Comparison of Performance Characteristics and Efficacy of Bilateral Thoracic Paravertebral Blocks in Obese and Non-Obese Patients Undergoing Reduction Mammaplasty Surgery: A Historical Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Although ultrasound (US)-guided regional anesthesia techniques are advantageous in the management of obese patients; the procedures can still be associated with technical difficulties and greater failure rates. The aim of this study is to compare the performance properties and analgesic efficacy of US-guided bilateral thoracic paravertebral blocks (TPVBs) in obese and non-obese patients. METHODS: Data of 82 patients, who underwent bilateral reduction mammaplasty under general anesthesia with adjunctive TPVB analgesia between December 2016 and February 2020, were reviewed. Patients were allocated into two groups with respect to their BMI scores (Group NO: BMI < 30 and Group O: BMI ≥ 30). Demographics, ideal US visualization time, total bilateral TPVB procedure time, needle tip visualization and performance difficulties, number of needle maneuvers, surgical, anesthetic and analgesic follow-up parameters, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), sleep duration, length of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and hospital stay, and patient/surgeon satisfaction scores were investigated. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients' data were complete. Ideal US visualization and total TPVB performance times were shorter, number of needle maneuvers were fewer and length of PACU stay was shorter in Group NO (p < 0.05). Postoperative pain scores were generally similar within first 24 h (p > 0.05). Time to postoperative pain, total analgesic requirements, incidence of PONV, sleep duration, length of hospital stay were comparable (p > 0.05). Satisfaction was slightly higher in Group NO (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: US-guided TPVB performances in obese patients might be more challenging and take longer time. However, it is still successful providing good acute pain control in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04596787.

Effects of ultrasound guided caudal epidural and transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative analgesia in pediatric inguinal hernia repair surgeries.

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound guided caudal epidural block (CEB) and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) are two techniques which are used for pain management after inguinal hernia surgeries (IHR). CEB is accepted as gold standard for lower abdominal surgeries while TAPB is more popular. OBJECTIVE: It is aimed to compare ultrasound guided CEB and TAPB for postoperative pain scores, additional analgesic requirement and chronic pain development in pediatric bilateral open IHR. STUDY DESIGN: Seventy patients aged 1-7 years undergoing bilateral open IHR were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Patients were randomized into group T (Bilateral TAPB) and group C (CEB). Postoperative FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scores were evaluated for pain density. Additional analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay was also recorded. Chronic pain is evaluated within a subgroup by using "revised Bieri faces pain scale" in the postoperative second month. RESULTS: Postoperative 15th, 30th, 45th min, first, second hour FLACC scores were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). In group C, FLACC scores at postoperative sixth and 24th were significantly higher than group T (1 (0-5) vs 0 (0-2); 1 (0-3) vs 0 (0-2), respectively; P < 0.001). Additional analgesic requirement in the postoperative 24 h was found to be statistically higher in Group C (56.7%) than in Group T (20%) (P < 0.01). Chronic pain development did not differ between the groups (P > 0.05). Length of hospital stay was found to be shorter in patients in Group T compared to patients in Group C [10 (5-14) vs 16 (5-18) hours, respectively; P < 0.01)]. DISCUSSION: Our results exhibited that TAPB and CEB for bilateral IHR have similar early analgesic efficacy in children. However; CEB patients experienced higher FLACC scores at the postoperative sixth and 24th hours, and the need for additional analgesics was higher and the length of hospital stay was longer comparing to TAPB. Of note, chronic pain was not observed in any of our subgroup patients (n = 21) who are older than four years. CONCLUSION: For bilateral IHR, US-guided CEB and TAPB have similar analgesic efficacy in the first six hours, postoperatively, However, TAPB appears to be slightly superior than CEB in terms of subacute pain and length of stay which is still not clinically distinctive.