Multiplexed suspension array immunoassays for detection of antibodies to pneumococcal polysaccharide and conjugate vaccines.

Combination and polyvalent vaccines not only provide protection against several different pathogens at the same time but can also increase vaccine protection against pathogens that have closely related pathogenic strains or serotypes. Multiplexed serological testing is a preferred method for determining the efficacy of combination and polyvalent vaccines, as it reduces the need for conducting multiple individual assays to confirm immune responses and cross-reactivity, uses less sample, and can be faster, more reliable, and more cost-effective. Bead-based suspension array technologies, such as the Luminex® xMAP® Technology, are often used for development of multiplexed serological assays for various vaccine trials and for routine testing in clinical laboratories to determine immune status of vaccinated individuals. This article reviews publications describing the development and implementation of bead-based multiplexed serological assays for detection of immune responses to polyvalent polysaccharide and conjugate vaccines against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Many of these serological assays on the bead array platform have been further optimized and expanded over time and are still widely used today.

Nucleic acid sample preparation techniques for bead-based suspension arrays.

Multiplexing in biological assays allows the simultaneous detection of multiple analytes in a single reaction, which reduces time, labor, and cost as compared to single reaction-based detection methods. Microsphere- or bead-based suspension array technologies, such as the Luminex® xMAP® system, offer high-throughput detection of nucleic acids through a variety of different assay chemistries. Common with most nucleic acid chemistries, for bead-based or other microarray technologies, is the need for efficient extraction and purification of the nucleic acids from the specimen of interest. Often, the optimal method will be dictated by the requirements of the up-front enzymatic chemistry, such as PCR, primer extension, branched DNA (bDNA), etc. For bead-based microarray platforms, the user must also be cognizant of proteins and other contaminants present in reactions that require heat denaturation, as that can lead to bead aggregation or agglutination, preventing the reading of assay results. This review describes and highlights some of the nucleic acid extraction and purification methods that have been used successfully for bead-based nucleic acid analysis, for both prokaryotic and eucaryotic nucleic acids, from a variety of sample types.

Multiplex Immunoassay Approaches Using Luminex® xMAP® Technology for the Study of COVID-19 Disease.

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has been one of the most severe outbreaks of respiratory illness in history. The clinical symptoms of COVID-19 may be similar to flu, although they can be life-threatening, particularly in the elderly and immunocompromised population. Together with nucleic acid detection, serological testing has been essential for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection but has been critically important for studying the epidemiology, serosurveillance, and for vaccine research and development. Multiplexed immunoassay technologies have a particular advantage as they can simultaneously measure multiple analytes from a single sample. xMAP technology is a multiplex analysis platform that can measure up to 500 analytes at the same time from the same sample. It has been shown to be an important tool for studying immune response to the various SARS-CoV-2 antigens, as well as for measuring host protein biomarker levels as prognostic indicators of COVID-19. In this chapter, we describe several key studies where xMAP technology was used for multiplexed analysis of SARS-COV-2 antibody responses and host protein expression in COVID-19 patients.

Detection of IgG Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and Neutralizing Capabilities Using the Luminex® xMAP® SARS-CoV-2 Multi-Antigen IgG Assay.

Serological assays have been a useful tool for detection of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. These assays are used for epidemiology and serosurveillance to monitor the progression of the pandemic, to identify and differentiate individuals who have developed antibodies from natural infection versus vaccine-induced immunity, and to identify potential donors of convalescent plasma for therapeutic purposes. In this chapter, we describe a commercially available bead-based serological assay, the Luminex® xMAP® SARS-CoV-2 Multi-Antigen IgG Assay, that detects and identifies antibodies against three SARS-CoV-2 antigens. In addition to the assay principle and workflow, we describe modifications that may be used to evaluate alternate sample types, antibody isotypes, and potential neutralizing antibody responses.

Proceedings of the Clinical Microbiology Open 2018 and 2019 - a Discussion about Emerging Trends, Challenges, and the Future of Clinical Microbiology.

Clinical Microbiology Open (CMO), a meeting supported by the American Society for Microbiology's Clinical and Public Health Microbiology Committee (CPHMC) and Corporate Council, provides a unique interactive platform for leaders from diagnostic microbiology laboratories, industry, and federal agencies to discuss the current and future state of the clinical microbiology laboratory. The purpose is to leverage the group's diverse views and expertise to address critical challenges, and discuss potential collaborative opportunities for diagnostic microbiology, through the utilization of varied resources. The first and second CMO meetings were held in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Discussions were focused on the diagnostic potential of innovative technologies and laboratory diagnostic stewardship, including expansion of next-generation sequencing into clinical diagnostics, improvement and advancement of molecular diagnostics, emerging diagnostics, including rapid antimicrobial susceptibility and point of care testing (POCT), harnessing big data through artificial intelligence, and staffing in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Shortly after CMO 2019, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic further highlighted the need for the diagnostic microbiology community to work together to utilize and expand on resources to respond to the pandemic. The issues, challenges, and potential collaborative efforts discussed during the past two CMO meetings proved critical in addressing the COVID-19 response by diagnostic laboratories, industry partners, and federal organizations. Planning for a third CMO (CMO 2022) is underway and will transition from a discussion-based meeting to an action-based meeting. The primary focus will be to reflect on the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and better prepare for future pandemics.

Diagnosis and Management of Bloodstream Infections With Rapid, Multiplexed Molecular Assays.

Bloodstream infection is a major health concern, responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality across the globe. Prompt identification of the responsible pathogen in the early stages of the disease allows clinicians to implement appropriate antibiotic therapy in a timelier manner. Rapid treatment with the correct antibiotic not only improves the chances of patient survival, but also significantly reduces the length of hospital stay and associated healthcare costs. Although culture has been the gold standard and most common method for diagnosis of bloodstream pathogens, it is being enhanced or supplanted with more advanced methods, including molecular tests that can reduce the turnaround time from several days to a few hours. In this article, we describe two rapid, molecular bloodstream infection panels that identify the most common pathogens and associated genetic determinants of antibiotic resistance - the Luminex® VERIGENE® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Test and the VERIGENE® Gram-Negative Blood Culture Test. We conducted a search on PubMed to retrieve articles describing the performance and impact of these tests in the clinical setting. From a total of 48 articles retrieved, we selected 15 for inclusion in this review based on the type and size of the study and so there would be minimum of three articles describing performance and three articles describing the impact post-implementation for each assay. Here we provide a comprehensive review of these publications illustrating the performance and clinical utility of these assays, demonstrating how genotypic tests can benefit diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

The COVID-19 Pandemic - A Diagnostic Industry Perspective.

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about unprecedented changes to all facets of the healthcare system, including the diagnostic industry. The pandemic has highlighted both the challenges and strengths of the industry and has also provided valuable insights on how to be better prepared for future pandemics. In this perspective article, we describe the challenges faced by the diagnostic industry in general, particularly the difficulties encountered by Luminex Corporation, a diagnostic assay development and manufacturing company located in Austin, Texas, USA, as well as the mitigation strategies employed. In addition to discussion of the key challenges, the article provides insights on the lessons learned and steps that can be undertaken to better prepare for future outbreaks.

A Rapid, Multiplex Dual Reporter IgG and IgM SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assay for a Multiplexed Bead-Based Flow Analysis System.

The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the need for rapid high-throughput methods for sensitive and specific serological detection of infection with novel pathogens, such as SARS-CoV-2. Multiplex serological testing can be particularly useful because it can simultaneously analyze antibodies to multiple antigens that optimizes pathogen coverage, and controls for variability in the organism and the individual host response. Here we describe a SARS-CoV-2 IgG 3-plex fluorescent microsphere-based assay that can detect both IgM and IgG antibodies to three major SARS-CoV-2 antigens-the spike (S) protein, spike angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor-binding domain (RBD), and nucleocapsid (Nc). The assay was shown to have comparable performance to a SARS-CoV-2 reference assay for IgG in serum obtained at ≥21 days from symptom onset but had higher sensitivity with samples collected at ≤5 days from symptom onset. Further, using soluble ACE2 in a neutralization assay format, inhibition of antibody binding was demonstrated for S and RBD.

Comparison of xMAP Salmonella Serotyping Assay With Traditional Serotyping and Discordance Resolution by Whole Genome Sequencing.

Salmonella spp. are a major cause of foodborne illness throughout the world. Traditional serotyping by antisera agglutination has been used as a standard identification method for many years but newer nucleic acid-based tests have become available that may provide advantages in workflow and test turnaround time. In this study, we evaluated the Luminex® xMAP® Salmonella Serotyping Assay (SSA), a multiplex nucleic acid test capable of identifying 85% of the most common Salmonella serotypes, in comparison to the traditional serum agglutination test (SAT) on 4 standard strains and 255 isolates from human (224), environmental, and food (31) samples. Of the total of 259 isolates, 256 could be typed by the SSA. Of these, 197 (77.0%) were fully typed and 59 (23.0%) were partially typed. By SAT, 246 of the 259 isolates (95%) were successfully typed. Sixty isolates had discrepant results between SAT and SSA and were resolved using whole genome sequencing (WGS). By SAT, 80.0% (48/60) of the isolates were consistent with WGS while by SSA 91.7% (55/60) were partially consistent with WGS. By serovar, all 30 serovars except one tested were fully or partially typable. The workflow comparison showed that SSA provided advantages over SAT with a hands-on time (HOT) of 3.5 min and total turnaround time (TAT) of 6 h, as compared to 1 h HOT and 2-6 days TAT for SAT. Overall, this study showed that molecular serotyping is promising as a rapid method for Salmonella serotyping with good accuracy for typing most common Salmonella serovars circulating in China.

Molecular and non-molecular approaches to etiologic diagnosis of gastroenteritis.

Gastroenteritis is a major cause of mortality and morbidity globally and rapid identification of the causative pathogen is important for appropriate treatment and patient management, implementation of effective infection control measures, reducing hospital length of stay, and reducing overall medical costs. Although stool culture and microscopic examination of diarrheal stool has been the primary method for laboratory diagnosis, culture-independent proteomic and genomic tests are receiving increased attention. Antigen tests for stool pathogens are routinely implemented as rapid and simple analytics whereas molecular tests are now available in various formats from high complexity to waived point-of-care tests. In addition, metagenomic next-generation sequencing stands poised for use as a method for both diagnosis and routine characterization of the gut microbiome in the very near future. Analysis of host biomarkers as indicators of infection status and pathogenesis may also become important for prediction, diagnosis, and monitoring of gastrointestinal infection. Here we review current methods and emerging technologies for the etiologic diagnosis of gastroenteritis in the clinical laboratory. Benefits and limitations of these evolving methods are highlighted.

Performance Evaluation of the Luminex Aries C. difficile Assay in Comparison to Two Other Molecular Assays within a Multihospital Health Care Center.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remain a serious issue in the United States. Fast and accurate diagnosis of CDI is paramount to achieve immediate infection control initiation, triaging, and isolation, as well as appropriate antibiotic treatment. However, both, over- and underdiagnosis can lead to adverse patient outcomes, such as unnecessary administration of antibiotics or unwanted spread of spores in any hospital setting, respectively. In this prospective study, we evaluated the FDA-cleared Aries C. difficile assay and compared its performance and workflow characteristics to those of the BD Max Cdiff and Xpert C. difficile/Epi assays. Out of 302 samples tested, 55 (18.2%) samples were positive, and 234 (77.5%) samples were negative for C. difficile by all three testing methods. Comparison results showed a positive and negative percent agreement (PPA and NPA, respectively) between the Aries and Xpert assays of 95.2% (59/62) and 99.2% (238/240), respectively. The PPA and NPA between the Aries and BD Max assays were 91.8% (56/61) and 96.6% (230/238), respectively. Invalid result rates were determined to be 2.6% for the BD Max assay, 1.0% for the Aries assay, and 0% for the Xpert assay. Hands-on time (HoT) and total turnaround time (TAT) varied considerably depending on the sample number and instrument throughput. The HoT ranged from 1.2 to 3.5 min per sample, and the TAT was 1 to 2.3 h. Overall, the results demonstrated that the Aries assay is a rapid and sensitive method for the diagnosis of CDI in clinical laboratories.

Amplification chemistries in clinical virology.

Molecular diagnostic methods have evolved and matured considerably over the last several decades and are constantly being evaluated and adopted by clinical laboratories for the identification of infectious pathogens. Advancement in other technologies such as fluorescence, electronics, instrumentation, automation, and sensors have made the overall diagnostic process more accurate, sensitive, and rapid. Nucleic acid based detection procedures, which rely on the fundamental principles of DNA replication have emerged as a popular and standard diagnostic method, and several commercial assays are currently available based on different nucleic acid amplification techniques. This review focuses on the major amplification chemistries that are used for developing commercial assays and discusses their application in the clinical virology laboratory.

Evaluation of the Aries Bordetella Assay for Detection and Identification of Bordetella pertussis in Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens.

The Aries Bordetella assay (Aries BA) (Luminex Corporation) recently received FDA clearance for the detection and differentiation of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis nucleic acids in nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Aries BA in comparison to that of the BioFire FilmArray respiratory panel (RP). The Aries BA was evaluated using retrospective, remnant nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS), previously tested by FilmArray RP. Performance characteristics evaluated included positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) with the FilmArray RP. Discordant analysis was performed using bidirectional sequencing. A time and motion study was performed to compare the laboratory workflow of the two tests. Three hundred samples were included in the study. There were no samples positive for B. parapertussis The PPA and NPA of the Aries BA were 61.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.8 to 82.7%) and 100% (95% CI, 98.7 to 100%). Discordant results included five Bordetella bronchiseptica results that were incorrectly identified as B. pertussis by the FilmArray RP and one false-negative result for both the Aries BA and the FilmArray RP. The overall agreement between the Aries BA and FilmArray RP for the detection of B. pertussis was considered good at 97.7% with a kappa value of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.9). The Aries BA offers a new diagnostic option for the rapid and targeted approach to the diagnosis of pertussis. Unlike the FilmArray RP, the Aries BA did not cross-react with B. bronchiseptica in our study, although a larger sample set should be tested to confirm this finding.

The genesis and evolution of bead-based multiplexing.

Multiplexed analysis has the advantage of allowing for simultaneous detection of multiple analytes in a single reaction vessel which reduces time, labor, and cost as compared to single-reaction-based detection methods. Microsphere-based suspension array technologies, such as the Luminex® xMAP® system, offer high-throughput detection of both protein and nucleic acid targets in multiple assay chemistries. After Luminex's founding in 1995, it quickly became the leader in bead-based multiplexing solutions. Today, xMAP Technology is the most widely adopted bead-based multiplexing platform with over 35,000 peer-reviewed publications, an installed base of approximately 15,500 instruments, and over 70 Luminex Partners offering more than 1300 research use kits as well as custom assay solutions. Because of the open architecture of the xMAP platform it has been implemented in a variety of applications that range from transplant medicine, biomarker discovery and validation, pathogen detection, drug discovery, vaccine development, personalized medicine, neurodegeneration, and cancer research.

Multiplexed detection and identification of respiratory pathogens using the NxTAG® respiratory pathogen panel.

The Luminex® NxTAG® Respiratory Pathogen Panel (NxTAG RPP) is an IVD-cleared assay for the simultaneous detection and identification of nucleic acids from 18 respiratory viruses and 2 (or 3 outside of the U.S.) atypical bacterial pathogens in nasopharyngeal swabs. Its scalability allows concurrent testing of up to 96 samples in a single batch. Nucleic acid extracted from 200 µL of raw specimen using the easyMAG® extractor is added directly to pre-plated, lyophilized bead reagents (LBRs), where multiplexed RT-PCR and hybridization to MagPlex-TAG™ microspheres occurs within a sealed reaction well using a single cycling program. Data acquisition is done on the MAGPIX® instrument which reads and sorts the reaction products directly from the sealed well following transfer of the assay plate from the thermal cycler. NxTAG is the newest innovation in bead-based nucleic acid chemistry developed by Luminex. Here we provide the detailed assay protocol and present data which describe the clinical and analytical performance characteristics of NxTAG RPP.

Laboratory Diagnosis of Respiratory Tract Infections in Children - the State of the Art.

In the pediatric population, respiratory infections are the most common cause of physician visits. Although many respiratory illnesses are self-limiting viral infections that resolve with time and supportive care, it can be critical to identify the causative pathogen at an early stage of the disease in order to implement effective antimicrobial therapy and infection control. Over the last few years, diagnostics for respiratory infections have evolved substantially, with the development of novel assays and the availability of updated tests for newer strains of pathogens. Newer laboratory methods are rapid, highly sensitive and specific, and are gradually replacing the conventional gold standards, although the clinical utility of these assays is still under evaluation. This article reviews the current laboratory methods available for testing for respiratory pathogens and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Analytical and Workflow Evaluation of the ARIES Sample-to-Result Molecular Assay for Clostridium difficile.

We evaluated the analytical and workflow characteristics of the ARIES Clostridium difficile assay, a recently developed qPCR-based test for toxigenic C. difficile ARIES was compared to the illumigene C. difficile assay, a commonly employed, loop-mediated amplification technique with similar sample-to-result capabilities. Following illumigene analysis, 122 positive and 164 negative stool specimens were banked for subsequent ARIES testing. The analytical agreement between the platforms was high: 93.4% positive agreement (89.0-97.8%) and 97.5% negative agreement (95.2-99.9%). For discordant specimens, amplification/bidirectional sequencing of tcdA/tcdB demonstrated toxigenic C. difficile in 2/4 illumigene(-)ARIES(+) and 2/8 illumigene(+)ARIES(-) specimens. In a time-motion study, the ARIES assay required less hands-on time than illumigene, but with greater total testing time. Overall, these findings support the ARIES C. difficile Assay as a new option for laboratories in their diagnostic repertoire.

Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the Luminex Aries Flu A/B & RSV Assay for Pediatric and Adult Respiratory Tract Specimens.

Influenza A and B viruses and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are three common viruses implicated in seasonal respiratory tract infections and are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in adults and children worldwide. In recent years, an increasing number of commercial molecular tests have become available to diagnose respiratory viral infections. The Luminex Aries Flu A/B & RSV assay is a fully automated sample-to-answer molecular diagnostic assay for the detection of influenza A, influenza B, and RSV. The clinical performance of the Aries Flu A/B & RSV assay was prospectively evaluated in comparison to that of the Luminex xTAG respiratory viral panel (RVP) at four North American clinical institutions over a 2-year period. Of the 2,479 eligible nasopharyngeal swab specimens included in the prospective study, 2,371 gave concordant results between the assays. One hundred eight specimens generated results that were discordant with those from the xTAG RVP and were further analyzed by bidirectional sequencing. Final clinical sensitivity values of the Aries Flu A/B & RSV assay were 98.1% for influenza A virus, 98.0% for influenza B virus, and 97.7% for RSV. Final clinical specificities for all three pathogens ranged from 98.6% to 99.8%. Due to the low prevalence of influenza B, an additional 40 banked influenza B-positive specimens were tested at the participating clinical laboratories and were all accurately detected by the Aries Flu A/B & RSV assay. This study demonstrates that the Aries Flu A/B & RSV assay is a suitable method for rapid and accurate identification of these causative pathogens in respiratory infections.