The wrong of rights: the moral authority of the family.

I argue that the notion of human rights is a flawed notion of relatively recent historical origin, growing primarily out of Enlightenment concerns to separate human beings from their metaphysical and communal heritage. I critique liberal, secular individualism as an abstract perspective that fails to comprehend those fundamental family relations out of which genuine human life emerges and within which it must remain if it is to be perceptive, grounded, and concrete. Finally, I argue that the most important relations humans sustain to each other are internal, not external to them and that the bonding found through empathy is more insightful in decision making than the analytic connections engendered through human reason.

On the Christian in Christian bioethics.

What is Christian about Christian bioethics? And is an authentically Christian bioethics a practical possibility in the world in which we find ourselves? In my essay I argue that personhood and the personal are so fundamental to the Christian understanding of our humanity that body, soul, and spirit are probably best understood as the components of a triune (as opposed to dual) aspect theory of personhood. To confess to a Christian bioethics is to admit that Christians cannot pretend fully to understand either cures or their meaning. However effective and "knowledge-based" contemporary medical interventions are, a Christian must humbly and honestly confess a lack of complete knowledge on both levels. At the same time, a Christian bioethicist must express a total personal commitment to Christian Faith.

Incidence of autopsy findings in unexpected deaths of children and adolescents.

Studies in various settings reveal that a significant percentage of autopsies demonstrate findings that were not previously clinically diagnosed. In the pediatric and adolescent age group, forensic examinations comprise a large percentage of total autopsies performed. We hypothesized that a similar number of previously undiagnosed findings would be present in this population and thus reviewed a series of autopsy reports from the Medical Examiners Office in the Arkansas Crime Laboratory. During 1997 through 1999, we performed 439 complete forensic autopsies on children and adolescents (age range 1 day to 19 years; median 18 months). Previously undiagnosed lesions were found in 173 (39%). Of these subjects, 68 (39%) had clinically significant pathology, 60 (35%) had insignificant pathology, and 45 (26%) had pathology of undetermined significance. Thirty-six subjects had lesions expected from a previously diagnosed condition. Of the total number of lesions found, 168 were inflammatory, 58 were congenital anomalies (48 unexpected), and 88 comprised miscellaneous other conditions. Infants <6 months of age were significantly more likely to have a previously undiagnosed lesson than children > 6 months (P <0.0001). Previously undiagnosed findings, mostly inflammatory, occur relatively frequently in pediatric and adolescent forensic autopsies and are more likely to occur in infants.