The Alliance-Outcome Association in Couple Therapy: A Common Fate Model.

The working alliance has been shown to be a robust predictor of couple therapy outcomes. However, there are still questions regarding the best way to conceptualize and analyze the association between the alliance and outcomes in the couple therapy context. This study presents results from a relatively novel analytic approach for evaluating the alliance and therapy outcomes via the shared influence model (i.e., common fate statistical methodology) with 93 couples who had at least three sessions. Examining the alliance in couple therapy this way allows for nuance in conceptualizing the process of the alliance among partners and the therapist in couple therapy. Empirically, the question that remains is whether the shared experience of the alliance between partners is a stronger predictor of therapy outcome as compared to the unique individual experiences of the alliance. This approach has not yet been utilized to model the couple alliance-outcome association. Results revealed that the shared influence model demonstrated a significant association between the alliance and therapy outcome. Specifically, the couple-level alliance construct was adequately represented from the partners' alliance ratings with the therapist, and couples that report higher shared alliance experiences were also likely to have better therapy outcomes. These findings suggest that conceptualizing and analyzing the alliance at the couple level may be strongly advantageous. Implications for research and practice are provided.

Se ha demostrado que la alianza terapéutica es un predictor fiable de los resultados de la terapia de pareja. Sin embargo, aún quedan preguntas con respecto a la mejor manera de conceptualizar y analizar la asociación entre la alianza y los resultados en el contexto de la terapia de pareja. Este estudio presenta resultados de un enfoque analítico relativamente innovador para evaluar la alianza y los resultados de la terapia mediante el modelo de influencia compartida (p. ej.: metodología estadística del destino común) con 93 parejas que tuvieron al menos tres sesiones. Analizar la alianza en la terapia de pareja de esta manera permite matices a la hora de conceptualizar el proceso de la alianza entre los integrantes de la pareja y el terapeuta en la terapia de pareja. Empíricamente, la pregunta que queda pendiente es si la experiencia compartida de la alianza entre los integrantes de la pareja es un predictor más fiable de los resultados de la terapia en comparación con las experiencias individuales únicas de la alianza. Este enfoque aún no se ha utilizado para interpretar la asociación entre la alianza de la pareja y los resultados. Los resultados revelaron que el modelo de influencia compartida demostró una asociación significativa entre la alianza y los resultados de la terapia. Específicamente, el constructo de la alianza a nivel de la pareja se representó adecuadamente a partir de las valoraciones de la alianza de los integrantes de la pareja con el terapeuta, y las parejas que informan más experiencias de alianza compartida también fueron propensas a tener mejores resultados en la terapia. Estos datos sugieren que puede ser enormemente ventajoso conceptualizar y analizar la alianza a nivel de la pareja. Se explican las consecuencias para la investigación y la práctica.

The associations among computer-mediated communication, relationships, and well-being.

Social support provided by interpersonal relationships is one of the most robust correlates of well-being. Self-disclosure serves as a basic building block of these relationships. With the rapid growth of the Internet in recent years, the question remains how self-disclosure, and subsequently relationships and well-being, differ when people communicate over the Internet rather than in person. The purpose of this article is to describe current Internet usage patterns as well as explore the association of Internet usage and well-being. Additionally, it directly compares the perceived benefits of face-to-face communication and computer-mediated communication. A questionnaire was administered to 99 undergraduates to measure Internet usage patterns, communication partners, self-disclosure, extraversion, and subjective well-being. Although Internet communication was found to be common, individuals perceived computer-mediated communication to be less useful than face-to-face communication. In addition, increased Internet usage was associated with decreased well-being. Implications are discussed in terms of a new Internet paradox in which people increasingly use the Internet for communication, although they perceive it to be less beneficial than face-to-face interactions and it is associated with reduced well-being.