liver Transplantation Is Safe and Helps Preserve Kidney Function.

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common after liver transplantation and affects outcome after liver transplantation. Antibody induction is commonly used to reduce dose and/or to delay introduction of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) but is very expensive. We propose a modified immunosuppressive protocol that delays administration of CNI for 48 to 72 hours without antibody induction. This study evaluates the results of our new protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed. Study patients had induction with steroid and mycophenolate mofetil without antibody induction, and CNI administration was delayed for 48 to 72 hours. Control patients received CNI and steroid induction without antibody induction, and CNI was continued posttransplant. AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level of at least 1.5 times the pretransplant baseline within the first postoperative week. RESULTS: Sixty liver transplant recipients from 2013 to 2015 were included in this study (30 in the delayed CNI group and 30 in the control group). The patient characteristics and intraoperative factors were comparable in both groups. AKI developed in 11 patients in the study group and in 20 patients in the control group (37% vs 66.7%; P = .02). There was no acute rejection observed in the first month in either group. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that delayed CNI introduction without antibody induction is safe and helps preserve kidney function. Antibody induction can be omitted safely in a delayed CNI introduction protocol to reduce the cost of liver transplantation without increasing the risk of acute rejection.

Laparoscopic versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients: A Single-Institutional Propensity Score Matching Comparison.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in elderly patients is increasing worldwide. Although open hepatectomy (OH) yields acceptable outcomes, high morbidity rate is concerned. Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) has evolved to improve perioperative outcomes. However, comparative study between both techniques for elderly patients with HCC is scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare outcomes between LH and OH specifically. METHODS: HCC patients aged ≥70 years after hepatectomy (2003-2018) were included. The propensity score matching (PSM) and comparative analyses between groups were performed. RESULTS: After PSM, there were 41 patients in each group with similar demographics, radiographic tumor characteristics, cirrhotic status, and extent of resection. The LH group had a shorter hospital stay (7 vs. 11 days, p = 0.002) compared with the OH group. The completeness of resection and complication rates were not statistically different between groups. The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were 86.7 and 43.4% in the LH group and 62.2 and 30.8% in the OH group (p = 0.221 and 0.500). CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed the operative and oncological safety of LH in elderly HCC patients with improved perioperative outcomes compared with OH.

Ileostomy After Intestinal Transplantation: The First in Depth Report on Techniques, Complications, and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Temporary ileostomy during intestinal transplantation (ITx) is the standard technique for allograft monitoring. A detailed analysis of the ITx ileostomy has never been reported. METHODS: A retrospective review of a single-center ITx database was performed. The analysis was divided into ileostomy formation and takedown episodes. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five grafts underwent ileostomy formation, and 79 underwent ileostomy takedown. Median age at ITx was 7.7 years and weight was 23 kg. Allograft types were intestine (22%), liver/intestine (55%), multivisceral (16%), and modified multivisceral (7%). Sixty-four percent had 1-stage ITx, whereas 36% required 2-staged ITx. Final ileostomy types were end (20%), loop (10%), distal blowhole (59%), and proximal blowhole (11%). Ileostomy formation: Thirty-one grafts had complications (23%), including prolapse (26%), ischemia (16%), and parastomal hernia (19%). Twelve required surgical revision. There were no significant differences in graft type, ileostomy type, survival, and ileostomy takedown rate between grafts with and without complications. Colon inclusive grafts had higher complication rates (P = 0.002). Ileostomy takedown: Ileostomy takedown occurred at a median of 422 days post-ITx. Twenty-five complications occurred after 22 takedowns (28%), including small bowel obstruction (27%) and abscess (18%). Fifteen grafts required surgical correction. Recipients with complications had longer hospital stay (17 versus 9 d; P = 0.001) than those without complications. Graft type, ileostomy type, and survival were not different. CONCLUSIONS: The first of its kind analysis of the surgical ileostomy after ITx reveals that most recipients can undergo successful ileostomy formation/takedown, complication rates are significant but within an acceptable range, and complications do not affect survival. This study demonstrates that the routine use of transplant ostomies remains an acceptable practice after ITx. However, true analysis of risk and benefit will require a randomized control trial.

Charting the Path Forward for Risk Prediction in Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: International Validation of HALTHCC Among 4,089 Patients.

Prognosticating outcomes in liver transplant (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continues to challenge the field. Although Milan Criteria (MC) generalized the practice of LT for HCC and improved outcomes, its predictive character has degraded with increasing candidate and oncological heterogeneity. We sought to validate and recalibrate a previously developed, preoperatively calculated, continuous risk score, the Hazard Associated with Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HALTHCC), in an international cohort. From 2002 to 2014, 4,089 patients (both MC in and out [25.2%]) across 16 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia were included. A continuous risk score using pre-LT levels of alpha-fetoprotein, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium score, and tumor burden score was recalibrated among a randomly selected cohort (n = 1,021) and validated in the remainder (n = 3,068). This study demonstrated significant heterogeneity by site and year, reflecting practice trends over the last decade. On explant pathology, both vascular invasion (VI) and poorly differentiated component (PDC) increased with increasing HALTHCC score. The lowest-risk patients (HALTHCC 0-5) had lower rates of VI and PDC than the highest-risk patients (HALTHCC > 35) (VI, 7.7%[ 1.2-14.2] vs. 70.6% [48.3-92.9] and PDC:4.6% [0.1%-9.8%] vs. 47.1% [22.6-71.5]; P < 0.0001 for both). This trend was robust to MC status. This international study was used to adjust the coefficients in the HALTHCC score. Before recalibration, HALTHCC had the greatest discriminatory ability for overall survival (OS; C-index = 0.61) compared to all previously reported scores. Following recalibration, the prognostic utility increased for both recurrence (C-index = 0.71) and OS (C-index = 0.63). Conclusion: This large international trial validated and refined the role for the continuous risk metric, HALTHCC, in establishing pre-LT risk among candidates with HCC worldwide. Prospective trials introducing HALTHCC into clinical practice are warranted.

Role of stratifin (14-3-3 sigma) in adenocarcinoma of gallbladder: A novel prognostic biomarker.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare and fatal biliary tract malignancy. Genetic derangements are one of many factors that determine the prognosis of GBC. In this study, the expression of the stratifin (SFN) gene encoding 14-3-3 sigma protein, which is reported to be associated with the metastatic property of cholangiocarcinoma cells, was investigated in GBC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cancer (n = 37) and non-cancer control tissues (n = 14) of gallbladders from patients who underwent surgical resection from January 2006 to May 2015 were retrieved. The expression of SFN normalized with that of ACTB was determined using RT-qPCR. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) including the type of SFN expression was performed. RESULT: The average expression level of SFN in cancer was higher than that in control tissues (p = 0.002). The relative SFN expression in cancer tissue was classified as overexpression (n = 14) and control level expression (n = 23) according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for discriminating early GBC recurrence or metastasis after surgery. The SFN overexpression group was associated with lower rates of distant metastasis and early tumor recurrence following resection. The univariate analysis demonstrated factors affecting DFS, including resection margin (p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.040), perineural invasion (p = 0.046), and SFN expression (p < 0.001). The multivariate analysis revealed that the resection margin (p = 0.019) and SFN expression (P = 0.040) were independent prognostic factors of DFS. CONCLUSION: To achieve the longest survival, margin-free resection is recommended. The overexpression of SFN in GBC is associated with better prognosis, lower rates of early cancer recurrence, and distant metastasis following resection. SFN expression might be a novel prognostic biomarker in GBC treatment. Further studies to elucidate the role of SFN might unveil its clinical benefit in cancer treatment regimens.

Intestinal failure after bariatric surgery: Treatment and outcome at a single-intestinal rehabilitation and transplant center.

BACKGROUND: Though intestinal failure (IF) after bariatric surgery (BS) is uncommon, its prevalence is increasing. However, data on the outcomes for these patients are limited. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the outcomes of treatment for patients with IF after BS. SETTING: University hospital. METHODS: A single-center analysis (1991-2016) of outcomes according to treatment arms established by a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: Twenty-five IF patients were identified (median age 45 yr). BS was 92% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The major cause of IF was volvulus/internal hernia (72%). Median time from BS to IF was 48 months. Treatment arms were intestinal rehabilitation (IR, n = 15), transplantation (TXP, n = 5), and parenteral nutrition (PN, n = 5). For IR, median bowel length was 60 cm. Forty-six percent ultimately discontinued PN. Twenty-seven percent were partially weaned PN and 27% failed IR. Common surgical rehabilitation was Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reversal and restoration of gastrointestinal continuity. The 5-year overall survival was 74%. For TXP, 7 patients were listed for TXP (5 initially and 2 after failed IR). Three underwent TXP, 2 isolated intestine and 1 isolated liver. Three were delisted (1 improvement and 2 death). For PN, 6 patients required long-term PN (5 initially and 1 after failed IR). Four patients are alive currently. CONCLUSIONS: IF after BS is an increasing problem facing IR centers. Internal hernia is the major cause. Surgical IR is the first-line therapy and affords the best outcome. TXP is reserved for rescuing patients who failed IR or develop PN complications. Long-term PN is suitable for patients in whom IR or TXP is impractical.

Evaluation of Early Allograft Function Using the Liver Graft Assessment Following Transplantation Risk Score Model.

Importance: Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) following a liver transplant (LT) unequivocally portends adverse graft and patient outcomes, but a widely accepted classification or grading system is lacking. Objective: To develop a model for individualized risk estimation of graft failure after LT and then compare the model's prognostic performance with the existing binary EAD definition (bilirubin level of ≥10 mg/dL on postoperative day 7, international normalized ratio of ≥1.6 on postoperative day 7, or aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase level of >2000 U/L within the first 7 days) and the Model for Early Allograft Function (MEAF) score. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective single-center analysis used a transplant database to identify all adult patients who underwent a primary LT and had data on 10 days of post-LT laboratory variables at the Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center of the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA between February 1, 2002, and June 30, 2015. Data collection took place from January 4, 2016, to June 30, 2016. Data analysis was conducted from July 1, 2016, to August 30, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Three-month graft failure-free survival. Results: Of 2021 patients who underwent primary LT over the study period, 2008 (99.4%) had available perioperative data and were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of recipients was 56 (49-62) years, and 1294 recipients (64.4%) were men. Overall survival and graft-failure-free survival rates were 83% and 81% at year 1, 74% and 71% at year 3, and 69% and 65% at year 5, with an 11.1% (222 recipients) incidence of 3-month graft failure or death. Multivariate factors associated with 3-month graft failure-free survival included post-LT aspartate aminotransferase level, international normalized ratio, bilirubin level, and platelet count, measures of which were used to calculate the Liver Graft Assessment Following Transplantation (L-GrAFT) risk score. The L-GrAFT model had an excellent C statistic of 0.85, with a significantly superior discrimination of 3-month graft failure-free survival compared with the existing EAD definition (C statistic, 0.68; P < .001) and the MEAF score (C statistic, 0.70; P < .001). Compared with patients with lower L-GrAFT risk, LT recipients in the highest 10th percentile of L-GrAFT scores had higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (median [IQR], 34 [26-40] vs 31 [25-38]; P = .005); greater need for pretransplant hospitalization (56.8% vs 44.8%; P = .003), renal replacement therapy (42.9% vs 30.5%; P < .001), mechanical ventilation (35.8% vs 18.1%; P < .001), and vasopressors (22.9% vs 11.0%; P < .001); longer cold ischemia times (median [IQR], 436 [311-539] vs 401 [302-506] minutes; P = .04); greater intraoperative blood transfusions (median [IQR], 17 [10-26] vs 10 [6-17] units of packed red blood cells; P < .001); and older donors (median [IQR] age, 47 [28-56] vs 41 [25-52] years; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The L-GrAFT risk score allows a highly accurate, individualized risk estimation of 3-month graft failure following LT that is more accurate than existing EAD and MEAF scores. Multicenter validation may allow for the adoption of the L-GrAFT as a tool for evaluating the need for a retransplant, for establishing standardized grading of early allograft function across transplant centers, and as a highly accurate clinical end point in translational studies aiming to mitigate ischemia or reperfusion injury by modulating donor quality and recipient factors.