Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Voice ; 2024 Feb 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38342645

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of fibromyalgia in patients with primary muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) in comparison to subjects with no dysphonia. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: The medical records and video recordings of all patients presenting to the Voice and Swallowing unit at a tertiary referral center between October 2022 and October 2023 and who were diagnosed with primary MTD were prospectively reviewed. The risk of fibromyalgia was assessed using the "Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool" (FiRST). Demographic data included age, gender, history of smoking, and history of high vocal load. The impact of dysphonia on quality of life was also analyzed using the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10). RESULTS: A total of 42 patients who had filled the FiRST questionnaire were enrolled in this study. These included 20 patients diagnosed with primary MTD and 22 healthy subjects with no history of dysphonia and normal laryngeal examination. Forty percent of the study group tested positive using the FiRST questionnaire as compared to only 9.1% in the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.03). The risk of having fibromyalgia was 6.67 times among patients with primary MTD in comparison to controls (RR=6.67; 95% CI [1.21-36.74]). CONCLUSION: The results of this investigation indicate that the risk of fibromyalgia is significantly higher in patients with primary MTD vs controls. A holistic approach in the diagnosis and treatment of MTD is advocated.

3.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 75(4): 4116-4124, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37974746

RESUMO

The authors aimed to develop an extensive preoperative checklist of CT scan findings during endoscopic access to the ventral skull base and implement it in clinical practice. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify the radiological landmarks crucial to endoscopic skull base surgery. Four electronic databases were searched: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar using search terms/keywords such as "radiological landmarks," "endoscopic skull base surgery," "CT scan," "pituitary surgery," "anatomical variations," "internal carotid," "optic nerve," "sphenoid sinus," "pneumatization," "dehiscence," and "protrusion". Inclusion criteria were limited to original articles and systematic reviews published in English, between the years 2000 and 2021, which pertained to the radiological landmarks to be identified during endoscopic skull base surgery. Full-text articles were retrieved and collated into a narrative review focused on a 12-item checklist the authors agreed upon. The mnemonic "O ROAD TO SELLA" was used to represent the checklist and include the following landmarks: Sphenoid Ostium, Sphenoid Rostrum, Onodi cells, Anatomic variations of the sphenoid sinus, Distance between the carotids, Tumor characteristics, Optic nerve dehiscence/protrusion, Septation/insertion of the sphenoid sinus, Entrance to the sellar floor, Lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus, cLinoid process pneumatization, and internal carotid Artery dehiscence/protrusion. The checklist is designed to be used by attending physicians, fellows, and residents and the authors intend to implement it into electronic medical records at the institution's medical center to monitor the outcomes of EEPS after implementation.

4.
J Med Virol ; 93(10): 6027-6029, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34050949

RESUMO

In the setting of a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic and increased disease burden, vaccination has become one of the major solutions. With the increase in vaccination numbers worldwide, it is important to stay vigilant to the potential side effects and life-threatening complications of such vaccines. We report the case of a 30-year-old male with a biphasic allergic reaction post messenger (mRNA) Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination. Several reports of allergic reactions have been cited in the literature after the administration of the mRNA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. It is important to keep a high index of suspicion in severe anaphylactic cases as some patients may have a recurrence of symptoms after discharge. It is crucial to acknowledge the potential risk of anaphylaxis in select individuals and have the appropriate measures in place to deal with adverse events. In case of severe symptoms, the administration of epinephrine is advised to prevent the development of a delayed biphasic anaphylactic reaction.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de mRNA
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA