MRI-guidance for motion management in external beam radiotherapy: current status and future challenges.

High precision conformal radiotherapy requires sophisticated imaging techniques to aid in target localisation for planning and treatment, particularly when organ motion due to respiration is involved. X-ray based imaging is a well-established standard for radiotherapy treatments. Over the last few years, the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to provide radiation-free images with high-resolution and superb soft tissue contrast has highlighted the potential of this imaging modality for radiotherapy treatment planning and motion management. In addition, these advantageous properties motivated several recent developments towards combined MRI radiation therapy treatment units, enabling in-room MRI-guidance and treatment adaptation. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art in MRI-based image guidance for organ motion management in external beam radiotherapy. Methodological aspects of MRI for organ motion management are reviewed and their application in treatment planning, in-room guidance and adaptive radiotherapy described. Finally, a roadmap for an optimal use of MRI-guidance is highlighted and future challenges are discussed.

Prenatal Risk Calculation (PRC) 3.0: An Extended DoE-Based First-Trimester Screening Algorithm Allowing For Early Blood Sampling.

AIM: Both previous versions of the German PRC algorithm developed by our group for routine first-trimester screening relied on the assumption that maternal blood sampling and fetal ultrasonography are performed at the same visit of a pregnant women. In this paper we present an extension of our method allowing also for constellations where this synchronization is abandoned through preponing blood sampling to dates before 11 weeks of gestation. METHODS: In contrast to the directly measured concentrations of the serum parameters PAPP-A and free ß-hCG, the logarithmically transformed values could be shown to admit the construction of reference bands covering the whole range from 16 to 84 mm CRL [corresponding to 63 to 98 days of gestation]. Prior to determining reference limits from which the DoEs for each individual patient had to be calculated, the log concentrations of all PAPP-A and free ß-hCG values were transformed once more using the calibration approach established in 1 for the elimination of the influence of maternal weight. RESULTS: Although that part of the database which was available for estimating the reference bands for blood sampling times prior to 11 weeks of gestation was comparatively sparse (898 out of 186 215 pregnancies with euploid outcome), the key statistical characteristics of the extended risk-calculation procedure turned out to be very satisfactory. Using the same cutoff value of 1:150 for the posterior risks of trisomy 21 and 13/18, the overall FPR (false positive rate) for diagnosing a T21 was found to be 3.42%. The corresponding DTR (detection rate) was obtained to be 86.8% and thus exceeded the DTR attained by PRC 2.0 for trisomy 21. For trisomies 13 and 18, the proportions of patients with calculated posterior risks exceeding the cutoff value of 1:150 were obtained to be 1.60% (=FPR) and 86.4% (=DTR). CONCLUSION: Transforming the measured concentrations of PAPP-A and free ß-hCG to the logarithmic scale allows one to extend the DoE-based algorithm developed by the FMF Germany for diagnosing trisomies 21 and 13/18 in such a way that it can be applied to constellations where blood sampling is done before 11 weeks of gestation.

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based Analysis of Cell-Free Fetal DNA in 3000 Cases from Germany and Austria.

BACKGROUND & PATIENT: Data from 3 008 patients, who underwent single-nucleotide-polymorphism (SNP)-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) are presented. METHOD: The PanoramaTM test (Natera, San Carlos, CA) was used to analyze cell-free fetal DNA from maternal blood for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, triploidy and sex-chromosome aneuploidies. RESULT: In 2 942 (97.8%) cases, a result was obtained. The average fetal fraction was 10.2%. A high-risk result for fetal aneuploidy was made for 65 (2.2%) cases. In 59 (90.8%) of these cases, invasive testing confirmed the aneuploidy. There were 6 false-positive cases. In the false-positive group, the fetal fraction was significantly lower. The overall positive predictive value was 90.8%. No false-negative cases were reported but many patients in this study have not delivered yet. Therefore, exact data cannot be given for potential false-negative cases. CONCLUSION: SNP-based NIPT is a reliable screening method for evaluating the risk of aneuploidies of chromosomes 21, 18 and 13. By using NIPT, the number of invasive procedures may be reduced significantly compared to maternal age and first-trimester screening.

[Combined first trimester screening and cell-free fetal DNA - "next generation screening"]. / Kombiniertes Ersttrimesterscreening und zellfreie fetale DNA ­ "Next Generation Screening"

In the last decades, prenatal screening for aneuploidy has become increasingly effective. While first trimester combined screening is considered to be the current gold standard, the use of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA), which is also called noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), will result in a change of paradigm. Respective studies indicate that in screening for trisomy 21, the detection and false-positive rates are 99 % and 0.1 %, respectively. For trisomies 18 and 13, there is less evidence but recent studies report detection rates of 98 % and 86 %. Despite the excellent results in screening for trisomy 21, NIPT should not be considered as a diagnostic test. Due to the costs of NIPT, it is unlikely that NIPT will be applied in the near future in population-based screening for trisomy. In addition, the scope of the current approach in first trimester screening exceeds the screening for aneuploidy as it is possible to assess the risk for various pregnancy complications. Therefore, a combination of both NIPT and first trimester combined screening seems reasonable. Both examinations could be applied in a contingent model where the latter is offered to everyone and NIPT is restricted to women with an intermediate risk after first trimester combined screening. Such a policy would result in a detection rate of about 97 % for a false-positive rate of about 1 %. While NIPT currently focuses on screening for trisomy 21, 18, 13 and sex chromosomal abnormalities, the scope of NIPT will soon become broader. In this respect, some study groups have managed to examine the whole fetal genome within the course of the pregnancy. However, moral and ethical considerations need to be taken into account.

Comparison of three first trimester screening algorithms for trisomy 21 with and without adjustment for maternal characteristics.

PURPOSE: Comparison of three algorithms (DoE 2007 and DoE 2011 algorithm of the FMF Germany and MoM algorithm of the FMF UK) in first trimester biochemical screening for trisomy 21 based on maternal and gestational age, free ß-hCG, and PAPP-A and assessment of relevant maternal characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 22 449 euploid singleton pregnancies undergoing combined screening for trisomy 21 at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation were examined. The measured maternal free ß-hCG and PAPP-A concentrations were converted into DoE 2007 and DoE 2011 values according to the algorithm of the FMF Germany and into MoM values according to the algorithm of the FMF UK. In each pregnancy, patient-specific risks and false-positive rates (FPR) were computed according to the three algorithms and were stratified according to gestational age, maternal ethnicity, maternal weight, and smoking status. RESULTS: Free ß-hCG and PAPP-A MoM and DoE 2011 were acceptably independent from maternal characteristics and gestational age, while there was a strong relationship between maternal weight and the DoE 2007 values. For a risk cut-off that corresponds to an overall 5 % FPR rate for each algorithm, the FPR in each group were around 5 % at gestational week 11 - 13. The FPR of the DoE 2007 algorithm increased linearly with maternal weight from 3.6 % in women of 50 kg or less to 11.8 % in women of more than 110 kg. CONCLUSION: Especially maternal weight has a significant impact on the risk calculation. In contrast to the DoE 2007 algorithm, the DoE 2011 and MoM algorithms both adjust for maternal weight.

Monozygotic twins discordant for trisomy 18.

We report on the pre- and postnatal cytogenetic, molecular genetic and clinical findings in monochorionic-diamniotic twins discordant for trisomy 18. Structural anomalies were identified in one of the twins on prenatal ultrasound examination at 20 weeks' gestation and sampling of amniotic fluid from both sacs was performed for karyotyping. This revealed trisomy 18 in the twin with abnormalities and a normal karyotype in the other twin. Elective Cesarean section was performed at 31 + 5 weeks and the aneuploid twin died shortly after delivery. The surviving twin showed low-grade mosaicism for trisomy 18 on postnatal analysis but has shown normal development. For prenatal diagnosis in monochorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancy the sampling of both amniotic sacs is recommended, especially if one twin has structural anomalies on ultrasound scan.

Individualized correction for maternal weight in calculating the risk of chromosomal abnormalities with first-trimester screening data.

AIM: In the algorithm developed by the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) Germany designed to evaluate the findings of routine first-trimester screening, the false-positive rate (FPR) was determined for the entire study group without stratification by maternal weight. Based on the data received from the continuous audit we were able to identify an increase in the FPR for the weight-related subgroups of patients, particularly for patients with extremely high body weights. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that the variability of the FPR can be reduced through adjusting the concentrations of free ß-HCG and PAPP-A measured in the maternal serum by means of a nonlinear regression function modeling the dependence of these values on maternal weight. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The database used to establish a version of the algorithm enabling control of the FPR over the whole range of maternal weight consisted of n = 123 546 pregnancies resulting in the birth of a child without chromosomal anomalies. The group with positive outcomes covered n = 500 cases of trisomy 21 and n = 159 trisomies 13 or 18. The dependency of the serum parameters free ß-HCG and PAPP-A on maternal weight was analyzed in the sample of negative outcomes by means of nonlinear regression. The fitted regression curve was of exponential form with negative slope. Using this model, all individual measurements were corrected through multiplication with a factor obtained as the ratio of the concentration level predicted by the model to belong to the average maternal body weight of 68.2 kg, over the ordinate of that point on the regression curve which belongs to the weight actually measured. Subsequently, the totality of all values of free ß-HCG and PAPP-A corrected for deviation from average weight were used as input data for carrying out the construction of diagnostic discrimination rules described in our recent paper for a database to which no corrections for over- or under-weight had been applied. This entailed in particular the construction of new reference bands for the corrected biochemical values as the basis for calculating the degree of extremeness (DOE) measures to replace the more traditional MOMs. In the final and most crucial step, stratified FPRs were computed and compared over a set of intervals partitioning the whole range of maternal weight into 18 classes. RESULTS: For the posterior risks of both trisomy 21 and 13 / 18 computed from the weight-corrected database, the use of a cutoff value of 1:150 turned out to be an appropriate choice. For T 21, the overall FPR obtained through comparing the individual risks with this cutoff was found to be 3.51 %. The corresponding proportion of ascertained cases of trisomy 21 detected by means of the new algorithm was 86.2 %. For the trisomy 13 / 18 group, the analogous results were a FPR of 2.07 % and a detection rate (DTR) of 83.0 %, respectively. A comparison between the FPRs obtained for the 18 intervals into which the range of maternal weight had been partitioned, showed the deviation of the strata-specific from the overall FPR to be fairly small: for T 21, the FPR ranged from 2.72 to 4.86 %, and the maximum was found in the group of 87.5 - 95.0 kg. For women with a weight of more than 120 kg, the FPR was only slightly above the FPR for the total sample (3.69 as compared to 3.51 %). Similar results were obtained for the discrimination rule constructed for diagnosing T 13 / 18: here, the minimum FPR (1.17 %) was found for patients weighing more than 120 kg, whereas the maximum (2.66 %) occurred in the interval 75.0 - 77.5 kg. CONCLUSION: In this study we demonstrated that the new algorithm developed by the FMF Germany to estimate risks for fetal trisomies 21 and 13 / 18 combines very good misclassification rates with a far-reaching stability of the false-positive rate against even extreme deviations from the average maternal weight.

[Comparison of two automatic evaluation methods on Images of the CDMAM test phantom]. / Vergleich zweier automatischer Verfahren zur Auswertung von CDMAM-Prüfkörperaufnahmen.

PURPOSE: To test the sensitivity of automatic methods for evaluating CDMAM test images with respect to noise. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CDMAM test images were analyzed with two computer programs. The images were made with different tube loads [mAs]. The other exposure conditions remained constant. They were analyzed with the CDCOM program, which is offered by the EUREF as a free download, and with the CDMAM Image Checker (CDIC), which was developed by the authors. RESULTS: The determination of the sensitivity in one image always delivers the same result when the same type of computer program is used. This means that the precision of both programs is sufficient. The dose sensitivity of CDIC is two times higher than the sensitivity of CDCOM. However, the required entrance dose (ESAK) for a faultless evaluation with the CDIC program is in the range of 10 mGy. The nominal sensitivity values for the CDCOM program attain a higher level. Differences in dose of more than 5 % should be detectable by both programs. CONCLUSION: Methods that dispense with visual inspections to determine the performance of X-ray units for mammography can be applied in the acceptance test or the yearly constancy tests according to the German X-ray directive ( section sign 16). The CDCOM program cannot be characterized fully because the data is not complete. Finally the detection methods are not clear. Therefore, the CDCOM program can be called a black box method, while the CDIC has to be called an open source method (general public license).

A new approach to calculating the risk of chromosomal abnormalities with first-trimester screening data.

PURPOSE: First-trimester screening at 11 - 14 weeks has been proven to be very useful in the early detection of chromosomal defects. The aim of this project was to develop a CE-certified new risk calculation program (PRC = Prenatal Risk Calculation) using a nationwide database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The database underlying the new risk calculation procedure was established in Germany from 2003 through 2006. Overall, the database includes measurements from 70,030 pregnant women having given birth to healthy children. Following consideration of all pregnancies associated with a chromosomally abnormal outcome, the sample size was 451. The algorithm used for calculating the risk of a chromosomally abnormal outcome comprises the following variables: maternal age, crown-rump length (CRL) (restricted to a range from 45 - 84 mm or, equivalently, 11 + 1 - 14 + 0 weeks of gestation), nuchal translucency (NT), as well as the maternal serum parameters PAPP-A (pregnancy associated plasma protein A) and free beta-hCG (free human chorionic gonadotropin). In a preliminary cross-validation study, we applied both the new algorithm and the FMF UK program to an independent sample containing n = 40,568 pregnancies with negative outcome, n = 187 cases of trisomy 21, n = 34 trisomies 18 and n = 13 trisomies 13. RESULTS: Using the primary sample of 70,030 pregnancies with a negative outcome, reference bands were constructed for the sonographic parameter fetal nuchal translucency and the biochemical parameters PAPP-A and free beta-HCG. Instead of MoM values we used "degree of extremeness" (DoE) values. This statistical parameter has been proven to give more precise results than the MoM measure because it assesses the deviation of the actual measurement value from the centre of the reference band expressed as a multiple of the width of the respective band section. The result of the risk calculation is visualized by means of a traffic light graph which allows the patient to comprehend her individual risk at first glance. The red color indicates a high risk, green a low risk, and yellow represents a moderate risk. In our preliminary cross-validation study the detection rate obtained for the German algorithm was 86.6 % for trisomy 21, 94.1 % for trisomy 18 and 92.4 for trisomy 13. The corresponding detection rates obtained with the same data by the FMF UK program were 86.1 %, 82.3 % and 69.2 % throughout. The false-positive rate was 5.0 % throughout. CONCLUSION: The new risk calculation procedure of the FMF Germany (PRC) has been made available as a CE-certified computer program. In screening for trisomy 21 it yields results comparable to those of the program used by the FMF UK. Regarding the diagnosis of trisomy 13 and 18, even higher detection rates are currently achieved with the German algorithm. Program, data base and license key are available free of charge to registered members of the FMF Germany.

[Clinical study of assessment of trisomy 21--precise risk evaluation in the first trimester of pregnancy]. / Eine klinische Studie zur Wertigkeit der Trisomie 21--Risikopräzisierung im ersten Trimester der Schwangerschaft.

BACKGROUND: In the past a non invasive risk analysis for detecting specific chromosomal aberrations was only possible from week 15 of pregnancy. In this paper the practicability of first trimester screening is analysed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Blood samples were taken from 1000 pregnant women before a invasive prenatal diagnosis was performed. Total hCG, free beta-hCG and PAPP-A (pregnancy associated plasma protein A) was analysed. These data were combined with complete cytogenetic and ultrasonographic (CRL and nuchal translucency--NT) data. RESULTS: In more than 90% of cases the NT was below 3 mm. Here the rate of normal karyotypes was 97.8%. In 61 cases a abnormal karyotype was found. Here in the most cases we found an elevated NT. Also in the most cases of trisomy 21 and 18 and in triploidies a characteristic ratio of hCG/free beta-hCG and PAPP-A was discovered. Combining NT and biochemical analysis, 85% of trisomies 21 could be discovered as a risk group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the possibilities of first trimester screening with a high detection rate for specific chromosomal aberrations. DISCUSSION: First trimester screening should only be performed in specialised centers because determination of NT and risk analysis needs extensive experience.

Counselling following the Prenatal Diagnosis of Klinefelter Syndrome: Comparisons between Geneticists and Obstetricians in Five European Countries.

Objective: To describe and compare the information obstetricians and geneticists in five European countries report they would give following the prenatal diagnosis of Klinefelter syndrome. Methods: 388 obstetricians and 269 geneticists from Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the UK completed a brief questionnaire assessing two variables: the information they reported providing to parents following the prenatal diagnosis of Klinefelter syndrome (categorized as positive or negative); and their perceptions of the quality of life with the condition. Results: Geneticists were more likely than obstetricians to report providing more positive than negative information about Klinefelter syndrome than equal amounts of positive and negative information or more negative than positive information about the condition (excess positive information). Regardless of specialty, the information that health professionals reported providing was predicted by their perceptions of the quality of life with the condition, and the country from which they came. Those perceiving quality of life as greater were more likely to provide an excess positive information, as were health professionals from Germany and the UK. Conclusions: These results suggest that the information parents across Europe receive after the prenatal diagnosis of Klinefelter syndrome varies according to the specialty and country of the health professionals consulted, and their perceptions of quality of life with the condition. This variation seems to reflect personal, cultural and professional differences between health professionals. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

The long-term effect of external quality assessment on performance in service cytogenetics.

In 1993 a nationwide cytogenetic external quality assessment program (EQA) was initiated in the Federal Republic of Germany. Presently, some 70 laboratories, representing approximately 90% of all cytogenetic diagnostic tests, are participating in the study. Based on the quality assessment scheme of the Association of Clinical Cytogeneticists (1988) in the United Kingdom, quality of chromosome preparation and speed of routine diagnostic services are being evaluated. As a result of continuous external quality assessment, the mean banding level of participating laboratories rose from below 400 bands per haploid set (bphs) in 1994 to approximately 450 bphs in 1999 in prenatal tests and from about 400 to approximately 500 bphs in postnatal tests over the same 5-yr period. The percentage of participants achieving a banding level of 400 bphs or higher rose from approximately 50% to 93% in prenatal tests and from 60% to 96% in postnatal tests. No significant differences were observed in banding scores achieved by private laboratories compared to university institutes. The impact of the assessment of interpretation, reporting, and documentation remains difficult to evaluate. Preliminary data point to a more stringent adherence to ISCN nomenclature in karyotype designation by participants.

A retrospective evaluation of second-trimester serum screening for fetal trisomy 18: experience of two laboratories.

A retrospective study on screening methods for fetal trisomy 18 has been carried out in two different laboratories using the serum parameters: total human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), unconjugated oestriol (uE3), and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in different combinations and in single marker protocols. Laboratory A (L(A)) utilized a radio-immunoassay to examine 38 fetal trisomy 18 cases and laboratory B (L(B)) utilized an enzyme-immunoassay to examine 33 trisomy 18 cases. As unaffected references the whole routine cohorts of each laboratory were used (L(A): 29 043; L(B): 4264). In both trisomy 18 study groups the median hCG and uE3 multiples of the median (MoM) values were markedly declined (L(A): 0.21 MoM, 0.37 MoM; L(B): 0.31 MoM, 0.44 MoM). Even after exclusion of trisomy 18 cases with combined neural tube or ventral wall defects the medians of AFP MoM values were only moderately declined (L(A): 0.73 MoM; L(B): 0.8 MoM). Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves after multivariate discriminance analysis and single marker evaluation demonstrated that the difference of efficiency between a combination of hCG, uE3 and AFP, and a combination of hCG and uE3 is small but that any of these combinations are more efficient than a combination of hCG and AFP or single marker protocols, respectively. At a risk cut-off generating a false-positive rate of one per cent the most effective marker combination detected 31 of 38 (81.6 per cent) affected pregnancies in L(A) and 25 of 33 (75.8 per cent) in L(B). The differences in sensitivity and specificity seem to be due to the different analytical systems being utilized by the two laboratories.

Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Evaluation of >3,000 cases.

OBJECTIVE: A new method in prenatal diagnostics allows to demonstrate certain numeric chromosomal aneuploidies in amniotic cells within 24 h in contrast to conventional methods which take 1-3 weeks. MATERIALS: The experience with this rapid fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method is compared to standard karyotyping and its clinical relevance is described in a large clinical pilot study. FISH on uncultured amniocytes has been performed from 12 weeks of gestation to the third trimester using commercially available chromosome-specific DNA probes for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y. RESULTS: FISH was performed successfully in 3,150 prenatal cases. All trisomies 13, 18 and 21 and all cases with gonosomal aberrations were detected by FISH analysis. Neither false-positive nor false-negative results were obtained using FISH. For all analyzable disorders the FISH results were in complete agreement with standard cytogenetics. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, FISH is a valuable and reliable method for rapid diagnosis of numeric chromosomal aneuploidies.