Evaluation of the utility and cost of secondary confirmatory testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae identification from culture.

Current guideline recommends the use of two identification methods for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) is now used for primary identification and may be sufficient for definitive identification of N. gonorrhoeae. The performance of three secondary tests (BactiCard, RapID NH and NET test) were compared using 45 bacterial isolates, including 37 Neisseria species. These secondary tests demonstrated diminished specificity (67% - 88%) for N. gonorrhoeae compared with MALDI-TOF. Additionally, data from six clinical microbiology laboratories was used to compare confirmatory test costs and the agreement of results with MALDI-TOF. Discrepancies were documented for 9.4% of isolates, though all isolates (n= 288) identified by MALDI-TOF as N. gonorrhoeae were confirmed by the reference laboratory. These data demonstrate that MALDI-TOF alone is sufficient for N. gonorrhoeae identification, as secondary did not add diagnostic value but do add costs to the testing process.

Performance of saliva compared with nasopharyngeal swab for diagnosis of COVID-19 by NAAT in cross-sectional studies: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is the preferred method to diagnose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Saliva has been suggested as an alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS), but previous systematic reviews were limited by the number and types of studies available. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic performance of saliva compared with NPS for COVID-19. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases up to 24 April 2021 for studies that directly compared paired NPS and saliva specimens taken at the time of diagnosis. Meta-analysis was performed using an exact binomial rendition of the bivariate mixed-effects regression model. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Of 2683 records, we included 23 studies with 25 cohorts, comprising 11,582 paired specimens. A wide variety of NAAT assays and collection methods were used. Meta-analysis gave a pooled sensitivity of 87 % (95 % CI = 83-90 %) and specificity of 99 % (95 % CI = 98-99 %). Subgroup analyses showed the highest sensitivity when the suspected individual is tested in an outpatient setting and is symptomatic. Our results support the use of saliva NAAT as an alternative to NPS NAAT for the diagnosis of COVID-19.

Purposeful microbiology comment added to urine cultures with Staphylococcus aureus increases orders for follow-up blood cultures.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria (SABU) often have underlying invasive disease, including S. aureus bacteremia (SAB). It has been proposed that most patients with SABU should have a blood culture done to rule out SAB. A preliminary audit suggested that our local hospitals had a low rate of follow-up blood culture orders for patients with SABU. In response to this, our microbiology laboratory changed the comment appended to urine cultures with growth of S. aureus to make a more assertive link between SABU and SAB and to recommend follow-up blood cultures. AIM: We designed a retrospective quasi-experimental study to see if the change in microbiology comment wording had an effect on clinician behaviour. We hypothesized that this simple comment change to make a more assertive link between SABU and SAB would lead to an increase in follow-up blood culture orders. METHODOLOGY: We used microbiology records to identify adult patients with urine cultures positive for Staphylococcus aureus at three acute-care hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, for 1 year pre- and post-intervention. We recorded urine and blood culture results, timing, patient demographics, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 243 adult patients with urine cultures with S. aureus were identified for inclusion. The primary outcome was met, as there was a significant increase in blood culture orders between the pre-intervention and post-intervention groups (66.9 % vs 80.4 %). This difference was mainly driven by an increase for emergency department and urgent care patients (30.6 % vs 63.6 %). The inpatient group had a high baseline rate of blood culture orders that did not change significantly (80.0 % vs 84.7 %). There was no significant change in detection of SAB (23.5 % vs 32.7 %) or inpatient mortality (18.0 % vs 24.7 %). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that a simple, purposeful comment appended to urine cultures with S. aureus leads to a significant increase in follow-up blood culture orders.