Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg Open ; 2(3)2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34870279

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The older population is growing and with this growth there is a parallel rise in the operations performed on this vulnerable group. The perioperative pain management strategy for older adults is unique and requires a team-based approach for provision of high-quality surgical care. METHODS: Literature search was performed using PubMed in addition to review of relevant protocols and guidelines from geriatric, surgical, and anesthesia societies. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized trials, observational studies, and society guidelines were summarized in this review. MANAGEMENT: The optimal approach to a pain management strategy for older adults undergoing surgery involves addressing all phases of perioperative care. For example, preoperative assessment of a patient's cognitive function and presence of chronic pain may impact the pain management plan. Consideration should be also given to intraoperative strategies to improve pain control and minimize both the dose and side effects from opioids (e.g. regional anesthetic techniques). Postoperative pain control (e.g. under or over treatment of pain) may impact the development of elderly-specific complications such as postoperative delirium and functional decline. Finally, pain management does not stop after the older adult patient leaves the hospital. Both discharge planning and post-operative clinic follow-up provide important opportunities for collaboration and intervention. CONCLUSIONS: An opioid-sparing pain management strategy for older adults can be accomplished with a comprehensive and collaborative interdisciplinary strategy addressing all phases of perioperative care.

3.
J Surg Res ; 259: 192-199, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33302219

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Older adults undergoing surgery are at risk for geriatric events (GEs: delirium, dehydration, falls or fractures, failure to thrive, and pressure ulcers). The prevalence and association of GEs with clinical outcomes after elective surgery is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the 2013-2014 National Inpatient Sample, we analyzed hospital admissions for the five most common elective procedures (total knee arthroplasty, right hemicolectomy, carotid endarterectomy, aortic valve replacement, and radical prostatectomy) in older adults (age ≥ 65). Our primary variable of interest was presence of any GE. Logistic regression estimated the association of GEs with (1) age group and (2) perioperative outcomes (mortality, postoperative complications, prolonged length of stay, and discharge to skilled nursing facility). RESULTS: Of 1,255,120 admissions, 66.5% were aged ≥65. The overall rate of any GE was 2.4% and increased with age (55-64 y: 1.5%; 65-74: 2.2%; ≥75: 4.1%; P < 0.001). After adjustment, the probability of any GE increased with age (P < 0.001). Rates of GEs varied by procedure (P < 0.001). In comparison with admissions with no GEs, one or more GE was associated with higher probability of worse outcomes including mortality, postoperative complications, prolonged length of stay, and discharge to skilled nursing facility (all P < 0.001). In addition, there was a dose-dependent relationship between GEs and these poor perioperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: GEs are strongly associated with poor perioperative outcomes. Efforts should focus on mutable factors responsible for GEs to optimize surgical care for older adults.


Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Delírio/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência de Crescimento/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
4.
Surgery ; 169(2): 356-361, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33077200

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The United States population is aging, and the number of older adults requiring operative care is increasing at a rapid rate. In order to address this issue, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society created best practice guidelines surrounding optimal perioperative care for the older adult surgical patient. This study aimed to determine the documented compliance with these guidelines at a single institution. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 86 older adults undergoing elective, inpatient coronary artery bypass graft, prostatectomy, or colectomy over a 2-year period (1/2016-12/2017) at a single Veterans Affairs institution. The primary outcome was compliance with the 38 measures from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society Best Practice Guidelines. The secondary outcome was postoperative (including geriatric-specific) complications. RESULTS: The mean reported compliance across all measures was 41% ± 4%. Of 38 analyzed measures, compliance for 10 measures was achieved for 0 patients, and only 1 patient for 7 measures. There was variance in compliance by phase of care (P < .05) with a high of 56% ± 8% (immediate preoperative phase of care) and a low of 35% ± 4% (intraoperative phase of care). CONCLUSION: Overall reported compliance with the Best Practice Guidelines of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society is low (41%) at this institution. This study identifies a need to improve the care provided to the vulnerable population of older adults undergoing an operation. Future work is needed to understand barriers for implementation and how compliance relates to outcomes.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Perioperatória/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Geriatria/normas , Hospitais de Veteranos/organização & administração , Hospitais de Veteranos/normas , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Estados Unidos
6.
Surgery ; 167(3): 550-555, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31866059

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database is increasingly used for surgical research. However, it is unclear how well this database represents the breadth of work performed by different specialties. METHODS: Using the 2017 NSQIP participant use file and the 2017 Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary file, we evaluated (1) what proportion of surgical work is captured by NSQIP, (2) what procedures and disciplines are undersampled, and (3) the overall concordance between the NSQIP sample and a national sample. RESULTS: The NSQIP database reported at least one case for 4,463 out of the 5,272 Current Procedures Terminology codes in the Medicare file, potentially capturing 97.8% of surgical work across all 10 specialties. However, this proportion decreased to 72.1% when only procedures with at least 100 cases in NSQIP were considered. Limiting our analysis to only those procedures with 100 cases had markedly different effects by specialty. In part, this was owing to undersampling of minor procedures, which are more common in disciplines such as otolaryngology and urology. The overall association between the size of the NSQIP sample and the Medicare sample was 0.08. CONCLUSION: Although NSQIP has the potential to capture a diverse surgical caseload, some specialties and procedures are undersampled, limiting the ability for NSQIP to generate valid benchmarks. There was little correlation between the sample sizes in NSQIP and a national sample. Increasing sampling of underrepresented procedures and developing weights to scale NSQIP to a national sample would strengthen the program's ability to inform health outcomes research and provide valid comparisons across procedures and specialties.


Assuntos
Benchmarking/organização & administração , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Benchmarking/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
Surgery ; 167(2): 468-474, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31515123

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Geriatric patients require specialized perioperative care, yet the impact of geriatric surgery proportion (a measure of experience) and geriatric surgery volume, on clinical outcomes is unknown. This study analyzes the association between proportion and volume and clinical outcomes after high-risk geriatric surgery. METHODS: Using the 2014 National Inpatient Sample, hospital encounters for older adults (≥65 years) undergoing high-risk geriatric surgery were identified. Geriatric surgery volume was defined as a hospital's annual volume of geriatric patients undergoing high-risk geriatric surgery. Geriatric surgery proportion was calculated as volume divided by the sum of high-risk surgeries in all ages. Hierarchical multivariable regression models identified predictors of inpatient mortality, postoperative length of stay, and discharge to nursing facility. RESULTS: There were an estimated 514,950 hospital encounters for older adults undergoing high-risk geriatric surgery from 3,115 hospitals. Mean proportion was 0.53 ± 0.19; median volume was 60 cases per year, ranging from 5 to 3,235. After adjustment, comparing the 90th to 10th percentiles, higher proportion was associated with decreased mortality (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.81 [0.73-0.88]; P < .001) and shorter postoperative length of stay (-4.44% (-5.49 to -3.39%); P < .0001). Higher volume was not associated with mortality but was associated with longer length of stay (7.76% [6.75-8.77%]; P < .0001) and decreased discharge to nursing facility (0.87 [0.79-0.95]; P= .003). CONCLUSION: Treatment of geriatric patients at hospitals with the highest proportion of high-risk geriatric surgery, or the most experience, is associated with improved outcomes. High-proportion hospitals should be examined to understand the mechanisms by which better quality geriatric surgical care is achieved, while lower-proportion hospitals may be targets for quality improvement efforts.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/mortalidade , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
8.
Am Surg ; 85(10): 1089-1093, 2019 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31657300

RESUMO

Older adults undergoing nonelective surgery are at risk for geriatric events (GEs: delirium, dehydration, falls/fractures, failure to thrive, and pressure ulcers), but the impact of GEs on postoperative outcomes is unclear. Using the 2013 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample, we analyzed nonelective hospital admissions for five common operations (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, colectomy, soft tissue debridement, small bowel resection, and laparoscopic appendectomy) in older adults (aged ≥65 years) and a younger referent group (aged 55-64 years). Nationally weighted descriptive statistics were generated for GEs. Logistic regression controlling for patient, procedure, and hospital characteristics estimated the association of 1) age with GEs and 2) GEs with outcomes. Of 471,325 overall admissions, 64.7 per cent were aged ≥65 years. The rate of any GE in older adults was 26.9 per cent; GEs varied by age and procedure (P < 0.001). After adjustment, the probability of any GE increased with age category (P < 0.001); having any GE was associated with higher probability of all outcomes (P < 0.001): mortality (4.5% vs 0.8%), postoperative complications (61.7% vs 24.9%), prolonged length of stay (24.3% vs 7.9%), and skilled nursing facility discharge (46.6% vs 10.3%). In addition, there was a dose-response relationship between GEs and negative outcomes. GEs are prevalent in the nonelective surgery setting and associated with worse clinical outcomes. Quality improvement efforts should focus on addressing GEs.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/efeitos adversos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Desbridamento/efeitos adversos , Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Apendicectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/estatística & dados numéricos , Colectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Desbridamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Desidratação/epidemiologia , Desidratação/etiologia , Delírio/epidemiologia , Delírio/etiologia , Insuficiência de Crescimento/epidemiologia , Insuficiência de Crescimento/etiologia , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/epidemiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/etiologia , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
JAMA Surg ; 154(10): 915-921, 2019 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31314063

RESUMO

Importance: The primary data sources used to generate and update work relative value units (RVUs) are surveys of small groups of specialists who are asked to estimate the time and intensity needed to perform surgical procedures. Because these surveys are conducted by specialty societies and rely on subjective data, these sources have been challenged as potentially biased. Objective: To assess whether objective work measures are associated with a surgical procedure's assigned work RVUs and whether differences exist by surgical specialty. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study obtained data from the 2016 and 2017 participant use files of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The 2017 physician fee schedule of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services was a secondary data source. Procedures were included if they had at least 100 patient-level observations over the 2-year period. Data were analyzed from August 29, 2018, to April 2, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The dependent variable was a procedure's assigned work RVU. Independent variables of work RVUs were 4 procedure-level work measures (median operative time, median postoperative length of stay, all-cause 30-day readmission rate, and all-cause 30-day reoperation rate) and surgeon specialty (10-level category using general surgery as the reference). Results: The data set included 628 unique Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and 726 CPT-specialty combinations from 1 239 991 patient observations. Statistically significant associations were found between each work measure and assigned work RVU, as follows: median operative time (R2 = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.78), postoperative length of stay (R2 = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.36-0.48), rate of readmission (R2 = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.13-0.23), and rate of reoperation (R2 = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.10-0.20). Including all 4 measures explained 80.2% (95% CI, 77.3%-83.1%) of the variation. Adding the surgical specialty improved the overall fit of the model (likelihood ratio test χ2 = 231.27; P < .001). Cardiac (7.78; 95% CI, 4.25-11.31; P < .001) and neurosurgery (2.46; 95% CI, 1.08-3.83; P < .001) had higher work RVUs compared with general surgery, whereas orthopedics (-1.53; 95% CI, -2.48 to -0.59; P = .002), urology (-1.58; 95% CI, -2.88 to -0.29; P = .02), plastics (-2.70; 95% CI, -4.39 to -1.01; P = .002), and otolaryngology (-3.05; 95% CI, -4.69 to -1.42; P < .001) had lower work RVUs compared with general surgery. Conclusions and Relevance: Objective work measures appeared to be associated with assigned work RVUs, predominantly with operative time; registry data can be used to augment and inform the generation and updating processes of the work RVUs.


Assuntos
Mecanismo de Reembolso , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Estudos Transversais , Current Procedural Terminology , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Duração da Cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Reoperação , Estados Unidos
11.
Surgery ; 165(5): 1027-1034, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30905469

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: National, procedure-specific clinical registries are increasingly available in surgery, although data about children have lagged behind. Data related to the surgical management of appendicitis in children have become available recently and can be used to inform patient and family expectations and to identify clinical areas in need of ongoing improvement. METHODS: Cases of acute, uncomplicated appendicitis in children (<18 years of age) were extracted from the 2017 pediatric appendectomy-targeted file of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Epidemiologic data were generated across 5 domains: (1) patient characteristics/severity, (2) preoperative imaging patterns, (3) characteristics of the operation, (4) pathologic outcomes, and (5) postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: The final sample included 9,507 appendectomies for acute, uncomplicated appendicitis performed at 106 hospitals. The population was predominantly male (60.6%), involving children 6 to 12 years of age (55.3%). Only 2.9% of patients did not have imaging before their appendectomy. Overall, 38.2% received a computed tomography; however, patients transferred with imaging received computed tomography at 3.8 times the rate of those with only local (ie, operating hospital) imaging. Laparoscopy was used in 94.6% of cases, with 1.1% converted to open. Negative appendectomy and complication rates were 3.3% and 2.1%, respectively. Children ≤5 years of age had 2.3 greater odds of negative appendectomy than children 6 to 17 years of age. CONCLUSION: Children undergoing operation for acute, uncomplicated appendicitis have excellent clinical outcomes, although children ≤5 years of age have an increased risk of negative appendectomy. Despite guidelines against their use, more than one-third of children received a computed tomography before operation, driven predominantly by transferring hospitals.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Apendicectomia/efeitos adversos , Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicite/diagnóstico por imagem , Apendicite/patologia , Apêndice/diagnóstico por imagem , Apêndice/patologia , Apêndice/cirurgia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/normas , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/normas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
J Healthc Qual ; 41(2): 91-98, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30688834

RESUMO

Older Veterans are increasingly undergoing surgery and are at particularly high risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Prehabilitation has emerged as a method to improve postoperative outcomes by enhancing the patient's preoperative condition. We present data from our prehabilitation pilot project and plans for expansion and dissemination of a nationwide quality improvement effort. The infrastructure of the existing Veterans Affairs (VA) Gerofit health and exercise program was used to create our pilot. Pilot patients were screened for risk of postoperative functional decline, assessed for baseline physical function, enrolled in a personalized exercise program, and prepared to transition into the hospital for surgery. Patients (n = 9) completed an average of 17.7 prehabilitation sessions. After completing the program, 55.6% improved in ≥2 of the 5 fitness assessments completed. Postoperative outcomes including complications, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmissions were better than predicted by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator. We have obtained institutional support for implementing similar prehabilitation programs at VA hospitals nationally through our designation as a VA Patient Safety Center for Inquiry. This is the first multi-institutional prehabilitation program for frail, older Veterans and represents an essential step toward optimizing surgical care for this vulnerable population.


Assuntos
Idoso Fragilizado , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Saúde dos Veteranos/normas , Veteranos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
15.
Surgery ; 165(3): 593-601, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30385123

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic data related to the surgical management of appendicitis are out of date. As we contemplate the role of nonoperative therapy in uncomplicated appendicitis, a contemporary profile of the risks and benefits of operative appendectomy is needed. METHODS: This study merged the 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program essential and appendectomy-targeted participant use files. The appendectomy-targeted file provides procedure-specific variables related to imaging, approach, and outcomes. Epidemiologic data were generated across five domains for adults with uncomplicated appendicitis: patient characteristics/severity, imaging patterns, operative characteristics, pathologic outcomes, and postoperative morbidity/mortality. RESULTS: The merged data file contained 12,376 adult appendectomies from 115 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sites. After exclusions, 7,778 cases were analyzed. Almost all patients (96.1%) received preoperative imaging, with most (79.2%) receiving a computed tomography scan only. Only 2.6% of appendectomies were performed open, and the laparoscopic to open conversion rate was 0.5%. Most patients (87.3%) were discharged the day of or the day after their operation. The rate of finding an incidental tumor was 1.1%, with greater rates in the elderly (2.7% among patients aged ≥65 years). The overall rate of a negative appendectomy (NA) was 3.8%; the negative appendectomy rate was 1.7% for patients with any positive imaging study and 19.4% for patients with no imaging. The 30-day mortality was 0.04%; 30-day rates of any complication and serious complications were 3.0% and 2.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Preoperative imaging, a laparoscopic approach, and excellent clinical outcomes have become the norm for the surgical management of uncomplicated appendicitis. As surgeons contemplate the role of nonoperative therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis, the data presented here should be used to inform the ongoing debate.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia , Adulto Jovem
16.
Am Surg ; 84(10): 1650-1654, 2018 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30747688

RESUMO

The population is aging and more geriatric patients are undergoing surgery. The national burden and age-specific outcomes of previously defined high-risk colorectal procedures (HRCP) remain unknown. Using the 2014 National Inpatient Sample, patients were stratified into nongeriatric (NG, <65 years), younger geriatric (YG, 65-79 years), and older geriatric (OG, ≥80 years) cohorts. Cases were grouped into nonelective admissions (NA) and elective admissions (EA). Nationally representative outcomes were compared across age group and admission type. Of 215,425 patients undergoing HRCP, 47.3 per cent were ≥65 years. During NA and EA, inpatient mortality, discharge to nursing facility, and median postoperative length of stay increased with each increasing age category (P < 0.001). Outcomes during NA were worse than EA in all age groups (P < 0.001). For example, rates of discharge to nursing facility were 13.4 per cent NG, 39.4 per cent YG, and 64.7 per cent OG during; NA and 3.1 per cent NG, 13.3 per cent YG, and 34 per cent OG during EA. During NA and EA, cost was equal in YG and OG but greater than in NG. Outcomes after HRCP are worse for older patients and for nonelective cases. This information can inform preoperative counseling and targeted quality improvement projects. Further work is needed to understand geriatric-specific risk factors and outcomes to provide high-quality patient-centered care.


Assuntos
Colectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Colo Sigmoide/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colectomia/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/economia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA