Physiotherapist-supervised exercises versus unsupervised home-based exercises after nonsurgically treated proximal humerus fracture: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fracture (PHF) is a common fragility fracture in older adults and can have a substantial impact on upper limb function. Although most patients with PHF can be treated nonsurgically, it is unknown whether older adults benefit from supervised exercise therapy after PHF. Therefore, the objective of this trial was to investigate whether 10 weeks of physiotherapist-supervised exercises once a week were superior to 10 weeks of unsupervised home-based exercises in older adults with a nonsurgically treated displaced 2-part PHF. METHODS: This was designed as an assessor-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial and took place in 3 Nordic countries. In total, 72 patients (≥60 years) with nonsurgically treated displaced 2-part PHF were randomized to either physiotherapist-supervised exercises once a week for 10 weeks, combined with daily home-based exercises, or to 10 weeks of daily unsupervised home-based exercises. The primary outcome measure was the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) with a primary endpoint at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were DASH (at 12 months), Constant-Murley Score, the 15D-instrument, Visual Analog Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale, with follow-up visits after 3 and 12 months. Non-union and patient death within 3 months were counted as complications. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in both groups was 72 years. At 3 months follow-up, the mean DASH score in the supervised group was 25.9 (SD 16.0) compared to 22.4 (SD 18.9) in the unsupervised group. The mean between-group difference (3.5, 95% CI -5.0 to 12.5) was not clinically relevant. None of the secondary outcome measures presented any clinically relevant or statistically significant between-group differences at 3 or 12 months follow-up. One patient in the supervised group and 3 in the unsupervised group were diagnosed with non-union. One patient from each group died before 3 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This trial provides no evidence that supervised exercises are superior to unsupervised home-based exercises in improving functional outcome or health-related quality of life in older patients with a nonsurgically treated 2-part PHF. Further, our results suggest that most older adults with a nonsurgically treated 2-part PHF can perform home-based exercises without the supervision of a physiotherapist.

What is success of treatment? Expected outcome scores in cervical radiculopathy patients were much higher than the previously reported cut-off values for success.

PURPOSE: Treatment success can be defined by asking a patient how they perceive their condition compared to prior to treatment, but it can also be defined by establishing success criteria in advance. We evaluated treatment outcome expectations in patients undergoing surgery or non-operative treatment for cervical radiculopathy. METHODS: The first 100 consecutive patients from an ongoing randomized controlled trial (NCT03674619) comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy were included. Patient-reported outcome measures and expected outcome and improvement were obtained before treatment. We compared these with previously published cut-off values for success. Arm pain, neck pain and headache were measured by a numeric rating scale. Neck disability index (NDI) was used to record pain-related disability. We applied Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the expected outcome scores for the two treatments. RESULTS: Patients reported mean NDI of 42.2 (95% CI 39.6-44.7) at baseline. The expected mean NDI one year after the treatment was 4 (95% CI 3.0-5.1). The expected mean reduction in NDI was 38.3 (95% CI 35.8-40.8). Calculated as a percentage change score, the patients expected a mean reduction of 91.2% (95% CI 89.2-93.2). Patient expectations were higher regarding surgical treatment for arm pain, neck pain and working ability, P < 0.001, but not for headache. CONCLUSIONS: The expected improvement after treatment of cervical radiculopathy was much higher than the previously reported cut-off values for success. Patients with cervical radiculopathy had higher expectations to surgical treatment.

Making shoulder pain simple in general practice: implementing an evidence-based guideline for shoulder pain, protocol for a hybrid design stepped-wedge cluster randomised study (EASIER study).

INTRODUCTION: Research suggests that current care for shoulder pain is not in line with the best available evidence. This project aims to assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and the implementation of an evidence-based guideline for shoulder pain in general practice in Norway. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial with a hybrid design assessing clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and the effect of the implementation strategy of a guideline-based intervention in general practice. We will recruit at least 36 general practitioners (GPs) and randomise the time of cross-over from treatment as usual to the implemented intervention. The intervention includes an educational outreach visit to the GPs, a computerised decision tool for GPs and a self-management application for patients. We will measure outcomes at patient and GP levels using self-report questionnaires, focus group interviews and register based data. The primary outcome measure is the patient-reported Shoulder Pain and Disability Index measured at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include the EuroQol Quality of Life Measure (EQ5D-5L), direct and indirect costs, patient's global perceived effect of treatment outcome, Pain Self-Efficacy and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. We will evaluate the implementation process with focus on adherence to guideline treatment. We will do a cost-minimisation analysis based on direct and selected indirect costs and a cost-utility analysis based on EQ5D-5L. We will use mixed effect models to analyse primary and secondary outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics-South East Norway (ref. no: 2019/104). Trial results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal in accordance with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04806191.

The clinical course of neck pain: Are trajectory patterns stable over a 1-year period?

BACKGROUND: Recent studies with data-driven approaches have established common pain trajectories. It is uncertain whether these trajectory patterns are consistent over time, and if a shorter measurement period will provide accurate trajectories. METHODS: We included 1,124 patients with non-specific neck pain in chiropractic practice. We classified patients into pre-defined trajectory patterns in each of four quarters of the follow-up year (persistent, episodic, and recovery) based on measures of pain intensity and frequency from weekly SMS. We explored the shifts between patterns and compared patients with stable and shifting patterns on baseline characteristics and clinical findings. RESULTS: 785 (70%) patients were in the same pattern in 1st and 4th quarters. Patients with episodic pattern in the 1st quarter shifted to other patterns more frequently than patients in the other patterns. A stable persistent pattern was associated with reduced function and higher scores on psychosocial factors. There was a decreased frequency of patients classified as persistent pattern (75% to 63%) and an increase of patients in recovery pattern (4% to 15%) throughout the four quarters. The frequency of patients classified as episodic remained relatively stable (21% to 24%). CONCLUSIONS: We found an overall stability of the persistent pattern, and that episodic patterns have more potential for shifts. Shifts mostly occurred between patterns closest in pain variation. The deviation in pattern distribution compared with previous studies suggests that the duration of measurement periods has an impact on the results of the classification. SIGNIFICANCE: Having persistent pain and having very minor pain is relatively stable over one year, while episodic pain has more potential for shifts. The duration of measurement periods appears to have an impact on the results of the classification. The given criteria resulted in a reduced frequency of episodic pattern due to shorter measurement periods. Our findings contribute to improved understanding and predicting NP using a combination of patient characteristics and trajectory patterns.

Shoulder patients in primary and specialist health care. A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Shoulder pain is a prevalent problem and has a considerable impact on the use of primary and specialist health care in Norway. It is important to improve short-term recovery and reduce long-term consequences regarding pain and disability, the high costs of treatment and the amount of sick-leave. Treatment for non-specific shoulder pain is mainly non-operative. The aims of this study were to investigate if there are differences in main characteristics, pain and disability (SPADI-score) and psycho-social factors between patients in primary and specialist health care. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included patients consulting physiotherapy in primary health care and patients at an outpatient clinic in specialist health care. Well-known and tested questionnaires for these populations were used and variables were divided into clinical, sociodemographic, psycho-social, and shoulder pain and disability. Descriptive statistics were applied. Two-sample t-test and linear regression were used for continuous data whereas chi-square tests and logistic regression were applied to test differences in categorical data between the two study populations. RESULTS: Two hundred and 36 patients were recruited from primary health care (FYSIOPRIM, Physiotherapy In Primary Care) and 167 from specialist health care. Patients in primary health care reported less regular use of pain medication (30.7 vs. 61.3%) and fewer patients had symptom duration >12 months (41.9 vs. 51.0%). Furthermore, they reported lower pain intensity, less shoulder pain and disability (SPADI-score), lower scores on psycho-social factors, but higher on expectations of recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with shoulder pain treated in primary health care and in specialist health care are different according to factors such as duration of symptoms, pain and disability, and some of the psycho-social variables. However, the differences are small and the variations within the two study samples is large. Patients treated in primary health care seemed to be less affected and to have higher expectations concerning their recovery. However, based on our results we may question why many patients are referred to specialist health care rather than continuing treatment in primary health care.

Patients with shoulder pain referred to specialist care; treatment, predictors of pain and disability, emotional distress, main symptoms and sick-leave: a cohort study with a six-months follow-up.

Objectives Recommendations for referral of patients with shoulder pain from primary to specialist care are mainly clinical. Several patients are referred without meeting these criteria for referral, whereas some are referred for a second opinion although surgery is not recommended. The aims of this study were to describe a shoulder pain cohort in specialist healthcare according to demographic data, clinical, and psychological factors; evaluate changes in pain and disability, distress and main symptoms from baseline to six-month follow-up; and to assess predictors of pain and disability, changes in the main symptoms and sick-leave at six-months. Results were compared to previous randomised trials conducted at the same clinic in patients with subacromial shoulder pain. Methods This prospective study included 167 patients from an outpatient clinic in specialist healthcare with shoulder pain for more than 6 weeks. Clinical (pain duration, intensity, pain sites), sociodemographic (age, gender, educational level, work status) and psychological variables (emotional distress (HSCL-10), fear of pain, screening of "yellow flags", health-related quality of life) were collected. Shoulder pain and disability (SPADI-score) were assessed and the patients were asked about their outcome expectation and to predict their status of their shoulder problem the next month. They underwent a clinical interview, a clinical assessment of shoulder function and orthopaedic tests for diagnostic purposes. After six months they received a questionnaire with main variables. Results Of the 167 patients (55% women), 50% had symptoms for more than 12 months and 37 (22%) were on sick-leave. Characteristics were in general comparable to patients previously included in clinical trials at the same department. The SPADI-score was 46 (23) points. Mean emotional distress was within the normal range (1.7 (SD 0.6)). More than 80% had received treatment before, mainly physiotherapy in addition to the GPs treatment. One hundred and thirty-seven patients (82%) were re-referred to physiotherapy, 74 (44%) in the outpatient clinic specialist healthcare, and 63 (38%) in primary care. One hundred and eighteen (71%) answered the follow-up questionnaire. Mean change in SPADI-score was 10.5 points (95% CI (6.5-14.5)), and 29% of the patients improved more than the smallest detectable difference (SDD). The percentage sick-listed was 19.5%, and mean change in main symptoms (-9 to +9) was 3.4 (SD 3.9). The subgroup of patients receiving physiotherapy in outpatient specialist care did not show any significant change in the main variables. The prediction models suggested that a lower level of education, more fear of pain and a high baseline SPADI-score, predicted a higher SPADI-score at follow-up. A high baseline HSCL-10 score was the only significant predictor for a high HSCL-10 score. At follow-up, less pain at rest predicted more change in main symptoms and more yellow flags (a higher score on the Örebro screening test) predicted sick-leave. Conclusions Within the limitations of a cohort study, patients with persistent shoulder pain referred to an outpatient specialist clinic had similar baseline characteristics but shorter treatment duration, inferior clinical results and predictors somewhat different compared with previous clinical trials conducted at the same clinic. The study raises some questions about the effectiveness of the routines in daily clinical practice, the selection of patients, the treatment duration and content.

Visual trajectory pattern as prognostic factors for neck pain.

BACKGROUND: A novel approach capturing both temporal variation and pain intensity of neck pain is by visual trajectory patterns. Recently, both previous and expected visual trajectory patterns were identified as stronger predictors of outcome than traditional measures of pain history and psychological distress. Our aim was to examine patient characteristics within the various previous and expected patterns, relationship between the two patterns and predictive value of a variable combining the previous and expected patterns. METHODS: Patients with neck pain (n = 932) consulting chiropractors were included. Baseline measures included pain intensity, disability, psychological variables and symptom history and expectations. Participants reported global perceived effect after 12 weeks. Analyses included descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: Pain intensity, disability, psychological and worse outcome expectations increased from a single pain episode to severe ongoing pain of previous and expected patterns. Having a severe pain history was associated with poor prognosis, particularly if combined with negative expectations. The variable combining previous and expected patterns had a discriminative ability similar to that of other predictors AUC = 0.64 (95% CI = 0.60-0-67) versus AUC = 0.66 (95% CI = 0.62-0.70). The model with highest discriminative ability was achieved when adding the combined patterns to other predictors AUC = 0.70 (95% CI = 0.66-0.73). CONCLUSION: The study indicates that pain expectations are formed by pain history. The patients' expectations were similar to or more optimistic compared with their pain history. The prognostic ability of the model including a simplified combination of previous and expected patterns, together with a few other predictors, suggests that the trajectory patterns might have potential for clinical use. SIGNIFICANCE: The dynamic nature of neck pain can be captured by visual illustrations of trajectory patterns. We report, that trajectory patterns of pain history and future expectations to some extent are related. The patterns also reflect a difference in severity assessed by higher degree of symptoms and distress. Moreover, the visual trajectory patterns predict outcome at 12-weeks. Since the patterns are easily applicable, they might have potential as a clinical tool.

Novel approach towards musculoskeletal phenotypes.

BACKGROUND: The multidimensional array of clinical features and prognostic factors makes it difficult to optimize management within the heterogeneity of patients with common musculoskeletal pain. This study aimed to identify phenotypes across prognostic factors and musculoskeletal complaints. Concurrent and external validity were assessed against an established instrument and a new sample, respectively, and treatment outcome was described. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal observational study of 435 patients (aged 18-67 years) seeking treatment for nonspecific complaints in the neck, shoulder, low back or multisite/complex pain in primary health care physiotherapy in Norway. Latent class analysis was used to identify phenotypes based on 11 common prognostic factors within four biopsychosocial domains; pain, beliefs and thoughts, psychological and activity and lifestyle. RESULTS: Five distinct phenotypes were identified. Phenotype 1 (n = 77, 17.7%) and 2 (n = 142, 32.6%) were characterized by the lowest scores across all biopsychosocial domains. Phenotype 2 showed somewhat higher levels of symptoms across the biopsychosocial domains. Phenotype 3 (n = 89, 20.5%) and 4 (n = 78, 17.9%) were more affected across all domains, but phenotype 3 and 4 had opposite patterns in the psychological and pain domains. Phenotype 5 (n = 49, 11.3%) were characterized by worse symptoms across all domains, indicating a complex phenotype. The identified phenotypes had good external and concurrent validity, also differentiating for the phenotypes in function and health-related quality of life outcome at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The phenotypes may inform the development of targeted interventions aimed at improving the treatment efficiency in patients with common musculoskeletal disorders. SIGNIFICANCE: This observational prospective study identified five distinct and clinically meaningful phenotypes based on biopsychosocial prognostic factors across common musculoskeletal pain. These phenotypes were independent of primary pain location, showed good external validity, and clear variation in treatment outcome. The findings are particularly valuable as they describe the heterogeneity of patients with musculoskeletal pain and points to a need for more targeted interventions in common musculoskeletal disorders to improve treatment outcome.

Associations between shoulder pain and functioning on the ICF checklist and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scale - a cross-sectional study.

Purpose: The association between patients' shoulder pain and functioning according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), and outcome on a condition specific patient reported outcome measure (PROM), has not been studied. The aim was to investigate how the most common problems on the ICF checklist were associated with shoulder function and disability.Materials and methods: In a cross-sectional design 164 patients ≥ 18 years with chronic shoulder pain were included. The ICF checklist, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) outcome measure and the Self-Report Comorbidity Questionnaire were used. A hierarchical regression model tested categories for functioning on the ICF checklist associated with disability on the DASH.Results: Mean age was 46.5 years, 54% were women. 85% had had the shoulder pain longer than 6 months. Mean DASH score was 33.2 points (SD 17.1). Adjusted R2 was 0.67. Older age, being woman and having a lower education explained 22% of the variance on the DASH. The body functions bodily pain, mobility of joints and energy and drive function explained 30% of the variance, and the activities and participation problems lifting and carrying objects, washing oneself and recreation and leisure explained an additional 13%.Conclusions: The shoulder disability was multi-dimensional and comprised body functions and activities and participation. And 67% of the variance in the DASH score was explained.Implications for rehabilitationPersistent shoulder pain results in multi-dimensional disability calling for a broader assessment of function.A biopsychosocial approach to shoulder pain and disability is recommended.Functioning assessed on the ICF checklist can be applied in the assessment of chronic shoulder pain as it contributes to the understanding of self-reported disability on a region specific outcome measure.

One year results of a randomized controlled trial on radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment, with predictors of pain, disability and return to work in patients with subacromial pain syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) is increasingly used to treat patients with subacromial pain syndrome despite conflicting evidence of its effectiveness. Better knowledge regarding prognostic factors may contribute to the improvement in treatment and prognosis for the patients. AIM: The first aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of rESWT in addition to supervised exercises in patients with subacromial pain syndrome after one year. The second aim was to identify predictors of pain and disability and work status after one year in this patient group. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. SETTING: An outpatient shoulder clinic of a University hospital. METHODS: Patients aged 25 to 70 years, with subacromial pain syndrome lasting at least three months were included and randomly assigned to receive either rESWT and supervised exercises or sham rESWT and supervised exercises. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and work status were assessed after one year. RESULTS: We screened 265 patients and enrolled 143; 74 were allocated to receive sham rESWT and exercises, and 69 were allocated to receive rESWT and exercises. After one year, no differences were found for the SPADI Score (mean difference -1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) -10.2 to 7.0, P=0.71). Subgroup analysis of patients with calcification in the rotator cuff demonstrated no significant additional effect of rESWT to supervised exercises (mean difference -6.3, 95% CI -22.4 to 9.8, P=0.44). Marital status (single), frequent use of pain medication, not working at baseline, negative outcome expectations, low self-reported general health status and few supervised exercise sessions predicted a poor outcome on SPADI after one year. CONCLUSIONS: Radial ESWT was not superior to sham rESWT in addition to supervised exercises in the long term for patients with subacromial pain syndrome. The identified predictors for pain, disability and work should be assessed in future studies and addressed by clinicians in order to improve the effectiveness of supervised exercises. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Radial ESWT should not be recommended for patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Clinicians should assess patient`s outcome expectations, and if possible reduce the use of pain medication and sick leave in this patient group.

Shoulder MRI features with clinical correlations in subacromial pain syndrome: a cross-sectional and prognostic study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on shoulder patients have suggested that the prevalence of rotator cuff or bursa abnormalities are weakly related to symptoms and that similar findings are often found in asymptomatic persons. In addition, it is largely unknown whether structural changes identified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) affect outcome after treatment for shoulder pain. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate the presence of structural changes on MRI in patients with subacromial pain syndrome and to determine to what extent these changes are associated with symptoms and predict outcome after treatment (evaluated by the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)). METHODS: A prospective, observational assessment of a subset of shoulder patients who were included in a randomized study was performed. All participants had an MRI of the shoulder. An MRI total score for findings at the AC joint, subacromial bursa and rotator cuff was calculated. Multiple linear regression analysis was applied to examine the relationship between the MRI total score and the outcome measure at baseline and to examine to what extent the MRI total score was associated with the change in the SPADI score from baseline to the one year follow-up. RESULTS: There was a weak, inverse association between the SPADI score at baseline and the MRI total score (ß = -3.1, with 95% CI -5.9 to -0.34; p = 0.03), i.e. the SPADI score was higher for patients with a lower MRI total score. There was an association between the change in the SPADI score from baseline to the one year follow-up and the MRI total score (ß = 8.1, 95% CI -12.3 to -3.8; p < 0.001), with a poorer outcome for patients with a higher MRI total score. Both tendinosis (p = 0.01) and bursitis (p = 0.04) were associated with a poorer outcome after one year. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, MRI findings were significantly associated with the change in the SPADI score from baseline and to one year follow-up, with a poorer outcome after treatment for the patients with higher MRI total score, tendinosis and bursitis on MRI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov no NCT01441830 . September 28, 2011.

Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) When Combined With Supervised Exercises in Patients With Subacromial Shoulder Pain: A Double-Masked, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Subacromial shoulder pain is a common complaint, and radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) is increasingly used to treat this condition. Although many therapists use rESWT in combination with supervised exercises, no studies have evaluated the additional effect of rESWT with supervised exercises for subacromial shoulder pain. PURPOSE: To assess whether rESWT is more effective than sham rESWT when combined with supervised exercises for improving pain and function in patients with subacromial shoulder pain. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Patients between 25 and 70 years of age with subacromial shoulder pain with and without calcification in the rotator cuff lasting at least 3 months were assessed for eligibility; 143 patients were recruited. Participants were allocated (1:1) by computer-generated randomization in blocks of 20 to receive either rESWT or sham rESWT in addition to supervised exercises. The rESWT and sham rESWT were performed once a week with additional supervised exercises once a week for the first 4 weeks. The following 8 weeks, the patients received supervised exercises twice a week. The primary outcome was change in the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) after 24 weeks. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to group assignment. RESULTS: At 24 weeks, participants in both the sham group and the rESWT group had improved ( P < .001) in SPADI score compared with baseline (-23.9 points [SD, 23.8 points] and -23.3 points [SD, 25.0 points], respectively), but there were no differences between the groups (mean difference 0.7; 95% CI, -6.9 to 8.3; P = .76). Prespecified subgroup analysis of patients with calcification in rotator cuff showed that the rESWT group had a greater improvement in SPADI score after 24 weeks (mean difference -12.8; 95% CI, -24.8 to -0.8; P = .018). CONCLUSION: Radial ESWT offered no additional benefit to supervised exercises in the treatment of subacromial shoulder pain after 24 weeks, except in the subgroup of patients with calcification in the rotator cuff. Registration: NCT01441830 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Is radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rEWST) combined with supervised exercises (SE) more effective than sham rESWT and SE in patients with subacromial shoulder pain? Study protocol for a double-blind randomised, sham-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Subacromial shoulder pain is a common complaint. Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) has being increasingly used to treat calcific and non-calcific tendinosis, although there is no evidence of the effectiveness of rESWT in non-calcific tendinosis of the rotator cuff. A randomised single blind study showed that the short-term effect of supervised exercises (SE) was significantly better than rESWT on subacromial shoulder pain, but both groups improved. In a clinical trial on achilles tendinopathy rESWT improved the effectiveness of treatment with eccentric loading. The objective of this present study is to evaluate if rESWT in addition to SE is more effective in improving shoulder pain and function compared with sham rESWT and SE in patients with subacromial shoulder pain. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a double blind, randomised sham-controlled trial which is performed at the shoulder clinic at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in Oslo University Hospital, Norway. One-hundred-forty-four patients with subacromial shoulder pain lasting at least 3 months, age from 25 to 70 years old are included in the trial. Patients are randomly allocated in 1:1 ratio to receive either rESWT or sham rESWT once a week in addition to SE once a week for the initial 4 weeks. Subsequently SE are provided twice a week for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure is a change in the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) at 24 weeks follow-up. Secondary outcomes include return to work, pain at rest and on activity, function, and health related quality of life. The patients, the physiotherapist providing the exercise regimen and the outcome assessor are blinded to group assignment. The physiotherapist providing the rESWT is not blinded. DISCUSSION: Because of the extensive use of rESWT in the treatment of subacromial shoulder pain the results of this trial will be of importance and have impact on clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01441830.

Patterns of shoulder pain during a 14-year follow-up: results from a longitudinal population study in Norway.

BACKGROUND: Population studies have reported that shoulder pain is the third most frequently reported musculoskeletal pain. Long duration, pain intensity and high level of disability predict persistent complaints. The present study aimed to describe the prevalence of shoulder pain in a general population and follow this over a long period (1990 to 2004). The objective was also to describe the stability of shoulder pain and patterns of co-occurrence with neck and upper back pain. METHODS: Data were obtained from a self-reported questionnaire in a population in Ullensaker muncipality, north-east of Oslo. The Standard Nordic Questionnaire was sent in 1990, 1994 and 2004 to inhabitants belonging to six birth cohorts from 1918-20 to 1968-70. RESULTS: The 1-year prevalence of shoulder pain was 46.7% (95% CI, 44.9% to 48.6%) in 1990, 48.7% (95% CI, 46.8% to 50.5%) in 1994, and 55.2% (95% CI, 53.5% to 56.9%) in 2004. Approximately three-quarters of the persons with shoulder pain at one given time also reported shoulder pain at the next follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of shoulder pain during a 14-year period was high and slightly increasing. Shoulder pain was reported most frequently in co-occurrence with neck pain. Classification models should include neck pain as well as other co-occurring pain sites.

Supervised exercises compared with radial extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for subacromial shoulder pain: 1-year results of a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence from a recent randomized controlled trial indicated that supervised exercises (SE) were more effective than radial extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (rESWT) for the treatment of subacromial shoulder pain in the short to medium term. Little knowledge exists about the long-term results of rESWT for subacromial pain. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of rESWT and SE provided to patients with subacromial shoulder pain after 1 year. DESIGN: This was a single-blind randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The study was conducted in the outpatient clinic of the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department at Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Norway. PATIENTS: One hundred four patients with subacromial shoulder pain lasting at least 3 months participated. Patients were randomly assigned to either an rESWT group (n=52) or an SE group (n=52). INTERVENTION: The rESWT intervention consisted of one session weekly for 4 to 6 weeks. The SE intervention consisted of two 45-minute sessions per week for up to 12 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Secondary outcome measures were questions regarding pain and function and work status. RESULTS: After 1 year, an intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant differences between the 2 groups for the primary outcome measure (-7.6 points, 95% confidence interval=-16.6 to 0.5) and pain, function, and medication use. Twenty-nine participants (60%) in the SE group versus 24 participants (52%) in the rESWT group were categorized as clinically improved. Thirty-eight participants in the SE group were at work compared with 30 participants in the rESWT group (odds ratio=1.1, 95% confidence interval=1.0 to 1.2). Fewer patients in the SE group had received additional treatments between 18 weeks and 1 year. LIMITATIONS: The lack of a placebo control group, the lack of a cost-benefit analysis, and the small sample size were limitations of the study. CONCLUSION: No significant difference was found between the SE and rESWT groups at the 1-year follow-up. More participants in the SE group had returned to work.

[Non-traumatic shoulder pain]. / Atraumatiske skulderlidelser.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain (usually non-traumatic) is the third most common cause of consultations for musculoskeletal pain in primary health care. This article discusses challenges within diagnostics and treatment of non-traumatic shoulder pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The article is based on literature identified through a non-systematic search in PubMed and the Cochrane library. RESULTS: One clinical test alone is generally not sufficient to make a pathoanatomical diagnosis. The incidence of degenerative changes in the normal population makes it difficult to interpret diagnostic images. MR is mainly indicated as part of a preoperative assessment and upon a specific indication. For diagnosis of the rotator cuff, ultrasound is as good as MR. Clinical studies do not show clear effects of specific treatment. This may be caused by methodological weaknesses of the trials evaluated and that patient characteristics and placebo effects contribute to the diagnosis. Injection with glucocorticoids seems to be well founded in patients with adhesive capsulate (frozen shoulder). With subacromial pain, supervised physical exercise and surgical treatment have similar effects, but there is not sufficient evidence to recommend particular treatments for rupture. INTERPRETATION: Non-traumatic shoulder pain is usually diagnosed adequately from the medical history and a combination of clinical tests; conservative treatment is most often adequate. When diagnostic imaging is required, ultrasound should be the first choice.

Clinical, socio-demographic and radiological predictors of short-term outcome in rotator cuff disease.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is common with rotator cuff disease as the most frequently used clinical diagnosis. There is a wide range of treatment options for this condition, but limited evidence to guide patients and clinicians in the choice of treatment strategy. The purpose of this study was to investigate possible prognostic factors of short-term outcome after corticosteroid injection for rotator cuff disease. METHODS: We performed analyses of data from 104 patients who had participated in a randomized controlled study. Socio-demographic, clinical and radiographic baseline factors were assessed for association with outcome at six-weeks follow-up evaluated by Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and patient perceived outcome. Factors with significant univariate association were entered into multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: In the multivariate analyses; a high SPADI score indicating pain and disability at follow-up was associated with decreasing age, male gender, high baseline pain and disability, being on sick-leave, and using regular pain medication. A successful patient perceived outcome was associated with not being on sick-leave, high active abduction, local corticosteroid injection and previous cortisone injections. Structural findings of rotator cuff tendon pathology on MRI and bursal exudation or thickening on ultrasonography did not contribute to the predictive model. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline characteristics were associated with outcome after corticosteroid injection in rotator cuff disease. Sick-leave was the best predictor of poor short-term outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials NCT00640575.

Predictors of shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) and work status after 1 year in patients with subacromial shoulder pain.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is a common complaint in primary health care and has an unfavourable outcome in many patients. The objectives were to identify predictors for pain and disability (SPADI) and work status in patients with subacromial shoulder pain. METHODS: Secondary analyses of data from a randomized clinical controlled trial were performed. Outcome measures were the absolute values of the combined Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and work status 1 year after treatment with supervised exercises (SE) or radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT). Predictors of outcome were investigated using multiple linear regression (SPADI) and logistic regression (work status). RESULTS: 104 patients were included. Low education (≤ 12 years), previous shoulder pain, and a high baseline SPADI score predicted poor results with these variables explaining 29.9% of the variance in SPADI score at 1 year. Low education and poor self-reported health status predicted a work status of "not working": Odds Ratio, OR = 4.3(95% CI (1.3 to 14.9)), p = 0.02 for education, and OR = 1.06 (95% CI (1.0 to 1.1)), p = 0.001 for self-reported health status, respectively. Adjustments for age, gender, and treatment group were performed, but did not change the results. CONCLUSION: Education was the most consistent predictor of pain and disability, and work status at 1 year follow-up. Also, baseline SPADI score, previous shoulder pain and self-reported health status predicted outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials NCT00653081.

Determinants of the shoulder pain and disability index in patients with subacromial shoulder pain.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of determinants on the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. Baseline registrations were applied. PATIENTS: Two hundred patients with subacromial shoulder pain lasting at least 3 months. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of possible determinants, 2 independent variables regarding pain and 2 regarding function, and the outcome measurement. Two multiple regression models (one with and one without the independent variables of pain and function) for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, the 2 subscales, and the determinants, were performed. RESULTS: The included determinants explained 29% of the variance of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (25% for pain and 33% for disability subscale) with pain medication, emotional distress, flexion, and the hand-behind-back range accounting for 26%. When pain and function were included, the final model explained 65% of the variance, with gender, education and range of flexion showing significance. CONCLUSION: The determinants explained 26% of the variance of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, but explained only a minor proportion when pain and function were included. This supports the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index as a shoulder pain and disability questionnaire.