The role of preoperative immune cell metrics in renal cell carcinoma with a tumor thrombus.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to stratify preoperative immune cell counts by cancer specific outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a tumor thrombus after radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of RCC with tumor thrombus that underwent radical nephrectomy with thrombectomy across an international consortium of seven institutions were included. Patients who were metastatic at diagnosis and those who received preoperative medical treatment were also included. Retrospective chart review was performed to collect demographic information, past medical history, preoperative lab work, surgical pathology, and follow up data. Neutrophil counts, lymphocyte counts, monocyte counts, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios (NLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratios (LMR), and neutrophil to monocyte ratios (NMR) were compared against cancer-specific outcomes using independent samples t-test, Pearson's bivariate correlation, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four patients were included in the study, including nine patients who were metastatic at the time of surgery. Absolute lymphocyte count preoperatively was greater in patients who died from RCC compared to those who did not (2 vs 1.4; p < 0.001). Patients with tumor pathology showing perirenal fat invasion had a greater neutrophil count compared to those who did not (7.5 vs 5.5; p = 0.010). Patients with metastatic RCC had a lower LMR compared to those without metastases after surgery (2.5 vs 3.2; p = 0.041). Tumor size, both preoperatively and on gross specimen, had an interaction with multiple immune cell metrics (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative immune metrics have clinical utility in predicting cancer-specific outcomes for patients with RCC and a tumor thrombus. Additional study is needed to determine the added value of preoperative serum immune cell data to established prognostic risk calculators for this patient population.

Comparison of Single-Port Robotic Donor Nephrectomy and Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.

Purpose: To compare the intra- and postoperative outcomes of single-port robotic donor nephrectomies (SP RDNs) and laparoscopic donor nephrectomies (LDNs). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database for patients who received LDN or SP RDN between September 2020 and December 2022. Donor baseline characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, postoperative outcomes, and recipient renal function were extracted and compared between LDN and SP RDN. SP RDN learning curve analysis based on operative time and graft extraction time was performed using cumulative sum analysis. Results: One hundred forty-four patients underwent LDN and 32 patients underwent SP RDN. LDN and SP RDN had similar operative times (LDN: 190.3 ± 28.0 minutes, SP RDN: 194.5 ± 35.1 minutes, p = 0.3253). SP RDN patients had significantly greater extraction times (LDN: 83.2 ± 40.3 seconds, SP RDN: 204.1 ± 52.2 seconds, p < 0.0001) and warm ischemia times (LDN: 145.1 ± 61.7 seconds, SP RDN: 275.4 ± 65.6 seconds, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in patient subjective pain scores, inpatient opioid usage, or Clavien-Dindo II+ complications. Short- and medium-term postoperative donor and recipient renal function were also similar between the groups. SP RDN graft extraction time and total operative time learning curves were achieved at case 27 and 13, respectively. Conclusion: SP RDN is a safe and feasible alternative to LDN that minimizes postoperative abdominal incisional scars and has a short learning curve. Future randomized prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm the findings of this study and to identify other potential benefits and drawbacks of SP RDNs.

Higher preoperative eGFR is a predictor of worse renal function decline after robotic assisted radical cystectomy: Implications for postoperative management.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer or high risk noninvasive bladder cancer, renal function decline is a concern after radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. The pathophysiology of this decline is multifactorial, with subclinical acidosis and metabolic derangements from the diversion thought to contribute. It is unknown whether patients with baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of further decline in renal function. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of two high volume robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) centers between 2016 and 2020. Preoperative demographics and comorbidities were collected. Postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated at 12 and 24 months to determine short-term rate in decline of eGFR. Absolute and percent changes in eGFR were calculated. RESULTS: There were a total of 555 patients who underwent RARC. Men comprised 76.2% of the cohort. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given in 31% of patients and adjuvant chemotherapy was given in 4.81% of patients. Higher preoperative eGFR (B -0.549, 95% CI -0.708 to -0.391, P < 0.001) and presence of diabetes mellitus (B -15.414, 95% CI -24.820 to -6.008, P = 0.001) were significant predictors of eGFR decline at 12 months. At 24 months, presence of diabetes mellitus (B -11.799, 95% CI -21.816 to -1.782, P = 0.021) and higher preoperative eGFR (B -0.621, 95% CI -0.796 to -0.446, P < 0.001) were correlated with a steeper decline in eGFR. Higher preoperative eGFR was also predictive of upstaging to CKD3 or higher post operatively (OR 1.019, 95% CI 1.004-1.034, P = 0.015). Intracorporeal diversion was protective, whereas presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and higher preoperative eGFR predicted greater decline in eGFR. CONCLUSION: Patients with higher preoperative eGFR and diabetes are at increased risk of renal function decline post RARC at 12 and 24 months. This suggests that patients with risk factors for renal function decline, but otherwise normal renal function at baseline, are a particularly vulnerable population for progression to CKD after RARC and should be counseled and closely followed postoperatively for renal function deterioration.

Tips and tricks in achieving zero peri-operative opioid used in onco-urologic surgery.

PURPOSE: To review non-opioid based protocols in urologic oncologic surgery and describe our institutional methods of eliminating peri-operative opioids. METHODS: A thorough literature review was performed using PUBMED to identify articles pertaining to reducing or eliminating narcotic use in genitourinary cancer surgery. Studies were analyzed pertaining to protocols utilized in genitourinary cancer surgery, major abdominal and/or pelvic non-urologic surgery. RESULTS: Reducing or eliminating peri-operative narcotics should begin with an institutionalized protocol made in conjunction with the anesthesia department. Pre-operative regimens should consist of appropriate counseling, gabapentin, and acetaminophen with or without a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications. Prior to incision, a regional block or local anesthetic should be delivered. Anesthesiologists may develop opioid-free protocols for achieving and maintaining general anesthesia. Post-operatively, patients should be on a scheduled regimen of ketorolac, gabapentin, and acetaminophen. CONCLUSION: Eliminating peri-operative narcotic use is feasible for major genitourinary oncologic surgery. Patients not only have improved peri-operative outcomes but also are at significantly reduced risk of developing long-term opioid use. Through the implementation of a non-opioid protocol, urologists are able to best serve their patients while positively contributing to reducing the opioid epidemic.

Perioperative Aspirin Use Is Associated with Bleeding Complications during Robotic Partial Nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Daily aspirin use following cardiovascular intervention is commonplace and creates concern regarding bleeding risk in patients undergoing surgery. Despite its cardio-protective role, aspirin is often discontinued 5-7 days prior to major surgery due to bleeding concerns. Single institution studies have investigated perioperative outcomes of aspirin use in robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). We sought to evaluate the outcomes of perioperative aspirin (pASA) use during RPN in a multicenter setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of patients undergoing RPN at 5 high volume RPN institutions. We compared perioperative outcomes of patients taking pASA (81 mg) to those not on aspirin. We analyzed the association between pASA use and perioperative transfusion. RESULTS: Of 1,565 patients undergoing RPN, 228 (14.5%) patients continued pASA and were older (62.8 vs 56.8 years, p <0.001) with higher Charlson scores (mean 3 vs 2, p <0.001). pASA was associated with increased perioperative blood transfusions (11% vs 4%, p <0.001) and major complications (10% vs 3%, p <0.001). On multivariable analysis, pASA was associated with increased transfusion risk (OR 1.94, 1.10-3.45, 95% CI). CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands, perioperative aspirin 81 mg use during RPN is reasonable and safe; however, there is a higher risk of blood transfusions and major complications. Future studies are needed to clarify the role of antiplatelet therapy in RPN patients requiring pASA for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.

The Evolving Clinical Management of Genitourinary Cancers Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), a disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, has become an unprecedented global health emergency, with fatal outcomes among adults of all ages throughout the world. There is a high incidence of infection and mortality among cancer patients with evidence to support that patients diagnosed with cancer and SARS-CoV-2 have an increased likelihood of a poor outcome. Clinically relevant changes imposed as a result of the pandemic, are either primary, due to changes in timing or therapeutic modality; or secondary, due to altered cooperative effects on disease progression or therapeutic outcomes. However, studies on the clinical management of patients with genitourinary cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic are limited and do little to differentiate primary or secondary impacts of COVID-19. Here, we provide a review of the epidemiology and biological consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection in GU cancer patients as well as the impact of COVID-19 on the diagnosis and management of these patients, and the use and development of novel and innovative diagnostic tests, therapies, and technology. This article also discusses the biomedical advances to control the virus and evolving challenges in the management of prostate, bladder, kidney, testicular, and penile cancers at all stages of the patient journey during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Urologic oncology practice during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review on what can be deferrable vs. nondeferrable.

PURPOSE: To provide a review of high-risk urologic cancers and the feasibility of delaying surgery without impacting oncologic or mortality outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A thorough literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify articles pertaining to surgical delay and genitourinary oncology. We reviewed all relevant articles pertaining to kidney, upper tract urothelial cell, bladder, prostate, penile, and testicular cancer in regard to diagnostic, surgical, or treatment delay. RESULTS: The majority of urologic cancers rely on surgery as primary treatment. Treatment of unfavorable intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer, can likely be delayed for 3 to 6 months without affecting oncologic outcomes. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer and testicular cancer can be treated initially with chemotherapy. Surgical management of T3 renal masses, high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma, and penile cancer should not be delayed. CONCLUSION: The majority of urologic oncologic surgeries can be safely deferred without impacting long-term cancer specific or overall survival. Notable exceptions are muscle-invasive bladder cancer, high-grade upper tract urothelial cell, large renal masses, testicular and penile cancer. Joint decision making among providers and patients should be encouraged. Clinicians must manage emotional anxiety and stress when decisions around treatment delays are necessary as a result of a pandemic.