Phase I study of ombrabulin in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the maximum tolerated dose/maximum administered dose, safety, pharmacokinetic, and efficacy profiles of ombrabulin combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin in Japanese patients with solid tumors. METHODS: Ombrabulin (25, 30, or 35 mg/m2) combined with paclitaxel (175 or 200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC5 or AUC6) was administered by intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors, including cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancers. The maximum tolerated dose/maximum administered dose was defined based on the dose-limiting toxicity at cycle 1. Efficacy was assessed based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). RESULTS: In total, 18 patients were recruited for this dose escalation study. One out of six patients treated with the highest doses of combination of ombrabulin (35 mg/m2), paclitaxel (200 mg/m2), and carboplatin (AUC6) presented a dose-limiting toxicity consisting of grade 3 Escherichia urinary tract infection. This dose was defined as the maximum tolerated dose of ombrabulin. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were alopecia (83.3%), neutropenia and fatigue (72.2% each), decreased appetite, nausea, diarrhea, arthralgia, and myalgia (66.7% each). The grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events included neutropenia (61.1%), Escherichia urinary tract infection, drug hypersensitivity, syncope, pulmonary embolism, and hydronephrosis (one patient each). In efficacy evaluation, seven patients achieved partial response or better (38.9%), including one complete response, and seven of 18 patients had stable disease (38.9%). Pharmacokinetic profiles in this Japanese study were comparable with those observed in the previous study without Japanese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although the maximum tolerated dose/maximum administered dose of ombrabulin (35 mg/m2) with taxane-platinum combination may be tolerable in Japanese patients in the first cycle, the dosages in the repeated treatment should be carefully selected for further study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01293630.

Effect of Baseline Characteristics on Cabazitaxel Treatment Duration in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Compassionate Use/Expanded Access Programs and CAPRISTANA Registry.

We examined factors that may impact cabazitaxel treatment duration in a real-life setting in a compassionate use program, expanded access program, and prospective observational study in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel (N = 1,621) received cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity or physician/patient decision. The median number of cabazitaxel cycles was six (range, 1-49); 708 patients (43.7%) received >6 cycles. Patients receiving >6 cycles tended to have a better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 (p = 0.0017 for ≤6 vs. >6 cycles). Overall, 348 patients (21.5%) were ≥75 years of age; 139 (39.9%) received >6 cycles. The main reason for discontinuation was disease progression; however, in patients receiving 1-2 cycles, the main reason for discontinuation was adverse events. Only 52 patients (3.2%) progressed during cycles 1-2. Cabazitaxel was well tolerated in these studies, which included some elderly and frail patients, offering clinicians an important treatment option in the management of mCRPC. Proactive management of adverse events may allow patients to receive a higher number of cabazitaxel cycles and derive greater benefit.

Real-world experience with cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a final, pooled analysis of the compassionate use programme and early access programme.

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel is a second-generation taxane approved for use in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel. Early access programmes were established to allow eligible patients with mCRPC access to cabazitaxel before regulatory approval. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary objective was to allow access to cabazitaxel before commercial availability for patients with mCRPC whose disease had progressed during or after chemotherapy with docetaxel; the secondary objective was overall safety. Patients received cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle, with daily oral 10 mg prednisone/prednisolone. G-CSF was administered per ASCO guidelines. RESULTS: In total, 1432 patients received cabazitaxel across 41 countries between 2010 and 2014 (median 6.0 treatment cycles [range 1-49]). The most frequently occurring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) possibly related to treatment were diarrhoea (33.3%), fatigue (25.4%) and anaemia (23.7%); the most frequently occurring possibly related Grade 3/4 TEAEs were neutropenia (18.7%) and febrile neutropenia (6.9%). G-CSF was administered in ≥ 1 cycle in 64% of patients (10.1% therapeutic use; 57.8% prophylactic use; 9.7% both uses). CONCLUSION: The safety profile of cabazitaxel in this pooled analysis of two cabazitaxel early access programmes was manageable and consistent with previous Phase III trials (TROPIC, PROSELICA).

Impact of pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients undergoing cabazitaxel treatment: an open-label study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel is an efficacious treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have previously progressed on docetaxel, but febrile neutropenia during the first cycle is a frequent complication. Asian patients are at increased risk of febrile neutropenia. Although primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor can reduce the incidence, its efficacy has not been prospectively demonstrated in Japanese patients with cabazitaxel treatment. METHODS: PEGAZUS, a prospective, single-arm study conducted at eight clinical sites in Japan, enrolled 21 heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients received cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, up to 10 cycles. Oral prednisolone 10 mg was taken daily. Pegfilgrastim 3.6 mg was administered at least 24 h after the cabazitaxel infusion. The primary endpoint was the incidence of febrile neutropenia in the first cycle. RESULTS: The median number of treatment cycles was seven. The relative dose intensity of cabazitaxel was 67.4% (range, 53.2-91.3%). Two of 21 patients (9.5%) experienced febrile neutropenia in the first cycle. This rate was lower than the rate (43%) previously observed without prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in a similar patient population. Six patients showed a prostate-specific antigen response (28.6%). Three of four patients evaluable for tumor response had stable disease and one had progressive disease. Grade ≥3 diarrhea was not observed. Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor significantly reduced the incidence of febrile neutropenia in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Cabazitaxel plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is safe and effective for Japanese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have previously progressed on docetaxel. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02441894).

Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy: Treatment Patterns From the PROXIMA Prospective Registry.

PURPOSE: There is a major clinical need to devise an optimal treatment sequence for the multiple therapy options available for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In the absence of prospective clinical trials, sequencing information can be derived from large, real-world registry studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PROXIMA (Treatment Patterns in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy) is a large, global, prospective registry study evaluating real-world treatment patterns of patients with mCRPC who experience disease progression during or after docetaxel therapy. Patients were enrolled worldwide between 2011 and 2014. Treatments were determined by the treating physicians and recorded in categories of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and palliative therapy. Treatment sequencing patterns, response to treatment, and types of progression were recorded and analyzed. Progression-free survival and overall survival with different treatment modalities were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Treatment patterns were evaluated in 903 patients. Therapy selection was influenced by region. Hormonal therapy (57.5%) and taxane chemotherapy (26.4%) were the most frequently administered first subsequent treatments after docetaxel. Tumor responses to first subsequent treatment were observed in 22.6% of evaluable patients. Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ significantly across different treatment modalities. CONCLUSION: Identifying an optimal treatment sequence is vital for improving the care of patients with mCRPC. The PROXIMA registry provided a representative sample of global data on real-world treatment patterns for patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel. These data can be used to devise optimal therapy sequences and inform treatment decisions.

Phase 1 study of ombrabulin in combination with docetaxel and cisplatin in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The combination use of the vascular disrupting agent ombrabulin with chemotherapeutic agents was previously shown to be highly synergistic in preclinical models. METHODS: In this dose-escalation study of ombrabulin (15.5-35 mg/m2) in combination with docetaxel (60 or 75 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), agents were administered 24 h apart every 3 weeks to Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. The study was designed and conducted in a 3 + 3 manner. Safety, tumor response and pharmacokinetics were evaluated. RESULTS: Eleven patients with non small cell lung cancer as the primary tumor were treated. Two patients out of five had dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in Cycle 1 at the starting doses of ombrabulin 15.5 mg/m2, docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2. Thus, dose escalation was terminated. The first dose level was re-evaluated in six patients who received prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). However, because of the occurrence of DLTs in Cycle 1 in two patients out of six, the study was led to the premature termination without pursued upper dose level. Partial response was observed in four patients out of 11. Pharmacokinetic parameters of ombrabulin and cisplatin were not altered in this combination treatment, while docetaxel clearance decreased by ~40% compared to that observed with docetaxel monotherapy at the same dose (60 mg/m2). CONCLUSION: A combination regimen of ombrabulin with cisplatin and docetaxel was not feasible for Japanese patients owing to the occurrence of hematological and non-hematological DLTs at the initial dose level. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01095302.

Phase 1 study of ombrabulin in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

OBJECTIVE: In clinical studies in Western countries, the recommended dose of combination ombrabulin a vascular disrupting agent, with cisplatin is 25 mg/m2 ombrabulin with 75 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks. Here, we report the first Phase 1 study of this treatment regimen in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicenter, sequential cohort, dose-escalation Phase 1 study of ombrabulin with cisplatin administered once every 3 weeks. The study used a 3 + 3 design without intrapatient dose escalation. The investigated dose levels of ombrabulin were 15.5 and 25 mg/m2 combined with cisplatin 75 mg/m2. The latter dose level was regarded as the maximum administered dose if more than one patient experienced dose-limiting toxicities. RESULTS: Ten patients were treated, but no dose-limiting toxicity was observed at both dose levels. Ombrabulin 25 mg/m2 with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 was the maximum administered dose and regarded as the recommended dose in the combination regimen for Japanese patients with cancer. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were neutropenia, decreased appetite, constipation, nausea and fatigue. One partial response and five cases of stable disease were reported as the best overall responses. Pharmacokinetic parameters of ombrabulin and cisplatin were comparable with those in non-Japanese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ombrabulin 25 mg/m2 with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks was well tolerated and established as the recommended dose in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. The safety and pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable between Japanese and Caucasian patients.

Phase 1 study of clofarabine in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Japan.

A phase 1 study was conducted to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and pharmacogenetic characteristics of clofarabine in seven Japanese pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Patients in Cohort 1 received clofarabine 30 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days, followed by 52 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days in subsequent cycles. Cohort 2 patients were consistently treated with 52 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. No more than six cycles were performed. Every patient had at least one ≥Grade 3 adverse event (AE). AEs (≥Grade 3) related to clofarabine were anaemia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, haemoglobin decreased, and platelet (PLT) count decreased. C max and AUC of clofarabine increased in a dose-dependent fashion, but its elimination half-life (T 1/2) did not appear to be dependent on dose or duration of treatment. Clofarabine at 52 mg/m(2)/day shows similarly tolerable safety and PK profiles compared to those in previous studies. No complete remission (CR), CR without PLT recovery, or partial remission was observed. Since clofarabine is already used as a key drug for relapsed/refractory ALL patients in many countries, the efficacy of clofarabine in Japanese pediatric patients should be evaluated in larger study including more patients, such as by post-marketing surveillance.

[Cabazitaxel--a next-generation taxane for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer].

Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease that responds variably to available agents, particularly androgen receptor(AR)- targeting agents. In preclinical models, cabazitaxel, a second-generation taxane, demonstrated enhanced antitumor activity when compared with docetaxel. In subsequent clinical trials, cabazitaxel was associated with pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability profiles consistent with those of previous taxanes. In the pivotal phase III study(TROPIC; NCT00417079), cabazitaxel led to significantly improved overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer(mCRPC), compared with mitoxantrone, when both were administered in combination with prednisone/prednisolone(median survival: 15.1 months[95%confidence interval(CI): 14.1-16.3]vs 12.7 months[95% CI: 11.6-13.7], hazard ratio(HR): 0.70[95% CI: 0.59-0.83], p<0.0001), and it also extended progression-free survival. Furthermore, a long-term analysis of the TROPIC trial revealed that the survival benefit with cabazitaxel was maintained at 2 years, with 60(15.9%)patients in the cabazitaxel group and 31(8.2%)patients in the mitoxantrone group surviving for B2 years(odds ratio: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.33-3.33). Cabazitaxel also provides pain palliation similar to that provided by using mitoxantrone. The safety profile of cabazitaxel is consistent with that of first-generation taxanes, and gastrointestinal(predominantly diarrhea)and hematologic(mainly neutropenia)adverse events are the most frequently reported. Clinical trial data suggest that these events can be managed with careful monitoring and dose reduction where necessary. In addition, treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(G-CSF)can mitigate hematologic adverse events, whereas supportive treatment with antiemetic and antidiarrheal agents may ameliorate gastrointestinal symptoms. The treatment paradigm for mCRPC is evolving rapidly with the emergence of data for new agents, leading to maximization of patient benefits. The proven efficacy and tolerability profiles of cabazitaxel suggest the promising role of this agent within this paradigm.

Cabazitaxel plus prednisone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel: results from the German compassionate-use programme.

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel (Cbz) is an approved second-line treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following docetaxel therapy with a significant survival benefit compared with mitoxantrone. However, grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 82% of patients. OBJECTIVE: To report on the safety results of mCRPC patients treated within a compassionate-use programme in Germany. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 111 patients with a mean age of 67.9 yr (range: 49-81 yr) and progressive mCRPC were included. Patients had received a mean number of 12.7 ± 10.8 cycles (range: 6-69 cycles) of docetaxel with a mean cumulative dose of 970.9 mg/m(2); mean time from last docetaxel application to progression was 6.95 mo (range: 2-54 mo). Of the patients, 31.5% progressed by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) increase only; the remainder had a combination of PSA increase and clinical progression. INTERVENTION: Cbz at a dosage of 25mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 wk combined with 5mg of oral prednisone twice a day. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Treatment-associated toxicity was the primary study end point; progression-free and overall survival were secondary end points. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patients received a mean number of 6.5 ± 2.2 cycles of Cbz and a mean cumulative dose of 160.3 ± 51.5mg/m(2). Grade 3 and 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded in 34 patients (30.6%) and 18 patients (16.2%), respectively. Grade 3/4 anaemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were reported in 4.5%, 7.2%, and 0.9% of the patients, respectively. Neutropenic fever was reported in 1.8% of the patients. Grade 3/4 gastrointestinal toxicity was identified in 4.5% of the patients. Three patients died because of Cbz-related toxicity. Granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factors were used in 17.1% of patients. The limitations are due to the nonrandomised nature of the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with Cbz is tolerable and is associated with a low incidence of serious adverse events in a real-world patient population with CRPC. The outcome of serious adverse events can be minimised with proactive treatment management and conscientious monitoring.