Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 82, 2024 Jul 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39075552

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospitals in any given region can be considered as part of a network, where facilities are connected to one another - and hospital pathogens potentially spread - through the movement of patients between them. We sought to describe the hospital admission patterns of patients known to be colonised with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), and compare them with CPE-negative patient cohorts, matched on comorbidity information. METHODS: We performed a linkage study in Victoria, Australia, including datasets with notifiable diseases (CPE notifications) and hospital admissions (admission dates and diagnostic codes) for the period 2011 to 2020. Where the CPE notification date occurred during a hospital admission for the same patient, we identified this as the 'index admission'. We determined the number of distinct health services each patient was admitted to, and time to first admission to a different health service. We compared CPE-positive patients with four cohorts of CPE-negative patients, sampled based on different matching criteria. RESULTS: Of 528 unique patients who had CPE detected during a hospital admission, 222 (42%) were subsequently admitted to a different health service during the study period. Among these patients, CPE diagnosis tended to occur during admission to a metropolitan public hospital (86%, 190/222), whereas there was a greater number of metropolitan private (23%, 52/222) and rural public (18%, 39/222) hospitals for the subsequent admission. Median time to next admission was 4 days (IQR, 0-75 days). Admission patterns for CPE-positive patients was similar to the cohort of CPE-negative patients matched on index admission, time period, and age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index. CONCLUSIONS: Movement of CPE-positive patients between health services is not a rare event. While the most common movement is from one public metropolitan health service to another, there is also a trend for movement from metropolitan public hospitals into private and rural hospitals. After accounting for clinical comorbidities, CPE colonisation status does not appear to impact on hospital admission frequency or timing. These findings support the potential utility of a centralised notification and outbreak management system for CPE positive patients.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae , beta-Lactamases , Humanos , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vitória/epidemiologia , Idoso , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Proteínas de Bactérias/metabolismo , Hospitalização , Adulto , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos , Admissão do Paciente , Enterobacteriaceae , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto Jovem , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Portador Sadio/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA