Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 28(7): 911-919, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35775678

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate etiologies of hand injuries in emergency department (ED), to compare the etiologies of hand injuries at the time of this study with the previous year, to assess whether novel coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected the treatment decisions, and to investigate the COVID-19 infection rate within the first 14 days after admission. METHODS: A total of 229 patients admitted to ED with hand injury between March 15 and April 30, 2020, were included in the study. The control group consisted of 439 ED admissions with hand injury in the previous year (March 15-April 30, 2019). Data including age, sex, cause of trauma, treatment, and COVID-19 infection status within 14 days after ED admission were compared between groups. RESULTS: The mean age was 32.30±15.63 years in the study group and 30.85±18.54 years in the control group. The number of patients consulted to the surgery department decreased by 52.6% and the number of patients admitted to ED with hand injuries de-creased by 47.6% during the pandemic, compared to the previous year (p=0.0001). The incidence of home accidents increased and the glass cuts and penetrating/perforating injuries were the most common causes during the pandemic most of which occurred at home. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic-mandated social restrictions led to a significant decrease in the number of ED admissions with hand injuries and the type of injuries. The incidence of home accidents increased with more time spent indoors. This study may be a useful guide for ED admissions of hand injury cases and management planning in the current and future pandemics.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Traumatismos da Mão , Ferimentos Penetrantes , Acidentes Domésticos , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Traumatismos da Mão/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Mão/etiologia , Traumatismos da Mão/terapia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Ferimentos Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg ; 54(3): 151-155, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32089033

RESUMO

Large palatal fistulas after cleft palate surgery are difficult to treat using local mucoperiosteal flaps alone, particularly if multiple attempts to close the fistulas have resulted in tissue scarring. In this study, we present our 15-year surgical experience with tongue flaps for large palatal fistulas. A total of 34 patients who underwent tongue flap surgery at our institution between January 2000 and January 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. An anteriorly-based dorsal tongue flap was used for the treatment of anteriorly localized large palatal fistulas in all patients. Data including demographic characteristics of the patients, previous surgeries, localization of the fistula, time between the first and second surgery, and complications were recorded. Factors affecting the surgical success were evaluated. Of the patients, 21 were males and 13 were females with a mean age of 11.7 ± 6.9 (range: 4 to 29) years. Detachment of the tongue flap was observed in nine patients after surgery. Seven of the patients with detachment were male aged ≤6 years (p < 0.05). Resuturing the flap back to the defect did not significantly affect the results. Our study results suggest that proper patient selection and attentive and rigorous surgical technique have a critical importance in the tongue flap repair and tongue flap is not recommended for patients who are under seven years of age.


Assuntos
Fístula/cirurgia , Palato Duro/cirurgia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Língua/transplante , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Fissura Palatina/cirurgia , Feminino , Fístula/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Cutan Med Surg ; 23(3): 258-264, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30556424

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The most common skin cancer is basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and the gold-standard treatment for high-risk tumours is Mohs surgery. However, alternative methods are needed for high-risk tumours in countries where the performance rate of Mohs surgery is low. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this article is to investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of margin-controlled, staged surgical excision (MCSSE) in high-risk tumours as a possible treatment alternative. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, including patients diagnosed with high-risk BCC in the head and neck region and treated with MCSSE between 2003 and 2010, was conducted. RESULTS: During the study period 50 tumours in 47 patients were treated, with low adverse event rates and high patient satisfaction rates. Of the 50 tumours, 1 recurred at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small sample size and relatively short follow-up period, the present study shows that MCSSE might be a feasible alternative for the treatment of high-risk BCCs in institutions where Mohs surgery is not performed. Future studies on long-term recurrence rates are needed.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Basocelular/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Basocelular/patologia , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA