Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 90(9): 2170-2175, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605637

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Historically, a zone II hematoma mandated exploration after penetrating trauma, but this has been challenged given potentially higher nephrectomy rates and the advent of therapeutic endovascular and endoscopic interventions. We hypothesized penetrating mechanism was not a predictor for delayed intervention in the modern era. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included renal trauma patients from 3/2019 to 6/2022. Our institutional practice is selective exploration of zone II hematomas for active bleeding and expanding hematoma only, regardless of mechanism. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression (MLR) were performed. RESULTS: One-hundred and forty-four patients were identified, with median age 32 years (IQR:23,49), 66% blunt mechanism, and injury severity score 17(IQR:11,26). Forty-three (30%) required operative intervention, and of the 20 that had a zone II exploration, 3 (15%) underwent renorrhaphy and 17 (85%) underwent nephrectomy. Penetrating patients more frequently underwent immediate operative intervention (67%vs10%,P < .0001), required nephrectomy (27%vs5%,P = .0003), and were less likely to undergo pre-intervention CT (51%vs96%,P < .0001) compared to blunt patients. Delayed renal interventions were higher in penetrating (33%vs13%,P = .004) with no difference in mortality or length of stay compared to blunt mechanism. Ureteral stent placement and renal embolization were the most common delayed interventions. On MLR, the only independent predictor for delayed intervention was need for initial operative intervention (OR 3.803;95%CI:1.612-8.975,P = .0023). Four (3%) required delayed nephrectomy, of which only one underwent initial operative intervention without zone 2 exploration. CONCLUSIONS: The most common delayed interventions after renal trauma were renal embolization and ureteral stent. Penetrating mechanism was not a predictor of delayed renal intervention in a trauma center that manages zone II retroperitoneal hematomas similarly regardless of mechanism.


Assuntos
Hematoma , Rim , Nefrectomia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Ferimentos Penetrantes , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Rim/lesões , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia/métodos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos Penetrantes/cirurgia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos Penetrantes/terapia , Hematoma/cirurgia , Hematoma/terapia , Hematoma/etiologia , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Adulto Jovem , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Traumatismos Abdominais/mortalidade , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos
2.
Am Surg ; 90(9): 2176-2181, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38613475

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Need for Trauma Intervention (NFTI) score was proposed to help identify injured trauma patients while minimizing under (UT) and over triage (OT). Using a national database, we aimed to describe UT and OT of NFTI vs standard Cribari method (CM) and hypothesized triage sensitivity remains poor. METHODS: The 2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried. Demographics, mechanism, verification level, interfacility transfer (IF), and level of activation were collected. Patients were stratified by both NFTI [+ vs -] and CM [Injury severity score (ISS) < 15 vs > 15]. UT was defined as NFTI + or ISS >15 without full trauma activation. RESULTS: 1,030,526 patients were identified in TQIP. 84,969 were UT and 97,262 were OT using NFTI while 94,020 were UT and 108,823 were OT using CM. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of NFTI is 49%, 89%, 45%, and 90%, respectively vs 43%, 87%, 39%, and 89% of CM, respectively. Age was higher in the UT group using both scores (52 vs 42, P < .0001 and 54 vs 42, P < .0001, respectively). Using MLR, level 2 and 3 verification, blunt mechanism, female, IF, and older age were associated with UT in both NFTI and CM. Level 1 verification, penetrating mechanism, male, no IF, and younger age were associated with OT. CONCLUSIONS: Current prehospital triage criteria have poor sensitivity for identifying severely injured trauma patients by both NFTI and CM. UT increases as age of the patient increases. Further studies are needed to improve triage.


Assuntos
Triagem , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Centros de Traumatologia
3.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 9(1): e001159, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38464553

RESUMO

Objectives: There is little evidence guiding the management of grade I-II traumatic splenic injuries with contrast blush (CB). We aimed to analyze the failure rate of nonoperative management (NOM) of grade I-II splenic injuries with CB in hemodynamically stable patients. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study examining all grade I-II splenic injuries with CB was performed at 21 institutions from January 1, 2014, to October 31, 2019. Patients >18 years old with grade I or II splenic injury due to blunt trauma with CB on CT were included. The primary outcome was the failure of NOM requiring angioembolization/operation. We determined the failure rate of NOM for grade I versus grade II splenic injuries. We then performed bivariate comparisons of patients who failed NOM with those who did not. Results: A total of 145 patients were included. Median Injury Severity Score was 17. The combined rate of failure for grade I-II injuries was 20.0%. There was no statistical difference in failure of NOM between grade I and II injuries with CB (18.2% vs 21.1%, p>0.05). Patients who failed NOM had an increased median hospital length of stay (p=0.024) and increased need for blood transfusion (p=0.004) and massive transfusion (p=0.030). Five patients (3.4%) died and 96 (66.2%) were discharged home, with no differences between those who failed and those who did not fail NOM (both p>0.05). Conclusion: NOM of grade I-II splenic injuries with CB fails in 20% of patients. Level of evidence: IV.

4.
Am J Surg ; 234: 117-121, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553336

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite improving understanding of trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC), mortality and morbidity due to exsanguinating trauma remain high. Increased complications due to hemorrhage have been reported in blood group O, possibly due to reduced levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF). METHODS: An urban level 1 adult trauma center registry was retrospectively queried. Patients receiving ≥6 units of pRBC within 4 â€‹h of presentation were included. Patient demographics, admission labs and outcomes were obtained. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: 562 patients were identified. There were no significant differences in demographics, admission labs, or outcome between different ABO groups. After adjustment, Type A patients were more likely to be hypocoagulable compared to Type O patients (p â€‹= â€‹0.014). No mortality differences were seen between ABO types in multiple regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: No outcome or mortality differences were seen between ABO types, therefore factors other than vWF expression should be considered to explain coagulopathy in trauma patients.


Assuntos
Sistema ABO de Grupos Sanguíneos , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea , Exsanguinação , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/etiologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Ferimentos e Lesões/sangue , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Exsanguinação/mortalidade , Exsanguinação/etiologia , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros
5.
Am Surg ; 90(7): 1879-1885, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527489

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Iliac and femoral venous injuries represent a challenging dilemma in trauma surgery with mixed results. Venous restoration of outflow (via repair or bypass) has been previously identified as having higher rates of VTE (venous thromboembolism) compared to ligation. We hypothesized that rates of VTE and eventual amputation were similar whether restoration of venous outflow vs ligation was performed at initial operation. METHODS: Patients in the 2019-2021 National Trauma Data Bank with iliac and femoral vein injuries were abstracted and analyzed. The primary outcomes of interest were in-hospital lower extremity amputation and VTE. RESULTS: A total of 2642 patients with operatively managed iliac and femoral vein injuries were identified VTE was found in 10.8% of patients. Multivariable logistic regression was performed and identified bowel injury, higher ISS, older age, open repair, and longer time to VTE prophylaxis initiation as independent predictors of VTE. Amputation was required in 4.2% of patients. Multivariable logistic regression identified arterial or nerve injury, femur or tibia fracture, venous ligation, percutaneous intervention, fasciotomy, bowel injury, and higher ISS as independent factors of amputation. CONCLUSION: Venous restoration was not an independent predictor of VTE. Venous ligation on index operation was the only modifiable independent predictor of amputation identified on regression analysis.


Assuntos
Amputação Cirúrgica , Veia Femoral , Veia Ilíaca , Melhoria de Qualidade , Lesões do Sistema Vascular , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Adulto , Veia Femoral/lesões , Veia Femoral/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Amputação Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Veia Ilíaca/lesões , Veia Ilíaca/cirurgia , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ligadura/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA