Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Appl Radiat Isot ; 186: 110304, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35635857

RESUMO

JRC-Geel organised a Europe-wide proficiency test on gross alpha/beta activity concentration measurements in water with 154 participants from the field of environmental radioactivity monitoring. The performance of the participants was evaluated by comparing their results to the reference value using percentage deviation, z-score and zeta-score. Many of the participants' results deviated several orders of magnitude from the reference values regardless of the techniques used suggesting that the radioactivity monitoring of drinking water using gross-counting in Europe needs improving. Comparing with a similar proficiency test in 2012 reveals no major improvements and indicate that standards for gross-counting methods need revision. From the accompanied questionnaire, participants' measurement methods, laboratory practices and pitfalls were discussed. From the 14 best performing methods, JRC identified "Best practices".


Assuntos
Água Potável , Radioatividade , Poluentes Radioativos da Água , Monitoramento Ambiental , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Poluentes Radioativos da Água/análise
2.
J Radioanal Nucl Chem ; 306(1): 325-331, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26366031

RESUMO

An interlaboratory comparison was organised by JRC-IRMM among environmental radioactivity monitoring laboratories for the determination of gross alpha/beta activity concentration in drinking water. Independent standard methods were used for the reference value determination. The performance of participating laboratories was evaluated with respect to the reference values using relative deviations. Sample preparation and measurement methods used by the participating laboratories are detailed, in particular in the view of method-dependency of the results. Many of the participants' results deviate by more than two orders of magnitude from the reference values regardless of the techniques used. This suggests that gross methods need revision.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA