Bioequivalence and adhesion evaluation of transdermal clonidine following a change in excipient supplier.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bioequivalence (BE), safety, tolerability, and adhesion of Oppanol® polyisobutylene (PIB)-containing transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) formulation (test treatment, T) with VistanexTM PIB-containing TTS formulation (reference treatment, R) of clonidine. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, 2-way crossover study comprised a 7-day treatment with 0.3 mg clonidine/24 h (T1/R1), a 7-day washout, and another 7-day treatment (R1/T1) period. After a 3-day washout period, subjects used T2 and R2 (each 0.1 mg clonidine/24 h) simultaneously in the 7-day adhesion phase. Primary endpoints were AUC0-168 and Cavg. Secondary endpoints were AUC0-∞ and Cmax. Additional endpoints included adhesion properties for all phases. For the primary endpoint, the geometric mean (gMean) ratios for test/reference treatment were calculated with BE defined as 90% confidence interval (CI) between 80 and 125%. RESULTS: 58 subjects (mean age, 41.3 years) received treatment (T1/R1, n = 29; R1/T1, n = 29); 55 completed the adhesion phase. BE criteria were met for the primary and secondary endpoints. Adjusted gMean ratios for T1/R1 were 102.3% (90% CI: 95.7%, 109.4%) for AUC0-168; 104.3% (90% CI: 98.4%, 110.5%) for Cavg; 102.8% (90% CI: 97.3%, 108.6%) for AUC0-∞; and 104.0% (90% CI: 98.2%, 110.3%) for Cmax. Mean adhesion was greater than 90% for all four patch types when data from all assessment times were included. Most frequently reported adverse events were general disorders and local irritation. CONCLUSIONS: Clonidine Oppanol® PIB-containing TTS formulation was bioequivalent to VistanexTM PIB-containing TTS formulation and had similar adhesive properties. Both doses and formulations of clonidine-TTS were well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the antiplatelet combination aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) plus extended-release dipyridamole are not altered by coadministration with the potent CYP2C19 inhibitor omeprazole.

BACKGROUND: The fixed-dose combination of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) 25 mg plus extended-release dipyridamole 200 mg (ASA+ER-DP) is used for long-term secondary stroke prevention in patients who have experienced non-cardioembolic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Although the theoretical risk is low that the antiplatelet activity of ASA+ER-DP will be affected by concomitant use of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), no formal drug-drug interaction studies have been conducted. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether the PPI omeprazole influences the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) behavior of ASA+ER-DP. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, crossover, drug-drug interaction study carried out in a clinical trial unit. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty healthy male and female volunteers aged 18-50 years were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to one of two treatment sequences (ABCD or CDAB), each comprising four 7-day treatments with a washout of ≥14 days between the second and third treatments. Treatment A=ASA+ER-DP 25 mg/200 mg (Aggrenox®) twice daily (BID) alone; B=ASA+ER-DP 25 mg/200 mg BID+omeprazole (Prilosec®) 80 mg once daily (QD) following ASA+ER-DP alone for 7 days; C=omeprazole 80 mg QD alone; D=omeprazole 80 mg QD+ASA+ER-DP 25 mg/200 mg BID following omeprazole alone for 7 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were systemic PK exposure to ER-DP and ASA inhibition of arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation. RESULTS: Systemic exposure to ER-DP was similar with and without omeprazole, based on steady-state area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12,ss, ng·h/mL) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax,ss, ng/mL). For the treatment comparison D versus A, the percent mean ratios were 96.38 (90% confidence interval [CI] 90.96-102.13) for AUC0-12,ss and 92.03 (86.95-97.40) for Cmax,ss. The ER-DP concentration versus time profiles were nearly superimposable. There was no effect on the PDs of the ASA component: the extent of ASA inhibition of arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation was almost identical with and without omeprazole, with a percent mean ratio for treatment D versus A = 99.02 (90 % CI 98.32-99.72) at 4 h after last dose. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The PK and PD behavior of ASA + ER-DP was not altered by concurrent administration of omeprazole.