Secretome of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells as a Possible Innovative Therapeutic Tool in Facial Nerve Injury Treatment.

Facial nerve palsy is a serious neurological condition that strongly affects patient everyday life. Standard treatments provide insufficient improvement and are burdened with the risk of severe complications, e.g., facial synkinesis. Mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies are a novel and extensively developed field which offers new treatment approaches with promising results in regards to the nervous tissue regeneration. The potential of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) to aid the regeneration of damaged nerves has been demonstrated in several preclinical models, as well as in several clinical trials. However, therapies based on cell transplantation are difficult to standardize in the manner similar to that of routine clinical practices. On the other hand, treatments based on mesenchymal stromal cell secretome harness the proregenerative features of mesenchymal stromal cells but relay on a product with measurable parameters that can be put through standardization procedures and deliver a fully controllable end-product. Utilization of mesenchymal stromal cell secretome allows the controlled dosage and standardization of the components to maximize the therapeutic potential and ensure safety of the end-product.

Interleukin-6 mimics insulin-dependent cellular distribution of some cytoskeletal proteins and Glut4 transporter without effect on glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.

Interleukin (IL)-6, a known proinflammatory cytokine, is released in both visceral adipose tissue and contracting skeletal muscle. In this study, we used microRNA profiling as a screening method to identify miRNA species modified by IL-6 treatment in mouse 3T3-L1 adipocytes. miRNA microarray analysis and qRT-PCR revealed increased expression of miR-146b-3p in adipocytes exposed to IL-6 (1 ng/ml) during 8-day differentiation. On the basis of ontological analysis of potential targets, selected proteins associated with cytoskeleton and transport were examined in the context of adipocyte response to insulin, using immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. We concluded that IL-6: (i) does not affect insulin action on actin cellular distribution; (ii) modulates the effect of insulin on myosin light chain kinase (Mylk) distribution by preventing its shift toward cytoplasm; (iii) mimics the effect of insulin on dynein distribution by increasing its near-nuclear accumulation; (iv) mimics the effect of insulin on glucose transporter Glut4 distribution, especially by increasing its near-nuclear accumulation; (v) supports insulin action on early endosome marker Rab4A near-nuclear accumulation. Moreover, as IL-6 did not disturb insulin-dependent glucose uptake, our results do not confirm the IL-6-induced impairment of insulin action observed in some in vitro studies, suggesting that the effect of IL-6 is dose dependent.

Interaction between Macrophages and Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Derived from Bone Marrow and Wharton's Jelly-A Comparative Study.

Despite intensive clinical research on the use of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), further basic research in this field is still required. Herein, we compared human bone marrow MSCs (BM-MSCs, n = 6) and Wharton's jelly MSCs (WJ-MSCs, n = 6) in their ability to interact with human primary macrophages. Evaluation of secretory potential revealed that under pro-inflammatory stimulation, WJ-MSCs secreted significantly more IL-6 than BM-MSCs (2-fold). This difference did not translate into the effect of MSCs on macrophages: both types of MSCs significantly directed M1-like macrophages toward the M2 phenotype (based on CD206 expression) to a similar extent. This observation was consistent both in flow cytometry analysis and immunocytochemical assessment. The effect of MSCs on macrophages was sustained when IL-6 signaling was blocked with Tocilizumab. Macrophages, regardless of polarization status, enhanced chemotaxis of both BM-MSCs and WJ-MSCs (p < 0.01; trans-well assay), with WJ-MSCs being significantly more responsive to M1-derived chemotactic signals than BM-MSCs. Furthermore, WJ-MSCs increased their motility (scratch assay) when exposed to macrophage-conditioned medium while BM-MSCs did not. These results indicate that although both BM-MSCs and WJ-MSCs have the ability to reciprocally interact with macrophages, the source of MSCs could slightly but significantly modify the response under clinical settings.