The Association Between Bone Remodeling Markers, genes polymorphisms with Incidence of Osteopenia Among Young Saudi Female.

Osteopenia and osteoporosis, are prevalent skeletal systemic conditions, cause weaker bones and an increased risk of fragility fractures. This work is aimed to evaluate the relation between bone-remolding markers and genotypes of four single nucleotide polymorphisms in young Saudi females (rs2297480 of farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FDPS), rs3736228 of Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5), rs1234612 of sclerostin (SOST), and rs9934438 of Vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1  (VKORC1) ). For this purpose, 750 premenopausal females aged 18 to 40 years old, either university students, postgraduates, or university employees were recruited and divided into three groups according to bone mineral density BMD (g/cm2) divided by T score into osteoporosis (n = 12), osteopenia (n = 147), and normal (n = 591). Serum SOST, BALP, calcium, phosphate, ALP, albumin, beta-CTXs and human VDR levels were determined. TaqMan SNP Genotyping assays were used to genotype four polymorphisms using real-time PCR (applied biosystem). Results showed that BALP, CTX-1 and SOST were significantly higher in the osteoporosis and osteopenia groups than in the normal group. Bone mineral density readings were considerably lower in females with the GG genotype in FDPS rs2297480 and TT genotype in LRP5 rs3736228, which increase the risk for osteopenia by 3. 6-fold and 3. 06-fold than control respectively. Also, females with the TT genotype in LRP5 rs3736228 have decreased average values for Bone Mineral Density. In conclusion, the GG genotype of FDPS rs2297480 and the TT genotype of LRP5 rs3736228 was shown to be strongly associated with osteopenia in young Saudi females with low bone mineral density and SOST levels.

Association Between Vitamin D Level and Z-Score Changes of Bone Density in College-Age Saudi Girls: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Objective: Vitamin D (VD) deficiency is a worldwide health problem. VD plays a crucial role in calcium homeostasis, phosphorus metabolism and bone health. Still much remain to understand the effect of VD deficiency on bone mass. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between VD levels and bone mass density (BMD) among college-age Saudi females. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 460 females with a median age of 21 years, were enrolled, completed a comprehensive, structured questionnaire which was validated by experienced endocrinologist, a dietician, and a statistician. Body mass indexes (BMI) were calculated, and BMD was estimated through quantitative ultrasound to ankle. Serum VD, calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, and alkaline phosphatase were measured using chemiluminescent immunoassay technique. Results: VD deficiency reached up to 83.3% (66.9% insufficiency and 16.4% deficiency). Lower than normal BMD was detected in 18.3% of subjects, with only 1.1% having a non-age-matched high risk for osteoporosis. The significant independent predictors of Z-score were age of menarche, menstrual irregularities, dairy products consumption, physical activity, BMI, alkaline phosphatase, and history of previous VD supplementation. Conclusion: VD deficiency and low BMD are highly prevalent among college-age Saudi females. Low BMD is not linked to serum level of VD but to its previous use as a supplementation. Early lifestyle changes, attention to gynecological problems, and prevention of VD deficiency are all needed to support BMD among these girls.

Utilization of Antibiotics for Hospitalized Patients with Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Al-Madinah Al-Munawara, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Most patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with severe Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia receive antibacterial antibiotics with little evidence of bacterial infections. Objective: This study was designed to review the profiles of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring intensive care, the rate of bacterial coinfection, the antibiotics used, and their relation to patient outcomes (death or recovery). Methods: This was a retrospective study that reviewed the medical records of all patients with confirmed COVID-19 (n = 120) severe pneumonia admitted directly from the emergency room to the intensive care unit, at a public hospital during the period from May 2020 to April 2021. The data collected included patients' demographic and laboratory data, comorbidities, antibiotic treatment, and their outcome. Descriptive statistics, bivariate inferential analysis tests (chi-square and unpaired T-Tests) and multivariable binary logistic regression were performed. Results: The mean age of the patients was 56.8 ± 16.5 years old, and among them, 74 (62.7%) were males. Of the included patients, 92 (77.0%) had comorbidities, 76 (63.3%) required mechanical ventilation and 30 (25%) died. All patients received empirical antibiotics for suspected bacterial coinfection. The most common antibiotics used were azithromycin (n = 97, 8%) and imipenem (n = 83, 9%). Ninety patients (75%) were on two empirical antibiotics. Early positive cultures for pathogens were found only in four patients (3.3%), whereas 36 (30%) patients had positive cultures 5-10 days after admission. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 16) and coagulase-negative Staphylococci (n = 14). In bivariate analysis empirical treatment with azithromycin resulted in a significantly lower mortality rate (p = 0.023), meanwhile mechanical ventilation, days of stay in intensive care unit, morbidities (e.g., lung disease), linezolid and, vancomycin use associated with mortality (p< 0.05). The adjusted logistic regression, controlling for age and gender, revealed that azithromycin antibiotic was more likely protective from mortality (OR= 0.22, 95%CI 0.06-0.85, p=0.028. However, patients with lung diseases and under mechanical ventilation were 35.21 and 19.57 more likely to die (95%CI =2.84-436.70, p=0.006; 95%CI=2.66-143.85, p=0.003, respectively). Conclusion: Bacterial coinfection with severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring intensive care was unlikely. The benefit of Azithromycin over other antibiotics could be attributed to its anti-inflammatory properties rather than its antibacterial effect.