RESUMO
Deep learning techniques offer improvements in computer-aided diagnosis systems. However, acquiring image domain annotations is challenging due to the knowledge and commitment required of expert pathologists. Pathologists often identify regions in whole slide images with diagnostic relevance rather than examining the entire slide, with a positive correlation between the time spent on these critical image regions and diagnostic accuracy. In this paper, a heatmap is generated to represent pathologists' viewing patterns during diagnosis and used to guide a deep learning architecture during training. The proposed system outperforms traditional approaches based on color and texture image characteristics, integrating pathologists' domain expertise to enhance region of interest detection without needing individual case annotations. Evaluating our best model, a U-Net model with a pre-trained ResNet-18 encoder, on a skin biopsy whole slide image dataset for melanoma diagnosis, shows its potential in detecting regions of interest, surpassing conventional methods with an increase of 20%, 11%, 22%, and 12% in precision, recall, F1-score, and Intersection over Union, respectively. In a clinical evaluation, three dermatopathologists agreed on the model's effectiveness in replicating pathologists' diagnostic viewing behavior and accurately identifying critical regions. Finally, our study demonstrates that incorporating heatmaps as supplementary signals can enhance the performance of computer-aided diagnosis systems. Without the availability of eye tracking data, identifying precise focus areas is challenging, but our approach shows promise in assisting pathologists in improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, streamlining annotation processes, and aiding the training of new pathologists.
RESUMO
Importance: Chronic symptoms reported following an infection with SARS-CoV-2, such as cognitive problems, overlap with symptoms included in the definition of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of ME/CFS-like illness subsequent to acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, changes in ME/CFS symptoms through 12 months of follow-up, and the association of ME/CFS symptoms with SARS-CoV-2 test results at the acute infection-like index illness. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multisite, longitudinal cohort study (Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infections Registry [INSPIRE]) enrolled participants from December 11, 2020, to August 29, 2022. Participants were adults aged 18 to 64 years with acute symptoms suggestive of SARS-CoV-2 infection who received a US Food and Drug Administration-approved SARS-CoV-2 test at the time of illness and did not die or withdraw from the study by 3 months. Follow-up surveys were collected through February 28, 2023. Exposure: COVID-19 status (positive vs negative) at enrollment. Main Outcome and Measures: The main outcome was the weighted proportion of participants with ME/CFS-like illness based on the 2015 Institute of Medicine clinical case definition using self-reported symptoms. Results: A total of 4378 participants were included in the study. Most were female (3226 [68.1%]). Mean (SD) age was 37.8 (11.8) years. The survey completion rates ranged from 38.7% (3613 of 4738 participants) to 76.3% (1835 of 4738) and decreased over time. The weighted proportion of participants identified with ME/CFS-like illness did not change significantly at 3 through 12 months of follow-up and was similar in the COVID-19-positive (range, 2.8%-3.7%) and COVID-19-negative (range, 3.1%-4.5%) groups. Adjusted analyses revealed no significant difference in the odds of ME/CFS-like illness at any time point between COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative individuals (marginal odds ratio range, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.42-1.67] to 1.18 [95% CI, 0.55-2.51]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective cohort study, there was no evidence that the proportion of participants with ME/CFS-like illness differed between those infected with SARS-CoV-2 vs those without SARS-CoV-2 infection up to 12 months after infection. A 3% to 4% prevalence of ME/CFS-like illness after an acute infection-like index illness would impose a high societal burden given the millions of persons infected with SARS-CoV-2.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/complicações , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Longitudinais , Prevalência , Adulto Jovem , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , AdolescenteRESUMO
While the early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the United States labor market are well-established, less is known about the long-term impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection and Long COVID on employment. To address this gap, we analyzed self-reported data from a prospective, national cohort study to estimate the effects of SARS-CoV-2 symptoms at three months post-infection on missed workdays and return to work. The analysis included 2,939 adults in the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE) study who tested positive for their initial SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of enrollment, were employed before the pandemic, and completed a baseline and three-month electronic survey. At three months post-infection, 40.8% of participants reported at least one SARS-CoV-2 symptom and 9.6% of participants reported five or more SARS-CoV-2 symptoms. When asked about missed work due to their SARS-CoV-2 infection at three months, 7.2% of participants reported missing ≥10 workdays and 13.9% of participants reported not returning to work since their infection. At three months, participants with ≥5 symptoms had a higher adjusted odds ratio of missing ≥10 workdays (2.96, 95% CI 1.81-4.83) and not returning to work (2.44, 95% CI 1.58-3.76) compared to those with no symptoms. Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 symptoms were common, affecting 4-in-10 participants at three-months post-infection, and were associated with increased odds of work loss, most pronounced among adults with ≥5 symptoms at three months. Despite the end of the federal Public Health Emergency for COVID-19 and efforts to "return to normal", policymakers must consider the clinical and economic implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on people's employment status and work absenteeism, particularly as data characterizing the numerous health and well-being impacts of Long COVID continue to emerge. Improved understanding of risk factors for lost work time may guide efforts to support people in returning to work.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Estudos Prospectivos , Retorno ao Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Emprego , Autorrelato , Pandemias , Absenteísmo , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Equidade em Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Mamografia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Programas de Rastreamento , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mamografia/métodos , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricos , Simulação por Computador , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , BiópsiaRESUMO
Importance: Pathologic assessment to diagnose skin biopsies, especially for cutaneous melanoma, can be challenging, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining has the potential to aid decision-making. Currently, the temporal trends regarding the use of IHC for the examination of skin biopsies on a national level have not been described. Objective: To illustrate trends in the use of IHC for the examination of skin biopsies in melanoma diagnoses. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to examine incident cases of melanoma diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2017. The analysis used the SEER-Medicare linked database, incorporating data from 17 population-based registries. The study focused on incident cases of in situ or malignant melanoma of the skin diagnosed in patients 65 years or older. Data were analyzed between August 2022 and November 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes encompassed the identification of claims for IHC within the month of melanoma diagnoses and extending up to 14 days into the month following diagnosis. The SEER data on patients with melanoma comprised demographic, tumor, and area-level characteristics. Results: The final sample comprised 132â¯547 melanoma tumors in 116â¯117 distinct patients. Of the 132â¯547 melanoma diagnoses meeting inclusion criteria from 2000 to 2017, 43â¯396 cases had accompanying IHC claims (33%). Among these cases, 28â¯298 (65%) were diagnosed in male patients, 19â¯019 (44%) were diagnosed in patients aged 65 years to 74 years, 16â¯444 (38%) in patients aged 75 years to 84 years, and 7933 (18%) in patients aged 85 years and older. In 2000, 11% of melanoma cases had claims for IHC at or near the time of diagnosis. This proportion increased yearly, with 51% of melanoma cases having associated IHC claims in 2017. Increasing IHC use is observed for all stages of melanoma, including in situ melanoma. Claims for IHC in melanomas increased in all 17 SEER registries but at different rates. In 2017, the use of IHC for melanoma diagnosis ranged from 39% to 68% across registries. Conclusions and Relevance: Considering the dramatically rising and variable use of IHC in diagnosing melanoma by pathologists demonstrated in this retrospective cross-sectional study, further investigation is warranted to understand the clinical utility and discern when IHC most improves diagnostic accuracy or helps patients.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Melanoma/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Estudos Transversais , MedicareRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Studies suggest increasing mental health care needs among children but limited capacity to meet those needs, potentially leaving some needs unmet. There are no recent national studies examining the receipt of mental health treatment among children. We sought to identify the correlates of treatment receipt in a nationally representative sample of children in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 2019 National Health Interview Survey. Parents reported on their child's sociodemographic characteristics, general health care engagement, mental health using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, and whether their child received therapy or medication in the prior year. Weighted logistic regressions tested associations among child characteristics and receipt of mental health treatment while controlling for parental report of child mental health symptoms. RESULTS: Among 7168 children surveyed, 1044 (15%) received mental health treatment, equating to over 7 million US children. Hispanic children (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.46 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.34-0.62]) and non-Hispanic Black children (AOR: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.23-0.54]) had lower odds of receiving treatment compared to non-Hispanic White children, controlling for mental health symptoms. Children with a well-child visit in the last year (AOR: 2.05 [95% CI: 1.20-3.52]) and whose usual place of care was a doctor's office (AOR 2.10 [95% CI: 1.33-3.34]) had higher odds of treatment receipt. CONCLUSIONS: Racially and ethnically minoritized children and those without primary care access have disproportionately low levels of receipt of mental health treatment. Interventions to meet the needs of these groups should be prioritized to reduce mental health disparities.
Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Humanos , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Estudos Transversais , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Transtornos Mentais/etnologia , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Razão de ChancesRESUMO
Introduction: Data on ethnic and racial differences in symptoms and health-related impacts following SARS-CoV-2 infection are limited. We aimed to estimate the ethnic and racial differences in symptoms and health-related impacts 3 and 6 months after the first SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: Participants included adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection enrolled in a prospective multicenter US study between 12/11/2020 and 7/4/2022 as the primary cohort of interest, as well as a SARS-CoV-2-negative cohort to account for non-SARS-CoV-2-infection impacts, who completed enrollment and 3-month surveys (N = 3,161; 2,402 SARS-CoV-2-positive, 759 SARS-CoV-2-negative). Marginal odds ratios were estimated using GEE logistic regression for individual symptoms, health status, activity level, and missed work 3 and 6 months after COVID-19 illness, comparing each ethnicity or race to the referent group (non-Hispanic or white), adjusting for demographic factors, social determinants of health, substance use, pre-existing health conditions, SARS-CoV-2 infection status, COVID-19 vaccination status, and survey time point, with interactions between ethnicity or race and time point, ethnicity or race and SARS-CoV-2 infection status, and SARS-CoV-2 infection status and time point. Results: Following SARS-CoV-2 infection, the majority of symptoms were similar over time between ethnic and racial groups. At 3 months, Hispanic participants were more likely than non-Hispanic participants to report fair/poor health (OR: 1.94; 95%CI: 1.36-2.78) and reduced activity (somewhat less, OR: 1.47; 95%CI: 1.06-2.02; much less, OR: 2.23; 95%CI: 1.38-3.61). At 6 months, differences by ethnicity were not present. At 3 months, Other/Multiple race participants were more likely than white participants to report fair/poor health (OR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.25-2.88), reduced activity (somewhat less, OR: 1.72; 95%CI: 1.21-2.46; much less, OR: 2.08; 95%CI: 1.18-3.65). At 6 months, Asian participants were more likely than white participants to report fair/poor health (OR: 1.88; 95%CI: 1.13-3.12); Black participants reported more missed work (OR, 2.83; 95%CI: 1.60-5.00); and Other/Multiple race participants reported more fair/poor health (OR: 1.83; 95%CI: 1.10-3.05), reduced activity (somewhat less, OR: 1.60; 95%CI: 1.02-2.51; much less, OR: 2.49; 95%CI: 1.40-4.44), and more missed work (OR: 2.25; 95%CI: 1.27-3.98). Discussion: Awareness of ethnic and racial differences in outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection may inform clinical and public health efforts to advance health equity in long-term outcomes.