Comparison of periprosthetic bone mineral density between two types of short-stems in total hip arthroplasty with a mean follow-up of 4 years.

INTRODUCTION: The use of short stems in primary hip arthroplasty has grown considerably in recent years, with a large variety of designs and stabilization methods available. Few studies have directly compared how these designs and fixation modes influence the bone mineral density (BMD) that is said to be better preserved with shorter implants. This led us to carry out a medium-term retrospective comparative study to (1) specify how the design of two different types of short stems influences the periprosthetic BMD, (2) compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of these stems. HYPOTHESIS: The periprosthetic BMD of a short stem varies based on the implant's design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-three patients underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a short stem between July 2012 and July 2014. Two groups of patients were formed: Vitae™ short stem (Adler Ortho, Milan, France), Optimys™ short stem (Mathys, Bettlach, Switzerland). The Vitae group consisted of 46 patients, while the Optimys group consisted of 47 patients. The mean age was 66 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 26 kg/m2. The groups had comparable age, BMI, sex, Harris Hip score and preoperative radiological features. Periprosthetic BMD of the two types of implants was determined between the 1st and 4th year postoperative using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the Gruen zones. The radiological and clinical outcomes were also determined. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in BMD in zone 7(-5.8%±0.1 CI95%[-0.09; -0.02] (p=0.003)), zone 2 (-4.8% ±0.1 CI95%[-0.093; -0.003] (p=0.038)) and zone 6 (-11% ±0.2 CI95%[-0.19; -0.03] (p=0.009)) in the patients with Vitae stems and in zone 2 (-13.7%±0.3 CI95%[-0.25; -0.03] (p=0.018)) in the patients with Optimys stems. A significant difference in BMD in zone 7 at 1 year (p=0.014) and 4 years (p=0.001) postoperative and in zone 6 (p=0.011) at 4 years postoperative existed between groups, with the Optimys group having higher BMD. There was a significant increase in femoral offset in the Optimys group but not the Vitae group: Δoffset=-0.50 mm±5.2 CI95%[-2.05; 1.05] (p=0.522) and Δoffset=2.79 mm±4.2 CI95%[1.21; 4.37] (p=0.001). The Harris Hip score was not significantly different between the two groups at 4 years postoperative (95.3±2.5 [88; 99] vs. 95.2±2.6 [88; 99] (p=0.991)). DISCUSSION: The design of short stems appears to influence the distribution of loads and the periprosthetic BMD. These stems are associated with very good radiological and clinical results in the medium term. Bone remodeling appears to continue beyond 1 year after the THA procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; Retrospective case-control study.

A comparison of bone union and complication rates between locking and non-locking plates in distal fibular fracture: Retrospective study of 106 cases.

BACKGROUND: Ankle fractures represents the third most frequent fracture in elderly patients. There is a current tendency to fix long bones fractures with locking plates. However, we rarely find published accounts about the use of locking plates in distal fibula fractures, except for biomechanical ones, studying human cadaveric fibula. OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to compare radiographic bone union rates at 6 and 12 weeks of follow up, then wound complications and hardware removal rates, and construct cost. STUDY DESIGN & METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 105 patients who underwent surgery with locking plates or non-locking plates over a two-year period, out of which 42 patients were treated with non-locking plates (VIVES™ - StrykerⓇ) and 63 with locking plates (VariAx™ - StrykerⓇ,). We analyzed bone union on anterior posterior and lateral X-rays of the ankle. We collected data of wound complications and hardware removal from patient records. Multiple linear regression techniques were performed after identifying dependent variables. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between non-locking and locking plates in the radiographic bone union rate of distal fibula, respectively at 6 and 12 post-operative weeks (85.71% vs. 81%; p = 0.525 and 97.62% vs. 96.83%; p = 1). No significant difference was found in the wound complication rate between the two groups (11.9% vs. 11.12%; p = 0.9). No significant differences were found in the hardware removal rate, either with or without operative site's infection (respectively: 30.95% vs. 39.68%; p = 0.361 and 21.42% vs. 38.09%; p = 0.071). Cost efficiency is in the favor of non-locking plates. CONCLUSION: Non-locking constructs are as effective as locking constructs in the treatment of displaced distal fibula fractures at a substantially lower cost. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed in the future to verify the finding of this study.

Resection of a Rare Metacarpal Distal Condyle Osteoid Osteoma.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoid osteoma is a benign bone-forming tumor with young male predilection. It occurs predominantly in the long bones. In the hand, osteoid osteoma is more commonly located in the phalanges and carpal bones. The metacarpals are the least common site for osteoid osteoma. Pain is the most common symptom. It usually increases at night and responds to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. CASE PRESENTATION: The authors report the excision of an osteoid osteoma lying at the distal condyle of a metacarpal bone of the left hand. The clinical and radiological findings are exposed as well as the surgical management of the lesion. Pain and swelling disappeared after surgery, and there was no evidence of recurrence at follow-up. DISCUSSION: They discuss this rare location and further radiological examination that was used leading to the diagnosis. The imputation of the traumatic factor has been discussed, along with the different therapeutic possibilities and the advantages of a total excision while preserving the integrity of the adjacent ligament and joint space. CONCLUSION: The surgical alternative appears to be a satisfying treatment for osteoid osteoma in this particular superficial location. Both the exact pathogenesis and the contribution of the traumatic factor remain unclear.