A Gyrolab Assay for the Quantitation of Free Complement Protein C5a in Human Plasma.

Complement protein C5a is recognized as an important component of the alternative complement pathway. Its role is prominent enough to garner interest not only as a biomarker, but also as a potential therapeutic target. Bioanalytical challenges have been posed in proper quantitation of free C5a due to interference from its precursor, C5. Additionally, free therapeutic target quantitation can be difficult due to effects of sample dilution and prolonged sample incubation when therapeutic is used as capture reagent. Gyrolab technology enables quantitation of free target analyte with minimal sample dilution and rapid sample incubations, thus enabling in vitro results that are more representative of in vivo pharmacodynamics. When coupled with strategic sample pretreatment, Gyrolab offers an opportunity to quantitate free C5a in human plasma with an assay that vastly diminishes C5 interference. A Gyrolab assay for the quantitation of free C5a in human plasma was developed and validated. Validation results confirmed that proper sample pretreatment and use of the Gyrolab platform yield accurate and reliable results. Due to the advantages that it provides, Gyrolab has become our default technology of choice for quantitation of free target.

Emerging technologies for biotherapeutic bioanalysis from a high-throughput and multiplexing perspective: insights from an AAPS emerging technology action program committee.

This manuscript aims to provide insights and updates on emerging technologies from a throughput and multiplexing perspective and to update readers on changes in previously reported technologies. The technologies discussed range from nascent (ultrasensitive Cira, Intellicyt®, Dynaxi and Captsure™) to the more established (Ella and SQIDlite™). For the nascent technologies, there was an emphasis on user interviews and reviews, where available, to help provide an unbiased view to our readers. For the Ella, a review of published user data as well as author and other user experiences are summarized. Due to their emergent nature, all the technologies described are applicable in the early drug development stage, may require an upfront investment of capital and may not perform as expected.

A Multi-site In-depth Evaluation of the Quanterix Simoa from a User's Perspective.

An in-depth evaluation of the Quanterix© Simoa™ platform was undertaken by scientists from the AAPS Emerging Technologies Focus Group to determine the overall performance of the technology as well as provide guidance to future users. In order to test the platform in a non-GLP bioanalytical setting, a cross-site evaluation of the Quanterix IL-6 biomarker kit was performed. Parameters tested during this evaluation included sensitivity, accuracy and precision, and parallelism in human serum from normal individuals. The results demonstrated improved sensitivity compared to the claimed sensitivity of other commercially available IL-6 kits and showed excellent site-to-site reproducibility. Observed issues included difficulties with system reliability and a lack of parallelism and specificity in a subset of samples. Overall, these results demonstrate that while there are challenges to the Simoa platform this technology offers automation capabilities and excellent sensitivity that enhance bioanalysis especially of low-abundance analytes.

Quantitative analysis of four protein biomarkers: An automated microfluidic cartridge-based method and its comparison to colorimetric ELISA.

Biomarker quantitation with ligand binding assays has matured greatly in recent years. This maturation has been partly in response to demands for more data points from fewer samples or less available sample volume. Multiplexing offers opportunities to acquire data for multiple analytes from single sample assay iterations, but has its own unique challenges and limitations. ProteinSimple has developed Simple Plex™, an automated immunoassay platform consisting of microfluidic cartridge-based assays run on the Ella instrument. Ella subverts traditional multiplexing challenges by rapidly performing triplicate measurements of up to four different analytes simultaneously, each in their own respective assay vessels and all from a single sample. Here we describe a comparison of the Simple Plex platform versus colorimetric ELISA and their respective abilities to quantitate four common biomarkers (MCP-1/CCL2, VEGF-A, TNF-α, and IL-6) from twenty-eight healthy individual donor plasma samples. Each biomarker was tested on the two platforms on each of two days. Ella analysis required significantly reduced sample volume, manual steps, and total time. Overall, Ella was able to quantify results for all twenty-eight samples for each of the four biomarkers. In contrast, ELISA was able to measure quantifiable results within respective calibration curve ranges for MCP-1/CCL2 (96% of samples) and VEGFA (7% of samples). For TNF-α and IL-6, ELISA was not sensitive enough to quantify any samples in the assay ranges. This stark difference in quantitative results underscores Ella's ability to multiplex without compromising sensitivity, and has far reaching potential for biomarker panel measurement in support of diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of disease.

Next generation ligand binding assays-review of emerging technologies' capabilities to enhance throughput and multiplexing.

The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a summary of the evaluation done by the Throughput and Multiplexing subteam on five emerging technologies: Single molecule array (Simoa™), Optimiser™, CyTOF® (Mass cytometry), SQIDLite™, and iLite™. Most of the information is presented with a minimum amount of published data and much is based on discussions with users and the vendor, to help provide the reader with an unbiased assessment of where the subteam sees each technology fitting best in the bioanalysis of large molecules. The evaluation focuses on technologies with advantages in throughput and multiplexing, but is wide enough to capture their strengths in other areas. While all platforms may be suited to support bioanalysis in the discovery space, because of their emergent nature, only Optimiser and SQIDLite are currently ready to be used in the regulated space. With the exception of Optimiser, each instrument/technology requires an up-front investment from the bioanalytical lab that will need justification during capital budget discussions. Ultimately, the platform choice should be driven by the quality of data, project needs, and the intended use of the data generated. In a time- and resource-constrained environment, it is not possible to evaluate all emergent technologies available in the market; we hope that this review gives the reader some of the information needed to decide which technology he/she may want to consider evaluating to support their drug development program in comparison to the options they already have in their hands.

Active glucagon-like peptide 1 quantitation in human plasma: a comparison of multiple ligand binding assay platforms.

There are a wide variety of ligand binding assay platforms available for implementation in present day bioanalytical laboratories. Selecting the platform that best suits a particular project's needs is highly dependent upon multiple assay characteristics. The active form of glucagon-like protein (GLP-1) is a biomarker of interest for type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and therefore a common target for quantitation. Previous projects requiring active GLP-1 measurements involved the use of a labor intensive ELISA, spurring an investigation towards other potential assay platforms. To that end, four separate ligand binding assay formats (standard ELISA, electrochemiluminescence, Gyrolab, and Singulex) were evaluated. The platforms were compared for numerous assay parameters including dynamic range, sample volume requirements, throughput, and cost. Additionally, thirty individual donor plasmas were run with each assay as representative study samples. Although our evaluation did not show any platform that was better than others in all assay characteristics, there was one that was best in sensitivity (Singulex) and one that was best in throughput and sample volume requirements (Gyrolab). The lack of a technology that was best in all categories underscores the importance of due diligence when selecting an assay platform; there are no silver bullets, and one must take into account what is necessary for project needs and the intended use of the data.

Prandial ghrelin attenuation provides evidence that des-acyl ghrelin may be an artifact of sample handling in human plasma.

BACKGROUND: Plasma acyl and des-acyl ghrelin are thought of as components of total ghrelin, but this has never been validated using ex vivo spiking experiments, human sample collection comparisons and fit-for-purpose translatable assays. RESULTS: Acyl ghrelin plasma stability was analyzed by LC-MS/MS and it revealed that acyl ghrelin is enzymatically and chemically converted to des-acyl ghrelin in the presence of active serine proteases and HCl. ELISAs with less than 30% total error were used to assess acyl ghrelin behavior in matched authentic human samples. Acyl and total ghrelin were not statistically different in 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride samples and acyl ghrelin losses in K(2)EDTA plasma were accounted for in des-acyl ghrelin formation. CONCLUSION: Acyl ghrelin is total ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin should not be detectible in healthy human plasma under optimal sample handling and assaying conditions.

Practical quantitative and kinetic applications of bio-layer interferometry for toxicokinetic analysis of a monoclonal antibody therapeutic.

Bio-layer interferometry (BLI) is a label-free technology that can be used for kinetic characterization of proteins. Although other label-free platforms have been used for quantitation purposes (most notably surface plasmon resonance), little work has been done using BLI. Here we present rationale and strategies for the development and analytical qualification of a BLI assay for the quantitation of a humanized antibody therapeutic in cynomolgus monkey plasma. Results of the qualification were compared to those of a validated ELISA used to quantitate the same therapeutic. Selectivity, matrix effect, and precision and accuracy were similar between the two methods. Target interference was more pronounced in the BLI assay compared to the ELISA. The main difference between the two assays was in the dynamic range (0.1-10 µg/mL for ELISA vs. 0.4-50 µg/mL for BLI). The monkey plasma BLI assay was applied to rat plasma for the comparison of study samples generated in the same matrix by ELISA. A direct quantitation comparison of sample results for the two methods shows a high degree of agreement (r(2)=0.979, slope=1.017). However, an evaluation of low concentration samples showed a bias of over-recovery in the BLI compared to the ELISA. In addition to utilizing the quantitative capabilities of the platform, we evaluated the utility of using the kinetic properties of the quantitative assay to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and illustrated the potential for ADA to cause either over recovery (non-neutralizing ADA) or under recovery (neutralizing ADA) of a biotherapeutic using the BLI assay.