Hemodynamic effects of orally administered delta-ALA during radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We investigated hemodynamics in patients receiving delta-Aminolevulinic acid (delta-ALA) to visualize tumor margins prior to radical retro pubic prostatectomy. PATIENTS: Twenty patients undergoing elective open radical retro pubic prostatectomy (RRP). METHODS: Cohort observational study. Ten patients receiving 20 mg/kg of delta-ALA orally prior to surgery (delta-ALA) and 10 patients undergoing RRP without the application of delta-ALA served as a retrospectively matched cohort (CONTROL). MEASUREMENTS: Changes in heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and functional hemodynamic parameters were assessed by electrocardiogram, non-invasive and invasive blood pressure monitoring plus transcardiopulmonary thermodilution. RESULTS: Patients of both groups did not differ in means of age, body mass index, or ASA classification. During surgery, HR and MAP did not differ significantly between both groups. Also, the amount of IV crystalloids and colloids did not differ significantly. In contrast, the amount of vasopressor necessary to maintain MAP within the target range of 70-90 mmHg was significantly higher in delta-ALA when compared to CONTROL (0.08 ± 0.04 µg/kg/min (delta-ALA) vs. 0.03 ± 0.02 µg/kg/min (CONTROL); P < 0.01). Immediately after surgery, patients of delta-ALA showed a significantly higher heart rate (82 ± 18 min(-1) vs. 67 ± 9 min(-1); P < 0.05) compared to patients of CONTROL. Cardiac index, global end-diastolic volume index, and extravascular lung water index were significantly higher after surgery, when compared to baseline values (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Orally administered delta-ALA prior to open radical prostatectomy induces hemodynamic instability in the perioperative period requiring vasopressor support. Further, an increase of extravascular lung water points toward an increased vascular permeability induced by delta-ALA.

Goal-directed fluid therapy using stroke volume variation does not result in pulmonary fluid overload in thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation.

Background. Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDT) guided by functional parameters of preload, such as stroke volume variation (SVV), seems to optimize hemodynamics and possibly improves clinical outcome. However, this strategy is believed to be rather fluid aggressive, and, furthermore, during surgery requiring thoracotomy, the ability of SVV to predict volume responsiveness has raised some controversy. So far it is not known whether GDT is associated with pulmonary fluid overload and a deleterious reduction in pulmonary function in thoracic surgery requiring one-lung-ventilation (OLV). Therefore, we assessed the perioperative course of extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) and p(a)O(2)/F(i)O(2)-ratio during and after thoracic surgery requiring lateral thoracotomy and OLV to evaluate the hypothesis that fluid therapy guided by SVV results in pulmonary fluid overload. Methods. A total of 27 patients (group T) were enrolled in this prospective study with 11 patients undergoing lung surgery (group L) and 16 patients undergoing esophagectomy (group E). Goal-directed fluid management was guided by SVV (SVV < 10%). Measurements were performed directly after induction of anesthesia (baseline-BL), 15 minutes after implementation OLV (OLVimpl15), and 15 minutes after termination of OLV (OLVterm15). In addition, postoperative measurements were performed at 6 (6postop), 12 (12postop), and 24 (24postop) hours after surgery. EVLWI was measured at all predefined steps. The p(a)O(2)/F(i)O(2)-ratio was determined at each point during mechanical ventilation (group L: BL-OLVterm15; group E: BL-24postop). Results. In all patients (group T), there was no significant change (P > 0.05) in EVLWI during the observation period (BL: 7.8 ± 2.5, 24postop: 8.1 ± 2.4 mL/kg). A subgroup analysis for group L and group E also did not reveal significant changes of EVLWI. The p(a)O(2)/F(i)O(2)-ratio decreased significantly during the observation period (group L: BL: 462 ± 140, OLVterm15: 338 ± 112 mmHg; group E: BL: 389 ± 101, 24postop: 303 ± 74 mmHg) but remained >300 mmHg except during OLV. Conclusions. SVV-guided fluid management in thoracic surgery requiring lateral thoracotomy and one-lung ventilation does not result in pulmonary fluid overload. Although oxygenation was reduced, pulmonary function remained within a clinically acceptable range.

Assessment of three minimally invasive continuous cardiac output measurement methods in critically ill patients and a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: In this study we compared the accuracy of three continuous cardiac output (CCO) measurement methods, with intermittent transcardiopulmonary thermodilution (TPTD-CO) as the gold standard. The three studied CCO measurement methods were: uncalibrated peripheral pulse contour measurement (FCCO), calibrated central pulse contour measurement (PCCO), and CCO obtained by indirect Fick principle (NCCO). METHODS: We performed an observational study in 23 critically ill patients. Statistical analysis was done using Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. A review of the relevant medical literature was performed. RESULTS: Only PCCO showed good correlation (R = 0.9) and agreement with a bias of 0.0 ± 0.8 L min⁻¹ and percentage error of 24.5% when compared to TPTD-CO. In patients with normal systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI > 1,700 dyne sec cm⁻5 m⁻²), NCCO (R = 0.8 and bias 0.4 ± 1.3 L min⁻¹) and FCCO (R = 0.8 and bias 0.1 ± 1 L min⁻¹) also produced reliable results. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that in our patient population, CCO can be most reliably monitored by calibrated central pulse contour measurements. All other methods appeared less accurate, especially in situations of low SVRI.

Thermodilution-derived indices for assessment of left and right ventricular cardiac function in normal and impaired cardiac function.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether thermodilution-derived parameters of right and left ventricular cardiac function (right ventricular ejection fraction, global ejection fraction, cardiac function index) are able to track changes of cardiac contractile function and whether they are influenced by substantial preload reduction. DESIGN: Prospective animal study. SETTING: University-affiliated animal research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS: Sixteen domestic pigs were studied. Right ventricular ejection fraction, global ejection fraction, and cardiac function index were compared to direct measurement of left ventricular rate of maximum systolic pressure rise and the left ventricular rate of maximum systolic pressure rise corrected to preload. Measurements were done with normal cardiac function during normo- and hypovolemia. Thereafter, cardiac function was impaired by continuous infusion of verapamil and measurements were repeated during normo- and hypovolemia (withdrawal of blood 20 mL kg body weight). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: With normal cardiac function, hypovolemia led to a significant decrease of right ventricular ejection fraction from 36.7% ± 6.6% to 29.8% ± 5.8% (p < .001), global ejection fraction from 40.5% ± 6.2% to 33.6% ± 7.6% (p < .001), and the left ventricular rate of maximum systolic pressure rise from 2104 ± 390 mm Hg sec to 1297 ± 438 mm Hg sec (p < .001). Cardiac function index (8.92 ± 2.20 min to 7.93 ± 1.54 min) and the left ventricular rate of maximum systolic pressure rise corrected to preload (18.2 ± 4.7 mm Hg sec mL to 15.2 ± 4.3 mm Hg sec mL) did not change significantly. Infusion of verapamil led to a significant reduction of right ventricular ejection fraction, global ejection fraction, cardiac function index, the left ventricular rate of maximum systolic pressure rise, and the left ventricular rate of maximum systolic pressure rise corrected to preload (p < .001). Now, hypovolemia led to a significant decrease of right ventricular ejection fraction (29.1% ± 4.6% to 24.9% ± 5.9%; p < .001), global ejection fraction (37.1% ± 4.7% to 31.9% ± 3.9%; p < .05), cardiac function index (7.58 ± 1.02 to 6.27 ± 1.19 min; p < .05), and the left ventricular rate of maximum systolic pressure rise (733 ± 141 mm Hg sec to 426 ± 108 mm Hg sec; p < .05). Only the left ventricular rate of maximum systolic pressure rise corrected to preload did not change significantly (6.7 ± 1.3 mm Hg sec mL to 4.6 ± 1 mm Hg sec mL; p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Right ventricular ejection fraction, global ejection fraction, and cardiac function index enable detection of changes in load-independent, intrinsic cardiac contractility. Importantly, they also reflect changes of contractile function caused by substantial decrease of preload, emphasizing the importance of assessing both cardiac contractile function in coherence with cardiac preload to differentiate between reduced intrinsic contractility and hypovolemia.

The wolf is crying in the operating room: patient monitor and anesthesia workstation alarming patterns during cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Vital sign monitors and ventilator/anesthesia workstations are equipped with multiple alarms to improve patient safety. A high number of false alarms can lead to a "crying wolf" phenomenon with consecutively ignored critical situations. Systematic data on alarm patterns and density in the perioperative phase are missing. Our objective of this study was to characterize the patterns of alarming of a commercially available patient monitor and a ventilator/anesthesia workstation during elective cardiac surgery. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational study in 25 consecutive elective cardiac surgery patients. In all patients, identically fixed alarm settings were used. All incoming patient data and all alarms from the patient monitor and the anesthetic workstation were digitally recorded. Additionally, the anesthesia workplace was videotaped from 2 different angles to allow retrospective annotation and correlation of alarms with the clinical situation and assessment of the anesthesiologists' reaction to the alarms. RESULTS: Of the 8975 alarms, 7556 were hemodynamic alarms and 1419 were ventilatory alarms. For each procedure, 359 ± 158 alarms were recorded, representing a mean density of alarms of 1.2/minute. CONCLUSION: Approximately 80% of the total 8975 alarms had no therapeutic consequences. Implementation of procedure-specific settings and optimization in artifact and technical alarm detection could improve patient surveillance and safety.

Standardizing care and monitoring for anesthesia or procedural sedation delivered outside the operating room.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to summarize recommendations for the safe and efficient conductance of sedation and anesthesia at remote locations; and to define safety standards, monitoring techniques, quality of care and procedural eligibility. RECENT FINDINGS: Anesthesia outside of the operating room is rapidly increasing in numbers, which has seen a growth of older and sicker patients. These circumstances have created a need for guidelines, for both specialist anesthesia providers and nonanesthesia-trained practitioners, that define patient selection, minimum monitoring (hemodynamics and respiration), facility design and equipment, policy framework, recovery facilities and policies. The patient's safety throughout all stages of sedation and/or anesthesia is the most pertinent goal. Recent data emphasize the importance of monitoring pulse oximetry and end-tidal carbon dioxide for any sedating or anesthetic procedure. Substandard monitoring combined with oversedation and subsequent respiratory depression are implicated as the main reasons for catastrophic sedation and anesthetic outcomes at remote locations. SUMMARY: Patient selection, procedure appropriateness and location appropriateness are the key elements defining the provision of safe anesthesia care outside the operating room. Titratable, short-acting intravenous drugs are preferred such as propofol and remifentanil.