Lack of change in the respiratory quotient during oxygen supply dependence in endotoxemic shock: a subanalysis of an experimental controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the reductions in systemic and renal oxygen consumption are associated with the development of evidence of anaerobic metabolism. METHODS: This is a subanalysis of a previously published study. In anesthetized and mechanically ventilated sheep, we measured the respiratory quotient by indirect calorimetry and its systemic, renal, and intestinal surrogates (the ratios of the venous-arterial carbon dioxide pressure and content difference to the arterial-venous oxygen content difference. The Endotoxemic Shock Group (n = 12) was measured at baseline, after 60 minutes of endotoxemic shock, and after 60 and 120 minutes of fluid and norepinephrine resuscitation, and the values were compared with those of a Control Group (n = 12) without interventions. RESULTS: Endotoxemic shock decreased systemic and renal oxygen consumption (6.3 [5.6 - 6.6] versus 7.4 [6.3 - 8.5] mL/minute/kg and 3.7 [3.3 - 4.5] versus 5.4 [4.6 - 9.4] mL/minute/100g; p < 0.05 for both). After 120 minutes of resuscitation, systemic oxygen consumption was normalized, but renal oxygen consumption remained decreased (6.3 [5.9 - 8.2] versus 7.1 [6.1 - 8.6] mL/minute/100g; p = not significance and 3.8 [1.9 - 4.8] versus 5.7 [4.5 - 7.1]; p < 0.05). The respiratory quotient and the systemic, renal and intestinal ratios of the venous-arterial carbon dioxide pressure and content difference to the arterial-venous oxygen content difference did not change throughout the experiments. CONCLUSION: In this experimental model of septic shock, oxygen supply dependence was not associated with increases in the respiratory quotient or its surrogates. Putative explanations for these findings are the absence of anaerobic metabolism or the poor sensitivity of these variables in detecting this condition.

Lack of change in the respiratory quotient during oxygen supply dependence in endotoxemic shock: a subanalysis of an experimental controlled study / Ausência de alteração no quociente respiratório durante a dependência do suprimento de oxigênio no choque endotoxêmico: subanálise de um estudo experimental controlado

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate if the reductions in systemic and renal oxygen consumption are associated with the development of evidence of anaerobic metabolism. Methods: This is a subanalysis of a previously published study. In anesthetized and mechanically ventilated sheep, we measured the respiratory quotient by indirect calorimetry and its systemic, renal, and intestinal surrogates (the ratios of the venous-arterial carbon dioxide pressure and content difference to the arterial-venous oxygen content difference. The Endotoxemic Shock Group (n = 12) was measured at baseline, after 60 minutes of endotoxemic shock, and after 60 and 120 minutes of fluid and norepinephrine resuscitation, and the values were compared with those of a Control Group (n = 12) without interventions. Results: Endotoxemic shock decreased systemic and renal oxygen consumption (6.3 [5.6 - 6.6] versus 7.4 [6.3 - 8.5] mL/minute/kg and 3.7 [3.3 - 4.5] versus 5.4 [4.6 - 9.4] mL/minute/100g; p < 0.05 for both). After 120 minutes of resuscitation, systemic oxygen consumption was normalized, but renal oxygen consumption remained decreased (6.3 [5.9 - 8.2] versus 7.1 [6.1 - 8.6] mL/minute/100g; p = not significance and 3.8 [1.9 - 4.8] versus 5.7 [4.5 - 7.1]; p < 0.05). The respiratory quotient and the systemic, renal and intestinal ratios of the venous-arterial carbon dioxide pressure and content difference to the arterial-venous oxygen content difference did not change throughout the experiments. Conclusion: In this experimental model of septic shock, oxygen supply dependence was not associated with increases in the respiratory quotient or its surrogates. Putative explanations for these findings are the absence of anaerobic metabolism or the poor sensitivity of these variables in detecting this condition.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar se as reduções do consumo de oxigênio sistêmico e renal estão associadas ao desenvolvimento de evidências de metabolismo anaeróbico. Métodos: Esta é uma subanálise de estudo já publicado. Em ovinos anestesiados e ventilados mecanicamente, medimos o quociente respiratório por calorimetria indireta e seus substitutos sistêmicos, renais e intestinais (as razões entre a diferença de pressão venoarterial do teor de dióxido de carbono e a diferença arteriovenosa do teor de oxigênio). O Grupo Choque Endotoxêmico (n = 12) foi medido inicialmente, após 60 minutos do choque endotoxêmico e após 60 e 120 minutos da ressuscitação com fluidos e norepinefrina, e os valores foram comparados com os do Grupo Controle (n = 12) sem intervenções. Resultados: O choque endotoxêmico diminuiu o consumo de oxigênio sistêmico e renal (6,3 [5,6 - 6,6] versus 7,4 [6,3 - 8,5] mL/minuto/kg e 3,7 [3,3 - 4,5] versus 5,4 [4,6 - 9,4] mL/minuto/100g; p < 0,05 para ambos). Após 120 minutos de ressuscitação, o consumo sistêmico de oxigênio foi normalizado, mas o consumo renal de oxigênio permaneceu reduzido (6,3 [5,9 - 8,2] versus 7,1 [6,1 - 8,6] mL/minuto/100g; p = NS e 3,8 [1,9 - 4,8] versus 5,7 [4,5 - 7,1]; p < 0,05). O quociente respiratório e as razões sistêmica, renal e intestinal entre a diferença na pressão venoarterial do teor de dióxido de carbono e a diferença arteriovenosa do teor de oxigênio não se alteraram ao longo dos experimentos. Conclusão: Nesse modelo experimental de choque séptico, a dependência do suprimento de oxigênio não foi associada a aumentos no quociente respiratório ou em seus substitutos. As explicações possíveis para esses achados são a ausência de metabolismo anaeróbico ou a baixa sensibilidade dessas variáveis na detecção dessa condição.

Dissociation between sublingual and gut microcirculation in the response to a fluid challenge in postoperative patients with abdominal sepsis.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to compare intestinal and sublingual microcirculation and their response to a fluid challenge. METHODS: Twenty-two septic patients in the first postoperative day of an intestinal surgery, in which an ostomy had been constructed, were evaluated both before and 20 min after a challenge of 10 mL/kg of 6% hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4. We measured systemic hemodynamics and sublingual and intestinal microcirculation. Correlations between variables were determined through the Pearson test. RESULTS: Fluid administration increased the cardiac index (2.6 ± 0.5 vs. 3.3 ± 1.0 L/min/m(2), P < 0.01) and mean arterial blood pressure (68 ± 11 vs. 82 ± 12 mm Hg, P < 0.0001). The sublingual but not the intestinal red blood cell (RBC) velocity increased (912 ± 270 vs. 1,064 ± 200 µm/s, P < 0.002 and 679 ± 379 vs. 747 ± 419 µm/s, P = 0.12, respectively). The sublingual and intestinal perfused vascular density (PVD) did not change significantly (15.2 ± 2.9 vs. 16.1 ± 1.2 mm/mm(2) and 12.3 ± 6.7 vs. 13.0 ± 6.7 mm/mm(2)). We found no correlation between the basal sublingual and intestinal RBC velocities or between their changes in response to the fluid challenge. The individual changes in sublingual RBC velocity correlated with those in cardiac index and basal RBC velocity. Individual changes in intestinal RBC velocity did not correlate with either the cardiac index modifications or the basal RBC velocity. The same pattern was observed with the sublingual and the intestinal PVDs. The sublingual RBC velocities and PVDs were similar between survivors and nonsurvivors. But the intestinal RBC velocities and PVDs were lower in nonsurvivors. CONCLUSIONS: In this series of postoperative septic patients, we found a dissociation between sublingual and intestinal microcirculation. The improvement in the sublingual microcirculation after fluid challenge was dependent on the basal state and the increase in cardiac output. In contrast, the intestinal microcirculation behaved as an isolated territory.

Persistent villi hypoperfusion explains intramucosal acidosis in sheep endotoxemia.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that persistent villi hypoperfusion explains intramucosal acidosis after endotoxemic shock resuscitation. DESIGN: Controlled experimental study. SETTING: University-based research laboratory. SUBJECTS: A total of 14 anesthetized, mechanically ventilated sheep. INTERVENTIONS: Sheep were randomly assigned to endotoxin (n = 7) or control groups (n = 7). The endotoxin group received 5 microg/kg endotoxin, followed by 4 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) for 150 mins. After 60 mins of shock, hydroxyethylstarch resuscitation was given to normalize oxygen transport for an additional 90 mins. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Endotoxin infusion decreased mean arterial blood pressure, cardiac output, and superior mesenteric artery blood flow (96 +/- 10 vs. 51 +/- 20 mm Hg, 145 +/- 30 vs. 90 +/- 30 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1), and 643 +/- 203 vs. 317 +/- 93 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1), respectively; p < .05 vs. basal), whereas it increased intramucosal-arterial PCO2 (deltaPCO2) and arterial lactate (3 +/- 3 vs. 14 +/- 8 mm Hg, and 1.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.7 +/- 1.3 mmol/L; p < .05). Sublingual, and serosal and mucosal intestinal microvascular flow indexes, and the percentage of perfused ileal villi were reduced (3.0 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.4, 3.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.6, 3.0 +/- 0.0 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.2, and 98% +/- 3% vs. 76% +/- 10%; p < .05). Resuscitation normalized mean arterial blood pressure (92 +/- 13 mm Hg), cardiac output (165 +/- 32 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)), superior mesenteric artery blood flow (683 +/- 192 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)), and sublingual and serosal intestinal microvascular flow indexes (2.8 +/- 0.5 and 3.5 +/- 0.7). Nevertheless, deltaPCO2, lactate, mucosal intestinal microvascular flow indexes, and percentage of perfused ileal villi remained altered (10 +/- 6 mm Hg, 3.7 +/- 0.9 mmol/L, 2.3 +/- 0.4, and 78% +/- 11%; p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In this model of endotoxemia, fluid resuscitation corrected both serosal intestinal and sublingual microcirculation but was unable to restore intestinal mucosal perfusion. Intramucosal acidosis might be due to persistent villi hypoperfusion.

Effects of levosimendan and dobutamine in experimental acute endotoxemia: a preliminary controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that levosimendan increases systemic and intestinal oxygen delivery (DO(2)) and prevents intramucosal acidosis in septic shock. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled experimental study. SETTING: University-based research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Nineteen anesthetized, mechanically ventilated sheep. INTERVENTIONS: Endotoxin-treated sheep were randomly assigned to three groups: control (n=7), dobutamine (10 microg/kg/min, n=6) and levosimendan (100 microg/kg over 10 min followed by 100 microg/kg/h, n=6) and treated for 120 min. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After endotoxin administration, systemic and intestinal DO(2) decreased (24.6+/-5.2 vs 15.3+/-3.4 ml/kg/min and 105.0+/-28.1 vs 55.8+/-25.9 ml/kg/min, respectively; p<0.05 for both). Arterial lactate and the intramucosal-arterial PCO(2) difference (DeltaPCO(2)) increased (1.4+/-0.3 vs 3.1+/-1.5 mmHg and 9+/-6 vs 23+/-6 mmHg mmol/l, respectively; p<0.05). Systemic DO(2) was preserved in the dobutamine-treated group (22.3+/-4.7 vs 26.8+/-7.0 ml/min/kg, p=NS) but intestinal DO(2) decreased (98.9+/-0.2 vs 68.0+/-22.9 ml/min/kg, p<0.05) and DeltaPCO(2) increased (12+/-5 vs 25+/-11 mmHg, p<0.05). The administration of levosimendan prevented declines in systemic and intestinal DO(2) (25.1+/-3.0 vs 24.0+/-6.3 ml/min/kg and 111.1+/-18.0 vs 98.2+/-23.1 ml/min/kg, p=NS for both) or increases in DeltaPCO(2) (7+/-7 vs 10+/-8, p=NS). Arterial lactate increased in both the dobutamine and levosimendan groups (1.6+/-0.3 vs 2.5+/-0.7 and 1.4+/-0.4 vs. 2.9+/-1.1 mmol/l, p=NS between groups). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with dobutamine, levosimendan increased intestinal blood flow and diminished intramucosal acidosis in this experimental model of sepsis.

Effects of levosimendan in normodynamic endotoxaemia: a controlled experimental study.

OBJECTIVES: Levosimendan is an inotropic and vasodilator drug that has proved to be useful in cardiogenic shock. Pretreatment with levosimendan in experimental hypodynamic septic shock in pigs has shown valuable effects in oxygen transport. Our goal was to assess the effects of levosimendan in a normodynamic model of endotoxaemia. METHODS: Twelve sheep were anaesthetized and mechanically ventilated. After taking basal haemodynamic and oxygen transport measurements, sheep were assigned to two groups during 120 min: (1) endotoxin (5 microg/kg endotoxin); (2) levosimendan (5 microg/kg endotoxin plus levosimendan 200 microg/kg followed by 200 microg/kg/h). Both groups received hydration of 20 ml/kg/h of saline solution. RESULTS: In the endotoxin group, cardiac output, intestinal blood flow and systemic and intestinal oxygen transports and consumptions (DO(2) and VO(2)) remained unchanged. In the levosimendan group, systemic and intestinal DO(2) were significantly higher than in the endotoxin group. Because stroke volume did not change (basal versus 120': 0.9+/-0.1 ml/kg versus 0.9+/-0.2 ml/kg, p=0.3749), the elevation in cardiac output by levosimendan (145+/-17 ml/min/kg versus 198+/-16 ml/min/kg, p=0.0096) was related to an increased heart rate (159+/-32 beats l/min versus 216+/-19 beats l/min, p=0.0037). Levosimendan precluded the development of gut intramucosal acidosis at 120' (endotoxin versus levosimendan, ileal intramucosal-arterial PCO(2) difference: 19+/-4 Torr versus 10+/-4 Torr, p=0.0025). However, levosimendan decreased mean arterial blood pressure (99+/-20 Torr versus 63+/-13 Torr, p=0.0235) and increased blood lactate levels (2.4+/-0.9 mmol/l versus 4.8+/-1.5 mmol/l, p=0.0479). All p-values are differences in specific points (paired or unpaired t-test with Bonferroni correction) after two-way repeated measures ANOVA. A p-value<0.05 was considered significant. CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan improved oxygen transport and prevented the development of intramucosal acidosis in this experimental model of endotoxaemia. However, systemic hypotension and lactic acidosis occurred. Additional studies are needed to show if different doses and timing of levosimendan administration in septic shock might improve gut perfusion without adverse effects.