Patients' preferences for telemedicine versus in-clinic consultation in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The Hybrid Patient Care system integrates telehealth and in-clinic consultation. While COVID-19 increased telehealth use, healthcare providers are still seeking the best combination of virtual and in-clinic consultation. Understanding patients' tele-consultation-related preferences is vital for achieving optimal implementation. The discrete choice experiment (DCE) is the stated preference technique for eliciting individual preferences and is increasingly being used in health-related applications. The study purpose was to evaluate attributes and levels of the DCE regarding patients' preferences for telemedicine versus traditional, in-clinic consultation in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to facilitate successful implementation. METHODS: A three-phase structure was used in the qualitative stage of the DCE: (1) a literature review and preparation of interview guides; (2) Eight focus group interviews comprised of 26 patients and 33 physicians; and (3) Attribute selection: a ranking exercise among 48 patients. The Think Aloud technique, in which respondents are asked to verbalize their thoughts, was used in the focus groups. Interview data were analyzed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eight attributes were proposed by the patients in the focus groups. The four most important attributes were then selected in pre-testing, and are described in this study: Availability, time until the appointment, severity of the medical problem, patient-physician relationship, and flexible reception hours. CONCLUSIONS: This study has a theoretical contribution in post-COVID-19 patients' preferences in Hybrid Medicine patient care. This provides a foundation to assess the rigors of this stage and provide additional evidence to the limited existing literature on attributes development for DCE patient preferences.

Induction of atypical prostatic hyperplasia in rats by sympathomimetic stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Prostatic innervation may participate in its homeostasis and growth. alpha-Adrenergic inhibition alleviates clinical symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, the prostatic effect of adrenergic agonists has not been investigated. This study deals with the prostatic effect of subchronic sympathomimetic stimulation. METHODS: Male rats received daily subcutaneous injections of the alpha-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine, 1, 10, or 20 mg/kg per day, the beta-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol, 1, 2.5 or 5 mg/kg per day, or saline, for 30 days, and the prostates were removed for histopathological examination. RESULTS: Phenylephrine induced atypical prostatic hyperplasia, characterized by piling-up with papillary and cribriform patterns, and budding-out of epithelial cells. It decreased prostatic secretions and total weight. Similar results were observed in orchidectomized rats receiving exogenous testosterone supplementation. Isoproterenol had no prostatic morphological effect. CONCLUSIONS: These results raise the possibility that sympathetic stimuli play a role in normal and aberrant growth and differentiation of prostatic epithelium, and suggests neurostimulants-treated animals as a model to study the etiology and development of prostatic hyperplasia.