Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 159(3): 221-224, 2023 03 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36694371

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the proportion of nonsurgical inpatients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria (AMH) who qualified for urologic investigation according to consensus guidelines. METHODS: The study population included all patients acutely admitted to the internal medicine departments of Israeli regional hospitals between 2014 and 2017. RESULTS: Of 29,086 consecutive admissions, 10,116 (34.8%) underwent dipstick urinalysis and 8,389 (28.8%) underwent reflex microscopic urinalysis. After the exclusion of patients with a urethral catheter or a positive urine culture, 2,206 had 3 or more RBCs per high-power field, and as many as 2,052 (7.1% of the entire cohort and 24.4% of all patients undergoing microscopic urinalysis) met the criteria for a urologic workup. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that according to the consensus guidelines, an unreasonably high proportion of hospitalized nonsurgical patients would be referred for a urologic workup of uncertain clinical utility because of an incidental AMH finding.


Assuntos
Hematúria , Pacientes Internados , Humanos , Adulto , Hematúria/diagnóstico , Hematúria/epidemiologia , Hematúria/etiologia , Urinálise , Eritrócitos , Microscopia
2.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 28(4): 566-568, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34812562

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Restricting the performance of microscopic urinalyses only to patients in whom it was specifically requested has been shown to reduce their number in laboratories servicing both inpatients and outpatients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of such restriction solely in in-patients in a 400-bed regional hospital. METHODS: In 2017, we discontinued routine ('reflex') microscopic urinalysis for all positive dipstick results, and restricted such testing to in-patients in whom it was specifically requested by a doctor. We compared the numbers of patients in three internal medicine departments who had a urinalysis over 2-year periods before and after 2017, and reviewed doctors' complaints. RESULTS: Before 2017, more than 80% of all dipstick tested samples had one or more abnormalities that led to a microscopic examination. Discontinuation of reflex microscopy reduced microscopic urinalysis to less than 10% of all patients with dipsticks on admission. Requests for repeat urinalysis decreased from 4.3% to 2.5% and there were no complaints after the change in policy. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of a 'reflex' microscopic urinalysis in patients with abnormal dipstick results did not increase repeat urine testing. Doctors apparently felt that the microscopic urinalysis does not have clinical utility in the vast majority of hospitalized adult patients.


Assuntos
Fitas Reagentes , Urinálise , Adulto , Humanos , Microscopia , Pacientes , Urinálise/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA