The effects of telehealth-delivered mindfulness meditation, cognitive therapy, and behavioral activation for chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a significant problem affecting millions of people worldwide. Three widely implemented psychological techniques used for CLBP management are cognitive therapy (CT), mindfulness meditation (MM), and behavioral activation (BA). This study aimed to evaluate the relative immediate (pre- to post-treatment) and longer term (pre-treatment to 3- and 6-month follow-ups) effects of group, videoconference-delivered CT, BA, and MM for CLBP. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a three-arm, randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of three active treatments-CT, BA, and MM-with no inert control condition. Participants were N = 302 adults with CLBP, who were randomized to condition. The primary outcome was pain interference, and other secondary outcomes were also examined. The primary study end-point was post-treatment. Intent-to-treat analyses were undertaken for each time point, with the means of the changes in outcomes compared among the three groups using an analysis of variance (ANOVA). Effect sizes and confidence intervals are also reported. RESULTS: Medium-to-large effect size reductions in pain interference were found within BA, CT, and MM (ds from - .71 to - 1.00), with gains maintained at both follow-up time points. Effect sizes were generally small to medium for secondary outcomes for all three conditions (ds from - .20 to - .71). No significant between-group differences in means or changes in outcomes were found at any time point, except for change in sleep disturbance from pre- to post-treatment, improving more in BA than MM (d = - .49). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this trial, one of the largest telehealth trials of psychological treatments to date, critically determined that group, videoconference-delivered CT, BA, and MM are effective for CLBP and can be implemented in clinical practice to improve treatment access. The pattern of results demonstrated similar improvements across treatments and outcome domains, with effect sizes consistent with those observed in prior research testing in-person delivered and multi-modal psychological pain treatments. Thus, internet treatment delivery represents a tool to scale up access to evidence-based chronic pain treatments and to overcome widespread disparities in healthcare. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03687762.

Positive impacts of psychological pain treatments: Supplementary analyses of a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials often focus on symptom reduction as a primary outcome, overlooking positive psychology factors of potential importance although many individuals can and do live well with pain. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Psychosocial Illness Impact-Positive (PIIP) scale assesses perceptions of adaptive psychosocial functioning (e.g., coping and meaning-making) after illness onset. This study evaluated the effects of hypnosis (HYP), mindfulness meditation (MM), and pain psychoeducation (ED) on PIIP scores, using data from a completed randomized clinical trial (RCT) of complementary and integrative chronic pain interventions. We hypothesized that treatment effects on PIIP would mirror the RCT's primary pain intensity outcome, such that HYP and MM, relative to ED, would lead to greater improvements in PIIP during trial follow-up. METHOD: Our sample included 262 Veterans who completed the PROMIS PIIP Short-Form 8a at pre- and posttreatment and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Linear regression was used to test between-group differences in PIIP at each time point, controlling for baseline PIIP, average pain intensity, and baseline perceptions of prepain psychosocial functioning. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in PIIP at posttreatment or 3-month follow-up. However, group differences emerged at 6-month follow-up: individuals randomized to MM and HYP showed improved PIIP relative to those randomized to ED. CONCLUSIONS: Positive psychosocial outcomes are a mostly untapped territory in clinical trials of pain interventions. The present work highlights the potential benefits of including positive psychology concepts in both research and clinical contexts, emphasizing the importance of understanding human flourishing in the presence of illness and disability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Initial development and psychometric properties of the Therapist Quality Scale.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: This study sought to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a brief measure of the quality of therapist treatment delivery that would be applicable for use across different types of psychosocial chronic pain treatments: the Therapist Quality Scale (TQS). RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: An initial pool of 14 items was adapted from existing measures, with items selected that are relevant across interventions tested in a parent trial comparing an 8-week, group, Zoom-delivered mindfulness meditation, cognitive therapy, and behavioral activation for chronic back pain from which data for this study were obtained. A random selection of 25% of video-recorded sessions from each cohort was coded for therapist quality (two randomly selected sessions per group), with 66 sessions included in the final analyses (n = 33 completed pairs). Items were coded on a 7-point Likert-type scale. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability estimates were generated. RESULTS: EFA showed a single-factor solution that provided a parsimonious explanation of the correlational structure for both sessions. Eight items with factor loadings of ≥ .60 in both sessions were selected to form the TQS. Reliability analyses demonstrated all items contributed to scale reliability, and internal consistency reliabilities were good (αs ≥ .86). Scores for the eight-item TQS from the two sessions were significantly correlated (r = .59, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The TQS provides a brief measure with preliminary psychometric support that is applicable for use across different types of treatments to rate the quality of the therapist's delivery. The items assess quality in delivering specific techniques, maintaining session structure, and in developing and maintaining therapeutic rapport. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Exploration of how valued living relates to resilience among people with spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: We lack critical information regarding promoting resilience in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Living according to one's values may increase resilience. The aims of this study were to: (a) determine whether the degree to which individuals with SCI are living according to their values is associated with resilience; (b) identify values endorsed as most important; and (c) examine whether the importance of these values differs significantly by high vs. low resilience. RESEARCH DESIGN: Individuals with SCI (N = 202, Mage = 47.32) completed an online survey. Two linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the extent to which domains of valued living (measured using the Valuing Questionnaire [VQ] and its subdomains, progress and obstruction, and the Valued Living Questionnaire [VLQ]) were associated with resilience. To explore whether resilience was associated with ratings of the perceived importance of specific types of values, we identified the top 10 most important values endorsed in the sample and performed independent sample t tests to analyze whether high (top quartile) versus low (bottom quartile) resilience groups differed on their importance ratings of specific types of values. RESULTS: Successful pursuit of values (VQ-progress) positively predicted resilience (B = 0.67, p < .001) while barriers in pursuit of values (VQ-obstruction) negatively predicted resilience (B = -0.16, p < .05). The VLQ score (living according to particular values) positively predicted resilience (B = 0.18, p < .001). Participants with high resilience levels rated the following values as significantly more important relative to those low in resilience: caring, respect, compassion, gratitude, responsibility, and contribution. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with SCI who are able to pursue their values with intention had higher levels of resilience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Evaluating the benefits of a second pain treatment following a clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the value of including an open label phase after a clinical trial of pain treatments by examining participant characteristics and potential benefits. METHOD: Secondary data analysis. Veterans with chronic pain who completed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing hypnosis, mindfulness meditation, and pain education were invited to participate in an open label phase. Average and worst pain intensities, pain interference, and depression were assessed pre- and postopen label phase; global impressions of change and treatment satisfaction were assessed at postopen label phase only. RESULTS: Of those who were offered the open label phase, 40% (n = 68) enrolled. Enrollees were likely to be older, to have attended more sessions in the RCT, to be satisfied with their first treatment, and to perceive improvement in their ability to manage pain after the RCT. In the open label phase, depression and worst pain decreased across all three treatment conditions. No other improvements were observed. However, most Veterans perceived improvements in pain intensity, ability to manage pain, and pain interference, and were satisfied with the second intervention. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be some value to adding an open label phase to the end of a trial of pain treatments. A substantial portion of study participants elected to participate and reported it to be beneficial. Exploring data from an open label phase can illuminate important aspects of patient experience, barriers to and facilitators of care, as well as treatment preferences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Understanding the Role of Therapist Quality in Accounting for Heterogeneity of Patient Outcomes in Psychosocial Chronic Pain Treatments.

A variety of evidence-based psychosocial treatments now exist for chronic pain. However, on average, effect sizes have tended to be modest and there is a high degree of heterogeneity in treatment response. In this focus article, we explore the potential role that therapist quality in delivering treatment may have in accounting for a degree of this variability in outcome. Therapist quality refers to the skillful delivery of treatment, harnessing both specific and common therapeutic factors during sessions. While recognized as important to assess and report in clinical trials by some reporting guidelines, few randomized controlled trials evaluating psychosocial treatments for chronic pain have reported on therapist factors. We reviewed the clinical trials included in three systematic reviews and meta-analyses of trials of cognitive-behavioral therapy (mainly), mindfulness-based interventions, and acceptance and commitment therapy. We found that of the 134 trials included, only nine assessed and reported therapist quality indicators, with a variety of procedures used. This is concerning as without knowledge of the quality in which treatments are delivered, the estimates of effect sizes reported may be misrepresented. We contextualize this finding by drawing on the broader psychotherapy literature which has shown that more skillful, effective therapists demonstrated ten times better patient response rates. Examination of the characteristics associated with these more effective therapists tends to indicate that skillful engagement of common factors in therapy sessions represents a distinguishing feature. We conclude by providing recommendations for assessing and reporting on therapist quality within clinical trials evaluating psychosocial treatments for chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: Therapist quality in the delivery of psychosocial treatments for chronic pain has rarely been assessed in clinical trials. We propose that therapist quality indicators are an under-studied mechanism that potentially contributes to the heterogeneity of treatment outcomes. We provide recommendations for assessing and reporting on therapist quality in future trials.

Heterogeneous trajectories of depression and resilience following limb amputation.

OBJECTIVE: To identify longitudinal trajectories of depression in the first 6 months following limb loss and to explore baseline predictors of trajectories, including pain and demographic factors. A secondary aim was to evaluate whether trajectories of depression were associated with elevated symptoms of posttraumatic stress (PTS) at 6 months. DESIGN: Secondary longitudinal data analysis of an inception cohort study of persons with new-onset limb loss. Participants completed assessments at three intervals (initial, 3 months, and 6 months). SETTING: Hospitalized care, acute rehabilitation, ambulatory care, and community. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were recruited from consecutive cases of amputation surgery in a metropolitan hospital system over a period of 4 years (2002-2007). The final sample (n = 203) was predominantly White (79.3%) and male (78.8%) with an average age of 49.4 years (standard deviation [SD] = 14.6). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Depression was assessed via the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); posttraumatic stress symptoms were measured via the PTSD checklist- Civilian Version (PCL-C). RESULTS: Four trajectories of depression were identified via Latent Growth Mixture Modeling: Resilience (73.2%), Chronic Depression (11.2%), Emerging Depression (8.9%), and Recovery (6.7%). Average pain intensity significantly predicted trajectory membership. Membership in the Chronic Depression class predicted elevated 6-month PTS compared to all other classes; membership in the Resilience class predicted lower PTS than in the Chronic and Emerging Depression classes but did not differentiate from the Recovery trajectory. CONCLUSIONS: Findings reveal that the course of depression post-amputation is heterogenous, with varying profiles of symptom development, maintenance, and remission. A majority of individuals were classified as Resilient, whereas a substantial minority of individuals developed clinically significant depression between 3 and 6 months (Emerging Depression), suggesting that early screening during acute care may be insufficient. We detected a significant prospective relation between depression trajectories and distal PTS, advancing the potential clinical utility of trajectory modeling as a risk surveillance tool.

Collaborative Care Versus Usual Care to Improve Quality of Life, Pain, Depression, and Physical Activity in Outpatients With Spinal Cord Injury: The SCI-CARE Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Our goal was to test the effectiveness of collaborative care (CC) versus usual care (UC) to improve treatment of pain, depression, physical inactivity, and quality of life in outpatients with spinal cord injury (SCI). We conducted a single blind parallel group randomized controlled trial. The setting was two outpatient SCI rehabilitation clinics within a large academic medical center. Participants were 174 outpatients who were on average 47.7 years old, 76% male, 76% white, 8% Hispanic, 47% tetraplegic, 95% more than 1 year post-SCI, and 45% on Medicare. The intervention consisted of a mental health-trained collaborative care manager (CM) integrated into two SCI rehabilitation medicine clinics and supervised by content experts in pain and mental health treatment. The CM provided assessment, medical care coordination, adherence support, outcome monitoring, and decision support along with brief psychological interventions to the patients via up to 12 in-person or telephone sessions. Among all participants, 61% chose to focus on pain; 31% on physical activity and 8% on depression. The primary outcome was quality of life as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF at the end of treatment (4 months). Secondary outcomes were quality of life at 8 months and pain intensity and interference, depression severity, and minutes per week of moderate to vigorous physical activity at 4 and 8 months. A total of 174 participants were randomized 1:1 to CC (n = 89) versus UC (n = 85). The primary analysis, a mixed-effects linear regression adjusting for time since injury and sex, revealed a non-significant trend for greater improvement in quality of life in CC versus UC at 4 months (p = 0.083). Secondary analyses showed that those receiving CC reported significantly greater improvement in pain interference at 4- and 8-months and in depression at 4-months, but no significant effect on physical activity. We conclude that in an outpatient SCI care setting, CC is a promising model for delivering integrated medical and psychological care and improving management of common, chronic, disabling conditions such and pain and depression.

Effects of hypnosis, mindfulness meditation, and education for chronic pain on substance use in veterans: A supplementary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of three behavioral interventions for chronic pain on substance use. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Participants were 328 Veterans with chronic pain receiving care at one of two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in the northwest United States. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three 8-week manualized in-person group treatments: (a) hypnosis (HYP), (b) mindfulness meditation (MM), or (c) active education control (ED). Substance use frequency was assessed using 10 individual items from the WHO-ASSIST, administered at baseline prior to randomization and at 3- and 6-month posttreatment. RESULTS: Baseline substance use (i.e., any use) in the past 3 months was reported by 22% (tobacco), 27% (cannabis), and 61% (alcohol) of participants. Use of all other substances assessed was reported by < 7% of participants. Results showed that MM, as compared to ED, significantly reduced risk of daily cannabis use by 85% and 81% at the 3- and 6-month posttreatment follow-ups, respectively, after adjusting for baseline use. HYP, as compared to ED, significantly reduced risk of daily cannabis use by 82% at the 6-month posttreatment follow-up after adjusting for baseline use. There was no intervention effect on tobacco or alcohol use at either posttreatment follow-up. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: HYP and MM for chronic pain may facilitate reductions in cannabis use, even when reducing such use is not a focus of treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Who Benefits the Most From Different Psychological Chronic Pain Treatments? An Exploratory Analysis of Treatment Moderators.

Different psychological chronic pain treatments benefit some individuals more than others. Understanding the factors that are associated with treatment response-especially when those factors differ between treatments-may inform more effective patient-treatment matching. This study aimed to identify variables that moderate treatment response to 4 psychological pain interventions in a sample of adults with low back pain or chronic pain associated with multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, acquired amputation, or muscular dystrophy (N = 173). The current study presents the results from secondary exploratory analyses using data from a randomized controlled clinical trial which compared the effects of 4 sessions of cognitive therapy (CT), hypnosis focused on pain reduction (HYP), hypnosis focused on changing pain-related cognitions and beliefs (HYP-CT), and a pain education control condition (ED). The analyses tested the effects of 7 potential treatment moderators. Measures of primary (pain intensity) and secondary (pain interference, depression severity) outcome domains were administered before and after the pain treatments, and potential moderators (catastrophizing, hypnotizability, and electroencephalogram (EEG)-assessed oscillation power across five bandwidths) were assessed at pre-treatment. Moderator effects were tested fitting regression analyses to pre- to post-treatment changes in the three outcome variables. The study findings, while preliminary, support the premise that pre-treatment measures of hypnotizability and EEG brain activity predict who is more (or less) likely to respond to different psychological pain treatments. If additional research replicates the findings, it may be possible to better match patients to their more individually suitable treatment, ultimately improving pain treatment outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: Pre-treatment measures of hypnotizability and EEG-assessed brain activity predicted who was more (or less) likely to respond to different psychological pain treatments. If these findings are replicated in future studies, they could inform the development of patient-treatment matching algorithms.

Characterizing cannabis use in a sample of adults with multiple sclerosis and chronic pain: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Although cannabis has become an increasingly common method for pain management among people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), there is a dearth of knowledge regarding the types of cannabis products used as well as the characteristics of cannabis users. The current study aimed to (1) describe the prevalence of cannabis use and the routes of administration of cannabis products in adults with an existing chronic pain condition and MS, (2) to examine differences in demographic and disease-related variables between cannabis users and non-users, and (3) to examine differences between cannabis users and non-users in pain-related variables, including pain intensity, pain interference, neuropathic pain, pain medication use, and pain-related coping. METHODS: Secondary analysis of baseline data from participants with multiple sclerosis (MS) and chronic pain (N = 242) enrolled in an RCT comparing mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and usual care for chronic pain. Statistical methods included t-tests, Mann-Whitney tests, chi-square tests, and Fisher's exact tests to assess for differences in demographic, disease-related, and pain-related variables between cannabis users and non-users. RESULTS: Of the 242 participants included in the sample, 65 (27%) reported the use of cannabis for pain management. The most common route of administration was oil/tincture (reported by 42% of cannabis users), followed by vaped (22%) and edible (17%) products. Cannabis users were slightly younger than non-users (Medage 51.0 vs 55.0, p = .019) and reported higher median pain intensity scores (6.0 vs 5.0, p = .022), higher median pain interference scores (5.9 vs 5.4, p = .027), and higher median levels of neuropathic pain (20.0 vs 16.0, p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The current study identified factors that may intersect with cannabis use for pain management and adds to our current knowledge of the types of cannabis products used by PwMS. Future research should continue to investigate trends in cannabis use for pain management, especially as the legality and availability of products continue to shift. Additionally, longitudinal studies are needed to examine the effects of cannabis use on pain-related outcomes over time.

Psychological Approaches for Migraine Management.

Migraine headaches are among the most prevalent and disabling pain conditions worldwide. Best-practice migraine management is multidisciplinary and includes the psychological approaches to address cognitive, behavioral, and affective factors that worsen pain, distress, and disability. The psychological interventions with the strongest research support are relaxation strategies, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and biofeedback, though the quality of clinical trials for all psychological interventions needs continued improvement. The efficacy of psychological interventions may be improved by validating technology-based delivery systems, developing interventions for trauma and life stress, and precision medicine approaches matching treatments to patients based on specific clinical characteristics.

Using participatory action research to develop a new self-management program: Results from the design stage of Managing My MS My Way.

BACKGROUND: Self-management programs have been used with success in several clinical populations, and there is a growing body of evidence to support their use among persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). This group aimed to develop a novel self-management program, Managing My MS My Way (M4W), which is based in social cognitive theory and contains evidence-based strategies that have been shown to be effective for persons with MS. Furthermore, persons with MS would serve as stakeholders throughout the development process to ensure that the program would be useful and encourage adoption. This paper outlines the initial development stages of M4W, including determining 1) stakeholders' interest in a self-management program, 2) the general focus of the program, 3) the delivery method of the program, 4) the content of the program, and 5) potential barriers and adaptations. METHODS: A three-stage study consisting of an anonymous survey (n = 187) to determine interest, topic, and delivery format; semi-structured interviews (n = 6) to follow-up on the survey results; and semi-structured interviews (n = 10) to refine the content and identify barriers. RESULTS: Over 80% of survey participants were somewhat or very interested in a self-management program. Fatigue was the topic with the greatest amount of interest (64.7%). An internet-based program (e.g., mobile health or mHealth) was the most preferred delivery method (37.4%), with the first group of stakeholders proposing a module-based system with an initial in-person orientation session. The second group of stakeholders were overall enthusiastic about the program, giving moderate to high confidence scores for each of the proposed interventional strategies. Suggestions included skipping sections that were not applicable to them, setting reminders, and seeing their progress (e.g., visualizing their fatigue scores as they move through the program). In addition, stakeholders recommended larger font sizes and speech-to-text entry. CONCLUSIONS: Input from the stakeholders has been incorporated into the prototype of M4W. The next steps will be to test this prototype with another group of stakeholders to assess its initial usability and identify issues before developing the functional prototype.

Self-efficacy trajectories of individuals newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: The first year following a new multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis may be a critical time for individuals as they learn to manage their disease. Effective self-management of MS likely requires healthy self-efficacy levels, yet little is known about self-efficacy in the postdiagnosis period. This study aims to improve our understanding of self-efficacy in individuals newly diagnosed with MS by examining self-efficacy trajectories and identifying patient characteristics associated with trajectories in the first postdiagnosis year. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Newly diagnosed adults with MS/clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (N = 230) completed a battery of questionnaires, including the University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale, at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, postdiagnosis. Sankey diagrams characterized self-efficacy trajectories and a multiple regression model tested patient characteristics as predictors of self-efficacy change scores. RESULTS: Mean self-efficacy T-scores ranged from 50.79 to 52.04 (SD = 9.40 and 10.12, respectively) across the postdiagnosis year. MS diagnosis (vs. CIS), higher disability levels, and higher MS symptom severity were associated with lower self-efficacy levels at baseline. Baseline symptom severity predicted change in self-efficacy levels from baseline to month 12 (B = -0.05, p = .030). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Self-efficacy remains relatively stable in the first year following a MS diagnosis, though high symptom severity is associated with decreased self-efficacy at 12-months postdiagnosis. Clinical characteristics (e.g., MS diagnosis, disability level) also appear to play a role in setting the course of self-efficacy in this postdiagnosis year. Timely interventions that enhance self-efficacy and/or improve certain clinical characteristics may promote healthy self-management of MS that carries forward in disease course. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

The association between sleep and cognitive function in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: While there is evidence in other clinical groups to suggest that sleep problems can negatively impact cognitive performance, this relationship has not yet been examined in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Thus, we sought to examine the association between sleep and cognitive function in people with SCI. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Over the course of 7 days, 167 individuals with SCI completed daily subjective ratings of sleep (sleep quality, number of hours slept per night, and bedtime variability) and wore a wrist-worn device that continuously monitored autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity (i.e., blood volume pulse [BVP] signal and electrodermal activity [EDA] signal). At the end of this home monitoring period, participants completed a subjective rating of cognition and six objective cognitive tests. A series of multivariable linear regressions were used to examine associations between eight measures of sleep/ANS activity during sleep and eight cognitive variables. RESULTS: Subjective ratings of sleep were not related to either objective cognitive performance or self-reported cognitive function. However, there were some relationships between ANS activity during sleep and objective cognitive performance: lower BVP signal was associated with poorer performance on measures of processing speed, working memory, learning and long-term memory, and EDA signals were associated with poorer performance on a measure of executive function. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Future work is needed to better understand the relationship of sleep, especially sleep physiology, and cognitive functioning for individuals with SCI, and how that may be similar or different to relationships in the general population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Patient-Centered Framework for Rehabilitation Research in Outpatient Settings.

Conducting high-quality clinical research is dependent on merging scientific rigor with the clinical environment. This is often a complex endeavor that may include numerous barriers and competing interests. Overcoming these challenges and successfully integrating clinical research programs into clinical practice settings serving rehabilitation outpatients is beneficial from both a logistical perspective (eg, supports efficient and successful research procedures) and the establishment of a truly patient-centered research approach. Leveraging our experience with navigating this research-clinical care relationship, this article (1) proposes the Patient-Centered Framework for Rehabilitation Research, a model for integrating patient-centered research in an outpatient clinical setting that incorporates a collaborative, team-based model encompassing patient-centered values, as well as strategies for recruitment and retention, with a focus on populations living with disabilities or chronic diseases; (2) describes application of this framework in a comprehensive specialty multiple sclerosis center with both general strategies and specific examples to guide adaptation and implementation in other settings; and (3) discusses the effect of the framework as a model in 1 center, as well as the need for additional investigation and adaptation for other populations. The 5 interconnected principles incorporated in the Framework and which prioritize patient-centeredness include identifying shared values, partnering with the clinical setting, engaging with the population, building relationships with individuals, and designing accessible procedures. The Patient-Centered Framework for Rehabilitation Research is a model presented as an adaptable roadmap to guide researchers in hopes of not only improving individual patients' experiences but also the quality and relevance of rehabilitation research as a whole. Future investigation is needed to test the Framework in other settings.

Trends and Disparities in the Use of Telehealth Among Injured Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To describe telehealth trends within a population-based workers' compensation system during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to assess telehealth utilization by sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used Washington State workers' compensation claims and medical billing data from January 2019 to October 2020. RESULTS: Telehealth use averaged 1.2% of medical bills pre-pandemic, peaked in April 2020 at 8.8%, and leveled off to around 3.6% from July to October 2020. Telehealth utilization differed significantly by age, sex, number of dependents, injury, industry, and receipt of interpreter services. Workers residing in counties with higher population, lower poverty rates, and greater Internet access had higher telehealth usage. CONCLUSIONS: There were dramatic shifts in telehealth; usage differed by sociodemographic characteristics. Further studies evaluating disparities in tele-health access among injured workers are needed.

Effects of hypnosis vs mindfulness meditation vs education on chronic pain intensity and secondary outcomes in veterans: a randomized clinical trial.

ABSTRACT: Effective, rigorously evaluated nonpharmacological treatments for chronic pain are needed. This study compared the effectiveness of training in hypnosis (HYP) and mindfulness meditation (MM) with an active education control (ED). Veterans (N = 328) were randomly assigned to 8 manualized, group-based, in-person sessions of HYP (n = 110), MM (n = 108), or ED (n = 110). Primary (average pain intensity [API]) and secondary outcomes were assessed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3 and 6 months posttreatment. Treatment effects were evaluated using linear regression, a generalized estimating equation approach, or a Fisher exact test, depending on the variable. There were no significant omnibus between-group differences in pretreatment to posttreatment change in API; however, pretreatment to posttreatment improvements in API and several secondary variables were seen for participants in all 3 conditions. Participation in MM resulted in greater decreases in API and pain interference at 6 months posttreatment relative to ED. Participation in HYP resulted in greater decreases in API, pain interference, and depressive symptoms at 3 and 6 months posttreatment compared with ED. No significant differences on outcomes between HYP and MM were detected at any time point. This study suggests that all 3 interventions provide posttreatment benefits on a range of outcomes, but the benefits of HYP and MM continue beyond the end of treatment, while the improvements associated with ED dissipate over time. Future research is needed to determine whether the between-group differences that emerged posttreatment are reliable, whether there are benefits of combining treatments, and to explore moderating and mediating factors.

Development of the Pain Responses Scale: A measure informed by the BIS-BAS model of pain.

BACKGROUND: The behavioural inhibition system and activation system (BIS-BAS) model of pain focusses on two clusters of responses to pain-escape/avoidance (BIS) and approach (BAS) behaviours. While the BIS-BAS model emphasizes active responses to pain, deactivation responses such as despondence and relaxation are also common. This study sought to develop self-report scales assessing cognitive, behavioural intentions and affective responses to pain consistent with this extended BIS-BAS framework. We also sought to develop short-forms of the emerging scales. METHODS: Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to derive scales from a large item pool administered to a community sample with heterogeneous chronic pain (N = 476). RESULTS: The items resulted in 16 scales assessing Thoughts, Affective responses, Behavioural Intentions and Valence-Associated Thoughts, which loaded on to the four theorized types of pain responses-Escape, Approach, Despondence and Relaxation-with the four emerging short-form scales assessing these overarching factors. The internal consistency reliabilities of the long-forms generally ranged from good to excellent (αs ≥ 0.83), with the exception of the Relaxation-Behavioural Intentions scale (α = 0.64). The four short-forms demonstrated at least adequate internal consistency reliability (αs ≥ 0.79). An initial test of the construct validity of the scales in relation to pain-related outcomes is also reported. CONCLUSIONS: We anticipate that the Pain Responses Scale (PRS) developed from this research will be useful for assessing mechanisms targeted by many psychosocial pain treatments and will provide a nuanced understanding of the shared versus specific nature of these mechanisms. SIGNIFICANCE: The Pain Responses Scale emerging from this research assesses four theorized, overarching responses to pain: Escape, Approach, Giving Up and Relaxation. This measure will afford the capacity to test a reconceptualized BIS-BAS model of pain and inform treatments that are adapted based on this framework.

Quality of life in individuals newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about quality of life (QOL) at the time of multiple sclerosis (MS) or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) diagnosis and how it evolves in the critical adjustment period immediately following a new diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: To (1) describe QOL trajectory in the first year post-MS/CIS diagnosis and (2) examine associations of demographic and biopsychosocial factors with QOL at baseline and as it evolves over the first year post-MS/CIS diagnosis. METHODS: Participants were N = 250 individuals newly diagnosed with MS or CIS. Participants completed self-report assessments of QOL, demographics, and biopsychosocial factors at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-diagnosis using validated measures. RESULTS: At 1-month post-diagnosis, QOL M = 75.2/100 with subsequent assessments revealing consistent ratings on average. Modelling revealed a small number of variables that were predictive of QOL at baseline and/or change in QOL over time. CONCLUSION: QOL in the first year post-MS/CIS diagnosis was, on average, high and stable. A subset of modifiable factors across the biopsychosocial spectrum was associated with baseline level of QOL and change in QOL over time. The stability in QOL suggests that patients can be assessed early after diagnosis for key variables that are predictive of both current and future QOL.