Lung reduction operation and resection of pulmonary nodules in patients with severe emphysema.

BACKGROUND: Severe pulmonary dysfunction has been considered a relative contraindication to surgical resection in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. We report our initial experience with the combined use of lung volume reduction operation and tumor resection in this patient population. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Between January 1995 and July 1996, 14 patients underwent combined lung volume reduction operation and pulmonary nodule resection. Ten (71%) patients were oxygen dependent, 5 (36%) had a room air partial pressure of carbon dioxide > or = 45, and 5 (36%) were steroid dependent preoperatively. Mean preoperative pulmonary function tests included a forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 680 +/- 98 mL (24% +/- 5% predicted), forced vital capacity of 54% +/- 5% predicted, and a forced expiratory volume in 1 second to vital capacity ratio of 37% +/- 2% predicted. RESULTS: Sixteen lesions were resected in the 14 patients and included 9 non-small cell carcinomas. There was one postoperative death. All other patients are alive and well through a mean follow-up of 22.6 +/- 2.3 months (12 to 35 months). At 6-month follow-up improvements were noted in dyspnea index, forced expiratory volume in 1 second forced vital capacity, and 6-minute walk distance. Mediastinal recurrence at 12-month follow-up developed in 1 patient with two separate bronchioalveolar carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous lung volume reduction operation and tumor resection should be considered in patients with emphysema with marginal reserve in the hope of maximizing postoperative lung function.

Gastrointestinal consequences of left ventricular assist device placement.

Left ventricular assist devices effectively improve hemodynamic function and reverse renal and hepatic dysfunction; however, their effects upon the gastrointestinal (Gl) system have not been addressed. We evaluated Gl function in 27 left ventricular assist device recipients using interviews, Gl contrast studies, endoscopy, and 99mTc sulfur colloid studies of esophageal transit and gastric emptying. While on left ventricular assist device support (mean duration of 84 days), 19 patients reported early satiety and/or nausea, and 1 was unable to tolerate oral intake. Esophageal transit time (normal, < 10 sec) was borderline slow at 14 +/- 4 (mean +/- standard error of the mean) and gastric emptying (normal < 90 min) was prolonged (range of 106-506 min, mean = 283 +/- 69 min). In a 1-38 month follow-up, gastric function subjectively improved in all. Six patients had intraperitoneal device placement. One died of aspiration pneumonia secondary to small bowel obstruction, and one had prolonged inability to tolerate oral intake, which required feeding jejunostomy tube placement. The 21 patients with pre peritoneal placement of the device did not require Gl operative interventions and had no catastrophic Gl events; they had mild to no Gl complaints. Pre peritoneal placement may mitigate early satiety and obviate serious Gl complications.

Fungal infections in left ventricular assist device recipients. Incidence, prophylaxis, and treatment.

The authors reviewed the charts of 26 recipients of a left ventricular assist device to determine the incidence of fungal infections and the clinical course of these patients. Nine patients (35%) had positive fungal cultures. Of these, six had clinical infections and three were colonized asymptomatically. Three of the six infected patients (including one with mediastinal sepsis and another requiring left ventricular assist device replacement for intractable fungemia) underwent orthotopic heart transplantation after successful therapy. Of the remaining three, one died of a thromboembolic stroke (probably septic in nature), one died secondary to driveline rupture, and the third succumbed to culture-negative sepsis. Two of the colonized patients underwent transplantation, and the third succumbed to perioperative right sided circulatory failure and hypoxia. Positive fungal cultures were a common finding in our series. Because of a significant incidence of fungal infection-related morbidity, the authors revised their pre operative and post operative protocol to include: 1) 2 weeks of fluconazole therapy (200 mg intravenously daily) for patients receiving broad spectrum antibiotics and for those with evidence of preoperative fungal colonization; 2) daily dressing changes around drivelines; 3) daily nystatin swish and swallow; and 4) empiric fluconazole treatment for culture-negative sepsis. Using this protocol, three left ventricular assist device recipients received prophylactic fluconazole and had no evidence of fungal morbidity or mortality on short-term follow-up.

Noncardiac surgery in long-term implantable left ventricular assist-device recipients.

OBJECTIVE: The authors describe their experience with left ventricular assist-device (LVAD) recipients undergoing noncardiac surgery and delineate surgical, anesthetic, and logistic factors important in the successful intraoperative management of these patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Left ventricular assist-devices have become part of the armamentarium in the treatment of end-stage heart failure. As the numbers of patients chronically supported with long-term implantable devices grows, general surgical problems that are commonly seen in other hospitalized patients are becoming manifest. Of particular interest is the intraoperative management of patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgical procedures. METHODS: The anesthesia records and clinical charts were reviewed for eight ventricular assist-device recipients undergoing general surgical procedures between August 1, 1990 and August 31, 1994. RESULTS: A total of 12 procedures were performed in 6 men and 2 women averaging 52.7 years of age. Mean time elapsed from device implantation to operation was 68 +/- 35 days. Conventional inhalational and intravenous anesthetic techniques were well tolerated in these patients undergoing diverse surgical procedures. No perioperative mortality was observed. Five of eight patients went on to successful cardiac transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic recovery after LVAD insertion has defined a new group of patients who develop noncardiac surgical problems often seen in other critically ill patients. Recognition of the unique potential problems that the LVAD recipient may encounter in the perioperative period--in particular patient positioning, device limitations, and fluid and inotropic management--will ensure an optimal surgical outcome for LVAD recipients undergoing noncardiac surgery.