Cognitively impaired stroke patients do benefit from admission to an acute rehabilitation unit.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cognitively impaired stroke patients benefit (defined as having an improved level of functional independence and capable of being discharged home) from admission to an acute rehabilitation unit. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from a historical cohort of patients with acute stroke within the last 4 weeks or less. SETTING: Acute stroke rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTS: The study sample was divided into 4 distinct groups based on admission Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores: cognitively intact (MMSE score range, > or =25 points), mild cognitive impairment (MMSE score range, 21-24), moderate cognitive impairment (MMSE score range, 10-20), and severe cognitive impairment (MMSE score range, < or =9 points). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were: change in total FIM instrument score, cognitive FIM subscore, length of stay (LOS), FIM efficiency, and discharge disposition (home vs not-to-home). RESULTS: Based on the MMSE cut scores, there were 233 cognitively intact patients and 435 cognitively impaired (mild, n=139; moderate, n=165; severe, n=131) patients. The cognitively intact and the 3 cognitively impaired groups were similar in age, sex, and ethnicity. The data show that the 3 cognitively impaired groups of patients had delayed onset to acute rehabilitation admission and greater stroke severity and disability. The change in FIM total score and FIM efficiency was similar between the cognitively intact and the 3 cognitively impaired groups (P=.058). There were, however, statistically significant changes in the FIM cognitive subscore favoring the cognitively impaired groups (P<.001). Similarly, patients in the cognitively intact group had a shorter LOS (P<.001) and more home discharges (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that despite severe neurologic impairment(s) and disability, cognitively impaired stroke patients make significant functional gains while undergoing rehabilitation and many can be discharged home. Based on these results, stroke patients with cognitive impairments benefit from rehabilitation and should be given the same access to acute rehabilitation services as stroke patients who are cognitively intact.

Predictors of a successful driver evaluation in stroke patients after discharge based on an acute rehabilitation hospital evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: One of the most common concerns of a stroke patient is the ability to drive. We aimed to determine which neurologic impairments on an acute rehabilitation admission evaluation predict the likelihood of a successful driver evaluation after discharge. DESIGN: Prospective study in an acute stroke rehabilitation unit. RESULTS: A total of 45 stroke patients undertook a driver evaluation at our institution. The mean age +/- standard deviation was 71.0 +/- 9.8 yrs, Mini-Mental State Examination score was 22.7 +/- 8.1, upper limb and lower limb Motricity Index scores were 63.7 +/- 34.8 and 71.8 +/- 24.3, Limb Placement Task was 4.6 +/- 3.6 inches, and admission total FIM score was 68.5 +/- 18. The admission variables differed between those who failed (n = 10) vs. those who passed the in-clinic driver evaluation (n = 29, 75%): Mini-Mental State Examination (17.5 +/- 9.7 vs. 24.6 +/- 6.7, P = 0.004), and upper limb (82 +/- 23.7 vs. 57.4 +/- 36.1, P = 0.05) and lower limb (87.6 +/- 11.8 vs. 66.4 +/- 25.2, P = 0.01) Motricity Index scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undertook and passed the in-clinic driver evaluation had, at admission, higher Mini-Mental State Examination and Motricity Index scores with normal visual field defects.

Assessing the motor status score: a scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke.

The Motor Status Scale (MSS) measures shoulder, elbow (maximum score = 40), wrist, hand, and finger movements (maximum score = 42), and expands the measurement of upper extremity impairment and disability provided by the Fugl-Meyer (FM) score. This work examines the interrater reliability and criterion validity of the MSS performed in patients admitted to a rehabilitation hospital 21 +/- 4 days after stroke. Using the MSS and the FM, 7 occupational therapists masked to each other's judgments, evaluated 12 consecutive patients with stroke. Two therapists evaluated 6 additional patients on consecutive days. Intraclass correlation coefficients were significant for each group of raters for the shoulder/elbow and for the wrist/band (P < 0.0001); test-retest measures were also significant for the shoulder/elbow (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.99, P < 0.004) and for the wrist/hand (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.99, P < 0.003). The internal item consistency for the overall MSS was significant (Cronbach alpha = 0.98, P < 0.0001). Finally the correlation between the MSS and the FM (R2 = 0.964) was significant (P < 0.0001). The MSS affords a reliable and valid assessment of upper limb impairment and disability following stroke.