Hospital and Surgeon Surgical Valvar Volume and Survival after Multi-Valve Cardiac Surgery in Medicare Beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: Long-term outcomes after multi-valve cardiac surgery remain under-evaluated. METHODS: Medicare administrative claims from 2008-2019 identified beneficiaries undergoing multi-valve surgery. Operative characteristics were doubly-adjudicated using International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Technology codes. A multivariable flexible parametric model evaluated predictors of survival; regression standardization was performed to predict standardized survival probabilities (SSP) at varying percentiles of annual valvar volume. RESULTS: Of 476,092 cardiac surgeries involving the aortic (AVS), mitral (MVS), or tricuspid (TVS) valve, 63,083 (13.3%) were identified as involving multi-valve surgery: 22,884 MVS+TVS, 30,697 AVS+MVS, 3,443 AVS+TVS and 6,059 AVS+MVS+TVS. Surgery occurred at 1,157 hospitals by 2,922 surgeons. Annual valvar volume (total AVS+MVS+TVS) was tallied for surgeons and hospitals. Median survival varied substantially by type of multi-valve surgery: 8.09 [7.90-8.24] years in MVS/TVS, 6.65 [6.49-6.81] years in AVS/MVS, 5.77 [5.37-6.13] in AVS/TVS, and 6.02 [5.64-6.38] in AVS/MVS/TVS. SSPs were calculated across combined hospital/surgeon volume percentiles; the median SSP increased with increasing percentile of combined hospital/surgeon volume: 5%tile: 5.77 [5.58,5.98], 25%tile: 6.18 [6.07,6.28], 50%tile: 6.56 [6.44,6.68], 75%tile: 6.86 [6.75,6.97], and 95%tile: 7.58 [7.34,7.83] years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Survival varied significantly by type of multi-valve surgery, worsened with addition of concomitant interventions and improved substantially with increasing annual hospital and surgeon volume. Hospital volume was associated with an improved early hazard for death that abated beyond 3 months post-surgery), while surgeon volume was associated with an improved hazard for death that persisted even beyond the first post-operative year. Consideration should be given to referring multi-valve cases to high-volume hospitals and surgeons.

Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Replacement With Balloon- Versus Self-Expanding Valves in Patients With Degenerated Stentless Aortic Bioprosthesis.

Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been associated with favorable outcomes in patients with degenerated stentless bioprosthesis. However, whether the outcomes after ViV TAVR for failed stentless bioprosthesis differ between balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) and self-expanding valves (SEVs) remains unknown. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed 59 consecutive patients who underwent ViV TAVR for failed stentless bioprsothesis with BEVs (n = 42) versus SEVs (n = 17) in a single-health care system between 2013 and 2022. Overall, the mean age was 70.8 years and 74.6% were men. The mean transcatheter valve size was 26.3 ± 2.2 mm for BEVs and 26.4 ± 4 mm for SEVs (p = 0.93). The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 6.0 ± 3.6 for BEVs and 7.5 ± 5.5 for SEVs (p = 0.22). Compared with patients who received BEVs, those who received SEVs had higher rates of device malposition (2.4% vs 23.5%, p <0.01), postdeployment balloon dilation (11.9% vs 35.5%, p = 0.04) and need for a second transcatheter device (2.4% vs 35.5%, p <0.01). However, both groups showed similar improvement in aortic valve function at 30-day and 1-year follow-up (incidence of 1-year severe patient-prosthesis mismatch in BEVs: 17.6% vs 14.3% in SEVs, p = 0.78). The 1- and 3-year mortality did not differ between BEVs and SEVs (11.9% vs 11.8% and 25% vs 30%, respectively, Log rank p = 0.9). In conclusion, performing ViV TAVR for failed stentless bioprsothesis is technically challenging, especially when using SEVs; however, satisfactory positioning is possible in most cases, with excellent hemodynamic and clinical outcomes with BEVs and SEVs.

Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Failed Screening for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has recently emerged as a promising alternative to surgery for tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, a significant proportion of patients fail screening for TTVI, and little is known about their characteristics and natural history. This study sought to investigate causes of screen failure and outcomes of patients declined for TTVI. This was a retrospective single-center study of 32 patients who were ineligible for participation in transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement and tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair trials. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the therapy they received: optimized medical therapy (OMT) group or intervention group. The mean age was 82 ± 7.8 years and 68.8% were women. The most common reasons for TTVI exclusion were anatomic/procedural impediment (53.1%), inclusion criteria not met (40.6%), and multivalvular disease (6.3%). Overall, 19 patients (59.4%) did not undergo subsequent tricuspid intervention. The clinical outcomes of these patients who received OMT alone were poor, with a 1-year composite of cardiac death or heart failure readmission of 47.4%. These rates were worse than in patients who subsequently underwent an intervention, albeit not statistically significant (OMT: 47.7% vs 23.1% interventions, p = 0.3), and were significantly more pronounced in the subgroup of patients who were excluded for anatomic/procedural limitations (OMT: 70% vs 14.3% interventions, p = 0.05). In conclusion, patients ineligible for TTVI, particularly, those with anatomic/procedural limitations, and treated medically have poor outcomes. These data underscore the importance of earlier referral and support the need for further transcatheter therapy iterations.

A comprehensive deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis regimen in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.

Objectives: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a known surgical complication that can lead to pulmonary embolism with subsequent morbidity and mortality. The incidence of DVT following coronary artery bypass grafting is unclear. Prophylaxis regimens vary and some guidelines advocate against use of routine chemoprophylaxis in patients at low-moderate risk for venous thromboembolism. We utilized postoperative lower extremity venous ultrasound to determine the incidence of DVT following coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with low- to moderate-risk of venous thromboembolism receiving aggressive postoperative DVT prophylaxis. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study of all patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting between April 2022 and January 2023. All patients who completed postoperative venous ultrasound of the bilateral lower extremities were initially included. Patients who underwent concurrent valve or aortic surgery, were at high risk of venous thromboembolism, or were receiving anticoagulation therapy for nonvenous thromboembolism indications were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital incidence of DVT. Secondary outcomes were rates of mortality, postoperative bleeding, and thromboembolic events from discharge to 30 days postoperatively and from 30 days to 3 months postoperatively. Results: No DVTs were observed in 211 included patients. In hospital, there were 3 significant bleeding events and 1 stroke. Following discharge there were 3 additional bleeding events, 1 death, 1 transient ischemic attack, and 1 pulmonary embolism. Conclusions: We observed a 0% rate of DVT in low- to moderate-risk patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and receiving a comprehensive DVT prophylaxis regimen. In hospital bleeding and other thromboembolic event rates were 2.84% and 0.47% respectively.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in the setting of penetrating traumatic injuries.

BACKGROUND: Currently, no absolute contraindications to the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support exist. However, the presence of penetrating traumatic injuries is often considered a relative contraindication to ECMO support. In this study, we aim to assess whether penetrating traumatic injuries should be considered a contraindication to the use of ECMO support, and how to better select patients who may benefit from this therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this paper, we present the findings of a retrospective review of all patients at a large, level 1 trauma center who received ECMO support following penetrating traumatic injuries. We describe the use of ECMO in these patients along with the complications associated with this therapy. CONCLUSION: In this study we show penetrating traumatic injuries should not be considered a contraindication to ECMO support, and how ECMO can be a useful treatment strategy in selected patients with these injuries.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients With Pulmonary Embolism Undergoing Thrombolysis.

Patients with massive pulmonary embolism undergoing catheter-directed therapy are at high risk for cardiopulmonary arrest in the periprocedural period due to severe right ventricular dysfunction. We report the outcomes of 3 patients with massive pulmonary embolism treated successfully with catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Human Cells Grown With or Without Substitutes for Fetal Bovine Serum.

Safety concerns over cell-derived pharmaceutical products being manufactured in supplements of fetal bovine serum (FBS) have ignited pleas to replace FBS. Herein, four newly marketed alternatives to FBS were compared: a xeno-free product called Cell-Ess®, a human platelet lysate marketed as GroPro®, and two mixtures of adult bovine serum varying in their proportions of neonatal growth factors, called Liporo® and FetalGro®. An endothelial cell line (C2BBe1) and a neuronal cell line (SHSY5Y) near confluency in media with 10% FBS were selectively scraped and taken through a 25-day step-wise algorithm to replace FBS, and another human endothelial cell line (HRA-19) was studied to replicate C2BBe1. Cells were stained, counted, and compared for viability, migration, and spheroids. The C2BBe1 and HRA-19 cell lines failed to proliferate in 10% Cell-Ess® but grew in 10% GroPro® or 10% FetalGro® reasonably well compared to reference 10% FBS. With SH-SY5Y, only FetalGro® approached FBS's efficacy. These were all inferior to 11 different branded lots of FBS (positive controls), but five days into switching just amongst the FBS brands, 4 of 11 supported less proliferation than reference FBS in endothelial HRA-19 (p < 0.004). Moreover, neurospheres were enriched in two branded lots of FBS and FetalGro® (each p < 0.004), neurospheres being an unwanted phenotype for any neuronal cell application. Because platelet-derived GroPro® stood out amongst the non-FBS growth supplements to allow proliferation without inducing spheroids, it seems the best (mindful that the cells still grew slower in it compared to FBS). While no perfect replacement was found amongst the alternatives to FBS, the algorithm for switching should be useful in future testing of new alternatives to FBS as the need arises to switch from FBS and expand pharmaceutical products with safety for human use.