Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
ACS Infect Dis ; 5(7): 1169-1176, 2019 07 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31056908

RESUMO

In most bacteria, ß-lactam antibiotics inhibit the last cross-linking step of peptidoglycan synthesis by acylation of the active-site Ser of d,d-transpeptidases belonging to the penicillin-binding protein (PBP) family. In mycobacteria, cross-linking is mainly ensured by l,d-transpeptidases (LDTs), which are promising targets for the development of ß-lactam-based therapies for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. For this purpose, fluorescence spectroscopy is used to investigate the efficacy of LDT inactivation by ß-lactams but the basis for fluorescence quenching during enzyme acylation remains unknown. In contrast to what has been reported for PBPs, we show here using a model l,d-transpeptidase (Ldtfm) that fluorescence quenching of Trp residues does not depend upon direct hydrophobic interaction between Trp residues and ß-lactams. Rather, Trp fluorescence was quenched by the drug covalently bound to the active-site Cys residue of Ldtfm. Fluorescence quenching was not quantitatively determined by the size of the drug and was not specific of the thioester link connecting the ß-lactam carbonyl to the catalytic Cys as quenching was also observed for acylation of the active-site Ser of ß-lactamase BlaC from M. tuberculosis. Fluorescence quenching was extensive for reaction intermediates containing an amine anion and for acylenzymes containing an imine stabilized by mesomeric effect, but not for acylenzymes containing a protonated ß-lactam nitrogen. Together, these results indicate that the extent of fluorescence quenching is determined by the status of the ß-lactam nitrogen. Thus, fluorescence kinetics can provide information not only on the efficacy of enzyme inactivation but also on the structure of the covalent adducts responsible for enzyme inactivation.


Assuntos
Peptidil Transferases/química , Triptofano/química , beta-Lactamas/farmacologia , Acilação , Domínio Catalítico , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/enzimologia , Peptidil Transferases/antagonistas & inibidores , Peptidil Transferases/metabolismo , Serina/química , Espectrometria de Fluorescência , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , beta-Lactamas/química
2.
Endosc Int Open ; 3(5): E501-7, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26528508

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Neoplastic lesions can be missed during colonoscopy, especially when cleansing is inadequate. Bowel preparation scales have significant limitations and no objective and standardized method currently exists to establish colon cleanliness during colonoscopy. The aims of our study are to create a software algorithm that is able to analyze bowel cleansing during colonoscopies and to compare it to a validate bowel preparation scale. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A software application (the Clean Colon Software Program, CCSP) was developed. Fifty colonoscopies were carried out and video-recorded. Each video was divided into 3 segments: cecum-hepatic flexure (1st Segment), hepatic flexure-descending colon (2nd Segment) and rectosigmoid segment (3rd Segment). Each segment was recorded twice, both before and after careful cleansing of the intestinal wall. A score from 0 (dirty) to 3 (clean) was then assigned by CCSP. All the videos were also viewed by four endoscopists and colon cleansing was established using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Interclass correlation coefficient was then calculated between the endoscopists and the software. RESULTS: The cleansing score of the prelavage colonoscopies was 1.56 ±â€Š0.52 and the postlavage one was 2,08 ±â€Š0,59 (P < 0.001) showing an approximate 33.3 % improvement in cleansing after lavage. Right colon segment prelavage (0.99 ±â€Š0.69) was dirtier than left colon segment prelavage (2.07 ±â€Š0.71). The overall interobserver agreement between the average cleansing score for the 4 endoscopists and the software pre-cleansing was 0.87 (95 % CI, 0.84 - 0.90) and post-cleansing was 0.86 (95 % CI, 0.83 - 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: The software is able to discriminate clean from non-clean colon tracts with high significance and is comparable to endoscopist evaluation.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA