Educators' consideration of learner motivation in ophthalmology education in medical school: Influences on teaching practice and course design.

BACKGROUND: Ophthalmology education in medical school has historically neglected the impact of autonomous motivation on student learning and wellbeing. This study aimed to understand ophthalmology educators' consideration and application of student motivation in ophthalmology medical education. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lead ophthalmology educators from Australian and New Zealand medical schools participated in an online semi-structured in-depth interview. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Codes were generated and aligned into overarching themes. FINDINGS: Six educators participated in the study. Five main themes arose from the transcripts: the lack of explicit consideration of student motivation, implicit consideration of motivation in curriculum design and in teaching practices, the impact of innovation on motivation and the relationship between teacher and student motivation. Participants also commented on trends in ophthalmology education including generalists' confidence in managing ophthalmic disease, the role of fundoscopy in medical education and time pressure on ophthalmology in medical schools. CONCLUSION: There has only been an implicit instead of explicit consideration of motivation in ophthalmology education in medical school, which leaves an unfulfilled potential for teaching practices to impact the affective along with cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning. This study highlights the need for motivation to be explicitly incorporated into the development of teaching practices and curriculum reform.

Self-determination theory in ophthalmology education: factors influencing autonomy, competence and relatedness in medical students.

BACKGROUND: The affective components of learning, including student motivation, has yet to be thoroughly investigated in undergraduate ophthalmology education. This study aims to use Self-Determination Theory (SDT) as a framework to describe the variations in student perceptions of motivation in studying ophthalmology through their satisfactions of autonomy, competence and relatedness, and to highlight factors that stimulate or hinder this. METHODS: Penultimate year medical students from a single tertiary educational institution undertaking a clinical placement in ophthalmology participated in in-depth interviews to explore factors affecting their perceptions of motivation in studying ophthalmology. Interviews were transcribed and analysed according to the principles of interpretive phenomenography through the theoretical framework of SDT. RESULTS: Of the 39 students invited, 10 agreed to participate. Variations in perceptions of experiences generated the outcome space. Participants experienced either amotivation, external locus extrinsic motivation, internal locus extrinsic motivation and intrinsic motivation (conceptions of the outcome space). This was described with respect to their satisfaction of autonomy, competence and relatedness (dimensions of the outcome space). Additionally, 21 factors that impacted on motivation were identified, of which five over-arching factors impacted all three basic psychological needs - guidance, growth mindset, assessment, curricular pressure and extracurricular pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study provide a unique insight into the motivation of medical students studying ophthalmology. This provides an exciting opportunity for medical educators to address the affective aspect of learning.

Correcting magnification error in foveal avascular zone area measurements of optical coherence tomography angiography images with estimated axial length.

BACKGROUND: To generate and validate a method to estimate axial length estimated (ALest) from spherical equivalent (SE) and corneal curvature [keratometry (K)], and to determine if this ALest can replace actual axial length (ALact) for correcting transverse magnification error in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images using the Littmann-Bennett formula. METHODS: Data from 1301 participants of the Raine Study Gen2-20 year follow-up were divided into two datasets to generate (n = 650) and validate (n = 651) a relationship between AL, SE, and K. The developed formula was then applied to a separate dataset of 46 participants with AL, SE, and K measurements and OCTA images to estimate and compare the performance of ALest against ALact in correcting transverse magnification error in OCTA images when measuring the foveal avascular zone area (FAZA). RESULTS: The formula for ALest yielded the equation: ALest = 2.102K - 0.4125SE + 7.268, R2 = 0.794. There was good agreement between ALest and ALact for both study cohorts. The mean difference [standard deviation (SD)] between FAZA corrected with ALest and ALact was 0.002 (0.015) mm2 with the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of - 0.027 to 0.031 mm2. In comparison, mean difference (SD) between FAZA uncorrected and corrected with ALact was - 0.005 (0.030) mm2, with 95% LoA of - 0.064 to 0.054 mm2. CONCLUSIONS: ALact is more accurate than ALest and hence should be used preferentially in magnification error correction in the clinical setting. FAZA corrected with ALest is comparable to FAZA corrected with ALact, while FAZA measurements using images corrected with ALest have a greater accuracy than measurements on uncorrected images. Hence, in the absence of ALact, clinicians should use ALest to correct for magnification error as this provides for more accurate measurements of fundus parameters than uncorrected images.

RTVue XR AngioVue Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Software Upgrade Impacts on Retinal Thickness and Vessel Density Measurements.

Purpose: To determine the impact of an AngioVue software upgrade on total retinal thickness (RT) and inner retinal vessel density (VD) measurements derived from optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Methods: Optovue OCTA images (3 × 3 mm) from 126 individuals (105 healthy eyes and 72 eyes with retinal disease) were acquired before an upgrade of the AngioVue software, which resulted in an inward shift of the outer boundary of the inner retinal vessels and improved Bruch's membrane segmentation. Total RT and inner retinal VD values were extracted before and after the software upgrade for comparison. Bias and limits of agreement (LA) were calculated. Results: The mean (SD) age of participants was 46 (17) years. Mean (LA) foveal RT increased by 3.0 (-11 to +17) and 3.7 (-11 to +18) µm (P < 0.001) and parafoveal RT increased by 9.7 (-3.8 to +23) and 6.4 (-2.5 to +15) µm (P < 0.001) in healthy and diseased retina, respectively. Mean (LA) foveal inner retinal VD decreased by 6.6 (2.5-11) and 7.7 (0.4-15) percentage units (P < 0.001) and parafoveal inner retinal VD decreased by 4.1 (1.2-7.0) and 4.7 (0.5-8.9) percentage units (P < 0.001) in healthy and diseased retina, respectively. Conclusions: The AngioVue software upgrade resulted in an unexpected increase in total RT and an expected reduction in inner retinal VD measurements in all regions due to altered segmentation. Translational Relevance: RT and VD measures derived from the newer AngioVue software version are not directly comparable to the reported normative data derived from the older software.

Clinical validation of the RTVue optical coherence tomography angiography image quality indicators.

IMPORTANCE: All automated image quality indicators for en face optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images require gold standard validation for determining optimum thresholds. BACKGROUND: A manual grading system (gold standard) for OCTA images was validated and compared to two automated image quality indicators: signal strength index (SSI) and scan quality index (SQI) generated by different software versions of the Optovue OCTA device. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 52 eyes of 52 healthy individual and 77 eyes of 51 patients with retinal vascular diseases. METHODS: A total of 129 OCTA images of the superficial vascular plexus were graded manually by three independent examiners. Each image was assigned grades 1 to 4 (1-2, unacceptable; 3-4, acceptable) masked to the software-generated quality indicators. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-grader agreement and comparison of the utility of SSI and SQI in discriminating between acceptable and unacceptable OCTA images. RESULTS: There was a substantial agreement between the three graders (κ = 0.63). Mean SSI and SQI was significantly different between acceptable and unacceptable images (P < .001). SQI outperformed SSI in separating acceptable from unacceptable images (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.87 vs 0.80) and the optimum cut-off was ≥7 for SQI and ≥70 for SSI for acceptable images. Up to 30% of images with quality indicators reaching the optimum SQI and SSI cut-off thresholds still had unacceptable quality on manual grading. Unacceptable images were found in 33% and 66% of healthy and diseased eyes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: SQI is closely related to manual grading but we caution reliance on the optimized threshold to determine image quality. SQI is superior to SSI in discriminating between acceptable and unacceptable images.