Pathophysiology and management of Akathisia 70 years after the introduction of the chlorpromazine, the first antipsychotic.

OBJECTIVE: Akathisia is among the most troubling effects of psychiatric drugs as it is associated with significant distress on behalf of the patients, and it limits treatment adherence. Though it most commonly presents during treatment with antipsychotic drugs which block dopamine D2 receptors, Akathisia has also been reported during treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), stimulants, mirtazapine, tetrabenazine and other drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article was designed as a narrative review on akathisia with a focus on its clinical presentation, pathophysiology and management. A PubMed search for akathisia was conducted which returned 8481 articles. RESULTS: Akathisia is experienced as severe restlessness commonly accompanied by dysphoria and purposeless movement which relieves subjective tension. It has been attributed to an imbalance between dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission in the basal ganglia. Acute akathisia commonly resolves upon treatment discontinuation but tardive and chronic akathisia may persist after the causative agent is withdrawn and prove resistant to pharmacological treatment. Even drugs which induce no other extrapyramidal side effects (such as clozapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole and cariprazine) may induce akathisia. A high index of suspicion should be maintained in patients with motor disabilities, drug-induced parkinsonism and those under mechanical restraint. Propranolol and low-dose mirtazapine are the most thoroughly studied pharmacological interventions for akathisia, though benzodiazepines, voltage-gated calcium channel blockers (gabapentin, pregabalin) and opioids may be effective. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological management may pose a challenge in chronic akathisia. Rotation between different pharmacological management strategies may be optimal in resistant cases. Discontinuation of the causative drug and use of b-blockers, mirtazapine, benzodiazepines or gabapentinoids for symptomatic relief is the basis of management.

Converging dopaminergic neurotoxicity mechanisms of antipsychotics, methamphetamine and levodopa.

OBJECTIVE: Drugs affecting dopaminergic neurotransmission may exert toxic and beneficial effects that persist after discontinuation by modulating gene expression in key brain regions. Drug addiction, cravings and the tardive symptoms associated with chronic exposure to antipsychotics are among the most common processes attributed to long-term dopaminergic neurotoxicity. The purpose of this review was to investigate the mechanisms of dopaminergic neurotoxicity induced by neuroleptic drugs, dopamine agonists, levodopa, stimulants and known dopaminergic neurotoxins MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PubMed search for each of the dopaminergic compounds in question was carried out. The heterogenous nature of the relevant preclinical studies precluded a systematic review, so a narrative review was carried out. RESULTS: The dopaminergic neurotoxins 6-oxidopamine and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) promote oxidative stress and inhibit mitochondrial function, while their affinity for the dopamine transporter ensures they are attain toxic intracellular concentrations exclusively in dopaminergic neurons. Stimulants which inhibit the vesicular monoamine transporter such as amphetamine and its derivatives promote oxidative stress by greatly increasing intracellular dopamine concentrations and enabling dopamine autooxidation. Antipsychotics increase dopamine release and turnover by blocking autoinhibitory D2 receptors and lead to upregulation of post-synaptic D2 receptors. Dopamine agonists may slow the progression of Parkinson's disease by reducing dopamine turnover, but downregulation of D2 receptors may underlie their behavioural toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Though the mechanisms have not been completely elucidated yet, it seems drugs which affect dopaminergic neurotransmission may exert long-term effects which reverse slowly upon discontinuation, if at all. Until the nature of these changes is clear it would be best to utilize drugs which affect dopaminergic neurotransmission cautiously especially if prolonged treatment is required.

Autoinflammatory syndromes and infections: pathogenetic and clinical implications.

The autoinflammatory syndromes are a group of disorders characterized by recurrent episodes of seemingly unprovoked inflammation without significant levels of autoantobodies and antigen specific T cells. Although a direct association between defective innate immune responses to bacterial components and these diseases has not been formally established, much ongoing research is aimed towards confirmation of that hypothesis. This article will review recent advances in the study of a subset of NOD-like receptors (NLRs), which control the activation of caspase-1 through the assembly of a large protein complex called inflammasome. Moreover, we will review recent progresses in understanding of a range of autoinflammatory conditions in humans.

Possible role for tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in the treatment of resistant dermatomyositis and polymyositis: a retrospective study of eight patients.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the use of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)alpha inhibitors in refractory dermatomyositis and polymyositis in an academic centre. METHODS: A retrospective study of eight patients with dermatomyositis or polymyositis refractory to corticosteroids and immunosuppressives who were treated with TNF inhibitors between 1998 and 2004. RESULTS: 8 patients with dermatomyositis or polymyositis who were treated with TNF inhibitors as adjunct treatment were identified. The mean (SD) duration of disease before initiation of TNF inhibitors was 8.5 (4.4) years. The patients failed to respond to treatment with corticosteroids (oral and intravenous); intravenous immunoglobulin and immunosuppressants (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and leflunomide); 4.5 (1.4) immunosuppressants had been used before TNF treatment. Six patients were treated with etanercept alone, one with infliximab and one sequentially with both agents. Of the eight patients, six showed a favourable response with improved motor strength and decreased fatigue after 15.2 (6.5) months. Two of the patients did not respond after 4 (1.4) months and TNF inhibitors were discontinued. Responders showed a 54.4% (27.7%) decrease in serum concentration of creatine kinase, which was grossly abnormal (4463.5 (4036.4) U/l). Non-responders had similar reductions in creatine kinase concentration (56.1% (20.4%)), but their pre-treatment concentrations were in the normal range (118.5 (19.1) U/l). CONCLUSION: Anti-TNF agents may be useful in some patients with refractory dermatomyositis or polymyositis.

Diagnosis and management of adult onset Still's disease.

BACKGROUND: Adult onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a rare systemic inflammatory disorder of unknown aetiology that is responsible for a significant proportion of cases of fever of unknown origin and can also have serious musculoskeletal sequelae. OBJECTIVE: To assess and synthesise the evidence for optimal diagnosis and management of AOSD. METHODS: The key terms, adult onset Still's disease, AOSD, adult Still's disease, ASD, Still's disease were used to search Medline (1966-2005) and PubMed (1966-2005) for all available articles in the English language. Clinically relevant articles were subsequently selected. Bibliographies, textbooks, and websites of recent rheumatology conferences were also assessed. RESULTS: Data on diagnosis and treatment of AOSD are limited in the medical literature and consist mainly of case reports, small series, and modest scale retrospective studies. Diagnosis is clinical and requires exclusion of infectious, neoplastic, and other autoimmune diseases. Laboratory tests are non-specific and reflect heightened immunological activity. Treatment comprises non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs (methotrexate, leflunomide, gold, azathioprine, cyclosporin A, cyclophosphamide), and intravenous gammaglobulin. The recent successful application of biological agents (anti-tumour necrosis factor, anti-interleukin (IL)1, anti-IL6), often in combination with traditional immunosuppressive drugs, has been very promising. CONCLUSIONS: AOSD often poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge and clinical guidelines are lacking. The emergence of validated diagnostic criteria, discovery of better serological markers, and the application of new biological agents may all provide the clinician with significant tools for the diagnosis and management of this complex systemic disorder.