Single-centre experience with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumours (NETs): results using a theranostic molecular imaging-guided approach.

AIM: To summarise our centre's experience managing patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) in the first 5 years after the introduction of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-octreotate (LUTATE). The report emphasises aspects of the patient management related to functional imaging and use of radionuclide therapy. METHODS: We describe the criteria for treatment with LUTATE at our centre, the methodology for patient selection, and the results of an audit of clinical measures, imaging results and patient-reported outcomes. Subjects are treated initially with four cycles of ~ 8 GBq of LUTATE administered as an outpatient every 8 weeks. RESULTS: In the first 5 years offering LUTATE, we treated 143 individuals with a variety of NETs of which approx. 70% were gastroentero-pancreatic in origin (small bowel: 42%, pancreas: 28%). Males and females were equally represented. Mean age at first treatment with LUTATE was 61 ± 13 years with range 28-87 years. The radiation dose to the organs considered most at risk, the kidneys, averaged 10.6 ± 4.0 Gy in total. Median overall survival (OS) from first receiving LUTATE was 72.5 months with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 32.3 months. No evidence of renal toxicity was seen. The major long-term complication seen was myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with a 5% incidence. CONCLUSIONS: LUTATE treatment for NETs is a safe and effective treatment. Our approach relies heavily on functional and morphological imaging informing the multidisciplinary team of NET specialists to guide appropriate therapy, which we suggest has contributed to the favourable outcomes seen.

Small bowel obstruction, incisional hernia and survival after laparoscopic and open colonic resection (LAFA study).

BACKGROUND: Short-term advantages to laparoscopic surgery are well described. This study compared medium- to long-term outcomes of a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open colonic resection for cancer. METHODS: The case notes of patients included in the LAFA study (perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care) were reviewed 2-5 years after randomization for incisional hernia, adhesional small bowel obstruction (SBO), overall survival, cancer recurrence and quality of life (QoL). The laparoscopic and open groups were compared irrespective of fast-track or standard perioperative care. RESULTS: Data on incisional hernias, SBO, survival and recurrence were available for 399 of 400 patients: 208 laparoscopic and 191 open resections. These outcomes were corrected for duration of follow-up. Median follow-up was 3·4 (i.q.r. 2·6-4·4) years. Multivariable regression analysis showed that open resection was a risk factor for incisional hernia (odds ratio (OR) 2·44, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1·12 to 5·26; P = 0·022) and SBO (OR 3·70, 1·07 to 12·50; P = 0·039). There were no differences in overall survival (hazard ratio 1·10, 95 per cent c.i. 0·67 to 1·80; P = 0·730) or in cumulative incidence of recurrence (P = 0·514) between the laparoscopic and open groups. There were no measured differences in QoL in 281 respondents (P > 0·350 for all scales). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colonic surgery led to fewer incisional hernia and adhesional SBO events. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR222 (http://www.trialregister.nl).

A systematic review of local excision combined with chemoradiotherapy for early rectal cancer.

AIM: Local excision of early rectal cancer is a less morbid alternative to major abdominal surgery. This review evaluates the role of local excision with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy to identify a select group of patients where local excision is appropriate without significantly compromising the oncological outcome. METHOD: MEDLINE, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched to identify relevant articles investigating the role of local excision with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with T1/T2N0M0 disease. Eleven studies comprising 455 patients were selected. Oncological end-points included overall survival, disease-free and disease-specific survival, recurrence rates as well as perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: At a range of 30.5-115.2 months, median overall survival, disease-specific and disease-free survival were 75% (66-80.6%), 89% (75-93.3%) and 74% (64-85.2%), respectively. Median local, distant and overall recurrence rates were 10% (4.8-25%), 4.7% (4-11.8%) and 13.1% (10.7-23.5%), respectively. Mortality was 0% in all studies except one (2.9%). Most reported complications were minor and were treated conservatively. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides data suggesting that selected patients with T1/T2N0M0 rectal cancer may undergo local excision without compromising the oncological outcome otherwise conferred by total mesorectal excision. It may be a particularly useful option in patients in whom radical surgery is contraindicated. Randomized trials comparing both management strategies to consolidate this finding may lead to a paradigm change in the management of early rectal cancer.

Predicting postoperative mortality after colorectal surgery: a novel clinical model.

AIM: The aim of this study was to develop and externally validate a clinically, practical and discriminative prediction model designed to estimate in-hospital mortality of patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHOD: All consecutive patients who underwent elective or emergency colorectal surgery from 1990 to 2005, at the Zaandam Medical Centre, The Netherlands, were included in this study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) linking the explanatory variables to the outcome variable in-hospital mortality, and a simplified Identification of Risk in Colorectal Surgery (IRCS) score was constructed. The model was validated in a population of patients who underwent colorectal surgery from 2005 to 2011 in Barcelona, Spain. Predictive performance was estimated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: The strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality were emergency surgery (OR = 6.7, 95% CI 4.7-9.5), tumour stage (OR = 3.2, 95% CI 2.8-4.6), age (OR = 13.1, 95% CI 6.6-26.0), pulmonary failure (OR = 4.9, 95% CI 3.3-7.1) and cardiac failure (OR = 3.7, 95% CI 2.6-5.3). These parameters were included in the prediction model and simplified scoring system. The IRCS model predicted in-hospital mortality and demonstrated a predictive performance of 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87) in the validation population. In this population the predictive performance of the CR-POSSUM score was 0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study have shown that the IRCS score is a good predictor of in-hospital mortality after colorectal surgery despite the relatively low number of model parameters.

The DULK (Dutch leakage) and modified DULK score compared: actively seek the leak.

AIM: A standardized postoperative score, the DULK (Dutch leakage) score, has been demonstrated to be a useful clinical tool in the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage. It is complicated, however, and a simplification (the modified DULK score) based on fewer parameters derived from multiple logistic regression analyses has been developed. These include clinical condition, abdominal pain not localized at the wound, C-reactive protein level and respiratory rate. The accuracy of each was compared. METHOD: Data of all patients from five Dutch centres operated on between 16 October 2007 and 1 November 2009 with an anastomosis in the colon or rectum were entered into a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: In total, 782 patients were included of whom 81 (10.4%) had a clinically relevant anastomotic leakage. The DULK score gave an overall sensitivity of 97% for anastomotic leakage, overall specificity of 53%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 16% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. The modified DULK score used clinical condition, abdominal pain not localized at the wound, C-reactive protein level and respiratory rate. With at least one parameter present, overall sensitivity was 97%, overall specificity 57%, PPV 17% and NPV 99.5%. With at least two points PPV was 41% and with three points 57%. CONCLUSION: Both the original and modified DULK scores are useful for the early diagnosis of clinically relevant anastomotic leakage. The modified DULK score offers the benefit of fewer parameters and so can easily be used in a clinical environment to estimate the likelihood of anastomotic leakage. However, the early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage remains difficult.

Five-year results of fissurectomy for chronic anal fissure: low recurrence rate and minimal effect on continence.

AIM: The aim of the study was to determine the long-term outcome, recurrence rate and faecal incontinence score after fissurectomy for chronic anal fissure (CAF) not responding to conservative treatment. METHOD: Fifty-three consecutive patients (29 women) who underwent fissurectomy for a medically resistant CAF between 1998 and 2005 were included in the study. At a minimum follow-up of 5 years a standardized questionnaire was sent to all patients, assessing recurrence, satisfaction with the operation (on a scale of 0-10) and faecal continence (Vaizey score, 0-24). The patients were compared with a control group of 50 healthy volunteers, matched for sex and age, who had never undergone anal surgery. RESULTS: Forty-three (81%) patients (25 women) returned the questionnaire. The mean age was 40 (SD 12.1) years and median follow up was 8.2 (5.5-12.2) years. Five patients had a recurrent CAF (11.6%). Ninety per cent of patients would have consented to the operation again if necessary. The mean Vaizey score at follow-up was 2.5 (SD ± 4.2). The mean Vaizey score of the four patients who had had a previous lateral sphincterotomy was 3.8 and for the eight patients who had reported a continence disturbance before fissurectomy it was 8.3. The mean Vaizey score of the 31 patients who were continent before fissurectomy was 0.8 compared with 0.4 in the control group (P = 0.9). CONCLUSION: At 5 years or more fissurectomy for medically resistant CAF is effective with a low recurrence rate and minimal influence on continence.

Outcome of surgery for colonoscopic perforation.

AIM: The aetiology of colonoscopic perforation and factors related to poor outcome of surgical treatment were studied. METHOD: A single-centre review was conducted of all patients who underwent surgical treatment of a colonoscopic perforation, identified from a prospective registry of 21,981 consecutive colonoscopies carried out between 1993 and 2009. RESULTS: There were 29 (eight women) patients of mean age 73 years including 10 who had a nonelective colonoscopy. The perforation was not immediately recognized in 12 patients and in the remaining 17, seven were initially managed conservatively. The causes of perforation were barotrauma (11), mechanical force (14) and polypectomy-related (3). Barotrauma was more frequent in emergency colonoscopy and mechanical force in elective colonoscopy. The outcome of surgery was as follows: mortality 10%, complications 34.5%, reoperation 14%, secondary surgery 23% and permanent colostomy 3%. The only factor related to in-hospital mortality was an increased American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. CONCLUSION: Colonoscopic perforation requiring surgery is a catastrophic event with high mortality, morbidity and reoperation rates.

Deletion of chromosome 4q predicts outcome in stage II colon cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Around 30% of all stage II colon cancer patients will relapse and die of their disease. At present no objective parameters to identify high-risk stage II colon cancer patients, who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, have been established. With traditional histopathological features definition of high-risk stage II colon cancer patients is inaccurate. Therefore more objective and robust markers for prediction of relapse are needed. DNA copy number aberrations have proven to be robust prognostic markers, but have not yet been investigated for this specific group of patients. The aim of the present study was to identify chromosomal aberrations that can predict relapse of tumor in patients with stage II colon cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA was isolated from 40 formaldehyde fixed paraffin embedded stage II colon cancer samples with extensive clinicopathological data. Samples were hybridized using Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) arrays to determine DNA copy number changes and microsatellite stability was determined by PCR. To analyze differences between stage II colon cancer patients with and without relapse of tumor a Wilcoxon rank-sum test was implemented with multiple testing correction. RESULTS: Stage II colon cancers of patients who had relapse of disease showed significantly more losses on chromosomes 4, 5, 15q, 17q and 18q. In the microsatellite stable (MSS) subgroup (n = 28), only loss of chromosome 4q22.1-4q35.2 was significantly associated with disease relapse (P < 0.05, FDR < 0.15). No differences in clinicopathological characteristics between patients with and without relapse were observed. CONCLUSION: In the present series of MSS stage II colon cancer patients losses on 4q22.1-4q35.2 were associated with worse outcome and these genomic alterations may aid in selecting patients for adjuvant therapy.

Laparoscopic versus transverse Incision right colectomy for colon carcinoma.

AIM: We investigated whether laparoscopic right colectomy has short-term and / or oncological advantages compared with transverse incision right colectomy. METHOD: Patients who underwent an elective laparoscopic right colectomy or an open right colectomy through a transverse incision at the VU University Medical Center or Zaans Medical Center from 2005 to 2009 were prospectively followed. RESULTS: Patient groups were comparable in terms of gender, body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiology classification. Patients in the transverse incision group were older (68 years vs 75 years, P = 0.07) and blood loss was greater during this procedure (60 ml vs 130 ml, P = 0.001), which cost less than the laparoscopic procedure (€6.033 vs €7.221, P = 0.03). Hospital stay for the laparoscopic group was shorter (8 days vs 9 days, P = 0.04), but laparoscopic procedures took longer (155 min vs 77 min, P < 0.001) and 8% of patients in the laparoscopic group were converted to a median laparotomy. Postoperative complications were comparable for both groups (28% vs 32%, P = 0.74), and in both groups a radical resection rate of 96% (P = 0.94) was achieved. At a median follow up of 20 months the incidence of incisional hernia was similar in both groups and no patient required additional surgery as a result. Overall survival at 60 months was 70% for the laparoscopic group and 67% for the transverse incision group (P = 0.84). CONCLUSION: There a re few clinically relevant differences between a laparoscopic right colectomy and a transverse incision right colectomy. Transverse incision right colectomy is cheaper. The study may be the first to compare these two techniques, but it is a nonrandomized trial and therefore has its limitations.

Deletion of chromosome 4q predicts outcome in stage II colon cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Around 30% of all stage II colon cancer patients will relapse and die of their disease. At present no objective parameters to identify high-risk stage II colon cancer patients, who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, have been established. With traditional histopathological features definition of high-risk stage II colon cancer patients is inaccurate. Therefore more objective and robust markers for prediction of relapse are needed. DNA copy number aberrations have proven to be robust prognostic markers, but have not yet been investigated for this specific group of patients. The aim of the present study was to identify chromosomal aberrations that can predict relapse of tumor in patients with stage II colon cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA was isolated from 40 formaldehyde fixed paraffin embedded stage II colon cancer samples with extensive clinicopathological data. Samples were hybridized using Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) arrays to determine DNA copy number changes and microsatellite stability was determined by PCR. To analyze differences between stage II colon cancer patients with and without relapse of tumor a Wilcoxon rank-sum test was implemented with multiple testing correction. RESULTS: Stage II colon cancers of patients who had relapse of disease showed significantly more losses on chromosomes 4, 5, 15q, 17q and 18q. In the microsatellite stable (MSS) subgroup (n=28), only loss of chromosome 4q22.1-4q35.2 was significantly associated with disease relapse (p<0.05, FDR<0.15). No differences in clinicopathological characteristics between patients with and without relapse were observed. CONCLUSION: In the present series of MSS stage II colon cancer patients losses on 4q22.1-4q35.2 were associated with worse outcome and these genomic alterations may aid in selecting patients for adjuvant therapy.

Risk modelling of outcome after general and trauma surgery (the IRIS score).

BACKGROUND: A practical, easy to use model was developed to stratify risk groups in surgical patients: the Identification of Risk In Surgical patients (IRIS) score. METHODS: Over 15 years an extensive database was constructed in a general surgery unit, containing all patients who underwent general or trauma surgery. A logistic regression model was developed to predict mortality. This model was simplified to the IRIS score to enhance practicality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: The database contained a consecutive series of 33 224 patients undergoing surgery. Logistic regression analysis gave the following formula for the probability of mortality: P (mortality) = A/(1 + A), where A = exp (-4.58 + (0.26 x acute admission) + (0.63 x acute operation) + (0.044 x age) + (0.34 x severity of surgery)). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.92. The IRIS score also included age (divided into quartiles, 0-3 points), acute admission, acute operation and grade of surgery. The AUC predicting postoperative mortality was 0.90. CONCLUSION: The IRIS score accurately predicted mortality after general or trauma surgery.

Temporal endosonographic evaluation of anal sphincter integrity after primary repair for obstetric ruptures: a case for specific training of obstetricians.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate primary repaired obstetric lesions of the anal sphincter complex on anal endo-ultrasound within a few days and 8 weeks after primary repair and to investigate in this way the influence of suboptimal woundhealing on the final anatomical result. Furthermore to investigate the relation between faecal incontinence and sphincter defects. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. Setting The obstetric clinic and coloproctology outpatient clinic of the Zaans Medical Centre in Zaandam, the Netherlands. Subjects A cohort of 32 consecutive women with primary surgically repaired 3B, 3C or 4th degree anal sphincter defect after vaginal delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Appearance of the anal sphincter complex on anal endo-ultrasound within a few days week and 8 weeks after primary surgical repair, i.e. first and second ultrasound, respectively. Evaluation of anal continence, using the Vaizey incontinence score, at second ultrasound. RESULTS: No major wound breakdown was seen and four women had superficial, skin related wound problems. Twenty-eight women (87.5%) had a repaired external anal sphincter on the first and the second ultrasound. Of four external anal sphincter defects on first ultrasound one defect was not present on second ultrasound. The internal sphincter showed a defect on first ultrasound in 11 women and this was still present in 10 on second ultrasound. A total of 11 women had a persisting anal sphincter defect (external, internal or in combination). Mean Vaizey scores were significantly higher in women with a persisting sphincter defect (EAS, IAS or in combination) than in women with no sphincter defects, 2.3 and 0.4 respectively (95% CI 0.1-3.6, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Anal endo-ultrasound may be used for early evaluation of surgical repair of anal sphincter lesions after vaginal delivery. Persisting defects in the anal sphincters, in this series not because of major wound breakdown, can be explained by inadequate surgical repair.

Risk factors and management of presacral abscess following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: There is scant information regarding the incidence, risk factors and management of presacral abscesses following total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. METHODS: Gender, age, body mass index (BMI), neoadjuvant radiation therapy, ASA classification, tumor size, tumor localization and fecal diversion were investigated as independent risk factors for the development of a presacral abscess. RESULTS: 261 patients were included, 26 patients (10%) developed a presacral abscess. Twenty-two patients (14.8%) with and 4 patients (3.6%) without neoadjuvant radiation therapy developed a presacral abscess (p = 0.003), respectively. Nine ASA 1 patients (5.7%), 8 ASA 2 patients (8.5%) and 3 ASA 3 patients (70%) developed a presacral abscess (p = 0.001). More presacral abscesses were observed after resection of larger tumors: 38 versus 30 mm (p = 0.041). No correlation between gender, age, BMI, tumor localization and the development of a prescaral abscess was found. Management of the presacral abscess, without overt leakage, was initially performed by drainage through the anastomosis following anterior resections and through the perineal suture line following abdominoperineal resections. CONCLUSION: Presacral abscess is a frequent (10%) complication following TME for rectal cancer. Patients in poor general condition, neoadjuvant radiation therapy and large tumors are at risks for developing a presacral abscess. Management, without overt leakage, is in our experience best executed by drainage through the anastomosis or perineal suture line.

The relationship of histological tumor regression grade (TRG) and two different time intervals to surgery following radiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of two different time intervals between radiation therapy and surgery for rectal cancer on the histological tumor regression grade (TRG) in the resected specimen. METHODS: Between 1995 and 2000, patients undergoing preoperative radiation therapy and TME for locally advanced (T3N0 and T3N1) mid and low rectal tumors treated in the VU University Medical Center or the Zaans Medical Center were entered into this study. All patients received identical radiation treatment (5 x 5 Gy) in the VU University medical center and were subsequently operated on within 2 weeks in the Zaans Medical Center (SI group) and after 6-8 weeks in the VU University Medical Center (LI group). All available histological material was reevaluated for TRG and correlated to survival. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were included in the present study, 28 in the LI group and 39 in the SI group. Patient gender was comparable for both groups with 21 (75%) male patients in the LI group versus 26 (67%) male patients in the SI group (p = 0.46). A T3N0 preoperative tumor stage was found in 21 (75%) patients in the LI group and in 33 (85%) patients in the SI group (p = 0.36). All tumors were histologically proven adenocarcinoma. Patients in the SI group were significantly older (67 vs. 58 years). In the LI group, a significantly more pronounced histological tumor regression was found. A complete response (TRG1), combined with a near complete histological response (TRG 2), were present in 12 patients in the LI group and in four patients in the SI group (p = 0.002). Radicality of resection was comparable for both groups. With a follow-up of over 60 months, there were no statistically significant differences between the SI and LI groups regarding local control, overall, or disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: Although histological tumor regression is significantly more pronounced following a long interval between radiation therapy and surgery, in the present study, this is not reflected in a better radical resection rate, local control or better overall and disease-free survival.

Technical difficulty grade score for the laparoscopic approach of rectal cancer: a single institution pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to categorize laparoscopic rectal resections according to technical difficulty to standardize learning purposes and stratify results, making future studies more comparable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing a laparoscopic total mesorectal excision were prospectively followed. Four preoperatively known facts (gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor localization, and preoperative radiation therapy) were compared to four operative outcomes (operation time, blood loss, a visual analogue score (VAS) for difficulty rewarded by the surgeon, and oncological radicality of the procedure). RESULTS: Operating time for male and female patients was 257 vs. 245 min (P=0.229), blood loss was 300 vs. 300 ml (P=0.309), the VAS was 8 vs. 6 (P<0.001), and radicality was 93% vs. 91% (P=0.806). Operating time was 215, 250, and 305 min for high, mid, and low tumors (Spearman -0.44; P=0.02), respectively. Blood loss was 105, 300, and 600 ml (Spearman -0.38; P=0.01). Lower tumors were rewarded a higher VAS (Spearman -0.57; P<0.001) and were less often radically resected (Spearman 0.32; P=0.026). Operating time for irradiated and nonirradiated patients was 277 vs. 225 min (P=0.008), blood loss was 500 vs. 150 ml (P=0.006), the VAS was 7 vs. 5 (P<0.001), and radicality was 79% vs. 100% (P=0.046). Operating time was 240 min for BMI 25-30 and 253 min for BMI>30 (Spearman 0.13; P=0.391). Blood loss was 150 ml for BMI 25-30 and 500 ml for BMI>30 (Spearman 0.38; P=0.01). Higher BMIs were rewarded a higher VAS (Spearman 0.06; P=0.704). BMI had no correlation to radicality of the procedure (Spearman -0.12; P=0.402). There was an association between technical difficulty score and operation time (P=0.007), blood loss (P<0.001), VAS (P<0.001), and radicality of surgery (P=0.043). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery in male, irradiated, and obese patients with lower tumors seemed more difficult. A categorization according to technical difficulty, to preoperatively predict difficulty of the procedure, was found feasible.

Can the outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence be predicted?

PURPOSE: Pelvic-floor rehabilitation does not provide the same degree of relief in all fecal incontinent patients. We aimed at studying prospectively the ability of tests to predict the outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty consecutive patients (228 women) underwent medical history and a standardized series of tests, including physical examination, anal manometry, pudendal nerve latency testing, anal sensitivity testing, rectal capacity measurement, defecography, endoanal sonography, and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Subsequently, patients were referred for pelvic-floor rehabilitation. Outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation was quantified by the Vaizey incontinence score. Linear regression analyses were used to identify candidate predictors and to construct a multivariable prediction model for the posttreatment Vaizey score. RESULTS: After pelvic-floor rehabilitation, the mean baseline Vaizey score (18, SD+/-3) was reduced with 3.2 points (p<0.001). In addition to the baseline Vaizey score, three elements from medical history were significantly associated with the posttreatment Vaizey score (presence of passive incontinence, thin stool consistency, primary repair of a rupture after vaginal delivery at childbed) (R2, 0.18). The predictive value was significantly but marginally improved by adding the following test results: perineal and/or perianal scar tissue (physical examination), and maximal squeeze pressure (anal manometry; R2, 0.20; p=0.05). CONCLUSION: Additional tests have a limited role in predicting success of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence.

Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision: a comparative study on short-term outcomes. A single-institution experience regarding anterior resections and abdominoperineal resections.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) is being used in rectal cancer more frequently. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in short-term outcomes between open and laparoscopic TME. METHODS: In this nonrandomized consecutive study, the short-term outcomes of 100 patients undergoing TME for proven rectal cancer were analyzed. RESULTS: Two groups of 50 patients underwent an open or laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer. Both groups were comparable. Laparoscopic surgery took longer to perform (250 vs. 197.5 min, p < 0.01), but was accompanied by less blood loss (350 vs. 800 ml, p < 0.01). Enteric function recovered sooner after laparoscopy. The numbers of major and minor complications were comparable between both groups, although fewer patients had major complications in the laparoscopic group (6 vs. 15 patients, p = 0.03). Hospital stay was shorter for patients who underwent a laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (10 vs. 12 days, p = 0.04). Median follow-up was 17 months for the laparoscopic group and 22 months for the open group. Survival analyses between the groups showed no statistical difference in disease-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: This study shows that laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer is a safe and feasible technique with some short-term benefits over open TME.

Preoperative radiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison between two different time intervals to surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although it is now considered a standard treatment to irradiate an advanced mid or low rectal tumor before surgical total mesorectal excision (TME), the optimal time interval between radiation therapy and surgery remains controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1995 and 2005, patients undergoing preoperative radiation therapy and TME for locally advanced mid and low rectal tumors treated in the VU Medical Center or the Zaans Medical Center were entered into this study. All patients received identical radiation treatment in the VU Medical Center and were subsequently operated on within 2 weeks in the Zaans Medical Center (SI group) and after 6-8 weeks in the VU Medical Center (LI group). Preoperative tumor staging, operative data, postoperative complications, pathology results, and follow-up were compared. RESULTS: The SI group (N=57) underwent surgery after a median delay of 4 days and the LI group (N=51) after 45 days. Operative data and short-term morbidity were comparable for both groups. However, significantly higher numbers of complete remissions (12 vs 0%), tumor downstaging (55 vs 26%), and less lymph-node metastases (22 vs 44%) were found in the LI group. No significant differences were found regarding local control or long-term survival after a median follow-up of 34 months. CONCLUSION: Several advantages, such as complete remissions and downstaging in the LI group, do not appear to have expression in a better survival or less local recurrences after a median follow-up of 34 months. Although larger (randomized) studies will be needed for definite conclusions, this may indicate that patients can be operated on within 2 weeks after radiation therapy.

Electrical stimulation and pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback in patients with fecal incontinence: a cohort study of 281 patients.

PURPOSE: Pelvic floor rehabilitation is an appealing treatment for patients with fecal incontinence but reported results vary. This study was designed to assess the outcome of pelvic floor rehabilitation in a large series of consecutive patients with fecal incontinence caused by different etiologies. METHODS: A total of 281 patients (252 females) were included. Data about medical history, anal manometry, rectal capacity measurement, and endoanal sonography were collected. Subgroups of patients were defined by anal sphincter complex integrity, and nature and possible underlying causes of fecal incontinence. Subsequently patients were referred for pelvic floor rehabilitation, comprising nine sessions of electric stimulation and pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback. Pelvic floor rehabilitation outcome was documented with Vaizey score, anal manometry, and rectal capacity measurement findings. RESULTS: Vaizey score improved from baseline in 143 of 239 patients (60 percent), remained unchanged in 56 patients (23 percent), and deteriorated in 40 patients (17 percent). Mean Vaizey score reduced with 3.2 points (P < 0.001). A Vaizey score reduction of >or= 50 percent was observed in 32 patients (13 percent). Mean squeeze pressure (+5.1 mmHg; P = 0.04) and maximal tolerated volume (+11 ml; P = 0.01) improved from baseline. Resting pressure (P = 0.22), sensory threshold (P = 0.52), and urge sensation (P = 0.06) remained unchanged. Subgroup analyses did not show substantial differences in effects of pelvic floor rehabilitation between subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic floor rehabilitation leads overall to a modest improvement in severity of fecal incontinence, squeeze pressure, and maximal tolerated volume. Only in a few patients, a substantial improvement of the baseline Vaizey score was observed. Further studies are needed to identify patients who most likely will benefit from pelvic floor rehabilitation.

Sentinel node staging in colon carcinoma: value of sentinel lymph node biopsy with radiocolloid and blue staining.

BACKGROUND: Nodal staging accuracy is important in the prognosis and selection of patients for chemotherapy. This prospective study aims to assess the feasibility and accuracy of the sentinel lymph node procedure (SNP) using radiocolloid and blue dye in colon carcinoma. METHODS: In 56 patients, lymphatic mapping was accomplished by means of intraoperatively injecting patent blue and nanocoll subserosally around the tumour. Sentinel nodes (SNs) were harvested ex-vivo. Nodes were stained with H&E. If lymph nodes were interpreted as negative for metastatic tumour, serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining were performed. RESULTS: At least one SN was detected in 49 of 53 patients (92.5%). Three patients were excluded because of preoperatively detected metastases. Overall, 121 SN were harvested with a mean of 2.2 SN/patients. Eighteen patients had tumour positive nodes. In four patients, pathological nodes were palpable during operation and were excluded. The SN was histologically negative in 2 of 14 patients with positive nodes (false-negative rate 14.3%). In 5 of 14 patients with positive nodes, the SN was the exclusive site of regional nodal metastasis. Four patients were upstaged by immunohistochemical staining (28.6%). The negative predictive value was 93.9% and the overall accuracy 95.6%. Scintigraphy was done in 17 patients. In three patients the SN was detected only by this modality. DISCUSSION: The SN biopsy with the combined technique proved a feasible technique with a steep learning curve. It can change the initial staging from stage II to stage III colon carcinoma. Scintigraphy can improve the success rate of the technique.