Education Research: The Current Landscape of Clinician Educator Tracks in Adult Neurology Residency Programs: A National Survey of Program Directors.

Background and Objectives: As the concept of a clinician-educator (CE) evolves and the multiple competencies of the role become better defined, there seems to be a growing need for targeted training for clinicians pursuing a career in medical education. This study aims to describe the current state of CE tracks in adult neurology residency programs and to identify the barriers to implementation, potential solutions, and program goals and outcomes. Methods: We characterized CE tracks using 2 methods. First, we reviewed the websites of all US adult neurology residency programs to determine the availability of a CE track and its characteristics. Second, we administered a 20-item survey to program directors (PDs) of all US neurology residency programs, with questions focused on track availability, characteristics, perceived benefits of CE tracks on resident career development, barriers to implementation, and ideas for national initiatives that may facilitate track development or improvement. Results: Fifty-eight of 177 (33%) PDs responded to the survey. Combining the results of the website reviews and surveys, we found that 34 of 179 (19%) programs have CE tracks. Seventy percent of PDs felt that CE tracks are very impactful or impactful for participating residents' careers, a perception more common among PDs of programs with tracks. The greatest perceived benefit was in preparing residents for educational leadership roles. The greatest barriers to implementation were a lack of teaching faculty, a lack of resources, and limited resident time. The highest ranked idea for a national initiative that can facilitate track development was live and recorded lectures on medical education topics. Discussion: Although most PDs surveyed agreed that CE tracks are impactful for preparing residents as teachers and education leaders, such tracks are available in only 19% of adult neurology residency programs. PDs report that the benefits of CE tracks extend beyond the participants, with implications for the health of the residency program and the neurology department. While some programs have significant barriers to implementation, national initiatives may help reduce the resource burden on individual programs. Future areas of study include assessing the development and outcomes of national initiatives and analyzing the outcomes associated with CE tracks.

Clinician Perspectives on Palliative Care for Older Adults With Serious Mental Illnesses: A Multisite Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 5.5% of the population live with serious mental illnesses (SMI). Older adults with SMI experience a high burden of serious medical illnesses and disparities in advance care planning, symptom management, and caregiver support. The objectives of this study are to explore interdisciplinary clinician perspectives on the palliative care needs of older adults with SMI and serious medical illnesses. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study utilized thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews of interdisciplinary clinicians practicing palliative care, geriatrics, or geriatric/consultation-liaison psychiatry at four hospitals within an urban health system. MEASUREMENTS: Themes related to care of older adults with serious mental illness and serious medical illness with respect to clinician experiences, challenges in care, and opportunities to improve care. RESULTS: The authors interviewed 45 clinicians. Major themes identified were: (1) Current paradigms of palliative care do not meet the needs of patients with SMI; (2) Clinicians are motivated to care for this population but require more training and interdisciplinary practice; (3) There is a need for structural integration of psychiatric and palliative care services. CONCLUSIONS: The study underscores the inadequacy of current palliative care models in meeting the unique needs of older adults with SMI. Models of integrated psychiatric and serious illness care and enhanced training are needed to improve the delivery of palliative care. Integrated care models and workforce development at the interface of serious illness care and psychiatric have the potential to improve outcomes for this vulnerable population.

Interventions for behavioral health comorbidities in the hospice setting: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Behavioral health (BH) comorbidities in hospice patients are widespread and impact important outcomes, including symptom burden, quality of life, and caregiver wellbeing. However, evidence-based BH interventions tailored for the hospice setting remain understudied. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review with the objective of mapping studies of interventions for BH comorbidities in the hospice setting. We included empirical studies among hospice patients of interventions with BH outcomes. We abstracted data on study design, intervention type, and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Our search generated 7,672 unique results, of which 37 were ultimately included in our analysis. Studies represented 16 regions, with the United Kingdom (n=13) most represented. The most frequent intervention type was complementary and alternative interventions (n=13), followed by psychotherapeutic interventions (n=12). Most of the studies were either pilot or feasibility investigations. Fifteen studies employed a randomized controlled trial design. The most frequently utilized measurement tools for BH outcomes included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Seventeen studies demonstrated statistically significant results in a BH outcome measure. BH conditions prevalent among hospice patients that were the focus of intervention efforts included depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and general psychological distress. No study focused on trauma-related disorders or substance use disorders. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review reveals a concerning gap in research regarding evidence-based BH interventions in hospice settings, especially in the U.S. Despite extensive utilization of hospice care services and the high prevalence of BH conditions among hospice patients, randomized controlled trials focused on improving BH outcomes remain scant. The current BH practices, like the widespread use of benzodiazepines and antipsychotics, may not be rooted in robust evidence, underscoring an urgent need for investment in hospice research infrastructure and tailored clinical trials to test behavioral approaches to mitigate mental health outcomes at the end of life.

Mental Health Service Integration in Hospice Organizations: A National Survey of Hospice Clinicians and Medical Leadership.

Background: Unmet mental health needs are associated with a range of negative consequences for individuals at the end of life. Despite the high prevalence of mental health needs among individuals enrolled in hospice, there is a paucity of data describing mental health service integration in hospices in the United States. Objectives: 1. To identify patterns of mental health service integration in hospice organizations nationally; 2. To characterize gaps in mental health service delivery in hospice settings as perceived by hospice clinicians and medical leadership. Methods: A cross-sectional survey querying hospice clinicians and hospice medical leadership nationally. Results: A total of 279 surveys were included. Clinically significant mental health symptoms were common among hospice patients; the most frequently encountered symptom groups were depression, anxiety, dementia, and delirium. A minority of hospices maintained relationships with psychiatrists (23%, n = 60), psychiatric nurse practitioners (22%, n = 56), or psychologists (19%, n = 49). Only 38% (n = 99) of respondents were satisfied with their patients' access to services and only 45% (n = 118) were satisfied with the quality of these services. Common limitations to providing adequate mental health services included lack of specialist services, short length of stay for patients, and reluctance of patients to engage in these services. Conclusions: Significant mental health symptoms are common among hospice patients, and hospice organizations perceive these needs are not being met. Further research is needed to better understand the current treatment landscape and design interventions to address these needs.

Mental Health Integration and Delivery in the Hospice and Palliative Medicine Setting: A National Survey of Clinicians.

CONTEXT: Mental health comorbidities among individuals with serious illness are prevalent and negatively impact outcomes. Mental healthcare is a core domain of palliative care, but little is known about the experiences of palliative care clinicians delivering such care. OBJECTIVES: This national survey aimed to characterize the frequency with which palliative care providers encounter and manage common psychiatric comorbidities, evaluate the degree of mental health integration in their practice settings, and prioritize strategies to meet the mental health needs of palliative care patients. METHODS: A e-survey distributed to the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine membership. RESULTS: Seven hundred eight palliative care clinicians (predominantly physicians) were included in the analysis. Mood, anxiety, and neurocognitive disorders were frequently encountered comorbidities that many respondents felt comfortable managing. Respondents felt less comfortable with other psychiatric comorbidities. Eighty percent of respondents noted that patients' mental health status impacted their comfort delivering general palliative care at least some of the time. Mental health screening tool use varied and access to specialist referral or to integrated psychiatrists/psychologists was low. Respondents were unsatisfied with mental health training opportunities. CONCLUSION: Palliative care clinicians play a crucial role in addressing mental health comorbidities, but gaps exist in care. Integrated mental health care models, streamlined referral systems, and increased training opportunities can improve mental healthcare for patients with serious illness.

Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellowship Training in Mental Health: A Survey of Program Directors.

CONTEXT: Psychological and psychiatric care is a core domain of palliative care. Despite a high burden of mental health comorbidity among individuals with serious illness, the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education gives little guidance about training hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) fellows in this domain of care. Currently, there is a lack of empiric data on HPM physician fellowship training in mental health topics. OBJECTIVES: To characterize HPM physician fellowship training practices in the psychological and psychiatric aspects of palliative care. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study querying HPM fellowship training directors nationally. RESULTS: A total of 95 programs participated (51% response rate). A total of 98% programs offered didactics on mental health topics. Topics universally deemed as important by program directors were commonly taught, but there was variability in both the perceived importance and the didactic coverage of several topics. Only 15% of programs offered core rotations in psychiatry. Most programs offered psychiatry electives, but such electives were only rarely utilized by fellows. Interdisciplinary team (IDT) rounds infrequently included doctoral mental health clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: Beyond a few commonly identified and taught key topics, there is variability in clinical and didactic exposure to mental health training among HPM fellowships. Standardizing key learning objectives and guiding educators in how to achieve these objectives could improve the preparedness of the physician workforce in HPM to meet the mental health needs of patients with serious illness.

Psychiatric Comorbidities and Outcomes in Palliative and End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Although psychiatric comorbidities are common among individuals at end of life, their impact on outcomes is poorly understood. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review of six databases following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines and aimed at assessing the relationship between psychiatric comorbidities and outcomes in palliative and end-of-life care. Six databases were included in our search. This review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022335922). RESULTS: Our search generated 7472 unique records. Eighty-eight full texts were reviewed for eligibility and 43 studies were included in the review. Clinically, psychiatric comorbidity was associated with poor quality of life, increased physical symptom burden, and low function. The impact of psychiatric comorbidity on health utilization varied, though many studies suggested that psychiatric comorbidity increased utilization of palliative care services. Quality of evidence was limited by lack of consistent approach to confounding variables as well as heterogeneity of the included studies. CONCLUSION: Psychiatric comorbidity is associated with significant differences in care utilization and clinical outcome among patients at end of life. In particular, patients with psychiatric comorbidity and serious illness are at high risk of poor quality of life and high symptom burden. Our finding that psychiatric comorbidity is associated with increased utilization of palliative care likely reflects the complexity and clinical needs of patients with serious illness and mental health needs. These data suggest that greater integration of mental health and palliative care services may enhance quality-of-life among patients at end of life.