Circulating levels of the angiogenesis mediators endoglin, HB-EGF, BMP-9 and FGF-2 in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

PURPOSE: Endothelial barrier dysfunction is a hallmark of sepsis, and is at least partially mediated by pathways that regulate endothelial barrier assembly during angiogenesis. Not surprisingly, increased levels of key angiogenic proteins such as VEGF-A and Angiopoietin-2 have been described in sepsis. The purpose of this study was to investigate if additional pathways that regulate endothelial barrier integrity during angiogenesis could also be involved in the host response of sepsis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated circulating levels of four proteins involved in angiogenesis, not previously studied in sepsis, in a cohort of 50 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. RESULTS: Circulating levels of BMP-9 and FGF-2 were similar in patients and healthy volunteers. In contrast, patients with septic shock presented 1.5-fold higher levels of endoglin (P=0.004), and 2-fold lower levels of Heparin-Binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) (P=0.002) when compared to healthy individuals. Of note, HB-EGF deficiency has been recently demonstrated to be detrimental to survival in a murine model of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Endoglin and HB-EGF could be involved in the host response of sepsis. Additional studies are warrant to investigate their role as biomarker or therapeutic targets in sepsis.

Association of the immature platelet fraction with sepsis diagnosis and severity.

Management of Sepsis would greatly benefit from the incorporation of simple and informative new biomarkers in clinical practice. Ideally, a sepsis biomarker should segregate infected from non-infected patients, provide information about prognosis and organ-specific damage, and be accessible to most healthcare services. The immature platelet fraction (IPF) and immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF) are new analytical parameters of the complete blood count, that have been studied as biomarkers of several inflammatory conditions. Recently, a study performed in critically-ill patients suggested that IPF could be a more accurate sepsis biomarker than C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin. In this retrospective study we evaluated the performance of IPF and IRF as biomarkers of sepsis diagnosis and severity. 41 patients admitted to two intensive care units were evaluated, 12 of which with severe sepsis or septic shock, and 11 with non-complicated sepsis. Significantly higher IPF levels were observed in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock. IPF correlated with sepsis severity scores and presented the highest diagnostic accuracy for the presence of sepsis of all studied clinical and laboratory parameters. No significant differences were observed in IRF levels. Our results suggest that IPF levels could be used as a biomarker of sepsis diagnosis and severity.