Clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segment (CAIRS) in the treatment of keratoconus.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the results of corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segment (CAIRS) implantation in keratoconus. METHODS: The medical records of patients with keratoconus who underwent CAIRS implantation were reviewed. The CAIRS, prepared by trephination from the donor cornea, was implanted into a tunnel created using the femtosecond laser. The depth of the tunnel was 200 µ; the inner diameter of the tunnel was 4.5 mm; and the outer diameter was 7 mm. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), keratometry, minimum corneal thickness (CT), endothelial cell density (ECD), and high order aberration values were recorded preoperatively and at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 23 eyes of 23 patients were included in the study. Preoperative UCVA (0.08 ± 0.01) and BCVA (0.25 ± 0. 11) values improved postoperatively and reached 0.40 ± 0.05 and 0.68 ± 0.09, respectively, at the end of the 6-month follow-up period (p1 < 0.001, p2 = 0.016; respectively). A statistically significant flattening of all keratometric values was observed in the postoperative period compared to preoperatively (p < 0.001 for all). There were no statistical differences between CT and ECC values at the preoperative and postoperative visits (p1 = 0.654, p2 = 0.769; respectively). In addition, coma aberration values were lower than the preoperative values at all postoperative visits (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that CAIRS implantation is a safe treatment option with good visual and keratometric outcomes for suitable patients with keratoconus.

Effect of Keratoconus Stage and Classification Parameters on Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Outcomes.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the keratoconus (KC) stage according to the Amsler-Krumeich classification system and the parameters used in this classification on deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty outcomes. METHODS: The preoperative KC stage was determined, and the presence of corneal scarring was noted. The preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, mean central keratometry (K mean ) readings, topographic astigmatism, and minimum corneal thickness (CT) values were recorded. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also noted. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven eyes (54 eyes in stage 3-83 eyes in stage 4) were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 42.20 ± 24.36 months. There was no statistically significant difference between stage 3 and 4 KC groups for postoperative BCVA, K mean , CT, spherical equivalent, and topographic astigmatism values (each P value >0.05). The effect of preoperative BCVA, K mean , CT, and refractive error values on postoperative BCVA could not be demonstrated ( P = 0.264). In addition, no statistically significant correlation was found between postoperative and preoperative values (each P value > 0.05). Although intraoperative Descemet membrane perforation and postoperative early suture loosening were observed more frequently in stage 4 KC than in stage 3 KC, the 2 groups were statistically similar for these and other complications (each P value >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative KC stage and the parameters used in classification are not useful in predicting postoperative deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty outcomes. The timing of the surgery should be planned with the awareness that the progression of the disease will not have a negative effect on outcomes.

Comparison of Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconic Eyes With Previous Hydrops-Related Corneal Scar.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) procedures in keratoconic eyes with a previous hydrops-related corneal scar. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the medical records of patients who had hydrops-related corneal scarring and underwent keratoplasty surgery were reviewed. Patients treated with DALK were classified as group 1, and patients treated with PK as group 2. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness, keratometry (K), and refractive error values of each group were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Seventy-eight eyes (41 in group 1 and 37 in group 2) were included in this study. The mean follow-up period of the patients was 37.7 ± 30.0 months in group 1 and 51.2 ± 29.4 months in group 2 ( P = 0.06). The preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity and central corneal thickness values were statistically similar in both groups (each P value >0.05). Keratometry values (K1 and mean keratometry) were significantly steeper in group 1 ( P1 = 0.02 and P2 = 0.03, respectively). Descemet membrane perforation was experienced in 7 (4 macroperforation and 3 microperforation; 15.6%) of 45 eyes that planned to perform DALK. These 4 eyes with macroperforation underwent PK and were excluded from the study. When all postoperative complications were assessed, although the total complication rate was 21% after DALK, it was 43% after PK ( P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: DALK with a big-bubble technique is a feasible surgery in eyes with corneal scarring due to previous hydrops and is comparable with PK in terms of visual and refractive outcomes. This study suggests that DALK, which is safer than PK with less postoperative complication rates, should be the primary surgical option to avoid serious complications in keratoconic eyes with hydrops-related corneal scarring.