RESUMO
Background: Digital and mobile (mHealth) solutions are online or application-based services intended to support individuals with health needs. Despite evidence supporting the use of mHealth for patients with chronic pain, and the increasing desire of these types of solutions by both patients and providers, adoption of mHealth solutions remains limited. Implementation mapping can serve as a practical method to facilitate implementation and adoption of mHealth solutions within healthcare settings. Methods: Implementation mapping was used to develop implementation strategies based on contextual determinants organized within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) for mHealth eLearning solutions across an integrated, multi-site healthcare system. We describe our experience identifying stakeholders, delineating implementation facilitators and barriers, defining implementation outcomes using RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework, outlining initial implementation strategies, and iterating on implementation strategies. Results: A total of 30 implementation strategies were identified and implemented. Over the first year, primary and specialty care providers across all the clinical sites (n = 70) placed 2559 orders for the mHealth solution. Most patients reported receiving the mHealth eLearning module (74%), and most patients felt that the tool improved their knowledge regarding their condition (82%) and their ability to provide self-care related to the condition (73%). Conclusion: Practical applications of implementation science methods can help enable change within healthcare settings. Implementation mapping is an exercise that can engage stakeholders to facilitate the incorporation of new methods of care delivery, including mHealth solutions.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To design and evaluate, through a human-centered design approach, a multispeciality clinic for patients with central sensitization syndromes that combined virtual previsit consultations, traditional face-to-face appointments, and technology-enabled educational programming. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with suspected fibromyalgia and chronic abdominal pain were seen in a multispecialty practice, and the performance of the clinic was evaluated against a contemporary cohort. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation measures included team estimates of time spent on care-related tasks, physician rank of alignment of patient need with clinic design, major appointment changes, and nonvisit care tasks. Members of the care team also evaluated strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to the success of the clinic. RESULTS: The pilot clinic was operated from April 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021, and included 34 patients with suspected fibromyalgia/chronic abdominal pain. During the pilot period, physicians ranked the value of the virtual previsit consultations in providing care as 7.5 on a scale of 0 to 10 and reported an average of 50 minutes in preparation for the appointment, execution of the appointment, and postvisit documentation. We did not observe substantial differences in the number of added appointments or messages received within the patient portal when compared with a comparison cohort. Patients who participated in the combination nurse educator-led and digital education program provided positive feedback about their experience. CONCLUSION: Our clinic model provides a framework for the treatment of patients with debilitating centrally sensitized conditions and future expansion of virtual care delivery models to better meet patient care and educational needs.