Immediate non-occlusal versus delayed loading of mandibular first molars. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of immediate non-occlusal loading with delayed implant loading in the bilateral replacement of mandibular first molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a split-mouth, randomised controlled trial. Twenty patients with bilaterally missing mandibular first molars randomly received immediately or conventionally loaded single implants. One molar was restored with a non-occlusal temporary crown within 24 hours after implant placement (immediate loading group, IL) while the contralateral molar was restored with a definitive crown 4 to 5 months later (delayed loading group, DL). A total of 40 implants were installed. All implants were inserted in healed bone with an insertion torque between 35 and 45 Ncm. Outcome measures were implant failure, complications, radiographic marginal bone level changes, probing pocket depths (PPDs) and bleeding on probing (BOP). Clinical data were collected at implant placement, and after 6, 12 and 60 months. RESULTS: No patients dropped out and no implant failed. Only minor prosthetic complications were observed (two provisional acrylic crown fractures in the IL group and four ceramic chipping in the DL group). Two patients had bilateral peri-implant mucosal inflammation with BOP after 6 months. The differences between groups were not statistically significant (OR = 0.500; 95% CI: 0.045 to 3.489; P = 0.6831). At the 1-year follow-up examination, the mean marginal bone level was 0.83 ± 0.16 mm (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.91) in the IL group and 0.86 ± 0.16 mm (95% CI: 0.78 to 0.94) in the DL group, with no statistically significant differences between groups (difference = 0.03 ± 0.15 mm; 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.07; P = 0.53). After 5 years, mean marginal bone level was 1.06 ± 0.38 mm (95% CI: 0.97 to 1.15) in the IL group and 1.07 ± 0.32 mm (95% CI: 0.95 to 1.16) in the DL group, with no statistically significant differences between groups (difference = 0.01 ± 0.22 mm; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.10; P = 0.96). The mean marginal bone loss after 5 years was 0.62 ± 0.45 mm in the IL group and 0.69 ± 0.33 mm in the DL group (difference = 0.07 ± 0.32 mm; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.18; P = 0.567). At the 5-year follow-up the mean PPD and BOP values were 2.82 ± 0.65 mm and 1.17 ± 0.92 in the IL group, and 2.85 ± 0.53 mm and 1.17 ± 0.86 in the DL group, respectively. No significant differences were found (difference = 0.03 ± 0.15 mm; 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.21; P = 0.990; and 0.01 ± 0.07; 95% CI: -0.06 to 0.08; P = 1.000, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the present data seem to confirm the hypothesis that the clinical outcome of immediate versus delayed loading of implants in mandibular fist molar sites is comparable.

Patient-centered rehabilitation of single, partial, and complete edentulism with cemented- or screw-retained fixed dental prosthesis: The First Osstem Advanced Dental Implant Research and Education Center Consensus Conference 2017.

The aim of this consensus conference was to provide clinical guidelines, based on the available evidence and on the author's daily practice and experience, for general dentistry and dental practitioners to allow them to delivery long-term successful restorations. Three groups of expert clinicians and dental technicians were invited to evaluate all of the scientific literature from 1967 up to March 2017 to identify relevant studies on assigned topics and to prepare in advance narrative/systematic review, written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, to fulfill the consensus statement criteria. The three topics assigned to the three groups were abutment/framework materials and customization (metal vs. metal-free restorations), abutment/framework protocols and designs, and abutment/framework retentions (cemented- vs. screw-retained implant-supported prostheses). All the expert clinicians presented their results, and the lectures were followed by discussions. No significant differences in clinical parameters (marginal bone loss, bleeding on probing, and pocket probing depth) between screw- or cemented-retained were found for single and multiple implant-supported restorations. There is moderate evidence that nonoriginal abutments provide worse mechanical behavior than originals and high evidence that different implant neck designs do not offer any clinical or radiographic advantage. All the participants agreed that it is desirable to connect and remove abutments as few times as possible. There is medium evidence that an adequate platform switching tends to enhance tissue volume and stability in the medium- and long-term follow-up. No statistically significant differences exist between metal and zirconia as a framework material. The authors discussed and all agreed that retrievability and patient's expectation (function and esthetics) should guide the choice of the most adequate technique, component, and material.

Association of Smoking Habits and Height of Residual Bone on Implant Survival and Success Rate in Lateral Sinus Lift: A Retrospective Study.

The primary aim was to evaluate the association of patient-related factors, biomaterials, and implant characteristics on complications' rate of sinus graft surgery and on implant survival rate in grafted sinus. Secondary aims were to measure bone remodeling around implants and patient satisfaction. A retrospective cohort study was designed. Patients who had computerized tomography (CT) before sinus surgery (T0), orthopantomography after implant surgery (T1) and at follow-up (T2), were included. Specific forms were used to collect clinical data. Radiographic measures were: height of residual bone before sinus surgery measured on CT (T0) and apical and marginal bone levels around implants measured on orthopantomography at T1 and T2. Forty-three lateral sinus lifts were performed. Three grafts failed before implant insertion. Out of 83 implants inserted in 29 patients, a total of 19 failed. Mean follow-up (T2) was 6 ± 1.8 years [4; 11.2 years]. The multilevel models analysis showed no association between complications rate and patient-related factors, biomaterials, and implant characteristics. Smoking (odds ratio [OR]: 8.3; 95% CI 1.46-48.05, P = .0173) and height of residual bone (OR: 0.32 for each mm; 95% CI 0.15-0.68, P = .0034) were associated with implant failure. Bone remodeling between T1 and T2 was -0.8 ± 0.2 mm for apical bone and -0.6 ± 0.3 mm for marginal bone. General therapy satisfaction measured in a visual analogue scale was 8.4 ±1.4. In conclusion, lower height of residual bone before sinus surgery and smoking habits had a negative prognostic effect on survival rate of dental implants placed in grafted sinuses.

A Shift in the Orbit: Immediate Endoscopic Reconstruction After Transnasal Orbital Tumors Resection.

Endoscopic endonasal resection of orbital lesions is a safe and common approach. Nevertheless, medial orbital wall defects following the procedure are not routinely addressed, potentially leading to diplopia and enophthalmos. In this article, the authors propose a new technique for purely endoscopic endonasal reconstruction of orbital wall defects following endoscopic endonasal resection of orbital lesions.The patient, a 43-year-old male, suffering from right exophthalmos and diplopia due to a venous malformation of the right orbit underwent endoscopic endonasal resection of the mass. Excision was followed by immediate transnasal endoscopic reconstruction with a commercially available porous polyethylene mesh (Medpor).The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient did not report any residual orbital asymmetry or diplopia. No recurrence of the venous malformation, mesh infection, or reconstruction instability was reported during the follow-up.The authors believe that this new technique could spur head and neck surgeons in strategically rethinking their approach to orbital tumors, proposing reconstruction to patients on a routine basis, and developing even more reliable and manageable solutions.

Effect of Surgical Intervention for Removal of Mandibular Third Molar on Periodontal Healing of Adjacent Mandibular Second Molar: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate and synthesize scientific evidence on the effect of surgical interventions for removal of mandibular third molar (M3M) on periodontal healing of adjacent mandibular second molar (M2M). METHODS: The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) as CRD42012003059. Medline, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were interrogated to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to December 22, 2014. Patients with M3Ms fully developed, unilaterally or bilaterally impacted, were considered. Outcomes were clinical attachment level gain (CALg) and probing depth reduction (PDr) with a follow-up ≥ 6 months. Patient-subjective outcomes, such as pain, discomfort, and complications, and financial aspects and chair time, were also explored. A Bayesian network meta-analysis model was used to estimate direct and indirect effects and to establish a ranking of treatments. RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs were included and categorized into four groups investigating the following: 1) regenerative/grafting procedures (10 RCTs); 2) flap design (three RCTs); 3) type of suturing (one RCT); and 4) periodontal care of M2M (two RCTs). Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with resorbable (GTRr) and non-resorbable (GTRnr) membrane and GTRr with anorganic xenograft (GTRr + AX) showed the highest mean ranking for CALg (2.99, 90% credible interval [CrI] = 1 to 5; 2.80, 90% CrI = 1 to 6; and 2.29, 90% CrI = 1 to 6, respectively) and PDr (2.83, 90% CrI = 1 to 5; 2.52, 90% CrI = 1 to 5; and 2.77, 90% CrI = 1 to 6, respectively). GTRr + AX showed the highest probability (Pr) of being the best treatment for CALg (Pr = 45%) and PDr (Pr = 32%). Direct and network quality of evidence were rated from very low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of the authors' knowledge, the present review is the first one to evaluate quantitatively and qualitatively the effect of different interventions on periodontal healing distal to the second molar after extraction of the third molar. GTR-based procedures with or without combined grafting therapies provide some adjunctive clinical benefit compared to standard non-regenerative/non-grafting procedures. However, the overall low quality of evidence suggests a low degree of confidence and certainty in treatment effects. Evidence on variations of surgical M3M removal techniques based on flap design, type of suturing, and periodontal care of M2M is limited both qualitatively and quantitatively.

Immediate loading with LASER-treated surface implant: two-year resonance frequency analysis follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The chemical, physical, and morphologic characteristics of the implant surface play a fundamental role during the osteointegration process. Implant design is of paramount importance in determining implant primary stability and implant ability to sustain loading during and after osteointegration. LASER treatment of the surface allows defining the precise parameters of roughness to obtain a regular and repeatable surface in total absence of contamination. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the behavior of implant stability of LASER-treated surface implants by repeated resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements during 2 years in patients with complete upper maxilla edentulism subject to an immediate-loading protocol. METHODS: Ten patients were included, and each treated with the insertion of 6 or 8 LASER surface implants according to the individual surgical-prosthetic planning. During the bone drilling and implant insertion, torque values were monitored with a specific handpiece and software. All implants were loaded within 24 hours from the insertion with the application of a temporary full-arch prosthesis. Subsequent follow-up has been done at 24 months from the loading with radiographic controls (OPT) and RFA measurement on all implants at time of implant insertion and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months from loading. RESULTS: Resonance frequency analyses at 3 and 6 months from the implant loading have shown a rapid increment of implant stability quotient (ISQ) values in the first phases of bone remodeling, subsequent to the peri-implant bone remodeling. The paired comparisons between mean ISQ values by patient showed a statistically significant decrease in primary stability from baseline up to 1 month (P = 0.0039). Subsequent measurements revealed a statistically significant increase in implant stability from 1 up to 3 months (P = 0.0156), from 3 up to 6 months (P = 0.0020), from 6 up to 12 months (P = 0.020), and 12 up to 24 months (P = 0.0391). CONCLUSIONS: Resonance frequency analysis of the LASER-treated surface implants showed good ISQ values at all time point measurements. These results are consistent with data from literature on the analysis of RFA in protocols of immediate loading at the upper maxilla.

Biochemical markers as predictors of bone remodelling in dental disorders: a narrative description of literature.

Osteoporosis is a systemic disease in which the skeletal condition is characterized by a decreased mass of normally mineralized bone, due to an augmentation of bone resorption processes. Bone biomarkers serum are used for the diagnosis. On the other hand the main cause of the resorption in the bone jaws are periodontitis, inflammatory cysts, developmental cysts, odontogenic neoplasms. Periodontal diseases can be localized to a single site of the jaws or can affect all the teeth, with a massive bone resorption. The cysts are classified in developmental and inflammatory. They caused a local bone resorption in the jaws. Keratocystic odontogenic tumor produces a large bone resorption for its local aggressive nature. Their diagnosis is clinical and radiological.The aim of our review is to find a correlation between bone biomarkers serum and periodontitis, inflammatory cists, developmental cysts, odontogenetic neoplasms.The RANK/RANKL/OPG system is the most studied not only in osteoporosis but also in the periodontitis, inflammatory cysts, developmental cysts, odontogenic neoplasms. In the last years osteoimmunology was used to study the periodontal disease progression, because the immunity cells start the bone resorption processes.A lot of studies analyze the biomarkers present in the biofluids, as saliva and gingival crevicular fluid, but not the correlation with serum biomarkers.Future studies must be organized to deepen the correlation between bone biomarkers and bone jaws resorption and to allow diagnosis and prognosis of periodontitis, inflammatory cysts, developmental cysts, odontogenic neoplasms.

Bone regeneration in dentistry.

The edentulism of the jaws and the periodontal disease represent conditions that frequently leads to disruption of the alveolar bone. The loss of the tooth and of its bone of support lead to the creation of crestal defects or situation of maxillary atrophy. The restoration of a functional condition involves the use of endosseous implants who require adequate bone volume, to deal with the masticatory load. In such situations the bone need to be regenerated, taking advantage of the biological principles of osteogenesis, osteoinduction and osteoconduction. Several techniques combine these principles with different results, due to the condition of the bone base on which we operate changes, the surgical technique that we use, and finally for the bone metabolic conditions of the patient who can be in a state of systemic osteopenia or osteoporosis; these can also affect the result of jaw bone reconstruction.

Biphosphonates-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: Clinical and physiopathological considerations.

Since osteonecrosis of the jaw was related to biphosphonate administration by Marx, studies showing clinical symptoms, drug and surgical therapies overwhelmed the literature. Furthermore, the literature demonstrated the correlation between chronic biphosphonate adsumption and osteonecrosis of the jaw onset. Nitrogen-containing biphosphonates are widely used for the management of metastatic cancer, for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, for the treatment of Paget's disease, and for the management of acute hypercalcemia. According to our experience, the treatment of BRON-J's lesions is difficult and prolonged. For this reason, in order to avoid these complications it is mandatory to perform a risk staging in patients who must undergo biphosphonate administration. When pharmacologic treatments with antibiotics and local antiseptics are not able to control the development of BRON-J's complications, the clinicians should perform radical surgical treatments such as the resection of the bone involved.

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: the Florence experience.

Aims. Bisphosphonates (BPs) are important therapeutic drugs in multiple myeloma and cancers with bone metastases. Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (BRONJ) has been described as a potential side effect of the last generation BPs. The Authors evaluated clinical features, preventing measures and treatment strategies.Patients and methods. The Authors retrospectively analyzed 19 patients affected by malignant cancer in endovenous treatment with BPs. Fourteen patients were treated with zoledronate, 1 with pamidronate and 4 with both drugs for breast cancer (9 patients), multiple myeloma (6 patients), prostatic cancer (3 patients) and colon cancer (1 patient).Results. The lenght of therapy was 5-36 months before osteonecrosis was observed; in 15 patients BRONJ involved the mandible, in 2 the maxilla and in 2 both jaws. The trigger factors were tooth extractions, inadequate removable total denture, basic and advanced surgery, root canal treatment. Ten patients received non-surgical treatment, 7 patients minor surgical procedures and 2 patients a partial maxillectomy. Healing was achieved in all maxillary localization, and in one mandibular localization with partial maxillectomy.Conclusions. Prevention is the best important phase in the management of this pathology. Risk factors are the type of bisphosphonate and the length of exposure, while dental surgical procedures are trigger factors. Conservative treatment seems to be the best way to control BRONJ, but bone resection and soft tissue closure have to be performed when the lesion is refractory to conservative approach.