Prospective role of cefiderocol in the management of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: Review of the evidence.

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) has been classified by the World Health Organization as being in the critical category of pathogens requiring urgent new antibiotic treatment options. Cefiderocol, the first approved siderophore cephalosporin, was designed for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, particularly the non-fermenting species A. baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cefiderocol is mostly stable against hydrolysis by serine ß-lactamases and metallo-ß-lactamases, which are leading causes of carbapenem resistance. This review collates the available evidence on the in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and efficacy and safety of cefiderocol, and outlines its current role in the management of CRAB infections. In vitro surveillance data show susceptibility rates of >90% for cefiderocol against CRAB isolates as well as in vitro synergism with a variety of antibiotics recommended in guidelines. Clinical efficacy of cefiderocol monotherapy against CRAB infections has been demonstrated in the descriptive, open-label CREDIBLE-CR and the non-inferiority, double-blind APEKS-NP randomised clinical trials as well as in real-world cases in patients with underlying health problems. To date, the frequency of on-therapy development of cefiderocol resistance in A. baumannii appears to be low, but monitoring is highly recommended. Within current treatment guidelines for moderate-to-severe CRAB infections, cefiderocol is recommended for infections in which other antibiotics failed and in combination with other active antibiotics. In vivo pre-clinical data support the combination of sulbactam or avibactam with cefiderocol to enhance efficacy and to suppress the emergence of cefiderocol resistance. The benefit of combination therapy in the clinical setting is yet to be determined in prospective studies.

In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol Against Meropenem-Nonsusceptible Gram-Negative Bacilli with Defined ß-Lactamase Carriage: SIDERO-WT Surveillance Studies, 2014-2019.

We examined the in vitro susceptibility of meropenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex isolates from five consecutive annual SIDERO-WT surveillance studies (2014-2019) to cefiderocol and comparator agents in the context of their carbapenemase carriage. 1,003 Enterobacterales, 1,758 P. aeruginosa, and 2,809 A. baumannii complex isolates from North America and Europe that were meropenem nonsusceptible (CLSI M100, 2022) were molecularly characterized for ß-lactamase content by PCR followed by Sanger sequencing or by whole genome sequencing. Among Enterobacterales, 91.5% of metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-producing, 98.4% of KPC-producing, 97.3% of OXA-48 group-producing, and 98.7% of carbapenemase-negative, meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates were cefiderocol susceptible (MIC ≤4 mg/L). Among P. aeruginosa, 100% of MBL-producing, 100% of GES carbapenemase-producing, and 99.8% of carbapenemase-negative, meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates were cefiderocol susceptible (MIC ≤4 mg/L). Among A. baumannii complex, 60.0% of MBL-producing, 95.6% of OXA-23 group-producing, 89.5% of OXA-24 group-producing, 100% of OXA-58 group-producing, and 95.5% of carbapenemase-negative, meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates were cefiderocol susceptible (MIC ≤4 mg/L). Cefiderocol was inactive against A. baumannii complex isolates carrying a PER or VEB ß-lactamase (n = 103; 15.5% susceptible). Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam were inactive against MBL-carrying and A. baumannii complex isolates; ceftolozane-tazobactam was also inactive against serine carbapenemase-carrying Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. In summary, cefiderocol was highly active in vitro against Gram-negative isolates carrying MBLs and serine carbapenemases, as well as carbapenemase-negative, meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates.

In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the in vivo efficacy and resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam and meropenem using human-simulated regimens (HSR) in the murine infection model. METHODS: In total, 15 clinical A. baumannii were assessed: cefiderocol MICs, 2 mg/L (previously developed resistance on therapy), n = 3; 8 mg/L, n = 2; ≥32 mg/L, n = 10 (including VEB and PER-harbouring isolates). Mice received inactive control, cefiderocol, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam (C-CZA), cefiderocol + ampicillin/sulbactam (C-SAM) or cefiderocol + meropenem (C-MEM) HSRs. The mean change in log10 cfu/thigh compared with starting inoculum was assessed. Resistance development on treatment was a >4-fold increase in MIC relative control animals. In vitro activities of combinations were assessed by disc stacking. RESULTS: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, combinations produced significant kill with C-CZA -3.75 ±â€Š0.37 reduction in log10 cfu/thigh, C-SAM produced -3.55 ±â€Š0.50 and C-MEM produced -2.18 ±â€Š1.75 relative to baseline. Elevated MICs in cefiderocol treated animals occurred in three out of three isolates with MICs of 2 mg/L. Of these isolates, one developed elevated MICs with C-MEM compared with none treated with C-CZA or C-SAM. Disc stacking with C-CZA or C-SAM returned all isolates to at least the CLSI intermediate breakpoint, which may correlate with in vivo efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam HSR produced in vivo kill against all 12 cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates. Cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam prevented the development of resistance during treatment against cefiderocol-high-end-susceptible isolates with a propensity for resistance on therapy. These data support the clinical evaluation of cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam against A. baumannii, including multi-drug-resistant isolates.

Efficacy of Cefiderocol in Experimental Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia in Persistently Neutropenic Rabbits.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an important cause of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Cefiderocol is a parenteral siderophore cephalosporin with potent in vitro activity against S. maltophilia. We evaluated the efficacy of cefiderocol in a neutropenic rabbit model of S. maltophilia pneumonia in comparison to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). The cefiderocol area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve extrapolated to 8 h (AUC0-8) was lower (423.0 ± 40.9 µg·h/mL versus 713.6 ± 40.1 µg·h/mL) and clearance higher (252.77 ± 38.9 mL/h/kg versus 142.6 ± 32.9 mL/h/kg) in infected versus noninfected rabbits. We studied a clinical bloodstream S. maltophilia isolate with an MIC of 0.03 µg/mL of cefiderocol. Time spent above the MIC of cefiderocol for the majority of S. maltophilia isolates in rabbits recapitulated the plasma concentration-time profile observed in adult humans at the licensed dose of 2 g given intravenously (i.v.). Experimental groups consisted of 120 mg/kg cefiderocol i.v. every 8 hours (q8h); TMP-SMX, 5 mg/kg i.v. Q12h, and untreated controls (UCs). Treatment was administered for 10 days. Survival in cefiderocol-treated rabbits (87%) was greater than that in TMP-SMX-treated (25%; P < 0.05) and UC (0%; P < 0.05) groups. There was no residual bacterial burden in lung tissue or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in the cefiderocol group. Residual bacterial burden was present in lung tissue and BAL fluid in the TMP-SMX group but was decreased in comparison to UCs (P < 0.001). Lung weights (markers of pulmonary injury) were decreased in cefiderocol-treated versus TMP-SMX (P < 0.001) and UC (P < 0.001) groups. Cefiderocol is highly active in treatment of experimental S. maltophilia pneumonia, laying the foundation for future clinical investigations against this lethal infection in immunocompromised patients.

Outcomes with Cefiderocol Treatment in Patients with Bacteraemia Enrolled into Prospective Phase 2 and Phase 3 Randomised Clinical Studies.

INTRODUCTION: A post hoc, descriptive analysis of three prospective, randomised, controlled clinical studies investigating cefiderocol in gram-negative bacterial infections was conducted to assess its efficacy in patients with baseline bacteraemia. METHODS: Data from APEKS-cUTI (NCT02321800), APEKS-NP (NCT03032380) and CREDIBLE-CR (NCT02714595) studies were assessed individually. Patients received cefiderocol 2g, q8h, for 7-14 days or comparators (imipenem/cilastatin [APEKS-cUTI], meropenem [APEKS-NP] or best available therapy [BAT; CREDIBLE-CR]). Bacteraemia and clinical outcomes were assessed at early assessment (EA), end of treatment (EOT) and test of cure (TOC) for patients in the intention-to-treat populations with baseline blood samples positive for aerobic gram-negative species. Eradication, persistence or recurrence of baseline blood pathogen was confirmed from follow-up blood cultures; in the absence of follow-up blood cultures, clinical response, administration of additional antibiotics and vital status were used to assess bacteraemia outcome. RESULTS: Of 885 patients randomised, 84 had bacteraemia and 89 (cefiderocol: 55, comparators: 34) gram-negative pathogens were isolated, namely Enterobacterales (n = 62) and non-fermenters (n = 27). At EA, on-therapy bacteraemia eradication rates in APEKS-cUTI, APEKS-NP and CREDIBLE-CR were 100% (19/19), 50.0% (4/8) and 72.0% (18/25) with cefiderocol. Corresponding rates for comparators were 77.8% (7/9), 100% (10/10) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively. Persistence in blood at EA was seen in six patients overall (cefiderocol: 3, comparators: 3); indeterminate responses were common (cefiderocol: 8, comparators: 3), usually due to lack of blood cultures. Clinical cure/improvement rates at EA in APEKS-cUTI, APEKS-NP and CREDIBLE-CR were 100% (19/19), 62.5% (5/8) and 64.0% (16/25) with cefiderocol. Corresponding rates for comparators were 77.8% (7/9), 90.0% (9/10) and 30.8% (4/13), respectively. Bacteraemia eradication rates with cefiderocol in APEKS-cUTI, APEKS-NP and CREDIBLE-CR were 89.5%, 37.5% and 60.0% at EOT and 78.9%, 12.5% and 44.0% at TOC. CONCLUSION: This descriptive analysis suggests that cefiderocol may be a useful treatment option for gram-negative bacteraemia, including pathogens resistant to other antibiotics.

Cefiderocol for the Treatment of Infections Due to Metallo-B-lactamase-Producing Pathogens in the CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP Phase 3 Randomized Studies.

In the CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP studies, cefiderocol treatment was effective against gram-negative bacteria producing metallo-B-lactamases; rates of clinical cure (70.8% [17/24]), microbiological eradication (58.3% [14/24]), and day 28 all-cause mortality (12.5% [3/24]) compared favorably with comparators of best-available therapy and high-dose meropenem (40.0% [4/10], 30.0% [3/10], and 50.0% [5/10], respectively).

Iron serum levels and iron homeostasis parameters in patients with nosocomial pneumonia treated with cefiderocol: post hoc analysis of the APEKS-NP study.

Critically ill patients often present with low serum iron levels or anemia. We evaluated the impact of iron levels and iron homeostasis on the efficacy and safety of cefiderocol, an iron-chelator siderophore cephalosporin, in patients with nosocomial pneumonia in a post hoc analysis of the randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 APEKS-NP study (NCT03032380). Patients with Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia received cefiderocol 2 g, 3-h infusion, q8h, or high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem 2 g, 3-h infusion, q8h, for 7-14 days. Efficacy and safety parameters, including specific iron homeostasis parameters (i.e., hepcidin, iron, total iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation), were analyzed according to baseline iron levels. In the cefiderocol and meropenem arms, 79.1% (117/148) and 83.3% (125/150) randomized patients, respectively, had low baseline serum iron levels. Rates of 14-day (12.3% [14/114] vs 11.6% [14/121]) and 28-day all-cause mortality (20.5% [23/112] vs 19.0% [23/121]), clinical cure (63.2% [72/114] vs 67.2% [82/122]), and microbiological eradication (43.6% [41/94] vs 48.1% [51/106]) at test of cure were similar in cefiderocol vs meropenem arms, respectively. In the overall safety population, rates of anemia-related adverse events were similar (cefiderocol arm 18.2% [27/148], meropenem arm 18.7% [28/150]). Changes from baseline to test of cure in hepcidin, iron, total iron binding capacity, and transferrin saturation were similar between treatment arms. Cefiderocol treatment did not affect iron homeostasis, and its efficacy and safety were not influenced by baseline serum iron levels. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT03032380. Date of registration: 26 January 2017.

Mechanisms of Reduced Susceptibility to Cefiderocol Among Isolates from the CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP Clinical Trials.

The objective of this study was to characterize isolates with reduced susceptibility to cefiderocol in patients receiving cefiderocol for nosocomial pneumonia or carbapenem-resistant infections in the Phase 3 APEKS-NP and CREDIBLE-CR studies. Susceptibility testing of isolates was conducted at a central laboratory, and post-treatment changes were evaluated according to available breakpoints for cefiderocol. Whole-genome sequencing and multilocus sequence typing were performed for isolates to confirm their origin and identify mutations. Five (APEKS-NP) and nine (CREDIBLE-CR) isolates demonstrated a ≥ 4-fold minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) increase compared with genetically related baseline isolates; most remained susceptible to cefiderocol despite the ≥4-fold MIC increase. Mutations in ß-lactamases or penicillin-binding protein (PBP) were identified in 4/14 isolates: one Enterobacter cloacae (amino acid [AA] substitution [A313P] in ACT-17); two Acinetobacter baumannii (one PBP3 AA substitution [H370Y], one with OXA-23 substitutions [N85I and P225S]); and one Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PDC-30 [4AA deletion "TPMA" position 316-319]). Cloning experiments using isogenic Escherichia coli strains containing wild-type and those mutant cephalosporinase enzymes show that the mutant enzymes may contribute to decreased susceptibility to cefiderocol. Pharmacokinetic data were available for nine patients, for whom cefiderocol exposures exceeded 100% fT > 4 × MIC. No clear pattern between mutations and development or extent of MIC increases was observed. No mutations were identified in genes related to iron transport, including fiu, cirA, piuA/C, and pirA, among recovered Gram-negative isolates. Clinicaltrials.gov: APEKS-NP: NCT03032380; CREDIBLE-CR: NCT02714595.

Utilization of Colistin Versus ß-Lactam and ß-Lactamase Inhibitor Agents in Relation to Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Severe Gram-Negative Infections.

INTRODUCTION: Colistin is used to treat severe antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative infections (GNIs). With the rise of antibiotic resistance, colistin has been used increasingly as a 'last-line' therapy for multidrug-resistant GNIs. We evaluated the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality among patients receiving colistin or one of the new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors (ßL + ßLI) (ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, or meropenem/vaborbactam). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Premier Healthcare Database. The cohort included propensity score-matched adults with an inpatient stay between January 2016 and December 2018. Patients given both colistin and BL + BLI as treatment for ≥ 72 h were excluded. AKI was defined as acute renal failure or dialysis during hospitalization with antibiotic administration. Propensity score matching was used to control for selection bias and confounding. Logistic regression evaluated associations between treatment, AKI, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The total number of patients in the matched cohorts were 256 in each. Overall, 23.8% and 13.3% of patients receiving colistin or new ßL + ßLI agents, respectively, experienced AKI during hospitalization (p = 0.002); odds of AKI for colistin were 3.0 (95% CI 1.71, 5.21). Following propensity score-matching, patients without baseline renal disease experienced AKI during hospitalization to a higher degree in the colistin group compared to the ßL + ßLI group (17.1% vs. 6.8%); colistin use was associated with 3.7 times higher odds (95% CI 1.84, 7.42) of AKI compared to ßL + ßLI agents. The odds of mortality in patients on colistin developing AKI were more than three times that of patients receiving a BL + BLI agent who developed AKI. Among patients receiving colistin, incident AKI was associated with 6.1 times higher odds (95% CI 2.53, 14.71) of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving colistin for GNIs had significantly higher odds of AKI and mortality than those receiving ßL + ßLI.

Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation of Cefiderocol, a Parenteral Siderophore Cephalosporin, in Patients With Pneumonia and Healthy Subjects.

Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin for the treatment of infections caused by gram-negative bacteria including carbapenem-resistant strains. The aim of this study was to develop an intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic (PK) model of cefiderocol and assess the PK profile in lungs. An intrapulmonary PK model of cefiderocol was developed using the concentration data in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) from 7 patients with pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation and 20 healthy subjects. Subsequently, the model was applied to assess the ELF exposure of 125 patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to calculate the probability of target attainment for the percentage of time for which free ELF concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) over the dosing interval (%fT>MIC,ELF ). The developed model adequately described ELF concentrations and suggested the delayed distribution in ELF for patients with pneumonia compared to healthy subjects. Lung penetration ratio of cefiderocol in patients with pneumonia was calculated to be 34%, which was 1.4-fold that in healthy subjects. The estimated %fT>MIC,ELF was 100% in most of patients with nosocomial pneumonia, and no PK/pharmacodynamic relationship with %fT>MIC,ELF was found for microbiological or clinical outcome. The probability of target attainment for 100% fT>MIC,ELF was ≥ 99.5% against MICs ≤2 µg/mL and ≥87.0% against MICs ≤4 µg/mL regardless of renal function. The median of simulated ELF trough concentrations at steady state was >4 µg/mL regardless of renal function. These results reveal the adequacy of cefiderocol exposure in plasma and ELF at the recommended dosing regimens adjusted on the basis of renal function in critically ill patients with pneumonia.

In Vitro Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Pathogens to Cefiderocol in Five Consecutive Annual Multinational SIDERO-WT Surveillance Studies, 2014 to 2019.

We report in vitro susceptibility data from five consecutive annual SIDERO-WT surveillance studies (2014 to 2019) for cefiderocol and comparators tested against Gram-negative clinical isolates from North America and Europe. CLSI broth microdilution was used to determine MICs for Enterobacterales (n = 31,896), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 7,700), Acinetobacter baumannii complex (n = 5,225), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 2,030), and Burkholderia cepacia complex (n = 425). MICs were interpreted by CLSI-approved clinical breakpoints (February 2021). Cefiderocol inhibited 99.8, 96.7, 91.6, and 97.7% of all Enterobacterales, meropenem-nonsusceptible, ceftazidime-avibactam-nonsusceptible, and ceftolozane-tazobactam-nonsusceptible isolates, respectively, at ≤4 µg/mL (susceptible breakpoint). Cefiderocol inhibited 99.9, 99.8, 100, and 99.8% of all P. aeruginosa, meropenem-nonsusceptible, ceftazidime-avibactam-nonsusceptible, and ceftolozane-tazobactam-nonsusceptible isolates, respectively, at ≤4 µg/mL (susceptible breakpoint). Cefiderocol inhibited 96.0% of all A. baumannii complex isolates and 94.2% of meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates at ≤4 µg/mL (susceptible breakpoint) and 98.6% of S. maltophilia isolates at ≤1 µg/mL (susceptible breakpoint). B. cepacia complex isolates were tested with a MIC50 of ≤0.03 µg/mL and MIC90 of 0.5 µg/mL. Annual cefiderocol percent susceptible rates for Enterobacterales (North America range, 99.6 to 100%/year; Europe range, 99.3 to 99.9%/year) and P. aeruginosa (North America range, 99.8 to 100%; Europe range, 99.9 to 100%) were unchanged from 2014 to 2019. Annual percent susceptible rates for A. baumannii complex demonstrated sporadic, nondirectional differences (North America range, 97.5 to 100%; Europe range, 90.4 to 97.5%); the wider range for Europe (∼7%) was due to isolates from Russia. Annual percent susceptible rates for S. maltophilia showed minor, nondirectional differences (North America range, 96.4 to 100%; Europe range, 95.6 to 100%). We conclude that clinical isolates of Enterobacterales (99.8% susceptible), P. aeruginosa (99.9%), A. baumannii (96.0%), and S. maltophilia (98.6%) collected in North America and Europe from 2014 to 2019 were highly susceptible to cefiderocol.

All-cause mortality rates in adults with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections: a comprehensive review of pathogen-focused, prospective, randomized, interventional clinical studies.

INTRODUCTION: Pathogen-focused, randomized, controlled trials (PF-RCT) are important in the fight against carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative infections. Some recently approved antibiotics and older generic antibiotics with activity against CR Gram-negative bacteria were investigated in PF-RCTs in a variety of infections. AREAS COVERED: We searched Pubmed, Cochrane database and international clinical trial databases for PF-RCTs for the period between 2005 and 2020 and compared the study designs, patient populations, infection types, pathogens, and Day-28 all-cause mortality (ACM). EXPERT OPINION: PF-RCTs are particularly challenging to quantitatively assess and compare due to the heterogeneity in infection types, pathogens, CR mechanism, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and endpoints. Data interpretation is further complicated by lack of formal statistical analysis plans and/or non-inferiority design, and limited power across most PF-RCTs. The studies with new antibiotics (i.e. plazomicin, meropenem/vaborbactam, cefiderocol) ranked lower regarding feasibility, with relatively small sample sizes (analyzed: 37-118) versus the comparative effectiveness studies of older generic drugs (analyzed: 94-406). ACM ranged between 11.8% and 40% for CR Enterobacterales, 17.7% and 57.4% for CR Acinetobacter spp., and 20.0% and 30.8% for CR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The information gathered must be considered carefully alongside the study limitations and caution should be exercised when making direct comparisons across trials.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYNew antibiotics to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections are needed because antimicrobial resistance has become a global threat. In recent years, several pathogen-focused, randomized, controlled clinical trials were conducted to test new antibiotics or combinations of older generic antibiotics in the fight against resistant bacteria. However, these trials were exceptionally challenging and most of them enrolled relatively few patients. These studies were highly heterogeneous in terms of species, antibiotics, infection site, mechanism of resistance, endpoints and patient factors. In these trials, all-cause mortality at Day 28 or Day 30 were numerically lower with the new antibiotics in infections caused by carbapenem-resistant (CR) Enterobacterales. However, in the trials which investigated CR Acinetobacter spp. infections, there was no reduction in all-cause mortality at Day 28 or Day 30 with combinations of older generic antibiotics compared with colistin monotherapy. Limited information was available for CR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. More pathogen-focused, randomized, controlled clinical trials with more feasible design and higher patient numbers are needed to demonstrate clinical benefit in drug-resistant infections.

Structured patient interview to assess clinical outcomes in complicated urinary tract infections in the APEKS-cUTI study: pilot investigation.

BACKGROUND: The APEKS-cUTI study demonstrated the non-inferiority of cefiderocol to imipenem-cilastatin in the primary endpoint of the composite of clinical and microbiological outcome in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs). We piloted a structured patient interview (SPI) to evaluate clinical outcomes based on patient-reported symptoms while conducting this pivotal randomized, double-blind, phase-2 study. The objectives were to assess the value of the SPI, using its performance relative to physician assessment, and also to strengthen the value of patient-reported measures in conducting clinical trials for cUTI treatment. METHODS: In addition to the protocol-defined clinical and microbiological outcomes, patients randomized in the APEKS-cUTI study were interviewed by the investigator or qualified study personnel at screening/baseline, early assessment (EA), end of treatment (EOT), test of cure (TOC), and follow-up (FUP). The 14-element questionnaire graded cUTI symptoms as absent or present, and if present, as mild, moderate, or severe. Changes in post-baseline symptoms based on patients' responses were rated by the interviewer. The overall clinical outcome was evaluated based on the responses provided by patients at each time point. RESULTS: Among the 371 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population, the rate of SPI completion in each treatment arm exceeded 90% at each time point. SPI-assessed clinical cure rates were 89.7% in the cefiderocol arm and 84.9% in the imipenem-cilastatin arm. There was substantial agreement between SPI evaluation and investigator global assessment of clinical outcome at TOC and FUP, with lower agreement at EA and EOT. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that patient-reported symptoms can be effectively captured in hospitalized patients with cUTI in a clinical trial setting. Development of a validated patient-reported outcome for use in such a setting is warranted. REGISTRATION: NCT02321800 (registered on 22 December 2014).

Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic profile of cefiderocol in mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: Lung penetration of cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin approved for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, has previously been evaluated in healthy subjects. This study assessed the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic profile of cefiderocol at steady state in hospitalized, mechanically ventilated pneumonia patients. METHODS: Patients received cefiderocol 2 g (or ≤1.5 g if renally impaired), administered IV q8h as a 3 h infusion, or 2 g q6h if patients had augmented renal function (estimated CLCR > 120 mL/min). After multiple doses, each patient underwent a single bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) procedure either at the end of the infusion or at 2 h after the end of infusion. Plasma samples were collected at 1, 3, 5 and 7 h after the start of infusion. After correcting for BAL dilution, cefiderocol concentrations in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) for each patient and the ELF/unbound plasma concentration ratio (RC, E/P) were calculated. Safety was assessed up to 7 days after the last cefiderocol dose. RESULTS: Seven patients received cefiderocol. Geometric mean ELF concentration of cefiderocol was 7.63 mg/L at the end of infusion and 10.40 mg/L at 2 h after the end of infusion. RC, E/P was 0.212 at the end of infusion and 0.547 at 2 h after the end of infusion, suggesting delayed lung distribution. There were no adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that cefiderocol penetrates the ELF in critically ill pneumonia patients with concentrations that are sufficient to treat Gram-negative bacteria with an MIC of ≤4 mg/L.