Implementing a Rural Natural Experiment: A Protocol for Evaluating the Impacts of Food Coops on Food Consumption, Resident's Health and Community Vitality.

BACKGROUND: Local food environments are recognized by experts as a determinant of healthy eating. Food cooperatives (coop) can promote the accessibility to healthier foods and thus improve the health of the population, particularly in remote rural communities. OBJECTIVE: To measure the effects of implementing a food coop in a disadvantaged community with poor access to food. We have two main research questions: (1). Does the establishment of a food coop in rural areas described as food deserts have an impact on accessibility, frequency of use, food consumption, food quality, and ultimately the health of individuals? (2). Does the establishment of a food coop in rural areas described as food deserts have an impact on food security and community vitality? DESIGN: A natural experiment with a mixed pre/post method will be used. The sample is composed of households that came from geographically isolated communities (population: 215 to 885 inhabitants) which qualified as food deserts and located in rural areas of Quebec (Canada). All communities plan to open a food coop (in the years 2022-2023), and as their opening will be staggered over time, participants from communities with a new food coop (intervention) will be compared to communities awaiting the opening of their food coop (control). Data collection was carried out at three time points: (1) before; (2) 1 to 5 months after; and (3) 13 to 17 months after the opening of the coop. Questionnaires were used to measure sociodemographic variables, dietary intake, residents' health, and community vitality. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with community stakeholders. RESULTS: Few natural experiments have been conducted regarding the impact of implementing food coops. Gathering concrete data on the effectiveness and processes surrounding these interventions through natural experiments will help to quantify their impact and guide knowledge users and policymakers to make more informed decisions.

Long-term bone mineral density changes and fractures in lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about long-term bone mineral density (BMD) changes and fractures in lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis (CF). We examined femur and lumbar spine (LS) BMD changes in men and women with CF up to 10 years post-transplant and documented post-transplant fracture prevalence. METHODS: Retrospective study of individuals who had undergone a lung transplant (2000-2015) and had a pre-transplant and at least one BMD measurement after transplant. Vertebral fractures were assessed on chest computed tomography scans and other fractures abstracted from medical records. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 131 individuals; 53% males, median age: 28 years [interquartile range: 24-35] and 31% having pre-transplant low bone mass. Most recipients were given bisphosphonates after transplant with proportion reaching 94% at 10 years. Up to 10 years post-transplant, men experienced positive or little change in LS BMD, indicating minimal loss from pre-transplant values. In contrast, women displayed negative changes in BMD up to 5 years post-transplant before recovering pre-transplant BMD values by 10 years. Similar patterns were observed at the femur BMD where men demonstrated a lower bone loss and faster recovery towards pre-transplant values than women. After transplant, 88% of recipients maintained their pre-transplant bone status, 3% experienced an improvement, mostly progressing from low bone mass to normal status whereas 9% had a deterioration of their pre-transplant bone status. Twenty-seven recipients suffered fractures in the post-transplant period. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underline that lung recipients with CF remain at risk of skeletal fragility despite prompt initiation of post-transplant anti-osteoporosis therapy.

Trends, Determinants, and Impact on Survival of Post-Lung Transplant Weight Changes: A Single-center Longitudinal Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Weight gain is commonly seen in lung transplant (LTx) recipients. Although previous studies have focused on weight changes at fixed time periods and relatively early after transplant, trends over time and long-term weight evolution have not been described in this population. The study objectives were to document weight changes up to 15 years post-LTx and assess the predictors of post-LTx weight changes and their associations with mortality. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of LTx recipients between January 1, 2000, and November 30, 2016 (n = 502). Absolute weight changes from transplant were calculated at fixed time periods (6 mo, 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 y), and continuous trends over time were generated. Predictors of weight changes and their association with mortality were assessed using linear and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: LTx recipients experienced a gradual increase in weight, resulting from the combination of multiple weight trajectories. Interstitial lung disease diagnosis negatively predicted post-LTx weight changes at all time points, whereas transplant body mass index categories were significant predictors at earlier time points. Patients with a weight gain of >10% at 5 years had a better survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.66), whereas a 10% weight loss at earlier time points was associated with worse survival (1 y: HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.22-3.41 and 2 y: HR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.22-4.58). CONCLUSIONS: Post-LTx weight changes display various trajectories, are predicted to some extent by individual and LTx-related factors, and have a negative or positive impact on survival depending on the time post-LTx. These results may lead to a better individualization of weight management after transplant.