Caprini guideline indicated venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis among inpatient surgical patients: are there racial/ethnic differences in practice patterns and outcomes?

BACKGROUND: While racial disparity in surgical mortality due to venous thromboembolism (VTE) has improved, a gap persists. Our study aim was to determine differences in VTE prevention practices and their impact on outcomes among racial surgical cohorts. METHODS: Elective surgeries performed between 1.1.2016 and 5.31.2021 were included. Racial/ethnic cohorts were propensity-matched 1:1 to non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, and outcomes were compared using unadjusted logistic regression. Match cohort balance was assessed using absolute standardized mean differences and linear model analysis of variance (ANOVA). Pearson's Chi-square tests evaluated bi-variate associations. Conditional logistic regression to compare outcomes between matched groups. Odds ratios, 95 â€‹% confidence intervals, and p-values are reported. Analyses were performed using R version 4.1.2 and the R package Matchit. RESULTS: Non-Hispanic other race (NHOR) (vs. NHW) patients were less likely to receive inpatient prophylaxis (OR 0.86, CI:0.76-0.98). Appropriate prophylaxis resulted in similar VTE for NHB (p â€‹= â€‹0.71) and Hispanic (p â€‹= â€‹0.06), compared to NHW patients. Inpatient bleeding was higher in Hispanic patients with a higher likelihood of receiving appropriate prophylaxis (OR 1.94, CI:1.16-3.32) and NHOR patients with a lower likelihood (OR 1.90, CI:1.10-3.36) CONCLUSION: Postoperative VTE was similar for minority patients receiving appropriate prophylaxis, compared to NHW patients. Inpatient bleeding was more likely in Hispanic and NHOR patients but may not be related to receiving appropriate prophylaxis. NHOR patients were less likely to receive inpatient thromboprophylaxis.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcome Trends Over Time: Are We Improving?

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is an effective treatment option for patients with obesity. Robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) is reported to have worse short-term patient outcomes compared to laparoscopic SG (LSG), but prior studies may not have accounted for evolving technology, including stapler utilization. OBJECTIVE: This study compared RSG and LSG outcomes over different time periods. SETTING: Academic Hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The 2015 to 2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) databases were used. Matched cohort analyses compared adverse outcomes within 30 days for the 2015-2018 and 2019-2021 cohorts. Bivariate and regression models compared cohorts using Stata/MP 17.0. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-eight thousand and sixty-nine SG were analyzed. Over the 7-year study period, all patient outcomes, operation length (OL), and length of stay (LOS) trended downward for RSG, except surgical site infection (SSI). In the 2015-2018 cohort, leak was significantly higher with RSG (OR 1.53), and OL and LOS longer (p < 0.001). In the 2019-2021 cohort which corelated with a significant increase in robotic cases, leak (OR 1.36), SSI (OR 1.46), and morbidity (OR 1.11) were higher with RSG. While the mean difference in OL and LOS decreased between the two time periods, they remain longer for RSG (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While RSG and LSG are safe with similar mortality, RSG continues to be associated with higher rates of morbidity, leak, and SSI, as well as longer OL, hospital LOS, and higher cost. The study is limited by the ability to account for the impact of surgeon experience and stapler utilization on outcomes.

A comprehensive analysis of health care Inequities in randomized clinical trials following bariatric surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a global epidemic, leading to an increasing focus on interventions like bariatric surgeries. Despite this, there's a noticeable gap in understanding the demographic distribution of patients in clinical trials for bariatric surgery. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of 117 registered randomized clinical trials related to bariatric surgery on ClinicalTrials.gov. We extracted demographic information, including age, sex, race, and ethnicity, and performed descriptive statistical analyses. RESULTS: The analysis covered 8,418 participants. The mean age was 43.8 years, with a substantial majority (93.8 â€‹%) falling within the 18-65 age group. Females comprised 74.9 â€‹% of participants, surpassing real-world estimates. Racially, 65.3 â€‹% of participants were White, while African Americans represented 18.5 â€‹%, Asians 1.2 â€‹%, Native Hawaiians 0.2 â€‹%, and American Indians 0.1 â€‹%, indicating an underrepresentation of diverse racial groups, notably lower compared to real-world demographic data. In terms of ethnicity, only 17.6 â€‹% were Hispanic. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals significant demographic disparities in patients undergoing bariatric surgeries in clinical trials. This suggests a lack of generalizability, emphasizing the need for inclusive recruitment strategies to enhance health equity.

Out-of-Pocket Costs among Commercially Insured Individuals with type 2 Diabetes and Obesity: Comparison between Ozempic and Sleeve Gastrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Determine out-of-pocket (OOP) costs two years after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or initiating Ozempic for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Individuals with obesity and T2D have a variety of treatment options. Risks and benefits of these treatment options are becoming more well documented; however, the real-world patient costs of these options are not known. METHODS: Adults with body mass index (BMI) 35 kg/m2 or higher, and T2D who had an SG or used Ozempic were identified in the employer-based retrospective claims database Merative™ (previously Truven IBM Marketscan) from 2017 to 2021. SG cohort was defined as having a SG (without filling a prescription for Ozempic) and Ozempic cohort was defined as continuously filling a prescription for Ozempic for at least 2 years (and not having any bariatric surgery). Individuals in each cohort were 1:1 propensity matched on demographics, obesity-related comorbidities, and baseline OOP costs. in the year before treatment. OOP costs were compared in the two years after treatment using paired t-tests. RESULTS: 302 SG were matched to 302 Ozempic patients (mean age 50, mean baseline BMI 40, 41% male). OOP healthcare costs were similar for the SG ($2,267) and Ozempic ($2,131) cohorts 1-year after index date (difference=$136, P=0.19). OOP healthcare costs were significantly lower in the SG cohort ($1,155 vs. $2,084, P<0.01) 2-years after index date. CONCLUSIONS: Within 2 years of starting treatment, OOP healthcare costs were significantly lower among individuals who had a SG versus those treated with Ozempic.

County health ranking: untangling social determinants of health and other factors associated with short-term bariatric surgery outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The complex interplay of the social determinants of health, race/ethnicity, and traditional surgical risk factors on outcomes following metabolic surgery is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the social determinants of health as measured by county health ranking (CHR) and short-term metabolic surgery outcomes. SETTING: Five accredited bariatric program sites at a national academic health system. METHODS: Data were collected from 5 sites of a single health system from 2010 to 2021. Current procedural terminology codes identified primary and revisional cases. Patient characteristics, procedural data, and 30-day occurrences were collected. CHRs for health factors were determined by ZIP Code and stratified into best, middle, and worst terciles. The primary outcome was 30-day complications, readmissions, or reinterventions/reoperations. Logistic regression assessed the correlation between CHR tercile and morbidity. RESULTS: We analyzed 4,315 primary and 370 revisional metabolic surgery cases. Overall, 64.0%, 27.4%, and 8.6% of patients lived in the best, middle, and worst CHR terciles, respectively. Patients in the middle and worst CHR terciles were more commonly older; non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic; suffered from preexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or hypertension, were dialysis dependence, were on therapeutic anticoagulation, or had inferior vena cava filters. Middle and worst CHR tercile patients were more likely to undergo index sleeve gastrectomy or robotic-assisted surgery and have surgery performed by a self-designated general surgeon. Thirty-day outcomes were similar across CHR terciles. Racial disparity in multiple short-term outcomes persisted despite adjustment for CHR tercile. CONCLUSION: Higher-risk patients are more likely to be from counties with lower CHRs, but CHR was not independently associated with 30-day outcomes after metabolic surgery.

Room for Improvement: The Impact of Guideline-Recommended Extended Thromboprophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery for Colorectal and Anal Cancer at a Tertiary Referral Center.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism occurs in approximately 2% of patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic surgery for cancers of the colon, rectum, and anus and is considered preventable. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons recommends extended prophylaxis in high-risk patients, but there is low adherence to the guidelines. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the impact of venous thromboembolism risk-guided prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective abdominal and pelvic surgeries for colorectal and anal cancers from 2016 to 2021. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis. SETTING: The study was conducted at a multisite tertiary referral academic health care system. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent elective abdominal or pelvic surgery for colon, rectal, or anal cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Receipt of Caprini-guided venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, 90-day postoperative rate of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolism, and bleeding events. RESULTS: A total of 3504 patients underwent elective operations, of whom 2224 (63%) received appropriate thromboprophylaxis in the inpatient setting. In the postdischarged cohort of 2769 patients, only 2% received appropriate thromboprophylaxis and no thromboembolic events were observed. In the group receiving inappropriate thromboprophylaxis, at 90 days postdischarge, the deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and venous thromboembolism rates were 0.60%, 0.40%, and 0.88%, respectively. Postoperative bleeding was not different between the 2 groups. LIMITATIONS: Limitations to our study include its retrospective nature, use of aggregated electronic medical records, and single health care system experience. CONCLUSION: Most patients in our health care system undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancers of the colon, rectum, and anus were discharged without appropriate Caprini-guided venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Risk-guided prophylaxis was associated with decreased rates of inhospital and postdischarge venous thromboembolism without increased bleeding complications. See Video Abstract . MARGEN DE MEJORA EL IMPACTO DE LA TROMBOPROFILAXIS RECOMENDADA POR LAS DIRECTRICES EN PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A CIRUGA ABDOMINAL POR CNCER COLORRECTAL Y ANAL EN UN CENTRO DE REFERENCIA TERCIARIO: ANTECEDENTES:El tromboembolismo venoso ocurre en aproximadamente el 2% de los pacientes sometidos a cirugía abdominal y pélvica por cánceres de colon, recto y ano, y se considera prevenible. La Sociedad Estadounidense de Cirujanos de Colon y Recto recomienda una profilaxis prolongada en pacientes de alto riesgo, pero el cumplimiento de las directrices es bajo.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo analizar el impacto de la profilaxis guiada por el riesgo de tromboembolismo venoso (TEV) en pacientes sometidos a cirugías abdominales y pélvicas electivas por cáncer colorrectal y anal entre 2016 y 2021.DISEÑO:Este fue un análisis retrospectivo.AJUSTE:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un sistema de salud académico de referencia terciaria de múltiples sitios.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a cirugía abdominal o pélvica electiva por cáncer de colon, recto o ano.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Recepción de profilaxis de tromboembolismo venoso guiada por Caprini, tasa postoperatoria de 90 días de trombosis venosa profunda, embolia pulmonar, tromboembolismo venoso y eventos de sangrado.RESULTADOS:Un total de 3.504 pacientes se sometieron a operaciones electivas, de los cuales 2.224 (63%) recibieron tromboprofilaxis adecuada en el ámbito hospitalario. En el cohorte de 2.769 pacientes después del alta, solo el 2% recibió tromboprofilaxis adecuada en la que no se observaron eventos tromboembólicos. En el grupo que recibió tromboprofilaxis inadecuada, a los 90 días después del alta, las tasas de trombosis venosa profunda, embolia pulmonar y tromboembolia venosa fueron del 0,60%, 0,40% y 0,88%, respectivamente. El sangrado posoperatorio no fue diferente entre los dos grupos.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones de nuestro estudio incluyen su naturaleza retrospectiva, el uso de registros médicos electrónicos agregados y la experiencia de un solo sistema de atención médica.CONCLUSIÓN:La mayoría de los pacientes en nuestro sistema de salud sometidos a cirugía abdominal o pélvica por cánceres de colon, recto y ano fueron dados de alta sin una profilaxis adecuada de TEV guiada por Caprini. La profilaxis guiada por el riesgo se asoció con menores tasas de tromboembolismo venoso hospitalario y dado de alta sin un aumento de las complicaciones de sangrado. (Traducción-Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez ).

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Otolaryngologic Patients Using Caprini Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the utilization of Caprini guideline-indicated venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis and impact on VTE and bleeding outcomes in otolaryngology (ORL) surgery patients. METHODS: Elective ORL surgeries performed between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between patient characteristics and receiving appropriate prophylaxis, inpatient, 30- and 90-day VTE and bleeding events. RESULTS: A total of 4955 elective ORL surgeries were analyzed. Thirty percent of the inpatient cohort and 2% of the discharged cohort received appropriate risk-stratified VTE prophylaxis. In those who did not receive appropriate prophylaxis, overall inpatient VTE was 3.5-fold higher (0.73% vs. 0.20%, p = 0.015), and all PE occurred in this cohort (0.47% vs. 0.00%, p = 0.005). All 30- and 90-day discharged VTE events occurred in those not receiving appropriate prophylaxis. Inpatient, 30- and 90-day discharged bleeding rates were 2.10%, 0.13%, and 0.33%, respectively. Although inpatient bleeding was significantly higher in those receiving appropriate prophylaxis, all 30- and 90-day post-discharge bleeding events occurred in patients not receiving appropriate prophylaxis. On regression analysis, Caprini score was significantly positively associated with likelihood of receiving appropriate inpatient prophylaxis (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.07) but was negatively associated in the discharge cohort (OR 0.43, CI 0.36-0.51). Receipt of appropriate prophylaxis was associated with reduced odds of inpatient VTE (OR 0.24, CI 0.06-0.69), but not with risk of bleeding. CONCLUSION: Although Caprini VTE risk-stratified prophylaxis has a positive impact in reducing inpatient and post-discharge VTE, it must be balanced against the risk of inpatient postoperative bleeding. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:1169-1182, 2024.

Risk stratified venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in bariatric patients using a Caprini assessment: practice patterns and opportunities for improvement.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is rare after bariatric surgery but is the most common cause of mortality. The use of VTE risk-stratification tools and compliance with practice guidelines remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to determine the utilization of risk-stratified VTE prophylaxis and its impact on VTE and bleeding outcomes. SETTING: Academic hospital system. METHODS: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy (2016-2021) were identified from our electronic health records. Caprini score and VTE prophylaxis regimen were retrospectively determined. VTE prophylaxis consistent with Caprini guidelines was considered appropriate. Outcomes were compared between VTE prophylaxis cohorts. Variables were compared by Kruskal-Wallis test, Pearson χ2 test, and regression models. A P value of <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 1849 bariatric cases were analyzed, including 64% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 36% sleeve gastrectomy cases. Of these, 70% and 3.7% received appropriate risk-stratified VTE prophylaxis during hospitalization and at discharge. The mean Caprini score was higher in those without appropriate prophylaxis (8.45 versus 8.04; P = .0004). Inpatient and 30- and 90-day VTE rates were .22%, .47%, and .64%. All discharge VTE events occurred in those not receiving appropriate Caprini risk-stratified VTE prophylaxis. Inpatient and 30- and 90-day bleeding complications were .22%, .23%, and .35%. The likelihood of receiving appropriate prophylaxis varied by hospital site, and receiving appropriate prophylaxis was not associated with increased bleeding risk. CONCLUSION: Caprini guideline-indicated VTE prophylaxis can be safely used in bariatric surgery patients and may reduce preventable VTE complications without increasing bleeding risk.

Can Risk-Based Thromboprophylaxis Practice Guidelines be Safely Used in Esophagectomy Cases? Experience of an Academic Health System.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in 3-11% of esophagectomy patients and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The use of validated VTE risk assessment tools and compliance with recommended practice guidelines remains unclear. In this study, we seek to determine the use of Caprini guideline indicated VTE prophylaxis and its effect on VTE and bleeding complications following esophagectomy. METHODS: Esophagectomy cases were identified from the Mayo Clinic electronic health records. Caprini score and VTE prophylaxis regimen received were determined retrospectively. VTE prophylaxis was identified as appropriate or inappropriate based on the Caprini score and prophylaxis received preoperative, during hospitalization, and after hospital discharge. Study cohorts were compared by Pearson Chi-square test, Fisher's Exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and logistic regression models. Stata/MP 16.1 was used for analysis. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported for logistic regression models. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-six esophagectomy cases were analyzed. The median Caprini score was thirteen. Appropriate prophylaxis resulted in a 6.9-fold reduction in inpatient VTE. All 30- and 90-day post-discharge VTEs occurred in those not receiving Caprini guideline-indicated VTE prophylaxis. Inpatient, 30- and 90-day post-discharge bleeding rates were 7.68%, 0.91%, and 2.11%, respectively; however, bleeding was not increased with receipt of appropriate prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: In this esophagectomy cohort, Caprini guideline indicated VTE prophylaxis resulted in reduced inpatient VTE events without increasing bleeding complications. Risk-based VTE prevention measures should be considered in this patient cohort known to be at heightened risk for postoperative VTE.

Venous thromboembolism and bleeding after hepatectomy: role and impact of risk adjusted prophylaxis.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in 2-6% of post-hepatectomy patients and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The use of VTE risk assessment models in hepatectomy cases remains unclear. Our study aimed to determine the use and impact of Caprini guideline indicated VTE prophylaxis following hepatectomy. Hepatectomy cases performed during 2016-2021 were included. Caprini score and VTE prophylaxis were determined retroactively, and VTE prophylaxis was categorized as appropriate or inappropriate. The primary outcome was the receipt of appropriate prophylaxis, and secondary outcomes were postoperative VTE and bleeding. Statistical analyses included Fisher Exact test, Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson Chi-Square test, and multivariate regression models. R Statistical software was used for analysis. A p-value < 0.05 or 95% Confidence Interval (CI) excluding 1 was considered significant. A total of 1955 hepatectomy cases were analyzed. Patient demographics were similar between study cohorts. Inpatient, 30- and 90-day VTE rates were 1.28%, 0.56%, and 1.24%, respectively. By Caprini guidelines, 59% and 4.3% received appropriate in-hospital and discharged VTE prophylaxis, respectively. Inpatient VTE (4.5-fold) and mortality (9.5-fold) were lower in patients receiving appropriate prophylaxis. All discharged VTE and mortality occurred in patients not receiving appropriate prophylaxis. Inpatient, 30- and 90-day bleeding rates were 8.4%, 0.62%, and 0.68%, respectively. Appropriate prophylaxis did not increase postoperative bleeding. Increasing Caprini score inversely correlated with receiving appropriate prophylaxis (OR 0.38, CI 0.31-0.46) at discharge, and appropriate prophylaxis did not correlate with bleeding risk (OR 0.79, CI 0.57-1.12). Caprini guideline indicated prophylaxis resulted in reduced VTE complications without increasing bleeding risk.

The Benefits of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on a Patient With Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a disorder affecting connective tissue throughout the body. Inherited through several different genetic mutations, the EDS symptoms of hyperextensibility, hypermobility, and fragility cause significant somatic and visceral issues in those affected. Chronic somatic dysfunction, pain, and systemic involvement create lifelong comorbidities and discomfort for these patients. One in every 5,000 individuals is burdened with EDS worldwide; in the US, the range has been reported to be 1/2,500-1/5,000 people. Very few patients with EDS in the literature have been documented and treated with osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT). The objective of this case report is to describe the response of an EDS patient to outpatient OMT over a series of three office visits. The patient has verbally consented to OMT at each encounter. A combination of soft tissue manipulation, muscle energy, Still's technique, counterstrain, and high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) was performed in the head and neck, thoracic, lumbar, ribs, and lower extremity regions. During the three clinic visits of this patient, OMT was performed in the same regions by the student physician under the supervision of the attending physician. At each visit, the patient was asked to report their pain levels pre- and post-treatment and assess symptom improvement using a one to 10 pain scale, as well as any subjective symptoms they are experiencing. Following each treatment, as well as at each follow-up encounter, the patient reported marked pain and symptom improvement. The objective of this case report is to describe the benefits that one patient experienced from three clinic visits. These results showed that subjective improvement in respiratory, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal symptoms secondary to the longstanding history of EDS may be possible through the use of OMT.

Caprini assessment utilization and impact on patient safety in gynecologic surgery.

PURPOSE: Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) can potentially be associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to determine the utilization of Caprini guideline indicated VTE in elective gynecologic surgery patients and its impact on postoperative VTE and bleeding complications. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of elective gynecologic surgical procedures performed between January 1, 2016, and May 31, 2021. Two study cohorts were generated: (1) those who received and (2) those who did not receive VTE prophylaxis based on Caprini score risk stratification. Outcome measures were then compared between the study cohorts and included the development of a VTE up to 90-days postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included postoperative bleeding events. RESULTS: A total of 5471 patients met inclusion criteria and the incidence of VTE up to 90 days postoperatively was 1.04%. Overall, 29.6% of gynecologic surgery patients received Caprini score-based guideline VTE prophylaxis. 39.2% of patients that met high-risk VTE criteria (Caprini > 5) received appropriate Caprini score-based prophylaxis. In multivariate regression analysis, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 2.37, CI 1.27-4.45, p < 0.0001) and Caprini score (OR 1.13, CI 1.03-1.24, p = 0.008) predicted postoperatively VTE occurrence. Increasing Charlson comorbidity score (OR 1.39, CI 1.31-1.47, P < 0.001) ASA score (OR 1.36, CI 1.19-1.55, P < 0.001) and Caprini score (OR 1.10, CI 1.08-1.13, P < 0.001) were associated with increased odds of receiving appropriate inpatient VTE prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: While the overall incidence of VTE was low in this cohort, enhanced adherence to risk-based practice guidelines may provide more patient benefit than harm to postoperative gynecologic patients.

Gastric Bypass Mortality Trends in Racial Cohorts: Are We Improving?

INTRODUCTION: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) continues to be safely performed in racial cohorts. However, studies continue to report differences in complications, with non-Hispanic black (NHB) patients having a higher rate of adverse outcomes, including mortality. It is unclear how these disparate outcomes have evolved over time. Our objective was to determine RYGB procedure and mortality trends in racial cohorts. METHODS: Using the 2015 to 2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) database, we identified primary RYGB cases performed laparoscopically or robotically. Non-Hispanic white (NHW) and non-Hispanic black (NHB) patient cohorts were matched based on patient and surgical characteristics. Conditional logistic regression analysis was conducted on the matched pairs. Primary outcomes of interest included year-to-year all-cause and procedure-related mortality. Stata/MP 16.1 was utilized for analysis, and a p-value of < 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval that excluded 1 were considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 148,829 RYGB cases in NHW (82.8%) and Black (17.2%) patients were analyzed. RYGB trends remain similar for NHB and NHW patients over 5 years. In matched cohorts, all-cause mortality (OR 2.23; 95% CI: 1.16-4.29), aggregate related readmission (OR 1.39; 95% CI: 1.27-1.51), related reintervention (OR 1.36; 95% CI: 1.19-1.56), and VTE (OR 1.86; 95% CI: 1.40-2.45) were more likely in NHB patients. During the study period, year-to-year mortality was higher in NHB patients compared to NHW patients. CONCLUSION: Over a 5-year period, year-to-year mortality remains higher in NHB patients after RYGB. While bariatric outcomes continue to improve, outcome gaps between racial cohorts seem to persist.

Association of Neutralizing Antispike Monoclonal Antibody Treatment With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Hospitalization and Assessment of the Monoclonal Antibody Screening Score.

Objective: To test the hypothesis that the Monoclonal Antibody Screening Score performs consistently better in identifying the need for monoclonal antibody infusion throughout each "wave" of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant predominance during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and that the infusion of contemporary monoclonal antibody treatments is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the efficacy of monoclonal antibody treatment compared with that of no monoclonal antibody treatment in symptomatic adults who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 regardless of their risk factors for disease progression or vaccination status during different periods of SARS-CoV-2 variant predominance. The primary outcome was hospitalization within 28 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. The study was conducted on patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 from November 19, 2020, through May 12, 2022. Results: Of the included 118,936 eligible patients, hospitalization within 28 days of COVID-19 diagnosis occurred in 2.52% (456/18,090) of patients who received monoclonal antibody treatment and 6.98% (7,037/100,846) of patients who did not. Treatment with monoclonal antibody therapies was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization when using stratified data analytics, propensity scoring, and regression and machine learning models with and without adjustments for putative confounding variables, such as advanced age and coexisting medical conditions (eg, relative risk, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.14-0.17). Conclusion: Among patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, including those who have been vaccinated, monoclonal antibody treatment was associated with a lower risk of hospital admission during each wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Risk adjusted venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following pancreatic surgery.

This study analyzes pancreatectomy cases performed between 2016 and 2021 to determine the impact of using Caprini guideline indicated VTE prophylaxis on VTE and bleeding complications. This is a retrospective study of cases performed in a single academic health care system, in which Caprini score and VTE prevention measures were determined retroactively and prevention practices binarized as appropriate or not appropriate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed of 1,299 pancreatectomy case. Most patients were stratified as high risk for postoperative VTE. Receiving appropriate VTE prophylaxis during admission was associated with a 3-fold reduction in VTE complications (0.82% vs. 2.64%, p=0.01) without increasing bleeding complications. All VTE complications occurring with 30-day (1.2%) and 90-day (2.7%) from hospital discharged occurred in those not receiving appropriate prophylaxis, and discharged bleeding complications were also not associated with receivng appropriate discharged VTE prophylaxis. The findings our the study are significant as it highlights the ongoing need for standardization in VTE risk assessment and prevention measures to increase compliance to risk adjusted VTE prevention practice guidelines, thus reducing preventable VTE complications and potentially associated morbidity and mortality.

Racial disparities in reasons for mortality following bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) remains a safe and effective treatment for patients with severe obesity. Recent studies have highlighted racial disparities in perioperative outcomes, including up to a twofold higher mortality rate in non-Hispanic black (NHB) (vs. non-Hispanic white (NHW)) patients. Causality for these disparate outcomes remains unclear and largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE: Our study aim was to determine reasons for mortality among racial and ethnic cohorts and MBS patients. SETTING: Academic Hospital. METHODS: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) cases were identified using the 2015 to 2018 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) database using current procedural (CPT) codes 43,664, 43,645, and 43,775. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of overall and bariatric-related mortality. Reasons for mortality were identified and compared between racial and ethnic cohorts. RESULTS: Of 650,903 RYGB and SG cases, 512,041 were included in our analysis (73% SG). For the entire cohort, all-cause and bariatric-related mortality rates were 0.095% and 0.05%, respectively. Age, male gender, ASA 4, functional status, therapeutic anticoagulation, smoking, COPD, and RYGB were independently associated with both overall and bariatric-related mortality. NHB had increased odds (2.13, p < 0.001) of bariatric-related mortality. Compared to NHW patients (13.3%), venous thromboembolic (VTE) complication was the most common reason for overall mortality in NHB (27.8%) and Hispanic (25%) patients (p < 0.001). VTE-related mortality directly associated with the bariatric procedure was also higher in NHB (34.6%) and Hispanic (33.3%) (vs. NHW 21.0%) patients (p 0.05). When stratified by procedure, mortality causes in RYGB cases were similar between racial and ethnic cohorts. In the SG cohort, the proportion of VTE-related mortality varied significantly (p 0.043) between NHB (39.2%), Hispanic 40.0%, and NHW (20.5%) patients. CONCLUSION: There are racial and ethnic differences in causes of mortality following bariatric surgery. The predominant cause of overall and bariatric-related mortality in NHB bariatric surgery patients is postoperative venous thromboembolism. More granular MBSAQIP data capture is needed to determine the role of patient risk versus practice patterns in these disparate outcomes.

Outcomes and Trends of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies (EBT) Among Minority Populations.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBT) have emerged as effective options for weight loss. While the benefits of EBT have been documented, data regarding such therapies among minority populations remains scant. We aim to investigate EBT trends and outcomes in minority populations. METHODS: Data were extracted from the 2015 to 2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) databases. Intragastric balloon (IGB) and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) cases were identified, and procedure volume assessed by year and race/ethnicity. Measures of interest included year-to-year mortality, surgical complications, and 30-day adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Of 966,646 cases in the MBSAQIP databases, 5209 (0.54%) IGB and ESG cases were included. 10.7% were black, and 81.6% were female patients. Compared to white patients, black and Hispanic patients were younger (p < 0.01) with a higher body mass index (p < 0.001). Mortality (0.03% vs. 0% vs. 0%, p = 0.99), reoperation (1.1% vs. 0.8% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.30), and reintervention (3.9% vs. 3.2% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.09) rates were similar between racial/ethnic cohorts. All complications were similar between racial/ethnic cohorts, except a higher rate of venous thromboembolism, in Hispanic (1.04%, p < 0.01) compared to black (0.18%) and white (0.21%) patients. IGB and ESG were predominantly performed in white and Hispanic patients, respectively. ESG was associated with a higher leak (0.6% vs. 0.02%, p < 0.01) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) (1.0% vs. 0.12%, p < 0.01) rate. CONCLUSION: While EBTs have increased annually, they are performed less in black patients. Future studies are needed to identify access barriers for black patients. They are safely performed with similar outcomes in racial/ethnic cohorts, except for a higher VTE rate in Hispanic patients.

Trainee Effect on Procedural Efficiency is Limited in Vascular Surgery Operations.

BACKGROUND: Surgical residents prepare during their training for independent operating experience. However, there is a fine balance between supervised intraoperative teaching and the need to keep operations short since this is associated with improved patient safety. We aim to understand if the composition of the vascular surgical team-presence of anesthesia and surgical trainees as well as the number of circulating nurses-affects elective operative times at our institution. As a secondary aim, we analyzed how time of day affects overall operative time. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all vascular surgery elective operations occurring between January 1, 2019, and October 15, 2021. Our reference operation between procedures was the construction of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Reference teams included circulating staff (fewer than two nurses), anesthesia (anesthesiologist with certified registered nurse anesthetist [CRNA]), and surgery (surgeon with nurse practitioner). The primary dependent variable was the time interval in minutes from wheels-in to wheels-out of surgery, which was divided into three subintervals: wheels-in to cut, cut to close, and close to wheels-out. Univariate analysis was performed to examine each surgical procedure's distribution of wheels-in to wheels-out time interval. Linear regression was performed to determine the effect of team composition and time of day on operative durations. RESULTS: We included a total of 853 vascular operations. Regarding overall operative time, different procedures took various amounts of time compared with the reference operation (AVF creation). Amputations and arteriograms were shorter (-30 min, P = 0.03, and -12 min, P = 0.05, respectively). Other procedures were longer: endarterectomy (+48 min, P < 0.01), rib resection (+78 min, P < 0.01), endovascular aorta repair (+120 min, P < 0.01), lower extremity bypass (+170 min, P < 0.01), and open aortic repair (+410 min, P < 0.01). No significant difference was found in carotid artery stent placement. Overall, there was a significant reduction in the close to wheels-out interval for anesthesiologists with a trainee (mean: -2.4 min; 95%; CI: -4.7, -0.12; P = 0.04). AVF took significantly more time with a surgical resident: wheels-in to cut time (mean: +4.2 min; 95%; CI: 0.92, 7.4; P = 0.01) and cut to close time (mean: +13 min; 3.2, 23; P < 0.01). Arteriogram wheels-in to cut time took longer with a surgeon alone (mean: +5.6; 95%; CI: 0.29, 11; P = 0.04). There were no other statistically significant findings with change in composition of the surgical team or changes in start time. CONCLUSIONS: General surgery residents generally do not add time to vascular surgery cases but may do so in certain cases, perhaps when they are given more autonomy (i.e. AVF creation). Future studies should look at multiple centers, specific vascular procedures, and level of training to explore whether experience among residents (i.e., intern versus senior resident) and case complexity play a role in procedural length, as this may indirectly affect attending surgeon burnout and patient outcomes.

Race affects adverse outcomes of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and acute kidney injury in coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalized patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to explore the racial disparities in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of prospectively collected data of consecutive COVID-19 patients hospitalized from March 11, 2020 to May 27, 2021. The primary outcome measures were the incidence of DVT/PE and mortality. The secondary outcome measures included differences in the length of hospitalization, need for intensive care unit care, readmission, and AKI. Multivariable regression models were used to assess for independent predictors of the primary and secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: The present study included 876 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The mean age was 64.4 ± 16.2 years, and 355 were women (40.5%). Of the 876 patients, 694 (79.2%) had identified as White, 111 (12.7%) as Black/African American, 48 (5.5%) as Asian, and 23 (2.6%) as other. The overall incidence of DVT/PE was 8.7%. The DVT/PE incidence rates differed across the race groups and was highest for Black/African American patients (n = 18; 16.2%), followed by Asian patients (n = 5; 10.4%), White patients (n = 52; 7.5%), and other (n = 1; 4.4%; P = .03). All but one of the hospitalization outcomes examined demonstrated no differences according to race, including the hospitalization stay (P = .33), need for intensive care unit care (P = .20), readmission rates (P = .52), and hospital all-cause mortality (P = .29). The AKI incidence differed among races, affecting a higher proportion of Black/African American patients (P=.003). On multivariable regression analysis, Black/African American race (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-4.0; P = .04) and higher D-dimer levels (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.1-1.2; P < .0001) were predictors of DVT/PE. In addition, Black/African American race (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.7; P = .001), lower hemoglobin levels (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9; P ≤ .0001), male sex (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4; P = .005), hypertension (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.1; P = .0005), and older age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.006-1.03; P = .003) were predictors of AKI. CONCLUSIONS: In our single-center case series, we found a higher incidence of DVT/PE and AKI among Black/African American patients with COVID-19. Black/African American race and D-dimer levels were independent predictors of DVT/PE, and Black/African American race, hemoglobin, and D-dimer levels were independent predictors of AKI.

The Impact of Caprini Guideline Indicated Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Colorectal Surgery Patients: Experience of a Single Health System.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common cause of preventable mortality following colorectal surgery (CRS), occurring in about 2% of patients. As a result, prophylaxis including discharge chemoprophylaxis is recommended. While VTE risk assessment tools are available, the consistent adoption and utilization of these tools remains elusive. Our study objectives were to determine the utilization and impact of risk adjusted VTE prophylaxis in CRS patients. STUDY DESIGN: CRS cases performed between 1/1/2016 and 5/31/2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Caprini score and implemented VTE prophylaxis measures were determined. The primary outcome measure was receiving Caprini guideline indicated VTE prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes included VTE and bleeding. Categorical variables were compared by chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, and continuous variables by Kruskal-Wallis test. Logistic regression models were used to determine predictors of receiving appropriate VTE prophylaxis or experiencing postoperative VTE and bleeding. RESULTS: 10,422 CRS cases were analyzed and 90.6% were high risk for VTE. In-hospital appropriate prophylaxis rates in low, moderate, high, and very high-risk category patients were 91.2%, 56.1%, 61.0%, and 63.1%, respectively. Inpatient VTE was reduced by 75% in those receiving appropriate VTE prophylaxis. At discharge, 5.8% of patients received appropriate prophylaxis, in whom there were no VTE events at 30- and 90 days from discharge. Increasing Caprini score positively correlated with VTE risk in both the inpatient and discharge cohorts, but inversely correlated with the likelihood of receiving appropriate prophylaxis at discharge (OR .31, P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Caprini guideline indicated VTE prophylaxis in CRS patients reduced VTE events without increasing bleeding complications.