RESUMO
A wide range of natural and man-made hazards increases the health risks at mass gatherings (MGs). Building on the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management (H-EDRM) framework to strengthen preparedness, response, and recovery from health emergencies in the communities and emergency-prone settings, such as MGs. The Jeddah tool is derived from the H-EDRM framework as an all-hazard MG risk assessment tool, which provides a benchmark for monitoring progress made in capacity strengthening over a given period for recurrent MGs. Additionally, it introduces a reputational risk assessment domain to complement vulnerability and capacity assessment matrixes. This paper describes the key elements of the Jeddah tool to improve the understanding of health risk assessment at MGs in the overarching contexts of health emergencies and disaster risk reduction, in line with international goals.
Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres , Desastres , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Gestão de Riscos , Organização Mundial da SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: During the 2019 Hajj, the Ministry of Health in Saudi Arabia implemented for the first time a health early warning system for rapid detection and response to health threats. AIMS: This study aimed to describe the early warning findings at the Hajj to highlight the pattern of health risks and the potential benefits of the disease surveillance system. METHODS: Using syndromic surveillance and event-based surveillance data, the health early warning system generated automated alarms for public health events, triggered alerts for rapid epidemiological investigations and facilitated the monitoring of health events. RESULTS: During the deployment period (4 July-31 August 2019), a total of 121 automated alarms were generated, of which 2 events (heat-related illnesses and injuries/trauma) were confirmed by the response teams. CONCLUSION: The surveillance system potentially improved the timeliness and situational awareness for health events, including non-infectious threats. In the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic, a health early warning system could enhance case detection and facilitate monitoring of the disease geographical spread and the effectiveness of control measures.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/organização & administração , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Islamismo , Administração em Saúde Pública/métodos , Vigilância em Saúde Pública/métodos , Aglomeração , Planejamento em Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Comportamento de Massa , Região do Mediterrâneo/epidemiologia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , ViagemAssuntos
COVID-19 , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Doenças Transmissíveis Importadas , Aglomeração , Missões Religiosas/tendências , Viagem/tendências , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Doenças Transmissíveis Importadas/epidemiologia , Doenças Transmissíveis Importadas/prevenção & controle , Doenças Transmissíveis Importadas/transmissão , Saúde Global/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Medição de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Medicina de Viagem/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Intra-arterial chemotherapy is an effective modality to treat unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal primaries if systemic chemotherapy has failed. Response rates of more than 40% and a median survival of 15 to 25 months have been reported from randomized trials. In this retrospective study, we analyzed specific technical complications associated with continuous intra-arterial chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: From 1982 to 1995, single-center clinical data from 180 patients with colorectal liver metastases were evaluated. Continuous intra-arterial chemotherapy was administered using either an implanted infusion pump or an intra-arterial port with an external infusion pump. The intra-arterial catheter was implanted according to the Watkins' technique. The treatment protocols consisted of 5-fluorouracil- or 5-fluorodeoxyuridine-based regimens. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients (39%) received an intra-arterial infusion pump and 110 patients (61%) an intra-arterial port. Sixty-eight technical complications affected port systems (62%), whereas 29 patients with pumps (41%) were affected by technical complications. Therapy-relevant complications were observed in 47% of the ports and 30% of the infusion pumps. The median complication-free survival was 12.2 months for infusion pumps and 7.3 months for ports (P =.0016). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that pumps are superior to ports in terms of complication rate and complication-free survival. On the basis of our results, pumps have a potential for a longer treatment, which may result in a prolonged median survival.