A Clinical Comparison of Home-Based and Hospital-Based Exercise Programs Following Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Repair for Anterior Shoulder Instability.

CONTEXT: Ideal rehabilitation method following arthroscopic capsulolabral repair surgery for anterior shoulder instability has not been proven yet. Although rapid or slow protocols were compared previously, home- or hospital-based protocols were not questioned before. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective unrandomized controlled clinical trial is to compare the clinical outcomes of home-based and hospital-based rehabilitation programs following arthroscopic Bankart repair. DESIGN: Nonrandomized controlled trial. SETTING: Orthopedics and physical therapy units of a single institution. PATIENTS: Fifty-four patients (49 males and 5 females) with an average age of 30.5 (9.1) years, who underwent arthroscopic capsulolabral repair and met the inclusion criteria, with at least 1-year follow-up were allocated into 2 groups: home-based (n = 33) and hospital-based (n = 21) groups. INTERVENTIONS: Both groups received identical rehabilitation programs. Patients in the home-based group were called for follow-up every 3 weeks. Patients in the hospital-based group admitted for therapy every other day for a total of 6 to 8 weeks. Both groups were followed identically after the eighth week and the rehabilitation program continued for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcomes were assessed using Disabilities of Arm Shoulder Hand, Constant, and Rowe scores. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the results in both groups. Wilcoxon test was used for determining the progress in each group. RESULTS: Groups were age and gender matched (P = .61, P = .69). Average number of treatment sessions was 13.8 (7.3) for patients in the hospital-based group. Preoperative Disabilities of Arm Shoulder Hand (27.46 [11.81] vs 32.53 [16.42], P = .22), Constant (58.23 [14.23] vs 54.17 [10.46], P = .13), and Rowe (51.72 [15.36] vs 43.81 [19.16], P = .12) scores were similar between groups. Postoperative scores at sixth month were significantly improved in each group (P = .001, P = .001, and P = .001). No significant difference was observed between 2 groups regarding clinical scores in any time point. CONCLUSIONS: We have, therefore, concluded that a controlled home-based exercise program is as effective as hospital-based rehabilitation following arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for anterior shoulder instability.

Nonoperative treatment of frozen shoulder: oral glucocorticoids.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report our results of glucocorticoid therapy combined with pregabalin and a home exercise program in patients with frozen shoulder. METHODS: Thirty-three patients (seven males, 26 females; mean age 52, range 43-71) diagnosed with primary idiopathic frozen shoulder were included in the study. Secondary causes and systemic diseases related to frozen shoulder were excluded. Administration of 0.5 mg/kg/day methylprednisolone was halved each week and ceased at the end of first month. Pregabalin, paracetamol and proton pump inhibitor was also included in the treatment. Physical therapy as a home program was initiated as the pain subsided. Patients were evaluated using the Constant, DASH and ASES scores in the sixth week and first year. Pain was evaluated with VAS and range of motion at each visit. RESULTS: Patients were followed up for an average period of 21 months (range 12-37). No adverse effect related to glucocorticoid therapy was observed during the treatment. The DASH, ASES and Constant scores improved significantly in the sixth week and first year (p > 0.05). Average range of motion and pain improved significantly every week until full recovery (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Glucocorticoid therapy combined with pregabalin and a home exercise program is an effective treatment in the first stage of frozen shoulder.